| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
ATLANTA |
|
|
158
| 78
Final
73 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 643 | WASHINGTON | -120 | | 644 | ATLANTA | +100 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor foul drawing team - attempting <=17 free throws/game, on Friday nights.
(21-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.8%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) |  - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, team that had a losing record last season.
(37-25 since 1997.) (59.7%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team from last season - scored 72 or more points/game, after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(56-31 since 1997.) (64.4%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game, after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(52-28 since 1997.) (65%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor foul drawing team from last season - attempted <=18 free throws/game, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(61-35 since 1997.) (63.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game, after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team from last season - scored 72 or more points/game, after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(31-14 since 1997.) (68.9%, +17.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team from last season - outscored by opponents by 3 or more points/game, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(28-16 since 1997.) (63.6%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 80 points or more.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(20-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(34-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +28 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(96-116 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.3%, +61 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(154-49 since 1997.) (75.9%, +57.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(147-46 since 1997.) (76.2%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(131-38 since 1997.) (77.5%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - excellent 3 point shooting team - making >=36% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(107-72 since 1997.) (59.8%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(75-46 since 1997.) (62%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team from last season - shooting pct defense of >=45%, vs. division opponents.
(48-23 since 1997.) (67.6%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(20-6 since 1997.) (76.9%, +14.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(107-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 79 | | 29-68 | 42.3% | 9-26 | 34.0% | 12-16 | 78.9% | 45 | 9 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 78 | | 31-71 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 10-14 | 73.9% | 44 | 9 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 491 times, while ATLANTA won 478 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.2, OPPONENT 77.5 | WASHINGTON is 22-16 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.0, OPPONENT 82.3 | ATLANTA is 181-230 against the money line (-89.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 | ATLANTA is 58-95 against the money line (-56.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 | ATLANTA is 29-63 against the money line (-34.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 113-139 against the money line (-45.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 36-53 against the money line (-31.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 80.0 | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 86.1 | ATLANTA is 32-46 against the money line (-30.6 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.6 | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in home games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 83.5 |
|
WASHINGTON is 97-150 against the money line (-76.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 75.8 | WASHINGTON is 73-141 against the money line (-84.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.8 | WASHINGTON is 167-250 against the money line (-100.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 75.9 | WASHINGTON is 41-96 against the money line (-52.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 3-19 against the money line (-18.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 89.0 | WASHINGTON is 110-200 against the money line (-99.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | WASHINGTON is 96-140 against the money line (-59.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 75.9 | WASHINGTON is 152-226 against the money line (-67.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.1 | ATLANTA is 86-62 against the money line (+30.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 79.9 | ATLANTA is 165-98 against the money line (+73.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.8, OPPONENT 84.3 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 6-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-19 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 58-99 against the money line (-40.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-17 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-19 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-12 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 6-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-48 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 168-252 against the money line (-69.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 269-369 against the money line (-111.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 19-35 against the money line (-29.3 Units) versus poor ball handling teams - committing >=17 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 32-24 against the money line (+19.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 225-270 against the money line (-76.9 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 141-159 against the money line (-58.1 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 60-97 against the money line (-50.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-17 against the money line (-14.8 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 88-80 against the money line (-40.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 80-109 against the money line (-46.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 58-86 against the money line (-41.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-17 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-17 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 69-83 against the money line (-38.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 77-68 against the money line (-42.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 352-472 against the money line (-123.6 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 73-110 against the money line (-50.1 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 177-248 against the money line (-86.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-24 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 160-232 against the money line (-85.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 60-99 against the money line (-53.4 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 28-54 against the money line (-47.6 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 63-79 against the money line (-32.4 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 17-32 against the money line (-22.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-26 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 10-20 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 21-38 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 31-41 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 155-233 against the money line (-95.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 59-79 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 33-29 against the money line (+17.5 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in May games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 74-57 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-1 | +1.7 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 84.2 | 42.8 | 46.9% | 41.2 | 74.8 | 35.6 | 41.3% | 40.2 | | Road Games | 2-0 | +2.2 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 81.0 | 42.0 | 46.7% | 44.0 | 67.0 | 28.5 | 37.8% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.7 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 84.2 | 42.8 | 46.9% | 41.2 | 74.8 | 35.6 | 41.3% | 40.2 | | Division Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 84.0 | 50.0 | 44.9% | 35.0 | 70.0 | 31.0 | 41.7% | 50.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.2 | 42.8 | 32-67 | 46.9% | 8-21 | 38.3% | 13-16 | 82.1% | 41 | 7 | 22 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 8-22 | 34.6% | 15-18 | 80.8% | 42 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.0 | 42.0 | 31-67 | 46.7% | 7-18 | 40.5% | 10-12 | 87.5% | 44 | 7 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 35.6 | 27-66 | 41.3% | 7-21 | 34.6% | 13-17 | 75.9% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 5 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.1 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 8-22 | 36.8% | 15-20 | 77.0% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.0 | 28.5 | 24-63 | 37.8% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 39 | 7 | 16 | 15 | 6 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 4-1 | +5.6 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 80.4 | 39.6 | 42.3% | 48.0 | 77.6 | 38.8 | 36.9% | 43.2 | | Home Games | 1-1 | +0.8 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 75.0 | 36.5 | 38.8% | 45.5 | 85.5 | 44.0 | 40.7% | 44.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.6 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 80.4 | 39.6 | 42.3% | 48.0 | 77.6 | 38.8 | 36.9% | 43.2 | | Division Games | 2-0 | +2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 93.0 | 43.0 | 51.7% | 46.0 | 79.0 | 35.5 | 39.2% | 39.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.4 | 39.6 | 27-63 | 42.3% | 9-23 | 38.9% | 18-22 | 81.1% | 48 | 6 | 14 | 22 | 7 | 17 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.8 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 7-21 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 80.8% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.0 | 36.5 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 10-23 | 44.7% | 12-16 | 75.8% | 45 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 4 | 16 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.6 | 38.8 | 26-72 | 36.9% | 9-25 | 34.1% | 16-21 | 75.7% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 39.9 | 29-70 | 42.1% | 8-22 | 35.9% | 16-20 | 77.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 85.5 | 44.0 | 28-70 | 40.7% | 11-27 | 40.7% | 17-21 | 83.3% | 44 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 8 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69.6, ATLANTA 68 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/6/2022 | INDIANA | 84-70 | W | -450 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 35 | 7 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 50 | 14 | | 5/8/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-66 | W | +120 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 46 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 15 | | 5/10/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 89-76 | W | +175 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 42 | 9 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 42 | 16 | | 5/13/2022 | DALLAS | 86-94 | L | -330 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 41 | 18 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | | 5/17/2022 | @ DALLAS | 84-68 | W | -165 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 42 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 34 | 14 | | 5/20/2022 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/22/2022 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/24/2022 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2022 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2022 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/7/2022 | @ DALLAS | 66-59 | W | +280 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 57 | 21 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 48 | 17 | | 5/11/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 77-75 | W | +175 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 50 | 13 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 49 | 8 | | 5/13/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 73-96 | L | +300 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 41 | 19 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 40 | 13 | | 5/15/2022 | @ INDIANA | 85-79 | W | +105 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 46 | 19 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 37 | 17 | | 5/17/2022 | @ INDIANA | 101-79 | W | -110 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 46 | 13 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 42 | 12 | | 5/20/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/24/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/29/2022 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/1/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2022 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2022 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 30-30 (-9.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 4-1 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 13-17 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 1-1 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/10/2021 | ATLANTA | 74 | 156.5 | Under | 34 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 45 | 11 | 7 | | | WASHINGTON | 82 | -5 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 50 | 11 | 10 | 6/17/2021 | ATLANTA | 93 | -1 | Over | 46 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 39 | 8 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 96 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 13-31 | 41.9% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 5 | 15 | 6/13/2021 | WASHINGTON | 78 | -4 | Over | 49 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 11-27 | 40.7% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 41 | 12 | 17 | | | ATLANTA | 101 | 167 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 13-29 | 44.8% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 42 | 10 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 17-11 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games in May games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 81.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 95-82 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 98-84 against the money line (+17.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 77-54 against the money line (+23.1 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 80.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 59-42 against the money line (+17.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 102-87 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 28-18 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 18-1 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 81.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Thibault is 23-17 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 72-84 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 32-38 against the money line (-17.5 Units) on Friday as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-12 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 31-42 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-22 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 12-17 against the money line (-13.9 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 9-24 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in road games off a road win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 81-83 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 77-76 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 55-55 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-27 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 10-21 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 8-18 against the money line (-21.7 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 38-42 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-22 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-30 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 61-83 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 22-32 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 18-32 against the money line (-15.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 41-60 against the money line (-24.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 71-88 against the money line (-38.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 26-43 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 65 times, while the home underdog won straight up 65 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 4 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 05/18/2022 - Myisha Hines-Allen left last game, is "?" Friday vs Atlanta Dream ( Leg ) | | [C] 05/06/2022 - Elizabeth Williams is out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 05/20/2022 - Monique Billings is downgraded to OUT Friday vs Wash Mystics ( Quarantine ) | | [G] 05/07/2022 - Tiffany Hayes is out indefinitely ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/1/2023 6:44:33 PM EST |
|
|
| |
|