|
|
PITTSBURGH GEORGIA TECH |
|
| 55 | 17 Final 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
315 | PITTSBURGH | 59.5 | 56 | 316 | GEORGIA TECH | -6.5 | -10 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -1 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 21.0 | 12.7 | 360.3 | (4.7) | 2.0 | 37.7 | 21.0 | 468.7 | (7.7) | 1.3 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 342.0 | (4) | 3.0 | 33.0 | 14.0 | 312.0 | (6) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 21.0 | 12.7 | 360.3 | (4.7) | 2.0 | 37.7 | 21.0 | 468.7 | (7.7) | 1.3 | Grass Games | 1-2 | -1 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 21.0 | 12.7 | 360.3 | (4.7) | 2.0 | 37.7 | 21.0 | 468.7 | (7.7) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 21.0 | 12.7 | 21.7 | 34:48 | 44-155 | (3.5) | 20-33 | 61.0% | 205 | (6.1) | 77-360 | (4.7) | (17.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 16.7 | 10.8 | 20.4 | 34:22 | 45-154 | (3.4) | 18-30 | 59.4% | 164 | (5.4) | 75-318 | (4.2) | (19.1) | Offense Road Games | 14.0 | 3.0 | 24.0 | 38:20 | 45-155 | (3.4) | 24-41 | 58.5% | 187 | (4.6) | 86-342 | (4) | (24.4) | Defense (All Games) | 37.7 | 21.0 | 20.0 | 25:12 | 28-120 | (4.2) | 20-32 | 60.8% | 349 | (10.8) | 61-469 | (7.7) | (12.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 40.7 | 21.2 | 21.7 | 26:38 | 30-165 | (5.5) | 20-32 | 63.9% | 333 | (10.4) | 62-498 | (8) | (12.2) | Defense Road Games | 33.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 21:40 | 24-148 | (6.2) | 15-28 | 53.6% | 164 | (5.9) | 52-312 | (6) | (9.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 39.0 | 12.0 | 488.5 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 26.0 | 7.0 | 279.0 | (5) | 1.5 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 37.0 | 10.0 | 322.0 | (5.7) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 189.0 | (3.6) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 39.0 | 12.0 | 488.5 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 26.0 | 7.0 | 279.0 | (5) | 1.5 | Grass Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 37.0 | 10.0 | 322.0 | (5.7) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 189.0 | (3.6) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 39.0 | 12.0 | 25.0 | 36:30 | 67-372 | (5.5) | 5-8 | 58.8% | 116 | (13.6) | 76-488 | (6.4) | (12.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.8 | 8.3 | 18.5 | 32:22 | 50-242 | (4.8) | 8-13 | 60.3% | 127 | (9.8) | 63-369 | (5.9) | (12) | Offense Home Games | 37.0 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 31:33 | 49-210 | (4.3) | 5-7 | 71.4% | 112 | (16) | 56-322 | (5.7) | (8.7) | Defense (All Games) | 26.0 | 7.0 | 16.0 | 23:30 | 30-132 | (4.4) | 14-25 | 54.9% | 147 | (5.8) | 55-279 | (5) | (10.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.3 | 9.8 | 17.8 | 28:38 | 34-140 | (4.1) | 14-25 | 55.4% | 156 | (6.3) | 59-296 | (5) | (13.2) | Defense Home Games | 10.0 | 7.0 | 14.0 | 28:27 | 38-116 | (3.1) | 8-14 | 57.1% | 73 | (5.2) | 52-189 | (3.6) | (18.9) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: PITTSBURGH 37.3, GEORGIA TECH 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | YOUNGSTOWN ST | 28-21 | W | -13 | L | 66 | U | 53-208 | 17-24-140 | 1 | 26-107 | 18-32-311 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | @ PENN ST | 14-33 | L | 18.5 | L | 64.5 | U | 45-155 | 24-41-187 | 3 | 24-148 | 15-28-164 | 1 | 9/16/2017 | OKLAHOMA ST | 21-59 | L | 10.5 | L | 66.5 | O | 34-103 | 20-35-288 | 2 | 35-104 | 26-37-572 | 2 | 9/23/2017 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/4/2017 | *TENNESSEE | 41-42 | L | 4 | W | 54 | O | 86-535 | 5-10-120 | 2 | 22-148 | 20-37-221 | 0 | 9/9/2017 | JACKSONVILLE ST | 37-10 | W | -14.5 | W | 51.5 | U | 49-210 | 5-7-112 | 0 | 38-116 | 8-14-73 | 3 | 9/23/2017 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/12/2017 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH: USC transfer Max Browne replaces Nathan Peterman, and he should able to reinvent himself. The Panthers will, however, need to be better in
the secondary. They gave up a ton of big plays last season. | | GEORGIA TECH: Georgia Tech is returning most of its O-Line from a year ago, so QB Matthew Jordan and the Yellow Jackets' slew of productive RBs should have room to run. Defensively, the team needs to improve the pass rush. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 9:11:36 AM EST. |
|
|