|
|
W VIRGINIA KANSAS |
|
| 71 | 56 Final 34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
329 | W VIRGINIA | -20.5 | -22 | 330 | KANSAS | 67.5 | 71 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | -1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 46.3 | 33.7 | 583.0 | (7.3) | 1.3 | 22.3 | 7.7 | 413.3 | (5.9) | 1.7 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 24.0 | 7.0 | 592.0 | (6.7) | 1.0 | 31.0 | 10.0 | 469.0 | (6.5) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 46.3 | 33.7 | 583.0 | (7.3) | 1.3 | 22.3 | 7.7 | 413.3 | (5.9) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-0 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 57.5 | 47.0 | 578.5 | (7.7) | 1.5 | 18.0 | 6.5 | 385.5 | (5.5) | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 46.3 | 33.7 | 27.7 | 26:30 | 39-214 | (5.5) | 26-41 | 64.8% | 369 | (9.1) | 80-583 | (7.3) | (12.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 41.3 | 26.4 | 23.3 | 28:51 | 41-212 | (5.1) | 21-32 | 63.7% | 301 | (9.3) | 74-513 | (7) | (12.4) | Offense Road Games | 24.0 | 7.0 | 29.0 | 28:60 | 35-221 | (6.3) | 31-54 | 57.4% | 371 | (6.9) | 89-592 | (6.7) | (24.7) | Defense (All Games) | 22.3 | 7.7 | 18.0 | 33:30 | 40-179 | (4.4) | 16-30 | 53.3% | 234 | (7.8) | 70-413 | (5.9) | (18.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.6 | 11.1 | 18.6 | 32:09 | 40-150 | (3.7) | 16-30 | 55.4% | 236 | (8) | 70-386 | (5.5) | (15.7) | Defense Road Games | 31.0 | 10.0 | 21.0 | 30:60 | 45-234 | (5.2) | 15-27 | 55.6% | 235 | (8.7) | 72-469 | (6.5) | (15.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -2.3 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 31.7 | 13.7 | 452.7 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 34.3 | 18.7 | 434.7 | (6.1) | 1.0 | Home Games | 1-1 | -1.3 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 32.5 | 13.5 | 453.5 | (5.7) | 2.5 | 30.5 | 15.5 | 427.0 | (5.7) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.3 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 31.7 | 13.7 | 452.7 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 34.3 | 18.7 | 434.7 | (6.1) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 1-2 | -2.3 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 31.7 | 13.7 | 452.7 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 34.3 | 18.7 | 434.7 | (6.1) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.7 | 13.7 | 23.0 | 27:15 | 30-109 | (3.6) | 28-49 | 58.2% | 343 | (7.1) | 79-453 | (5.7) | (14.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.4 | 15.7 | 18.7 | 27:21 | 32-135 | (4.2) | 21-38 | 56.1% | 295 | (7.8) | 70-430 | (6.1) | (13.7) | Offense Home Games | 32.5 | 13.5 | 23.0 | 27:12 | 29-110 | (3.7) | 27-49 | 55.6% | 343 | (6.9) | 79-453 | (5.7) | (14) | Defense (All Games) | 34.3 | 18.7 | 20.3 | 32:45 | 37-138 | (3.8) | 23-34 | 67.0% | 297 | (8.7) | 71-435 | (6.1) | (12.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.1 | 14.1 | 19.7 | 33:39 | 39-151 | (3.9) | 22-38 | 59.0% | 241 | (6.4) | 77-392 | (5.1) | (13.5) | Defense Home Games | 30.5 | 15.5 | 19.5 | 32:48 | 34-108 | (3.2) | 26-40 | 65.4% | 318 | (7.9) | 74-427 | (5.7) | (14) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: W VIRGINIA 22, KANSAS 15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/3/2017 | *VIRGINIA TECH | 24-31 | L | 5 | L | 54.5 | O | 35-221 | 31-54-371 | 1 | 45-234 | 15-27-235 | 0 | 9/9/2017 | E CAROLINA | 56-20 | W | -25 | W | 68 | O | 47-216 | 24-34-403 | 0 | 32-142 | 23-47-328 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | DELAWARE ST | 59-16 | W | -62 | L | 69 | O | 35-204 | 24-34-334 | 3 | 44-161 | 10-16-140 | 3 | 9/23/2017 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | SE MISSOURI ST | 38-16 | W | -19 | W | 42.5 | O | 25-73 | 23-37-364 | 3 | 33-94 | 25-44-170 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | C MICHIGAN | 27-45 | L | -5.5 | L | 55.5 | O | 34-147 | 32-62-323 | 2 | 35-123 | 28-37-467 | 1 | 9/16/2017 | @ OHIO U | 30-42 | L | 7 | L | 59 | O | 32-108 | 30-47-343 | 1 | 42-196 | 16-22-254 | 1 | 9/23/2017 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| W VIRGINIA: West Virginia is retooling a bit, but this team is still loaded with talent. One area where they should be better than last year is under center. Skyler Howard is no longer in Morgantown, but Florida transfer Will Grier is likely an upgrade. He also has dual-threat ability. West Virginia will, however, need its defense to take some steps forward. If it can then the Mountaineers could surprise a lot of people. | | KANSAS: Heading into this season, David Beaty had won just two games in two seasons with Kansas. The Jayhawks have been blown out more than most other Power 5 programs, but they should be a lot more competitive this year. Kansas has plenty of talent alone the defensive line, and that should bode well against Big 12 offenses. The Jayhawks do, however, need more from the secondary and a lot more from their pitiful offense. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 2:25:48 PM EST. |
|
|