|
|
PURDUE ILLINOIS |
|
| 62 | 46 Final 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
125 | PURDUE | -10 | -10 | 126 | ILLINOIS | 59.5 | 64.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-3 | -7.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 31.0 | 19.2 | 490.0 | (6.9) | 1.6 | 26.4 | 16.4 | 447.2 | (5.9) | 1.4 | Road Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 42.0 | 20.0 | 516.0 | (6.5) | 0.0 | 28.0 | 7.0 | 582.0 | (7.2) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.9 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 36.3 | 22.3 | 500.7 | (6.9) | 1.0 | 27.0 | 13.7 | 473.0 | (6.1) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 42.0 | 20.0 | 516.0 | (6.5) | 0.0 | 28.0 | 7.0 | 582.0 | (7.2) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 1-1 | -0.1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 34.5 | 18.5 | 494.0 | (6.6) | 1.5 | 29.5 | 19.0 | 491.5 | (6.1) | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.0 | 19.2 | 21.8 | 31:38 | 32-170 | (5.3) | 26-39 | 66.2% | 320 | (8.2) | 71-490 | (6.9) | (15.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.9 | 15.3 | 20 | 31:57 | 38-164 | (4.3) | 20-33 | 60.6% | 240 | (7.2) | 72-404 | (5.6) | (14) | Offense Road Games | 42.0 | 20.0 | 27.0 | 36:16 | 37-188 | (5.1) | 25-42 | 59.5% | 328 | (7.8) | 79-516 | (6.5) | (12.3) | Defense (All Games) | 26.4 | 16.4 | 23.4 | 28:22 | 38-162 | (4.2) | 22-37 | 60.0% | 285 | (7.7) | 75-447 | (5.9) | (16.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.4 | 17.4 | 22.8 | 29:03 | 40-165 | (4.1) | 22-36 | 60.6% | 271 | (7.6) | 76-436 | (5.7) | (14.3) | Defense Road Games | 28.0 | 7.0 | 31.0 | 23:44 | 39-259 | (6.6) | 25-42 | 59.5% | 323 | (7.7) | 81-582 | (7.2) | (20.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 29.2 | 14.8 | 411.0 | (5.7) | 0.8 | 28.6 | 13.2 | 483.4 | (6.4) | 2.4 | Home Games | 2-2 | +1 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 27.0 | 12.5 | 409.0 | (5.5) | 1.0 | 31.5 | 13.0 | 507.7 | (6.7) | 2.2 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 27.0 | 19.0 | 403.3 | (5.6) | 1.0 | 35.0 | 14.0 | 534.3 | (6.9) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 29.2 | 14.8 | 411.0 | (5.7) | 0.8 | 28.6 | 13.2 | 483.4 | (6.4) | 2.4 | Conference Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 31.0 | 20.5 | 415.0 | (6) | 1.0 | 40.0 | 17.5 | 488.5 | (6.6) | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 29.2 | 14.8 | 21.2 | 30:36 | 46-261 | (5.6) | 15-26 | 58.6% | 150 | (5.9) | 72-411 | (5.7) | (14.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.8 | 14.7 | 21.6 | 32:50 | 44-206 | (4.7) | 17-29 | 58.9% | 209 | (7.1) | 73-415 | (5.7) | (13.5) | Offense Home Games | 27.0 | 12.5 | 22.2 | 30:60 | 47-243 | (5.2) | 16-27 | 59.6% | 165 | (6.1) | 74-409 | (5.5) | (15.1) | Defense (All Games) | 28.6 | 13.2 | 26.0 | 29:24 | 38-194 | (5.1) | 24-38 | 63.0% | 289 | (7.7) | 76-483 | (6.4) | (16.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.2 | 13 | 21.7 | 28:10 | 36-171 | (4.7) | 21-36 | 58.6% | 244 | (6.9) | 72-415 | (5.8) | (14.7) | Defense Home Games | 31.5 | 13.0 | 26.2 | 29:00 | 40-213 | (5.4) | 22-36 | 62.9% | 295 | (8.3) | 75-508 | (6.7) | (16.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: PURDUE 37.6, ILLINOIS 24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | NORTHWESTERN | 27-31 | L | -1 | L | 51 | O | 25-202 | 30-46-270 | 3 | 42-166 | 23-37-235 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | E MICHIGAN | 19-20 | L | -15 | L | 50.5 | U | 42-341 | 14-24-135 | 2 | 31-69 | 22-34-347 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | MISSOURI | 37-40 | L | 5.5 | W | 67 | O | 16-42 | 39-55-572 | 1 | 46-233 | 26-43-375 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 30-13 | W | 6 | W | 62.5 | U | 41-76 | 21-28-296 | 2 | 34-85 | 15-29-144 | 4 | 9/29/2018 | @ NEBRASKA | 42-28 | W | -3.5 | W | 58 | O | 37-188 | 25-42-328 | 0 | 39-259 | 25-42-323 | 1 | 10/13/2018 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | KENT ST | 31-24 | W | -18 | L | 56 | U | 49-279 | 13-24-190 | 1 | 43-183 | 28-41-270 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | W ILLINOIS | 34-14 | W | -8 | W | 51 | U | 47-238 | 14-23-138 | 0 | 21-66 | 26-42-295 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | S FLORIDA | 19-25 | L | 14 | W | 59 | U | 48-212 | 20-31-168 | 1 | 44-215 | 23-40-411 | 2 | 9/21/2018 | PENN ST | 24-63 | L | 27.5 | L | 59.5 | O | 45-245 | 18-31-166 | 2 | 51-387 | 13-20-204 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | @ RUTGERS | 38-17 | W | -4.5 | W | 51 | O | 43-330 | 10-19-89 | 0 | 30-119 | 29-46-267 | 3 | 10/13/2018 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| PURDUE: Purdue enjoyed a four-win improvement in head coach Jeff Brohm's first year with the program, but the team is likely to take a small step back this season. Purdue returns only four starters on defense, and a lot of the roster's inexperience this season will be on the defensive line. In a conference full of teams that love to run the football, that figures to be especially problematic. The Boilermakers should be solid on offense, though. QB David Blough is back under center after a year where Purdue surprised some teams with their passing game. And running back Markell Jones is more than capable of making plays on the ground. Purdue might not be a title contender, but it will be competitive each week. | | ILLINOIS: It's probably safe to say that head coach Lovie Smith is on the hot seat this season'the 2005 AP NFL Coach of the Year is a miserable 5-19 in his career with Illinois. This offense averaged a Power Five-worst 15.4 points per game last season and, in limited playing time last year, soon-to-be starting quarterback Cam Thomas completed just 42.4 percent of his passes for 375 yards, zero touchdowns and five interceptions. That's not promising, but the hope is that a new spread attack will bring out the best in him. On defense, the Illini return seven starters from a unit that couldn't stop anybody. It's likely that opposing offenses will be looking forward to playing them once again. ' |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 10:28:26 AM EST. |
|
|