|
|
RUTGERS KANSAS |
|
| 44.5 | 14 Final 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
131 | RUTGERS | 46.5 | -1 | 132 | KANSAS | -4 | 44.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 19.0 | 10.5 | 278.5 | (4.1) | 3.0 | 29.5 | 17.5 | 374.0 | (5.8) | 1.5 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 134.0 | (2.2) | 2.0 | 52.0 | 35.0 | 579.0 | (7.9) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 19.0 | 10.5 | 278.5 | (4.1) | 3.0 | 29.5 | 17.5 | 374.0 | (5.8) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 19.0 | 10.5 | 278.5 | (4.1) | 3.0 | 29.5 | 17.5 | 374.0 | (5.8) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 19.0 | 10.5 | 17.5 | 31:57 | 38-143 | (3.7) | 15-29 | 52.5% | 135 | (4.6) | 68-278 | (4.1) | (14.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.2 | 8.8 | 16 | 30:51 | 34-130 | (3.8) | 16-31 | 53.7% | 195 | (6.3) | 65-325 | (5) | (14.6) | Offense Road Games | 3.0 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 28:23 | 31-69 | (2.2) | 11-30 | 36.7% | 65 | (2.2) | 61-134 | (2.2) | (44.7) | Defense (All Games) | 29.5 | 17.5 | 21.5 | 28:02 | 35-147 | (4.1) | 19-28 | 68.4% | 227 | (8) | 64-374 | (5.8) | (12.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 43 | 23.2 | 26.5 | 30:09 | 44-243 | (5.5) | 20-30 | 68.3% | 261 | (8.7) | 74-504 | (6.8) | (11.7) | Defense Road Games | 52.0 | 35.0 | 32.0 | 31:37 | 40-225 | (5.6) | 30-33 | 90.9% | 354 | (10.7) | 73-579 | (7.9) | (11.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | -2.4 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 27.0 | 8.5 | 308.0 | (4.3) | 0.5 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 304.5 | (4.5) | 3.5 | Home Games | 0-1 | -3.7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 23.0 | 10.0 | 255.0 | (3.6) | 1.0 | 26.0 | 10.0 | 329.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | -2.4 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 27.0 | 8.5 | 308.0 | (4.3) | 0.5 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 304.5 | (4.5) | 3.5 | Turf Games | 1-1 | -2.4 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 27.0 | 8.5 | 308.0 | (4.3) | 0.5 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 304.5 | (4.5) | 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.0 | 8.5 | 17.0 | 32:24 | 38-136 | (3.5) | 19-32 | 60.0% | 172 | (5.3) | 71-308 | (4.3) | (11.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.8 | 14.8 | 20.8 | 31:37 | 40-210 | (5.2) | 16-27 | 61.1% | 166 | (6.1) | 67-375 | (5.6) | (11.5) | Offense Home Games | 23.0 | 10.0 | 14.0 | 28:32 | 32-56 | (1.7) | 21-38 | 55.3% | 199 | (5.2) | 70-255 | (3.6) | (11.1) | Defense (All Games) | 16.5 | 5.0 | 14.5 | 27:36 | 39-145 | (3.7) | 15-28 | 53.6% | 159 | (5.7) | 67-304 | (4.5) | (18.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 17.5 | 10 | 16 | 29:23 | 39-146 | (3.7) | 16-29 | 55.7% | 174 | (6) | 68-320 | (4.7) | (18.3) | Defense Home Games | 26.0 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 31:28 | 50-187 | (3.7) | 12-24 | 50.0% | 142 | (5.9) | 74-329 | (4.4) | (12.7) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: RUTGERS 35, KANSAS 9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | TEXAS ST | 35-7 | W | -16.5 | W | 47.5 | U | 46-218 | 20-29-205 | 4 | 31-69 | 9-24-100 | 3 | 9/8/2018 | @ OHIO ST | 3-52 | L | 34 | L | 57.5 | U | 31-69 | 11-30-65 | 2 | 40-225 | 30-33-354 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | NICHOLLS ST | 23-26 | L | -9.5 | L | | - | 32-56 | 21-38-199 | 1 | 50-187 | 12-24-142 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | 31-7 | W | 3 | W | 48 | U | 45-216 | 18-27-145 | 0 | 28-103 | 18-32-177 | 6 | 9/15/2018 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| RUTGERS: Rutgers had the Power Five's worst offense a year ago, which led to the team hiring its ninth offensive coordinator in as many years. The Scarlet Knights are now hoping that they can take advantage of what is actually a pretty good stable of running backs. Help, however, needs to come from the quarterback position. There have been some positive vibes coming out of New Jersey surrounding freshman Artur Sitkowski, but it might be another year or two before he hits his stride. Defensively, the best that can be said for Rutgers is its secondary is decent. Of course, that's not enough to prevent this team from being the worst in the East yet again. | | KANSAS: As the above preseason conference title odds indicate, Kansas is far and away the worst team in the Big 12'we'd actually be more curious to see what their odds would be to finish not last. It's difficult to gauge the precise hotness of head coach David Beaty's seat, given that few coaches with a 3-33 program record would be given a fourth year to prove themselves. The Jayhawks will at least get a decent shot at a Power Five win when they host Rutgers on September 15. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 10:11:10 AM EST. |
|
|