| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
ATLANTA |
|
|
163.5
| 72
Final
61 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 661 | CONNECTICUT | -360 | | 662 | ATLANTA | +280 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(108-48 since 1997.) (69.2%, +61.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(167-132 since 1997.) (55.9%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(71-33 since 1997.) (68.3%, +47.2 units. Rating = 4*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(139-91 since 1997.) (60.4%, +45.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss against a division rival.
(63-27 since 1997.) (70%, +43.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(89-58 since 1997.) (60.5%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(91-65 since 1997.) (58.3%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(93-57 since 1997.) (62%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(71-27 since 1997.) (72.4%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite.
(44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +35.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(33-25 since 1997.) (56.9%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a home loss.
(65-25 since 1997.) (72.2%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(67-29 since 1997.) (69.8%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite.
(52-31 since 1997.) (62.7%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a losing record.
(57-32 since 1997.) (64%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(41-19 since 1997.) (68.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, on Sunday games.
(49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(55-29 since 1997.) (65.5%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(67-41 since 1997.) (62%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(45-14 since 1997.) (76.3%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, on Sunday games.
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite, on Sunday games.
(41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +21.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +15.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(61-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(27-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(114-149 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.3%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home loss against a division rival.
(92-22 since 1997.) (80.7%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(50-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home loss against a division rival, with a losing record.
(69-15 since 1997.) (82.1%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home loss against a division rival.
(64-13 since 1997.) (83.1%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(60-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(39-6 since 1997.) (86.7%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential).
(42-7 since 1997.) (85.7%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(38-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(58-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential).
(48-14 since 1997.) (77.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(33-3 since 1997.) (91.7%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +16 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +13.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite of 6 or more against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(32-11 since 1997.) (74.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(26-10 since 1997.) (72.2%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +13.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +13.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +13.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(43-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +12.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +11.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +11.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +11.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(39-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(117-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +47.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(80-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +11.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(31-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 30-69 | 43.4% | 7-18 | 38.4% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 47 | 11 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 75 | | 29-68 | 41.8% | 7-21 | 33.2% | 11-14 | 76.5% | 41 | 8 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 696 times, while ATLANTA won 283 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 23-15 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 127-86 against the money line (+31.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 71.1 | CONNECTICUT is 15-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 71.7 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 70.9 | CONNECTICUT is 96-42 against the money line (+39.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 74.0 | CONNECTICUT is 87-50 against the money line (+34.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 71-47 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 71.6 | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 69.3 | CONNECTICUT is 69-44 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | CONNECTICUT is 23-7 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 75.9 | ATLANTA is 185-237 against the money line (-91.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.6 | ATLANTA is 60-97 against the money line (-56.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.8 | ATLANTA is 32-66 against the money line (-33.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 39-68 against the money line (-42.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 82.5 | ATLANTA is 115-144 against the money line (-48.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.1 | ATLANTA is 36-54 against the money line (-32.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | ATLANTA is 8-23 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 88.2 | ATLANTA is 50-48 against the money line (-33.1 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 84.8 | ATLANTA is 31-76 against the money line (-54.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 82.6 | ATLANTA is 24-82 against the money line (-75.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 84.4 | ATLANTA is 40-74 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 78.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 80.2 | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 16-23 against the money line (-18.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.9 | CONNECTICUT is 6-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 86-66 against the money line (+26.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 79.8 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 104-52 against the money line (+23.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 56-28 against the money line (+31.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-18 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-14 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 166-110 against the money line (+32.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 66.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-13 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-15 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-26 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-25 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-27 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-26 against the money line (-17.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-24 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-27 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-18 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 55-91 against the money line (-43.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 84-133 against the money line (-61.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-26 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-23 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-31 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-51 against the money line (-31.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-26 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 23-36 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-57 against the money line (-32.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 106-78 against the money line (+21.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+10.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 58-45 against the money line (+18.5 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-8 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-10 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-12 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 87-54 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 229-278 against the money line (-80.5 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 53-79 against the money line (-50.0 Units) in June games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 57-70 against the money line (-33.1 Units) on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 142-165 against the money line (-63.3 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-22 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-12 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-20 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-17 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-20 against the money line (-16.0 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 23-36 against the money line (-18.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 65-91 against the money line (-35.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 24-48 against the money line (-28.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 41-61 against the money line (-32.1 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-28 against the money line (-25.4 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-24 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 81-112 against the money line (-48.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 48-67 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 116-150 against the money line (-56.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 53-80 against the money line (-33.3 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 53-74 against the money line (-41.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 42-81 against the money line (-50.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-20 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-20 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 48-52 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 69-86 against the money line (-41.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 78-71 against the money line (-44.3 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 99-105 against the money line (-44.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 99-137 against the money line (-60.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 106-158 against the money line (-70.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 24-26 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 128-90 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 37-32 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 48-29 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-21 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-7 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 36-24 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 79-59 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-18 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 103-68 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 55-24 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-34 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-23 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 38-8 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-6 against the money line (+21.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 19-1 against the money line (+23.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 10*) | Miller is 47-32 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-20 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 74-43 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 110-71 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-39 against the money line (+22.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 105-64 against the money line (+22.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 55-28 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 86-47 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 66-38 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 104-65 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 39-20 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 60-37 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 75-43 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 110-73 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-23 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 47-40 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 70-43 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 105-71 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-40 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 86-66 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 62-57 against the money line (-29.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 13-14 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 5-12 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 44 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [F] 06/25/2022 - Nia Coffey is "?" Sunday vs Connecticut Sun ( Knee ) | | [C] 06/25/2022 - Kia Vaughn is "?" Sunday vs Connecticut Sun ( Quarantine ) | | [G] 06/25/2022 - Erica Wheeler is "?" Sunday vs Connecticut Sun ( Foot ) | | [G] 06/25/2022 - Kristy Wallace is "?" Sunday vs Connecticut Sun ( Concussion ) | | [G] 06/15/2022 - Tiffany Hayes is out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/19/2024 6:36:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|