| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
ATLANTA |
|
|
157
| 85
Final
66 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 641 | WASHINGTON | -220 | | 642 | ATLANTA | +180 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(299-137 since 1997.) (68.6%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(299-137 since 1997.) (68.6%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(299-137 since 1997.) (68.6%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(299-137 since 1997.) (68.6%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(299-137 since 1997.) (68.6%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(299-137 since 1997.) (68.6%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less.
(83-54 since 1997.) (60.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a close road loss of 3 points or less.
(51-36 since 1997.) (58.6%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a close road loss of 3 points or less.
(30-27 since 1997.) (52.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 6 points or less.
(55-33 since 1997.) (62.5%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a close road loss of 3 points or less.
(45-28 since 1997.) (61.6%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after a loss by 6 points or less.
(25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +17 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(35-22 since 1997.) (61.4%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in July games.
(42-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.3%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(44-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(39-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.6%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(18-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(47-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +19.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in July games.
(23-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(30-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.2%, +24.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in July games.
(43-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +48.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win, in July games.
(21-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(34-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(119-159 over the last 5 seasons.) (42.8%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(48-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(114-21 since 1997.) (84.4%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(155-76 since 1997.) (67.1%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(121-55 since 1997.) (68.8%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(46-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +25 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(41-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in July games.
(26-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(31-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +15.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(63-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.3%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(71-16 since 1997.) (81.6%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(42-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(39-13 since 1997.) (75%, +30.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(27-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +21.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(44-16 since 1997.) (73.3%, +30.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(37-3 since 1997.) (92.5%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(40-9 since 1997.) (81.6%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(23-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(34-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(65-29 since 1997.) (69.1%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +11.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(53-28 since 1997.) (65.4%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(35-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(37-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(39-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +19.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(23-5 since 1997.) (82.1%, +18.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(28-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +15.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - playing with 2 days rest, in July games.
(21-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in July games.
(45-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(31-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(43-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, in July games.
(42-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(32-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(27-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +31.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(44-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +13.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(54-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(34-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +14.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +14.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +14.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(119-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +14.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(82-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 77 | | 28-68 | 41.7% | 8-24 | 34.1% | 12-16 | 76.4% | 45 | 9 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 75 | | 28-68 | 41.4% | 7-21 | 33.4% | 11-14 | 78.5% | 44 | 9 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 526 times, while ATLANTA won 434 times.
Edge against the money line=ATLANTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.7, OPPONENT 72.9 | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 77.1 | WASHINGTON is 12-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 75.9 | ATLANTA is 187-238 against the money line (-89.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.6 | ATLANTA is 60-98 against the money line (-57.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.9 | ATLANTA is 32-67 against the money line (-34.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 51-48 against the money line (-31.3 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 84.6 | ATLANTA is 40-75 against the money line (-39.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 78.4 |
|
WASHINGTON is 184-242 against the money line (-70.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 79.3 | WASHINGTON is 11-17 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 72-104 against the money line (-56.7 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 101-144 against the money line (-56.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.9 | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-7.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 80.7 | WASHINGTON is 158-231 against the money line (-73.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.2 | ATLANTA is 86-67 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 79.8 | ATLANTA is 62-38 against the money line (+27.1 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.8 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 8-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-15 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-28 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-29 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-28 against the money line (-15.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-29 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-20 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 55-93 against the money line (-45.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 84-135 against the money line (-63.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 116-139 against the money line (-49.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-28 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-28 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-22 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 12-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 87-99 against the money line (-46.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-79 against the money line (-37.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-57 against the money line (-34.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 111-184 against the money line (-66.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-24 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-199 against the money line (-73.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 206-275 against the money line (-90.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 180-261 against the money line (-90.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 278-376 against the money line (-116.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 130-171 against the money line (-58.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 231-280 against the money line (-78.9 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 143-167 against the money line (-63.5 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 82-115 against the money line (-48.2 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 63-102 against the money line (-51.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-22 against the money line (-16.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 160-201 against the money line (-59.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 81-113 against the money line (-49.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 48-53 against the money line (-33.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 79-72 against the money line (-43.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 361-481 against the money line (-131.0 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 92-135 against the money line (-53.9 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-56 against the money line (-25.6 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 78-111 against the money line (-53.1 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 209-287 against the money line (-108.8 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 130-190 against the money line (-69.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 183-253 against the money line (-93.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-8 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-7 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 62-103 against the money line (-63.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 81-121 against the money line (-70.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 103-167 against the money line (-60.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 97-155 against the money line (-55.4 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 169-232 against the money line (-65.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 119-167 against the money line (-52.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-26 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-22 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-7 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 59-69 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 178-290 against the money line (-99.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 128-192 against the money line (-61.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 161-237 against the money line (-100.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-8 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 2-4 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-5 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 36-31 against the money line (+19.8 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 34-17 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games in July games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in home games off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 88.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 22-17 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-10 | -5.8 | 14-9 | 8-15 | 79.3 | 40.5 | 43.5% | 42.3 | 75.9 | 36.2 | 43.0% | 41.2 | | Road Games | 6-6 | +1.6 | 8-4 | 4-8 | 77.7 | 39.5 | 42.9% | 42.7 | 76.4 | 37.2 | 42.9% | 42.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.1 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 80.8 | 43.0 | 43.6% | 43.0 | 80.6 | 37.4 | 43.6% | 42.4 | | Division Games | 7-6 | -7 | 8-5 | 3-10 | 76.8 | 40.8 | 43.1% | 40.2 | 74.2 | 35.7 | 43.7% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.3 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 43.5% | 8-24 | 34.1% | 12-16 | 76.1% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 15-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.7 | 39.5 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 8-24 | 32.6% | 11-15 | 76.8% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.9 | 36.2 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 12-16 | 75.4% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.4 | 37.2 | 29-67 | 42.9% | 8-21 | 36.3% | 11-16 | 72.6% | 42 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-11 | +3.6 | 12-9 | 11-10 | 78.3 | 38.4 | 41.6% | 45.0 | 79.2 | 40.2 | 40.8% | 43.0 | | Home Games | 6-5 | +3 | 6-5 | 4-7 | 76.0 | 39.3 | 41.0% | 44.2 | 75.5 | 39.1 | 39.6% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 78.8 | 36.8 | 39.6% | 43.0 | 82.0 | 44.2 | 43.4% | 43.0 | | Division Games | 4-8 | -3.3 | 5-7 | 7-5 | 78.7 | 36.3 | 41.5% | 43.1 | 82.5 | 42.3 | 43.8% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.3 | 38.4 | 29-69 | 41.6% | 8-22 | 35.1% | 13-16 | 78.6% | 45 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.0 | 39.3 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 8-22 | 37.6% | 12-15 | 79.4% | 44 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.2 | 40.2 | 27-66 | 40.8% | 8-25 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 77.5% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 8-23 | 34.5% | 14-18 | 78.3% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.5 | 39.1 | 26-65 | 39.6% | 7-24 | 29.7% | 17-22 | 77.0% | 44 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.5, ATLANTA 70.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/28/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-79 | L | +375 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 28 | 8 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 50 | 18 | | 5/31/2022 | @ INDIANA | 87-75 | W | -300 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 50 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 39 | 13 | | 6/3/2022 | NEW YORK | 70-74 | L | -850 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 50 | 14 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 38 | 12 | | 6/5/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 82-91 | L | +180 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 38 | 15 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 16 | | 6/8/2022 | CHICAGO | 84-82 | W | -165 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 41 | 13 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 38 | 13 | | 6/10/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-59 | W | -360 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 9 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 45 | 17 | | 6/12/2022 | PHOENIX | 90-99 | L | -250 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 59 | 18 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 15 | | 6/14/2022 | PHOENIX | 83-65 | W | -400 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 9 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 16 | | 6/16/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 65-77 | L | -175 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 13 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | | 6/19/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 71-63 | W | +145 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 10 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 48 | 16 | | 6/21/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-84 | L | -140 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 41 | 17 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 16 | | 6/23/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 71-85 | L | +170 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 45 | 12 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 39 | 7 | | 6/25/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 87-86 | W | +350 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 47 | 18 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 45 | 15 | | 6/28/2022 | ATLANTA | 92-74 | W | -330 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 36 | 14 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 35 | 14 | | 7/3/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-74 | L | +250 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 19 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 49 | 17 | | 7/6/2022 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2022 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/29/2022 | PHOENIX | 81-54 | W | +100 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 56 | 23 | 18-68 | 26.5% | 38 | 14 | | 6/1/2022 | MINNESOTA | 84-76 | W | -200 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 43 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 45 | 24 | | 6/3/2022 | CHICAGO | 65-73 | L | +170 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 42 | 12 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | | 6/5/2022 | INDIANA | 75-66 | W | -300 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 22 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 43 | 21 | | 6/7/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 60-72 | L | +280 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 47 | 15 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 39 | 19 | | 6/10/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 88-90 | L | +170 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 41 | 4 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 47 | 9 | | 6/15/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-105 | L | +375 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 16 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 44 | 11 | | 6/17/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 100-106 | L | +250 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 47 | 15 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 15 | | 6/21/2022 | DALLAS | 80-75 | W | +155 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 47 | 22 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 39 | 13 | | 6/24/2022 | NEW YORK | 77-89 | L | -115 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 37 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 52 | 16 | | 6/26/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 61-72 | L | +280 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 17 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 20 | | 6/28/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 74-92 | L | +250 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 35 | 14 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 36 | 14 | | 6/30/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 92-81 | W | +180 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 57 | 15 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 17 | | 7/3/2022 | SEATTLE | 90-76 | W | +180 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 47 | 16 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 36 | 14 | | 7/6/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2022 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2022 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 33-30 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 7-1 (+5.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 14-17 (+2.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 2-1 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/28/2022 | ATLANTA | 74 | 153.5 | Over | 32 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 35 | 8 | 14 | | | WASHINGTON | 92 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 15-25 | 60.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 36 | 6 | 14 | 5/24/2022 | ATLANTA | 50 | 157.5 | Under | 25 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 23 | | | WASHINGTON | 70 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 36 | 6 | 13 | 5/20/2022 | WASHINGTON | 78 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 25-31 | 80.6% | 43 | 6 | 17 | | | ATLANTA | 73 | 158 | Under | 44 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 35 | 8 | 14 | 9/10/2021 | ATLANTA | 74 | 156.5 | Under | 34 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 45 | 11 | 7 | | | WASHINGTON | 82 | -5 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 50 | 11 | 10 | 6/17/2021 | ATLANTA | 93 | -1 | Over | 46 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 39 | 8 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 96 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 13-31 | 41.9% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 5 | 15 | 6/13/2021 | WASHINGTON | 78 | -4 | Over | 49 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 11-27 | 40.7% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 41 | 12 | 17 | | | ATLANTA | 101 | 167 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 13-29 | 44.8% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 42 | 10 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 104-91 against the money line (+4.7 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-8 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games on Wednesday as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 104-90 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 60-44 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-7 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in road games off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 81.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 8-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 102-89 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 76-70 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 22-13 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 38-47 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-47 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 58-62 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 33-46 against the money line (-32.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 33-53 against the money line (-43.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 110-108 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 89-90 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 74-74 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-30 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 43-58 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 67-87 against the money line (-40.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 86-85 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 40-45 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-22 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 135-142 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 95-109 against the money line (-28.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 96-101 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 129-136 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-27 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 132-133 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 66 times, while the home underdog won straight up 35 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the home underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 07/05/2022 - Elena Delle Donne is probable Wednesday vs Atlanta Dream ( Rest ) | |
| [F] 07/03/2022 - Nia Coffey is "?" Wednesday vs Washinton Mystics ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/25/2024 7:46:36 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|