| | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT First Half Results CHICAGO |
|
| 88.5 | 38 Final 54 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
301 | CONNECTICUT | -5.5 | 302 | CHICAGO | 88 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more, with a losing record. (53-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more, with a losing record. (44-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, averaging 45 or more rebounds/game on the season. (52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (168-104 since 1997.) (61.8%, +53.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games. (74-39 since 1997.) (65.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, averaging 45 or more rebounds/game on the season. (43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games. (52-22 since 1997.) (70.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-12 since 1997.) (70.7%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games. (86-50 since 1997.) (63.2%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (29-12 since 1997.) (70.7%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-12 since 1997.) (70.7%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games. (51-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (192-125 since 1997.) (60.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (111-64 since 1997.) (63.4%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (58-24 since 1997.) (70.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (49-19 since 1997.) (72.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (42-13 since 1997.) (76.4%, +27.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (59-26 since 1997.) (69.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (112-60 since 1997.) (65.1%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (61-28 since 1997.) (68.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (57-26 since 1997.) (68.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (48-18 since 1997.) (72.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (90-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (225-165 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (180-125 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (75-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more. (243-173 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.4%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (142-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +36.4 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more. (189-130 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after one or more consecutive overs against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (76-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (64-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (130-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game. (58-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +16.2 units. Rating = 0*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (132-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game. (58-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +16.2 units. Rating = 0*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more. (217-156 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +45.4 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more. (239-171 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more. (187-129 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (60-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +16 units. Rating = 0*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (110-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (112-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (269-196 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more. (212-151 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.4%, +45.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, playing with 2 days rest. (279-190 since 1997.) (59.5%, +70 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an road win where they scored 85 or more points. (42-19 since 1997.) (68.9%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest. (115-68 since 1997.) (62.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, playing with 2 days rest. (172-107 since 1997.) (61.6%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win. (150-92 since 1997.) (62%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a road win. (194-123 since 1997.) (61.2%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (140-93 since 1997.) (60.1%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 89 | | 45 | | 35-75 | 47.2% | 8-22 | 37.5% | 10-14 | 72.6% | 47 | 16 | 14 | CHICAGO | 81 | | 41 | | 30-66 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 37.0% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 39 | 10 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 555 times, while CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 445 times. No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 557 games went under first half total, while 401 games went over first half total. Edge against first half total=Under |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 46.8, OPPONENT 38.7 | CONNECTICUT is 31-18 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.6, OPPONENT 40.6 | CONNECTICUT is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.1, OPPONENT 40.3 | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 46.2 | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) in home games when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.0, OPPONENT 48.1 | CHICAGO is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 46.1 | CHICAGO is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 44.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 19-34 against the 1rst half line (-18.4 Units) in road games when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 40.2 | CONNECTICUT is 27-54 against the 1rst half line (-32.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.0, OPPONENT 39.3 | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 45.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 100-65 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.5, OPPONENT 36.5 |
|
| | | | |
|
CHICAGO is 19-32 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-41 against the 1rst half line (-21.1 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-30 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 48.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 46-71 against the 1rst half line (-32.1 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-28 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-29 against the 1rst half line (-18.9 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-44 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-37 against the 1rst half line (-20.7 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 48.3, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 47.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 51-35 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 37-22 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-14 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-34 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 44-29 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 49-33 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 46-31 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 95-69 OVER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 127-92 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 177-138 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 83-58 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 105-75 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.8, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-5 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-14 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 131-94 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 173-132 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 95-67 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-12 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 48.2, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) off a road win over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-19 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-20 against the 1rst half line (+14.0 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-17 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.2, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-7 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-48 against the 1rst half line (-26.8 Units) in home games in August or September games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 54-80 against the 1rst half line (-34.0 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 46.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 46.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-28 against the 1rst half line (-16.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-28 against the 1rst half line (-16.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 44.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-27 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 44.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 43-64 against the 1rst half line (-27.4 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 46.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 25-43 against the 1rst half line (-22.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 60-42 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 45.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 45.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 45.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 45.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 66-44 OVER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 149-116 OVER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 46.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher this season. The average score was CHICAGO 43.9, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 46.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-15 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 46.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.7, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 41-24 OVER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-34 OVER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-29 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 83-59 OVER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-21 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 45-30 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.0, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-20 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout loss by 15 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 48.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 47.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 49.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.4, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 106-77 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 63-40 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.2, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 76-53 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-22 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-12 | -7.4 | 14-15 | 14-14 | 87.2 | 43.3 | 46.4% | 45.5 | 81.5 | 40.7 | 44.3% | 38.9 | Road Games | 8-8 | -0.5 | 7-9 | 6-9 | 84.4 | 41.4 | 43.9% | 47.1 | 81.6 | 40.5 | 44.5% | 40.2 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5.6 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 97.6 | 49.8 | 54.1% | 42.4 | 80.0 | 38.6 | 45.2% | 36.8 | Division Games | 8-6 | -11.2 | 6-8 | 7-6 | 87.4 | 44.1 | 45.7% | 47.4 | 80.0 | 40.9 | 43.3% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.2 | 43.3 | 34-73 | 46.4% | 8-21 | 36.7% | 12-16 | 73.9% | 45 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.4 | 41.4 | 33-74 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 33.7% | 12-16 | 73.0% | 47 | 13 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.5 | 40.7 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 16-19 | 80.4% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.6 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 15-20 | 79.0% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-19 | +2.4 | 11-16 | 17-12 | 82.0 | 41.3 | 44.3% | 40.5 | 89.8 | 45.2 | 46.6% | 43.6 | Home Games | 6-9 | +1.2 | 5-8 | 10-5 | 82.1 | 39.1 | 44.1% | 41.7 | 89.0 | 45.2 | 46.3% | 43.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +4.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 81.4 | 46.0 | 45.3% | 38.2 | 89.0 | 40.0 | 46.0% | 45.2 | Division Games | 4-8 | -2.9 | 4-8 | 7-5 | 79.5 | 38.1 | 43.4% | 40.4 | 89.3 | 45.7 | 45.9% | 45.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.0 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 40 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.1 | 39.1 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 36.9% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 89.8 | 45.2 | 34-72 | 46.6% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 44 | 11 | 22 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.0 | 45.2 | 33-71 | 46.3% | 7-19 | 38.1% | 15-20 | 77.3% | 43 | 10 | 23 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.8, CHICAGO 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 70-84 | 35-47 | 3 | L | 86.5 | U | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-72 | 41-25 | 5.5 | W | 80 | U | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 17 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | 41-50 | 3.5 | L | 84 | O | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | 40-41 | -2.5 | L | 83.5 | U | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | 42-38 | -5 | L | 81.5 | U | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | 43-45 | -2.5 | L | 83.5 | O | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | 44-33 | 1.5 | W | 81.5 | U | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | 42-35 | -4 | W | 85 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | 33-29 | -1.5 | W | 88 | U | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 22 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-75 | 44-38 | 2 | W | 88 | U | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | 94-68 | 45-35 | -3 | W | 84.5 | U | 39-68 | 57.4% | 41 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 35 | 9 | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 92-77 | 48-39 | -7 | W | 82.5 | O | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 15 | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 109-88 | 64-49 | -5 | W | 86 | O | 46-77 | 59.7% | 41 | 10 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 31 | 14 | 8/8/2018 | @ DALLAS | 101-92 | 48-32 | -1 | W | 86.5 | U | 40-71 | 56.3% | 40 | 9 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 41 | 13 | 8/10/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2018 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/17/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 94-97 | 45-44 | -1.5 | L | 82 | O | 31-74 | 41.9% | 48 | 15 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 13 | 7/3/2018 | @ DALLAS | 85-108 | 49-51 | 3.5 | W | 86 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 15 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 40 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 80-84 | 53-51 | 2.5 | W | 87 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 41 | 16 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 50 | 9 | 7/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 77-63 | 42-37 | 5 | W | 83.5 | U | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 14 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 7/10/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 74-98 | 36-49 | -2 | L | 87 | U | 27-71 | 38.0% | 42 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 49 | 14 | 7/13/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-88 | 33-45 | 6 | L | 86.5 | U | 29-67 | 43.3% | 43 | 17 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 84-107 | 47-53 | 2.5 | L | 81 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 28 | 17 | 41-67 | 61.2% | 44 | 14 | 7/18/2018 | SEATTLE | 83-101 | 37-54 | 5 | L | 88.5 | O | 33-69 | 47.8% | 37 | 16 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 38 | 13 | 7/20/2018 | DALLAS | 114-99 | 57-52 | 3.5 | W | 89.5 | O | 42-74 | 56.8% | 46 | 19 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 36 | 11 | 7/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 76-93 | 38-40 | 1.5 | L | 81.5 | U | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 13 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 38 | 9 | 7/25/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 101-87 | 56-43 | 3.5 | W | 85 | O | 39-70 | 55.7% | 41 | 12 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 12 | 7/31/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-91 | 55-36 | 7 | W | 92 | U | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 8 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 53 | 15 | 8/3/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 74-89 | 43-42 | 5 | W | 83.5 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 52 | 12 | 8/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 64-85 | 38-39 | 2 | W | 82.5 | U | 23-67 | 34.3% | 37 | 20 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 43 | 20 | 8/10/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 25-22 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | 26 of 47 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 5-2 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | 5 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 15-10 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | 14 of 25 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/1/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 110 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 56 | 18 | 16 | | CHICAGO | 72 | 170 | Over | 35 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 30 | 4 | 23 | 8/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 96 | 174.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 46 | 6 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -9.5 | Over | 37 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 46 | 11 | 13 | 7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 72 | 174.5 | Under | 32 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 36 | 5 | 18 | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -7 | SU ATS | 38 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 52 | 13 | 11 | 5/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 97 | 162 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 28-39 | 71.8% | 69 | 15 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 79 | -2.5 | Over | 37 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-31 | 61.3% | 48 | 8 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 48.2, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 56-41 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-19 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-19 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-19 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) off a road win as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 43-30 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-13 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-25 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 43-31 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 30-17 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 33-20 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.2, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-7 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-3 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.1, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-21 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 46-33 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-20 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 44-32 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 46.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 48.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Stocks is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 45.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 45.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 45.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 46.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 42.7, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 45.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 49.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 48.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-15 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.2, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.1, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 30-18 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-21 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 27-14 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 26-16 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 8 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times. Edge against the first half line=CONNECTICUT | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 2 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 0 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| | | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 07/05/2018 - Jamierra Faulkner is out for season ( ACL ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 10:58:04 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|