|
|
W KENTUCKY First Half Results WISCONSIN |
|
| 61.5 | 38 Final 34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
723 | W KENTUCKY | 63.5 | 724 | WISCONSIN | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-3 | +3 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 78.4 | 36.6 | 48.5% | 35.1 | 69.3 | 31.3 | 43.4% | 34.9 | Road Games | 2-2 | +2.2 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 70.5 | 30.0 | 47.0% | 31.0 | 72.2 | 32.2 | 44.3% | 36.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 77.0 | 33.6 | 50.3% | 34.6 | 66.8 | 29.8 | 41.0% | 34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.4 | 36.6 | 29-59 | 48.5% | 6-16 | 40.1% | 15-22 | 68.6% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.3 | 34.2 | 26-61 | 42.3% | 7-22 | 32.4% | 13-18 | 70.3% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.5 | 30.0 | 27-58 | 47.0% | 6-15 | 39.0% | 10-16 | 64.1% | 31 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 8 | 13 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.3 | 31.3 | 26-59 | 43.4% | 7-22 | 32.0% | 11-14 | 75.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.2 | 36.6 | 28-59 | 46.4% | 8-22 | 34.9% | 13-19 | 71.9% | 36 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.2 | 32.2 | 25-57 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 33.7% | 14-17 | 82.9% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 16 | 8 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-7 | -9.8 | 3-7 | 4-5 | 66.1 | 32.0 | 44.3% | 31.4 | 65.3 | 31.5 | 45.5% | 31.7 | Home Games | 3-3 | -7 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 72.7 | 34.8 | 46.9% | 31.5 | 67.5 | 32.8 | 48.2% | 29.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.5 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 55.4 | 27.4 | 39.8% | 29.6 | 67.2 | 34.0 | 46.9% | 33.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.1 | 32.0 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 33.0% | 11-16 | 68.2% | 31 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.9 | 33 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 8-22 | 34.2% | 12-17 | 69.8% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.7 | 34.8 | 26-56 | 46.9% | 8-21 | 37.8% | 12-18 | 69.2% | 31 | 7 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 10 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.3 | 31.5 | 24-53 | 45.5% | 6-16 | 35.8% | 11-15 | 72.8% | 32 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.5 | 37.5 | 28-58 | 47.4% | 8-21 | 36.3% | 15-20 | 72.5% | 36 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.5 | 32.8 | 25-52 | 48.2% | 7-17 | 38.5% | 10-14 | 74.1% | 29 | 5 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: W KENTUCKY 75.1, WISCONSIN 81.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2017 | MISSOURI ST | 80-85 | L | -1.5 | L | 141.5 | O | 22-56 | 39.3% | 34 | 15 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 38 | 18 | 11/15/2017 | KY WESLEYAN | 83-53 | W | | - | | - | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 12 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 26 | 24 | 11/19/2017 | NICHOLLS ST | 100-86 | W | | - | | - | 35-61 | 57.4% | 39 | 20 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 45 | 20 | 11/22/2017 | *VILLANOVA | 58-66 | L | 22.5 | W | 150.5 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 27 | 16 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 35 | 15 | 11/23/2017 | *PURDUE | 77-73 | W | 19 | W | 148 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 36 | 12 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 33 | 13 | 11/24/2017 | *SMU | 63-61 | W | 10 | W | 136 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 27 | 13 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 39 | 21 | 11/29/2017 | E KENTUCKY | 83-51 | W | -12 | W | 146.5 | U | 34-60 | 56.7% | 38 | 6 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 28 | 13 | 12/2/2017 | WRIGHT ST | 78-60 | W | -10 | W | 135 | O | 28-54 | 51.9% | 38 | 14 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 32 | 11 | 12/10/2017 | @ OHIO U | 84-89 | L | -3 | L | 148 | O | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 11 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 38 | 14 | 12/13/2017 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/16/2017 | INDIANA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/19/2017 | BELMONT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2017 | @ AUSTIN PEAY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/28/2017 | LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2017 | SOUTHERN MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2017 | S CAROLINA ST | 85-50 | W | | - | | - | 32-56 | 57.1% | 41 | 13 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 22 | 14 | 11/12/2017 | YALE | 89-61 | W | -15 | W | 138.5 | O | 31-61 | 50.8% | 34 | 7 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 31 | 17 | 11/16/2017 | XAVIER | 70-80 | L | -3.5 | L | 144.5 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 7 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 37 | 11 | 11/20/2017 | *BAYLOR | 65-70 | L | 0 | L | 135 | P | 23-58 | 39.7% | 32 | 8 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 39 | 9 | 11/21/2017 | *UCLA | 70-72 | L | -3 | L | 146 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 25 | 12 | 27-50 | 54.0% | 28 | 19 | 11/24/2017 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 71-49 | W | -16 | W | 129 | U | 27-54 | 50.0% | 37 | 9 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 25 | 9 | 11/27/2017 | @ VIRGINIA | 37-49 | L | 7.5 | L | 122 | U | 15-48 | 31.2% | 30 | 14 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 39 | 12 | 12/2/2017 | OHIO ST | 58-83 | L | -7.5 | L | 134 | O | 19-49 | 38.8% | 18 | 13 | 31-47 | 66.0% | 32 | 13 | 12/4/2017 | @ PENN ST | 64-63 | W | 5.5 | W | 135 | U | 23-52 | 44.2% | 36 | 10 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 34 | 11 | 12/6/2017 | @ TEMPLE | 55-59 | L | 3.5 | L | 133 | U | 23-56 | 41.1% | 33 | 11 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 32 | 9 | 12/9/2017 | MARQUETTE | 63-82 | L | -4.5 | L | 139 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 31 | 12 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 30 | 9 | 12/13/2017 | W KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/23/2017 | WI-GREEN BAY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/27/2017 | CHICAGO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2017 | UMASS-LOWELL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2018 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| WISCONSIN: Last season: 27-10; lost to Florida in regional semifinals of NCAA Tournament
Who's gone: F Nigel Hayes, F Vitto Brown, G Bronson Koenig, G Zak Showalter, G Jordan Hill
Who's back: F Ethan Happ (14.0 points, 9.0 rebounds) is the lone returning starter. One of the toughest big-man matchups in the country with his athleticism, one of Happ's only weaknesses is a lack of an outside shot. G D'Mitrik Trice (5.6 points) hit 41 percent from 3-point territory off the bench as a freshman last season. He has the poise to take over the point guard job from Koenig. G Brevin Pritzl will get a shot to show off his 3-point range with more regular minutes. Swingman Khalil Iverson's strength is athleticism in the paint.
Who's new: A promising three-member freshman class could be called on to contribute early, especially Gs Kobe King and Brad Davison. The athletic, 6-foot-4 King was the unanimous prep player of the year in Wisconsin last season. The hustling Davison could be the next player that Badgers fans love and opponents hate to face.
The Skinny: A transition year for Wisconsin. The talent is there, but the Badgers lack the experience that fueled the program to new heights over the last five years. A summer exhibition trip of Australia and New Zealand did help with developing chemistry. A return to the NCAA Tournament will depend on 3-point shooting and how the supporting cast develops around Happ. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 11:58:41 PM EST. |
|
|