|
|
OHIO U CINCINNATI |
|
| 56 | 30 Final 34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
339 | OHIO U | 59 | 53.5 | 340 | CINCINNATI | -8.5 | -7.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | -1 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 34.5 | 19.0 | 393.5 | (5.9) | 1.0 | 38.5 | 30.0 | 598.5 | (7.8) | 3.5 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 31.0 | 21.0 | 364.0 | (6) | 2.0 | 45.0 | 38.0 | 552.0 | (9) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | -1 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 34.5 | 19.0 | 393.5 | (5.9) | 1.0 | 38.5 | 30.0 | 598.5 | (7.8) | 3.5 | Turf Games | 1-1 | -1 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 34.5 | 19.0 | 393.5 | (5.9) | 1.0 | 38.5 | 30.0 | 598.5 | (7.8) | 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.5 | 19.0 | 17.5 | 30:48 | 35-132 | (3.8) | 17-32 | 54.7% | 261 | (8.2) | 67-393 | (5.9) | (11.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 33.7 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 29:53 | 38-190 | (4.9) | 15-29 | 52.6% | 206 | (7.1) | 68-396 | (5.9) | (11.8) | Offense Road Games | 31.0 | 21.0 | 13.0 | 30:08 | 30-118 | (3.9) | 16-31 | 51.6% | 246 | (7.9) | 61-364 | (6) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 38.5 | 30.0 | 24.5 | 29:12 | 35-167 | (4.8) | 26-41 | 62.7% | 431 | (10.4) | 76-598 | (7.8) | (15.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.7 | 18 | 21.2 | 31:07 | 43-167 | (3.9) | 18-34 | 54.0% | 285 | (8.3) | 77-452 | (5.9) | (15.8) | Defense Road Games | 45.0 | 38.0 | 23.0 | 29:52 | 31-173 | (5.6) | 25-30 | 83.3% | 379 | (12.6) | 61-552 | (9) | (12.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +6 | 3-0 | 0-2 | 36.7 | 22.0 | 426.0 | (5.8) | 0.7 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 228.7 | (3.8) | 1.0 | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 63.0 | 42.0 | 741.0 | (9.1) | 1.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 182.0 | (3.4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +6 | 3-0 | 0-2 | 36.7 | 22.0 | 426.0 | (5.8) | 0.7 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 228.7 | (3.8) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 42.0 | 24.5 | 487.0 | (6.8) | 0.5 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 190.0 | (3.4) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 36.7 | 22.0 | 23.0 | 34:05 | 52-264 | (5) | 14-21 | 65.1% | 162 | (7.7) | 73-426 | (5.8) | (11.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 42.7 | 25.2 | 26.9 | 34:09 | 48-247 | (5.1) | 18-27 | 65.9% | 242 | (8.8) | 76-489 | (6.5) | (11.5) | Offense Home Games | 63.0 | 42.0 | 38.0 | 35:03 | 55-409 | (7.4) | 21-26 | 80.8% | 332 | (12.8) | 81-741 | (9.1) | (11.8) | Defense (All Games) | 8.0 | 3.3 | 11.3 | 25:55 | 25-84 | (3.3) | 19-35 | 53.8% | 145 | (4.1) | 60-229 | (3.8) | (28.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 11.6 | 3.8 | 13 | 26:51 | 29-86 | (2.9) | 16-31 | 50.9% | 175 | (5.6) | 61-261 | (4.3) | (22.6) | Defense Home Games | 7.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 24:57 | 25-48 | (1.9) | 12-28 | 42.9% | 134 | (4.8) | 53-182 | (3.4) | (26) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OHIO U 14.5, CINCINNATI 16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | HOWARD | 38-32 | W | -30.5 | L | | - | 40-146 | 19-33-277 | 0 | 39-161 | 27-53-484 | 4 | 9/15/2018 | *VIRGINIA | 31-45 | L | 4 | L | 55.5 | O | 30-118 | 16-31-246 | 2 | 31-173 | 25-30-379 | 3 | 9/22/2018 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ UCLA | 26-17 | W | 14 | W | 63 | U | 51-194 | 14-26-110 | 1 | 31-144 | 23-37-162 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | *MIAMI OHIO | 21-0 | W | 1 | W | 45 | U | 51-188 | 6-11-45 | 0 | 19-59 | 22-41-139 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | ALABAMA A&M | 63-7 | W | -43.5 | W | | - | 55-409 | 21-26-332 | 1 | 25-48 | 12-28-134 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OHIO U: Last season, quarterback Nathan Rourke threw for 17 touchdowns and only seven picks while adding 912 yards and 21 touchdowns on the ground. He's arguably the best dual-threat QB this conference has to offer, and he's joined by a group of talented rushers in the backfield. The fact that they all run behind an experienced O-line only makes the Ohio offense more dangerous. Defensively, the Bobcats have to replace most of their front seven. If they can competently do that, there is little in the way of them taking the top spot in the East, and they'll definitely have a shot at a conference title. | | CINCINNATI: Head coach Luke Fickell went 4-8 in his first year with Cincinnati after having spent 16 of the previous 17 seasons on the Ohio State staff. A Year 2 improvement looks very realistic, as the Bearcats offense should be able to keep them in games. In quarterback Hayden Moore and wide receiver Kahlil Lewis, Cincinnati will have one of the best aerial combos in the conference. What's holding the team back is a defense that is weak in the secondary and doesn't possess the ability to get after the quarterback. That's never a good combination. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 9:57:23 AM EST. |
|
|