|
|
ARKANSAS ST
First Half Results
NEBRASKA |
|
|
26
| 26
Final
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 167 | ARKANSAS ST | 24 | | 168 | NEBRASKA | -8.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-5 | -10.1 | 7-6 | 3-10 | 27.3 | 13.3 | 383.7 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 21.5 | 11.9 | 362.8 | (5) | 1.7 | | Road Games | 4-3 | +2.2 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 26.6 | 8.7 | 355.4 | (5) | 0.9 | 22.1 | 14.1 | 340.7 | (4.7) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -0.8 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 28.7 | 12.3 | 370.7 | (5.1) | 0.7 | 17.0 | 10.3 | 250.7 | (3.6) | 1.7 | | Turf Games | 7-4 | -11.1 | 6-5 | 2-9 | 28.2 | 14.2 | 396.1 | (5.6) | 1.5 | 19.3 | 10.4 | 334.5 | (4.7) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 27.3 | 13.3 | 18.6 | 28:59 | 40-142 | (3.6) | 18-31 | 57.5% | 242 | (7.8) | 71-384 | (5.4) | (14.1) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.2 | 14.6 | 21.3 | 31:48 | 41-177 | (4.3) | 18-31 | 58.0% | 234 | (7.5) | 73-411 | (5.7) | (14.6) | | Offense Road Games | 26.6 | 8.7 | 17.1 | 29:51 | 39-110 | (2.8) | 18-33 | 56.1% | 245 | (7.5) | 72-355 | (5) | (13.4) | | Defense (All Games) | 21.5 | 11.9 | 19.3 | 30:58 | 40-143 | (3.6) | 18-33 | 54.2% | 219 | (6.7) | 73-363 | (5) | (16.9) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.6 | 13.1 | 20.5 | 29:14 | 40-164 | (4.1) | 18-32 | 57.8% | 225 | (7) | 72-388 | (5.4) | (14.6) | | Defense Road Games | 22.1 | 14.1 | 19.0 | 30:09 | 39-141 | (3.6) | 18-33 | 53.0% | 200 | (6) | 72-341 | (4.7) | (15.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-4 | +1 | 6-5 | 4-9 | 26.5 | 11.0 | 381.0 | (5.4) | 1.1 | 23.9 | 13.7 | 363.5 | (5.5) | 1.5 | | Home Games | 7-0 | +3 | 3-2 | 1-6 | 34.3 | 13.7 | 427.6 | (5.9) | 0.7 | 16.1 | 11.6 | 306.9 | (5) | 1.6 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 20.7 | 10.3 | 312.0 | (4.3) | 0.3 | 28.3 | 13.7 | 378.7 | (5.9) | 0.3 | | Turf Games | 8-3 | +1 | 5-4 | 3-8 | 27.0 | 11.5 | 370.8 | (5.3) | 1.0 | 23.6 | 13.6 | 346.9 | (5.4) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 26.5 | 11.0 | 20.5 | 32:07 | 40-169 | (4.2) | 15-31 | 50.2% | 212 | (6.9) | 71-381 | (5.4) | (14.4) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.4 | 13.6 | 20.7 | 31:34 | 41-183 | (4.5) | 18-31 | 56.6% | 216 | (6.9) | 72-400 | (5.5) | (14.6) | | Offense Home Games | 34.3 | 13.7 | 23.3 | 34:07 | 43-194 | (4.5) | 17-29 | 58.9% | 234 | (8.1) | 72-428 | (5.9) | (12.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 23.9 | 13.7 | 17.8 | 27:41 | 33-148 | (4.4) | 20-32 | 60.2% | 216 | (6.6) | 66-363 | (5.5) | (15.2) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.4 | 14.3 | 20.1 | 29:24 | 40-177 | (4.5) | 18-31 | 57.7% | 218 | (7) | 71-395 | (5.6) | (13.9) | | Defense Home Games | 16.1 | 11.6 | 14.6 | 25:31 | 29-106 | (3.6) | 18-32 | 56.0% | 201 | (6.3) | 61-307 | (5) | (19) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ARKANSAS ST 22.5, NEBRASKA 36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/2/2017 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2017 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/16/2017 | AK-PINE BLUFF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/23/2017 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/2/2017 | ARKANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2017 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/16/2017 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/23/2017 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2017 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | ARKANSAS ST: The Red Wolves rushed for only 137.2 YPG (106th in CFB) last season, and that number must go up in 2017. If they can't find a way to run the ball
effectively then a regression from last year is likely. Arkansas St. does, however, have a good rushing D. The team was top-50 there last year. | | NEBRASKA: The Cornhuskers no longer have the mobility of Tommy Armstrong under center, but transfer Tanner Lee is a good pocket passer. The defense should be a strength, so NU's success relies on the ability to score points. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/18/2024 6:23:55 PM EST. |
|
|