|
|
FLA INTERNATIONAL UTSA |
|
| 48 | 45 Final 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
213 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | -10 | -10.5 | 214 | UTSA | 49.5 | 48.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-3 | +1.8 | 6-3 | 4-5 | 33.7 | 17.6 | 408.6 | (6.2) | 1.1 | 25.1 | 14.0 | 392.3 | (5.7) | 1.4 | Road Games | 2-1 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 27.7 | 9.3 | 348.0 | (5.2) | 0.7 | 22.7 | 15.7 | 398.7 | (5.6) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -0.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 29.3 | 12.3 | 381.3 | (5.7) | 1.0 | 27.7 | 9.0 | 382.7 | (5.8) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 4-1 | +1.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 28.0 | 12.8 | 402.8 | (5.7) | 0.8 | 24.8 | 12.2 | 374.6 | (5.7) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 33.7 | 17.6 | 20.4 | 30:42 | 38-167 | (4.4) | 18-28 | 63.7% | 241 | (8.5) | 66-409 | (6.2) | (12.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34.8 | 19.2 | 21.4 | 30:35 | 39-190 | (4.9) | 18-29 | 60.8% | 249 | (8.6) | 68-440 | (6.5) | (12.6) | Offense Road Games | 27.7 | 9.3 | 16.3 | 30:06 | 38-134 | (3.6) | 17-29 | 58.6% | 214 | (7.4) | 67-348 | (5.2) | (12.6) | Defense (All Games) | 25.1 | 14.0 | 22.7 | 29:18 | 41-205 | (5) | 17-28 | 59.4% | 187 | (6.6) | 69-392 | (5.7) | (15.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.3 | 13.1 | 20.7 | 30:23 | 38-161 | (4.2) | 20-33 | 61.3% | 228 | (6.9) | 71-389 | (5.5) | (15.4) | Defense Road Games | 22.7 | 15.7 | 22.0 | 29:54 | 38-170 | (4.5) | 19-33 | 57.0% | 229 | (6.9) | 71-399 | (5.6) | (17.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-6 | -2 | 2-7 | 6-3 | 15.8 | 8.9 | 242.6 | (3.8) | 1.2 | 31.3 | 18.2 | 416.9 | (6.2) | 2.0 | Home Games | 2-2 | 0 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 19.5 | 13.5 | 272.7 | (4.2) | 1.2 | 27.5 | 12.7 | 355.7 | (5.4) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 226.7 | (3.8) | 1.3 | 36.7 | 25.0 | 513.0 | (6.9) | 2.0 | Dome Games | 2-2 | 0 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 19.5 | 13.5 | 272.7 | (4.2) | 1.2 | 27.5 | 12.7 | 355.7 | (5.4) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 2-3 | 0 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 14.6 | 8.6 | 227.2 | (3.8) | 1.0 | 26.8 | 16.4 | 411.6 | (5.8) | 2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 15.8 | 8.9 | 15.3 | 28:10 | 31-93 | (3) | 17-34 | 48.9% | 149 | (4.4) | 65-243 | (3.8) | (15.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.2 | 14.5 | 19.6 | 29:40 | 36-164 | (4.6) | 17-30 | 57.3% | 211 | (7) | 66-375 | (5.7) | (14.3) | Offense Home Games | 19.5 | 13.5 | 16.0 | 27:40 | 28-105 | (3.7) | 19-36 | 53.1% | 168 | (4.7) | 64-273 | (4.2) | (14) | Defense (All Games) | 31.3 | 18.2 | 20.3 | 31:50 | 39-162 | (4.1) | 18-28 | 66.1% | 255 | (9.2) | 67-417 | (6.2) | (13.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.3 | 13.2 | 20.2 | 31:28 | 39-162 | (4.2) | 18-30 | 59.3% | 217 | (7.2) | 69-380 | (5.5) | (15) | Defense Home Games | 27.5 | 12.7 | 19.2 | 32:19 | 34-86 | (2.5) | 20-31 | 64.0% | 269 | (8.6) | 66-356 | (5.4) | (12.9) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: FLA INTERNATIONAL 22, UTSA 27.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/15/2018 | MASSACHUSETTS | 63-24 | W | -3.5 | W | 66 | O | 53-329 | 16-23-207 | 2 | 34-199 | 15-32-224 | 3 | 9/22/2018 | @ MIAMI | 17-31 | L | 26 | W | 58.5 | U | 24-17 | 13-28-170 | 1 | 49-248 | 20-29-240 | 2 | 9/29/2018 | AK-PINE BLUFF | 55-9 | W | -57 | L | 70.5 | U | 29-220 | 13-19-393 | 0 | 44-172 | 14-21-110 | 2 | 10/13/2018 | MIDDLE TENN ST | 24-21 | W | -1 | W | 60.5 | U | 34-70 | 27-36-311 | 0 | 40-187 | 15-27-142 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | RICE | 36-17 | W | -23 | L | 53.5 | U | 38-217 | 20-29-229 | 0 | 29-125 | 12-21-115 | 3 | 10/27/2018 | @ W KENTUCKY | 38-17 | W | -3 | W | 54 | O | 38-197 | 19-28-171 | 0 | 38-168 | 18-34-144 | 1 | 11/3/2018 | FLA ATLANTIC | 14-49 | L | -1.5 | L | 59.5 | O | 33-96 | 19-34-234 | 3 | 60-439 | 10-16-157 | 0 | 11/10/2018 | @ UTSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2018 | MARSHALL | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/15/2018 | @ KANSAS ST | 17-41 | L | 20 | L | 46.5 | O | 39-143 | 19-34-157 | 1 | 44-164 | 14-19-285 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | TEXAS ST | 25-21 | W | -7.5 | L | 48.5 | U | 41-145 | 19-35-127 | 1 | 25-26 | 17-28-222 | 3 | 9/29/2018 | UTEP | 30-21 | W | -10.5 | L | 47 | O | 24-91 | 20-35-187 | 1 | 44-154 | 11-19-143 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | @ RICE | 20-3 | W | 1.5 | W | 49.5 | U | 38-135 | 8-22-43 | 0 | 37-47 | 16-30-175 | 4 | 10/13/2018 | LOUISIANA TECH | 3-31 | L | 12 | L | 47 | U | 23-85 | 19-40-201 | 2 | 38-75 | 25-37-309 | 2 | 10/20/2018 | @ SOUTHERN MISS | 17-27 | L | 15 | W | 43 | O | 26-57 | 12-28-117 | 0 | 46-218 | 28-33-269 | 3 | 11/3/2018 | @ UAB | 3-52 | L | 21.5 | L | 42.5 | O | 26-84 | 15-35-136 | 2 | 53-419 | 10-17-249 | 1 | 11/10/2018 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ MARSHALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2018 | NORTH TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| FLA INTERNATIONAL: FIU has a decent offensive line and some talent at running back, which should help it create short-yardage situations on third down. The problem is that this passing game can't be trusted to pick up the rest of the slack. The Golden Panthers don't have any difference-makers at receiver, and neither Christian Alexander nor James Morgan is an inspiring option at quarterback. Defensively, FIU is going to be pretty good up front. That's the best that can be said about the unit. Head coach Butch Davis is too good of a coach for this team to stray too far away from the .500 mark. | | UTSA: UTSA's offense is its biggest question mark heading into this season. The Roadrunners aren't very good on the line, and quarterback Bryce Rivers is unproven. That will make life on running back Jalen Rhodes really tough. But UTSA just might have the best defense in the conference, led by edge rusher Eric Banks. Defensive end Marcus Davenport might be gone, but this lethal Roadrunners pass rush isn't going anywhere. If the offense can play significantly better than expected, then UTSA will compete for its division, but it's hard to see that happening. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:55:33 PM EST. |
|
|