|
|
TULSA CONNECTICUT |
|
| 76.5 | 14 Final 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
317 | TULSA | +2 | Over 69.5 | 318 | CONNECTICUT | +10 | Under 81.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-5 | -1.3 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 35.4 | 17.3 | 443.6 | (6.1) | 1.0 | 40.1 | 22.9 | 561.3 | (7.6) | 1.7 | Road Games | 0-3 | -3 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 34.3 | 17.3 | 464.0 | (5.9) | 1.3 | 58.3 | 33.3 | 657.3 | (9.3) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 31.3 | 9.3 | 390.7 | (6.7) | 1.0 | 36.7 | 24.0 | 522.7 | (6.5) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 1-2 | +3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 31.3 | 9.3 | 390.7 | (6.7) | 1.0 | 36.7 | 24.0 | 522.7 | (6.5) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.4 | 17.3 | 21.6 | 26:31 | 50-272 | (5.4) | 13-23 | 57.1% | 172 | (7.5) | 73-444 | (6.1) | (12.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.3 | 13.1 | 20.7 | 29:32 | 39-176 | (4.6) | 18-31 | 58.3% | 229 | (7.4) | 70-405 | (5.8) | (14.3) | Offense Road Games | 34.3 | 17.3 | 23.7 | 29:08 | 52-269 | (5.2) | 15-26 | 56.4% | 195 | (7.5) | 78-464 | (5.9) | (13.5) | Defense (All Games) | 40.1 | 22.9 | 26.6 | 33:29 | 51-319 | (6.3) | 16-24 | 66.7% | 242 | (10.3) | 74-561 | (7.6) | (14) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33.1 | 18.1 | 22.7 | 31:27 | 46-237 | (5.2) | 16-26 | 60.7% | 221 | (8.4) | 72-458 | (6.4) | (13.8) | Defense Road Games | 58.3 | 33.3 | 28.3 | 30:52 | 47-347 | (7.4) | 17-24 | 72.2% | 310 | (12.9) | 71-657 | (9.3) | (11.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-4 | -2.1 | 1-5 | 4-2 | 28.3 | 11.5 | 431.5 | (6.1) | 1.8 | 40.3 | 22.3 | 558.5 | (6.7) | 0.7 | Home Games | 1-2 | -3.2 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 32.0 | 15.0 | 503.7 | (6.7) | 2.0 | 43.7 | 27.3 | 584.7 | (6.5) | 0.3 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +1.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 29.0 | 16.0 | 373.7 | (5.6) | 2.0 | 47.7 | 21.0 | 560.7 | (6.4) | 0.7 | Grass Games | 2-3 | -1.1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 28.4 | 11.8 | 437.8 | (6.1) | 2.0 | 38.6 | 22.6 | 570.6 | (6.7) | 0.8 | Conference Games | 1-3 | -1.1 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 31.2 | 15.5 | 429.2 | (6.2) | 1.7 | 46.0 | 22.5 | 569.5 | (6.5) | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.3 | 11.5 | 20.8 | 26:18 | 37-142 | (3.8) | 22-33 | 66.5% | 289 | (8.8) | 70-431 | (6.1) | (15.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.5 | 14.5 | 21.9 | 29:10 | 40-182 | (4.6) | 22-34 | 62.7% | 264 | (7.7) | 74-446 | (6) | (14.2) | Offense Home Games | 32.0 | 15.0 | 23.0 | 24:12 | 36-172 | (4.7) | 24-38 | 63.5% | 331 | (8.6) | 75-504 | (6.7) | (15.7) | Defense (All Games) | 40.3 | 22.3 | 28.5 | 32:56 | 36-166 | (4.5) | 32-47 | 67.6% | 392 | (8.3) | 84-558 | (6.7) | (13.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.2 | 16.4 | 22.8 | 30:05 | 34-130 | (3.9) | 25-43 | 58.0% | 304 | (7.1) | 76-434 | (5.7) | (14.9) | Defense Home Games | 43.7 | 27.3 | 29.3 | 34:18 | 39-163 | (4.2) | 34-50 | 68.0% | 421 | (8.4) | 89-585 | (6.5) | (13.4) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 35.4, CONNECTICUT 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2017 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 24-59 | L | 19.5 | L | 70.5 | O | 60-244 | 20-38-188 | 2 | 37-332 | 21-26-308 | 2 | 9/9/2017 | LA LAFAYETTE | 66-42 | W | -14 | W | 59 | O | 72-424 | 14-20-243 | 1 | 41-287 | 21-34-309 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | @ TOLEDO | 51-54 | L | 7 | W | 73.5 | O | 68-423 | 12-20-125 | 0 | 33-221 | 22-33-458 | 1 | 9/23/2017 | NEW MEXICO | 13-16 | L | -7.5 | L | 69 | U | 31-155 | 13-27-131 | 1 | 59-338 | 9-14-108 | 3 | 9/30/2017 | NAVY | 21-31 | L | 7.5 | L | 70.5 | U | 39-229 | 12-18-115 | 0 | 68-421 | 3-4-90 | 1 | 10/7/2017 | @ TULANE | 28-62 | L | 5.5 | L | 54 | O | 28-139 | 12-20-273 | 2 | 70-488 | 9-13-165 | 0 | 10/14/2017 | HOUSTON | 45-17 | W | 14 | W | 62.5 | U | 53-288 | 9-18-128 | 1 | 47-146 | 25-41-258 | 3 | 10/21/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2017 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2017 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2017 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2017 | HOLY CROSS | 27-20 | W | -22 | L | 50 | U | 37-160 | 28-41-278 | 2 | 26-89 | 33-56-358 | 1 | 9/16/2017 | @ VIRGINIA | 18-38 | L | 12.5 | L | 51.5 | O | 41-207 | 18-26-227 | 2 | 31-171 | 30-40-455 | 1 | 9/24/2017 | E CAROLINA | 38-41 | L | -5 | L | 63 | O | 38-190 | 24-39-406 | 1 | 47-170 | 30-39-426 | 0 | 9/30/2017 | @ SMU | 28-49 | L | 16.5 | L | 75 | O | 36--8 | 22-28-408 | 1 | 41-218 | 27-39-280 | 0 | 10/6/2017 | MEMPHIS | 31-70 | L | 16 | L | 76 | O | 34-167 | 21-35-310 | 3 | 45-231 | 39-55-480 | 0 | 10/14/2017 | @ TEMPLE | 28-24 | W | 10.5 | W | 58 | U | 38-139 | 18-28-105 | 2 | 29-117 | 33-55-356 | 2 | 10/21/2017 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/4/2017 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/11/2017 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/18/2017 | *BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TULSA: The Golden Hurricane have one of the conference's best offensive lines and RB D'Angelo Brewer knows exaclty how to use it. He rushed for 1,425 yards last year and should be even better this season. The team does, however, need somebody to step up and contribute at quarterback. | | CONNECTICUT: Head coach Randy Edsall is back with the Huskies, and he'll need to get more out of an offense that ranked last in FBS in scoring in 2016. There is optimism that he can do that, but probably not for another year or two. Defensively, the Huskies have some talent among the team's front seven. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/19/2024 8:21:26 AM EST. |
|
|