|
|
CONNECTICUT SYRACUSE |
|
| 75.5 | 21 Final 51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
325 | CONNECTICUT | | 326 | SYRACUSE | N.L. |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | +1 | 0-3 | 2-0 | 26.7 | 17.3 | 417.3 | (5.9) | 2.3 | 55.7 | 32.3 | 673.3 | (9.6) | 0.7 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 193.0 | (4.2) | 1.0 | 62.0 | 41.0 | 818.0 | (10.5) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +1 | 0-3 | 2-0 | 26.7 | 17.3 | 417.3 | (5.9) | 2.3 | 55.7 | 32.3 | 673.3 | (9.6) | 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 26.7 | 17.3 | 22.7 | 31:45 | 42-202 | (4.9) | 19-30 | 65.2% | 215 | (7.2) | 71-417 | (5.9) | (15.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.4 | 19.7 | 23.4 | 33:32 | 46-215 | (4.7) | 18-28 | 63.2% | 219 | (7.9) | 74-434 | (5.9) | (13.4) | Offense Road Games | 7.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 21:59 | 25-122 | (4.9) | 11-21 | 52.4% | 71 | (3.4) | 46-193 | (4.2) | (27.6) | Defense (All Games) | 55.7 | 32.3 | 32.3 | 28:13 | 36-298 | (8.2) | 25-34 | 73.3% | 375 | (11.1) | 70-673 | (9.6) | (12.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 48.4 | 26.7 | 28.1 | 27:09 | 36-221 | (6.2) | 25-36 | 67.7% | 341 | (9.4) | 72-562 | (7.8) | (11.6) | Defense Road Games | 62.0 | 41.0 | 38.0 | 38:01 | 45-400 | (8.9) | 25-33 | 75.8% | 418 | (12.7) | 78-818 | (10.5) | (13.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +2.6 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 49.0 | 28.3 | 485.7 | (5.6) | 0.7 | 19.7 | 4.7 | 383.0 | (5.8) | 2.0 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1.6 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 46.0 | 25.5 | 448.5 | (5.3) | 0.5 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 264.0 | (3.9) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2.6 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 49.0 | 28.3 | 485.7 | (5.6) | 0.7 | 19.7 | 4.7 | 383.0 | (5.8) | 2.0 | Dome Games | 2-0 | +1.6 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 46.0 | 25.5 | 448.5 | (5.3) | 0.5 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 264.0 | (3.9) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 49.0 | 28.3 | 25.7 | 31:38 | 54-257 | (4.8) | 18-32 | 55.2% | 229 | (7.1) | 86-486 | (5.6) | (9.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 41.1 | 27.8 | 21.3 | 29:34 | 42-198 | (4.7) | 19-32 | 60.7% | 222 | (7) | 74-421 | (5.7) | (10.2) | Offense Home Games | 46.0 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 30:30 | 50-218 | (4.4) | 21-34 | 61.8% | 230 | (6.8) | 84-448 | (5.3) | (9.7) | Defense (All Games) | 19.7 | 4.7 | 16.3 | 28:22 | 31-115 | (3.7) | 18-35 | 50.9% | 268 | (7.6) | 66-383 | (5.8) | (19.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21 | 8.9 | 18 | 31:26 | 35-113 | (3.2) | 20-36 | 56.2% | 247 | (6.9) | 71-360 | (5.1) | (17.1) | Defense Home Games | 8.5 | 3.5 | 12.5 | 29:29 | 32-51 | (1.6) | 17-35 | 50.0% | 212 | (6.1) | 67-264 | (3.9) | (31.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 31, SYRACUSE 22.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | UCF | 17-56 | L | 23.5 | L | 68 | O | 46-220 | 27-41-266 | 3 | 36-296 | 26-34-356 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | @ BOISE ST | 7-62 | L | 33.5 | L | 63 | O | 25-122 | 11-21-71 | 1 | 45-400 | 25-33-418 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | RHODE ISLAND | 56-49 | W | -9 | L | | - | 54-265 | 20-27-308 | 3 | 28-199 | 23-34-351 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2018 | @ W MICHIGAN | 55-42 | W | -4.5 | W | 65 | O | 62-334 | 11-28-226 | 1 | 28-242 | 19-36-379 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | WAGNER | 62-10 | W | -45 | W | 68.5 | O | 43-215 | 24-37-241 | 1 | 41-41 | 17-33-247 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | FLORIDA ST | 30-7 | W | 3.5 | W | 69 | U | 57-222 | 18-31-219 | 0 | 23-62 | 18-37-178 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CONNECTICUT: Much like Cincinnati, the Huskies will be able to put up some points but they won't be able to prevent anybody from scoring them. The Huskies lost most of the talent off of their porous defense from a year ago, and it's hard to imagine them finding a way to slow down some of these potent AAC offenses. But with a good quarterback in David Pindell and some solid pass-catching weapons, they should be able to at least excite some of their fans in shootout losses. That just means very little when trying to justify backing them to actually win games. | | SYRACUSE: The highlight of the 2017 season for Syracuse was a stunning home upset over Clemson, a game the Orange entered as 23-point underdogs. The lowlight was, well, every single game after that: 'Cuse lost all five of them, and each of the last three by at least three touchdowns. Eric Dungey is still around as starting quarterback, but his durability issues have contributed to late-season collapses like last year's. This defense tends to struggle against the pass, and an inexperienced secondary this year doesn't offer much promise for remedying that issue. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 6:42:01 AM EST. |
|
|