|
|
NOTRE DAME MICHIGAN ST |
|
| 54.5 | 38 Final 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
361 | NOTRE DAME | -3.5 | -3 | 362 | MICHIGAN ST | 54 | 54 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | -0.3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 39.0 | 18.3 | 494.0 | (6.5) | 1.7 | 18.7 | 10.0 | 352.0 | (4.6) | 2.0 | Road Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 49.0 | 14.0 | 611.0 | (7.8) | 2.0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 400.0 | (4.7) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -0.3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 39.0 | 18.3 | 494.0 | (6.5) | 1.7 | 18.7 | 10.0 | 352.0 | (4.6) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 39.0 | 18.3 | 21.0 | 27:41 | 44-331 | (7.5) | 16-32 | 49.5% | 163 | (5.1) | 76-494 | (6.5) | (12.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.7 | 11.8 | 18.6 | 29:16 | 40-186 | (4.7) | 18-32 | 56.4% | 202 | (6.3) | 72-388 | (5.4) | (14.5) | Offense Road Games | 49.0 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 29:35 | 51-515 | (10.1) | 11-27 | 40.7% | 96 | (3.6) | 78-611 | (7.8) | (12.5) | Defense (All Games) | 18.7 | 10.0 | 18.7 | 32:19 | 41-152 | (3.7) | 20-35 | 56.2% | 200 | (5.7) | 76-352 | (4.6) | (18.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.9 | 12.7 | 18.3 | 31:44 | 42-153 | (3.7) | 17-32 | 54.4% | 188 | (5.9) | 74-340 | (4.6) | (15.5) | Defense Road Games | 20.0 | 10.0 | 22.0 | 30:25 | 44-185 | (4.2) | 24-41 | 58.5% | 215 | (5.2) | 85-400 | (4.7) | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 31.5 | 14.0 | 461.0 | (6.1) | 2.5 | 12.0 | 1.5 | 203.5 | (3.4) | 1.0 | Home Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 31.5 | 14.0 | 461.0 | (6.1) | 2.5 | 12.0 | 1.5 | 203.5 | (3.4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 31.5 | 14.0 | 461.0 | (6.1) | 2.5 | 12.0 | 1.5 | 203.5 | (3.4) | 1.0 | Grass Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 31.5 | 14.0 | 461.0 | (6.1) | 2.5 | 12.0 | 1.5 | 203.5 | (3.4) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.5 | 14.0 | 23.0 | 35:25 | 47-255 | (5.4) | 17-28 | 61.4% | 205 | (7.2) | 76-461 | (6.1) | (14.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 37.3 | 18.7 | 24 | 31:15 | 43-238 | (5.5) | 20-30 | 64.6% | 268 | (8.9) | 73-507 | (6.9) | (13.6) | Offense Home Games | 31.5 | 14.0 | 23.0 | 35:25 | 47-255 | (5.4) | 17-28 | 61.4% | 205 | (7.2) | 76-461 | (6.1) | (14.6) | Defense (All Games) | 12.0 | 1.5 | 10.0 | 24:34 | 30-91 | (3) | 11-29 | 37.9% | 112 | (3.9) | 59-203 | (3.4) | (17) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21 | 6.5 | 18 | 29:44 | 36-140 | (3.9) | 17-34 | 50.0% | 184 | (5.3) | 70-323 | (4.6) | (15.4) | Defense Home Games | 12.0 | 1.5 | 10.0 | 24:34 | 30-91 | (3) | 11-29 | 37.9% | 112 | (3.9) | 59-203 | (3.4) | (17) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NOTRE DAME 34, MICHIGAN ST 30.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | TEMPLE | 49-16 | W | -20 | W | 55.5 | O | 44-422 | 17-30-184 | 1 | 37-85 | 19-35-245 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | GEORGIA | 19-20 | L | -5.5 | L | 57 | U | 37-55 | 20-40-210 | 2 | 43-185 | 16-29-141 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 49-20 | W | -14 | W | 54 | O | 51-515 | 11-27-96 | 2 | 44-185 | 24-41-215 | 3 | 9/23/2017 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | BOWLING GREEN | 35-10 | W | -17 | W | 56 | U | 46-215 | 22-36-250 | 3 | 24-67 | 10-31-145 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | W MICHIGAN | 28-14 | W | -7 | W | 51.5 | U | 49-296 | 13-21-161 | 2 | 36-116 | 12-27-79 | 1 | 9/23/2017 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NOTRE DAME: Notre Dame's 2016 season was a nightmare, but the team should be able to turn things around this year. The Fighting Irish have a good offensive line, so they should be able to improve in the running game. They do, however, have to be a lot better defensively. | | MICHIGAN ST: Michigan State is coming off a rough year, and things might not be much better this season. The Spartans are still very young, but the future is bright for Mark Dantonio's group. You can't keep him down long. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 5:02:42 AM EST. |
|
|