|
|
MASSACHUSETTS OHIO U |
|
| 69 | 42 Final 58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
137 | MASSACHUSETTS | +16.5 | Over 63 | 138 | OHIO U | -4.5 | Under 75 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 34.0 | 19.4 | 392.8 | (6.2) | 2.0 | 39.6 | 25.2 | 452.6 | (6.1) | 1.6 | Road Games | 0-3 | -2 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 19.3 | 9.0 | 353.7 | (5.5) | 2.7 | 50.7 | 35.7 | 548.7 | (7.1) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 28.7 | 18.3 | 359.0 | (6) | 2.0 | 42.7 | 23.0 | 462.7 | (6.3) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 2-2 | 0 | 2-2 | 4-0 | 39.2 | 21.7 | 410.2 | (6.5) | 2.0 | 41.0 | 27.2 | 443.7 | (5.8) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.0 | 19.4 | 20.2 | 25:36 | 33-159 | (4.8) | 18-30 | 60.4% | 234 | (7.8) | 63-393 | (6.2) | (11.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.4 | 18.2 | 21.1 | 28:16 | 37-174 | (4.7) | 18-31 | 60.2% | 234 | (7.6) | 68-408 | (6) | (13) | Offense Road Games | 19.3 | 9.0 | 20.3 | 25:59 | 31-124 | (4) | 20-34 | 57.8% | 230 | (6.8) | 65-354 | (5.5) | (18.3) | Defense (All Games) | 39.6 | 25.2 | 24.6 | 34:24 | 50-235 | (4.7) | 16-25 | 64.8% | 217 | (8.7) | 75-453 | (6.1) | (11.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.2 | 15.8 | 18.6 | 32:44 | 43-177 | (4.1) | 14-24 | 59.8% | 178 | (7.6) | 67-355 | (5.3) | (12.1) | Defense Road Games | 50.7 | 35.7 | 29.3 | 34:01 | 57-322 | (5.6) | 14-20 | 71.2% | 227 | (11.5) | 77-549 | (7.1) | (10.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -2 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 33.0 | 20.7 | 399.7 | (5.8) | 1.3 | 37.0 | 22.3 | 540.3 | (7.4) | 2.7 | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 38.0 | 17.0 | 423.0 | (5.8) | 0.0 | 32.0 | 22.0 | 645.0 | (7) | 4.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 33.0 | 20.7 | 399.7 | (5.8) | 1.3 | 37.0 | 22.3 | 540.3 | (7.4) | 2.7 | Turf Games | 1-2 | -2 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 33.0 | 20.7 | 399.7 | (5.8) | 1.3 | 37.0 | 22.3 | 540.3 | (7.4) | 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 33.0 | 20.7 | 20.0 | 32:19 | 38-166 | (4.3) | 16-30 | 51.6% | 234 | (7.7) | 69-400 | (5.8) | (12.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.4 | 14.2 | 17.7 | 29:35 | 36-162 | (4.6) | 16-31 | 52.6% | 184 | (6) | 66-346 | (5.2) | (13.6) | Offense Home Games | 38.0 | 17.0 | 22.0 | 31:28 | 40-146 | (3.6) | 19-33 | 57.6% | 277 | (8.4) | 73-423 | (5.8) | (11.1) | Defense (All Games) | 37.0 | 22.3 | 24.3 | 27:41 | 35-161 | (4.7) | 24-38 | 62.3% | 379 | (10) | 73-540 | (7.4) | (14.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.5 | 16.5 | 21.8 | 31:25 | 44-188 | (4.2) | 17-31 | 56.7% | 251 | (8.2) | 75-439 | (5.9) | (14.4) | Defense Home Games | 32.0 | 22.0 | 26.0 | 28:32 | 39-161 | (4.1) | 27-53 | 50.9% | 484 | (9.1) | 92-645 | (7) | (20.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MASSACHUSETTS 21, OHIO U 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/25/2018 | DUQUESNE | 63-15 | W | -21 | W | 71 | O | 39-282 | 19-28-290 | 1 | 36-130 | 16-30-123 | 4 | 9/1/2018 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 21-55 | L | 20.5 | L | 62 | O | 33-66 | 21-34-249 | 3 | 60-302 | 20-27-320 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | @ GA SOUTHERN | 13-34 | L | 1.5 | L | 60.5 | U | 25-107 | 23-36-216 | 2 | 59-334 | 6-9-154 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | @ FLA INTERNATIONAL | 24-63 | L | 3.5 | L | 66 | O | 34-199 | 15-32-224 | 3 | 53-329 | 16-23-207 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | CHARLOTTE | 49-31 | W | -5.5 | W | 55 | O | 35-142 | 12-19-189 | 1 | 41-81 | 23-36-283 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | COASTAL CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | HOWARD | 38-32 | W | -30.5 | L | | - | 40-146 | 19-33-277 | 0 | 39-161 | 27-53-484 | 4 | 9/15/2018 | *VIRGINIA | 31-45 | L | 4 | L | 55.5 | O | 30-118 | 16-31-246 | 2 | 31-173 | 25-30-379 | 3 | 9/22/2018 | @ CINCINNATI | 30-34 | L | 7 | W | 56 | O | 45-234 | 12-27-178 | 2 | 34-150 | 19-31-274 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/25/2018 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MASSACHUSETTS: A 4-12 record doesn't tell the full story of the Minutemen's 2017 season, in which they suffered an 0-6 start'with the average defeat coming only by a single score. A strong offense returns in its entirety for UMass, and Mark Whipple always delivers innovation on that side of the ball. If the team doesn't improve it will be its defense that held it back, as there's plenty of churn in the front seven. | | OHIO U: Last season, quarterback Nathan Rourke threw for 17 touchdowns and only seven picks while adding 912 yards and 21 touchdowns on the ground. He's arguably the best dual-threat QB this conference has to offer, and he's joined by a group of talented rushers in the backfield. The fact that they all run behind an experienced O-line only makes the Ohio offense more dangerous. Defensively, the Bobcats have to replace most of their front seven. If they can competently do that, there is little in the way of them taking the top spot in the East, and they'll definitely have a shot at a conference title. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 2:27:13 PM EST. |
|
|