|
|
CINCINNATI CONNECTICUT |
|
| 62.5 | 49 Final 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
111 | CINCINNATI | -1000 | 112 | CONNECTICUT | +625 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-0 | +7 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 36.0 | 18.2 | 425.5 | (6) | 0.7 | 13.5 | 8.5 | 274.5 | (4.3) | 1.2 | Road Games | 2-0 | +6 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 23.5 | 12.0 | 268.5 | (3.9) | 0.5 | 8.5 | 5.0 | 252.0 | (3.9) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 39.3 | 18.7 | 466.0 | (6.7) | 0.7 | 12.3 | 8.0 | 264.0 | (4.3) | 1.3 | Grass Games | 1-0 | +5 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 26.0 | 17.0 | 304.0 | (3.9) | 1.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 306.0 | (4.5) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 36.0 | 18.2 | 23.2 | 31:43 | 48-235 | (4.9) | 15-23 | 63.8% | 190 | (8.1) | 71-425 | (6) | (11.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 41 | 23.5 | 27 | 32:17 | 44-223 | (5) | 21-31 | 66.6% | 287 | (9.2) | 76-510 | (6.7) | (12.5) | Offense Road Games | 23.5 | 12.0 | 15.5 | 33:36 | 51-191 | (3.7) | 10-18 | 54.1% | 77 | (4.2) | 69-268 | (3.9) | (11.4) | Defense (All Games) | 13.5 | 8.5 | 14.7 | 28:17 | 30-121 | (4) | 17-33 | 51.9% | 153 | (4.6) | 63-274 | (4.3) | (20.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 18.6 | 9.6 | 14.8 | 28:43 | 33-120 | (3.7) | 15-30 | 50.9% | 181 | (6) | 63-301 | (4.8) | (16.2) | Defense Road Games | 8.5 | 5.0 | 13.0 | 26:24 | 25-101 | (4.1) | 22-39 | 57.7% | 150 | (3.9) | 64-252 | (3.9) | (29.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-3 | +1 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 25.2 | 16.5 | 411.7 | (5.8) | 2.5 | 54.5 | 32.0 | 664.0 | (9.2) | 0.7 | Home Games | 1-1 | +1 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 36.5 | 26.0 | 529.5 | (6.3) | 3.0 | 52.5 | 28.0 | 601.0 | (9.1) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 28.0 | 18.7 | 387.0 | (6) | 2.3 | 54.0 | 33.3 | 668.0 | (9.2) | 1.0 | Grass Games | 1-1 | +1 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 36.5 | 26.0 | 529.5 | (6.3) | 3.0 | 52.5 | 28.0 | 601.0 | (9.1) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 486.0 | (5.6) | 3.0 | 56.0 | 28.0 | 652.0 | (9.3) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.2 | 16.5 | 21.0 | 31:56 | 41-196 | (4.8) | 19-29 | 65.3% | 215 | (7.3) | 70-412 | (5.8) | (16.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.3 | 16.5 | 21.6 | 32:45 | 43-194 | (4.5) | 18-29 | 60.6% | 228 | (7.8) | 72-422 | (5.8) | (14.4) | Offense Home Games | 36.5 | 26.0 | 29.5 | 36:38 | 50-242 | (4.8) | 23-34 | 69.1% | 287 | (8.4) | 84-529 | (6.3) | (14.5) | Defense (All Games) | 54.5 | 32.0 | 30.7 | 28:03 | 39-309 | (8) | 24-33 | 72.2% | 355 | (10.7) | 72-664 | (9.2) | (12.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 48.7 | 27.2 | 27.5 | 28:01 | 40-236 | (5.9) | 23-35 | 65.6% | 317 | (9) | 75-553 | (7.4) | (11.3) | Defense Home Games | 52.5 | 28.0 | 29.5 | 23:19 | 32-247 | (7.7) | 24-34 | 72.1% | 353 | (10.4) | 66-601 | (9.1) | (11.4) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 20.2, CONNECTICUT 33 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ UCLA | 26-17 | W | 14 | W | 63 | U | 51-194 | 14-26-110 | 1 | 31-144 | 23-37-162 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | *MIAMI OHIO | 21-0 | W | 1 | W | 45 | U | 51-188 | 6-11-45 | 0 | 19-59 | 22-41-139 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | ALABAMA A&M | 63-7 | W | -43.5 | W | | - | 55-409 | 21-26-332 | 1 | 25-48 | 12-28-134 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | OHIO U | 34-30 | W | -7 | L | 56 | O | 34-150 | 19-31-274 | 1 | 45-234 | 12-27-178 | 2 | 9/29/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | UCF | 17-56 | L | 23.5 | L | 68 | O | 46-220 | 27-41-266 | 3 | 36-296 | 26-34-356 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | @ BOISE ST | 7-62 | L | 33.5 | L | 63 | O | 25-122 | 11-21-71 | 1 | 45-400 | 25-33-418 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | RHODE ISLAND | 56-49 | W | -9 | L | | - | 54-265 | 20-27-308 | 3 | 28-199 | 23-34-351 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | @ SYRACUSE | 21-51 | L | 31 | W | 75.5 | U | 39-178 | 19-29-217 | 3 | 46-341 | 22-32-295 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: Head coach Luke Fickell went 4-8 in his first year with Cincinnati after having spent 16 of the previous 17 seasons on the Ohio State staff. A Year 2 improvement looks very realistic, as the Bearcats offense should be able to keep them in games. In quarterback Hayden Moore and wide receiver Kahlil Lewis, Cincinnati will have one of the best aerial combos in the conference. What's holding the team back is a defense that is weak in the secondary and doesn't possess the ability to get after the quarterback. That's never a good combination. | | CONNECTICUT: Much like Cincinnati, the Huskies will be able to put up some points but they won't be able to prevent anybody from scoring them. The Huskies lost most of the talent off of their porous defense from a year ago, and it's hard to imagine them finding a way to slow down some of these potent AAC offenses. But with a good quarterback in David Pindell and some solid pass-catching weapons, they should be able to at least excite some of their fans in shootout losses. That just means very little when trying to justify backing them to actually win games. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/13/2024 6:38:34 AM EST. |
|
|