| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT CHICAGO |
|
| 178.5 | 86 Final 97 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
301 | CONNECTICUT | -500 | 302 | CHICAGO | +350 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games. (51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (81-52 since 1997.) (60.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (175-134 since 1997.) (56.6%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (103-65 since 1997.) (61.3%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (208-161 since 1997.) (56.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (57-22 since 1997.) (72.2%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (70-32 since 1997.) (68.6%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (71-39 since 1997.) (64.5%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +29.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (73-35 since 1997.) (67.6%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (68-36 since 1997.) (65.4%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better. (42-17 since 1997.) (71.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (31-15 since 1997.) (67.4%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (32-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +16 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (50-31 since 1997.) (61.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +11.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (29-15 since 1997.) (65.9%, +12 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (33-25 since 1997.) (56.9%, +11.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (113-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +16.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (146-106 since 1997.) (57.9%, +65 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (127-33 since 1997.) (79.4%, +60.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (121-32 since 1997.) (79.1%, +58.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (105-24 since 1997.) (81.4%, +56.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (115-80 since 1997.) (59%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (111-67 since 1997.) (62.4%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (92-39 since 1997.) (70.2%, +47 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (59-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +41.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (71-15 since 1997.) (82.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (85-55 since 1997.) (60.7%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (74-20 since 1997.) (78.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (55-9 since 1997.) (85.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (90-55 since 1997.) (62.1%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (83-29 since 1997.) (74.1%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (49-31 since 1997.) (61.2%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (71-49 since 1997.) (59.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (63-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +45.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (63-44 since 1997.) (58.9%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (78-50 since 1997.) (60.9%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (76-44 since 1997.) (63.3%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (55-29 since 1997.) (65.5%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (52-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (34-5 since 1997.) (87.2%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher. (39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (55-21 since 1997.) (72.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more. (43-8 since 1997.) (84.3%, +23 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (30-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +25 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more, with a losing record. (29-5 since 1997.) (85.3%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a blowout loss by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (26-12 since 1997.) (68.4%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher. (26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +13.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 35% or lower, allowing 50% or higher. (29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +19 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (24-3 since 1997.) (88.9%, +18.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more, with a losing record. (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game - shooting 35% or lower, allowing 50% or higher against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +15.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (32-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.1%, +28.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 consecutive covers as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +28.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more. (20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +12.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (64-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (54-25 since 1997.) (68.4%, +11 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a home blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more. (28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +18.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (37-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (32-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (32-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 89 | | 35-75 | 47.2% | 8-22 | 37.5% | 10-14 | 72.6% | 47 | 16 | 14 | CHICAGO | 81 | | 30-66 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 37.0% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 39 | 10 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 713 times, while CHICAGO won 268 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 79-35 against the money line (+44.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 45-33 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in road games when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 33-6 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.5, OPPONENT 80.8 | CHICAGO is 7-19 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 90.6 | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 90.2 | CHICAGO is 31-56 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 81.2 | CHICAGO is 6-22 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 92.1 | CHICAGO is 5-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in home games when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 94.5 | CHICAGO is 0-10 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 89.2 | CHICAGO is 1-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 89.8 | CHICAGO is 65-68 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 90.0 | CHICAGO is 14-37 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 88.4 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 6-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 85.6 | CONNECTICUT is 62-83 against the money line (-33.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 74.4 | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 61-73 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-15.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 80.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 87.8 | CHICAGO is 64-43 against the money line (+23.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 79.3 | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.7, OPPONENT 89.8 | CHICAGO is 9-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.5, OPPONENT 91.6 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 71-52 against the money line (+24.3 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-17 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-19 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-30 against the money line (+15.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 126-93 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 177-129 against the money line (+26.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-9 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 86-147 against the money line (-64.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-63 against the money line (-29.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 93.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 73-117 against the money line (-53.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 86-148 against the money line (-63.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 88-90 against the money line (-40.1 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 57-60 against the money line (-34.6 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 84-89 against the money line (-43.8 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-40 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 25-34 against the money line (-24.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-50 against the money line (-33.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 69-82 against the money line (-38.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-61 against the money line (-27.5 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 94.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-8.7 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-15 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-22 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-14 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-18 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-43 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season. The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 16-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-15 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-14 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-0 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-24 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 94.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-15 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 111-114 against the money line (-45.5 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 108-110 against the money line (-44.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-37 against the money line (-19.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-20 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 108-168 against the money line (-58.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 85-134 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 64-80 against the money line (-44.8 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 44-58 against the money line (-31.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 44-57 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in home games after a blowout loss by 20 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 85-127 against the money line (-44.6 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 57-69 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 20-24 against the money line (-21.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-12 | -7.4 | 14-15 | 14-14 | 87.2 | 43.3 | 46.4% | 45.5 | 81.5 | 40.7 | 44.3% | 38.9 | Road Games | 8-8 | -0.5 | 7-9 | 6-9 | 84.4 | 41.4 | 43.9% | 47.1 | 81.6 | 40.5 | 44.5% | 40.2 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5.6 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 97.6 | 49.8 | 54.1% | 42.4 | 80.0 | 38.6 | 45.2% | 36.8 | Division Games | 8-6 | -11.2 | 6-8 | 7-6 | 87.4 | 44.1 | 45.7% | 47.4 | 80.0 | 40.9 | 43.3% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.2 | 43.3 | 34-73 | 46.4% | 8-21 | 36.7% | 12-16 | 73.9% | 45 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.4 | 41.4 | 33-74 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 33.7% | 12-16 | 73.0% | 47 | 13 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.5 | 40.7 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 16-19 | 80.4% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.6 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 15-20 | 79.0% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-19 | +2.4 | 11-16 | 17-12 | 82.0 | 41.3 | 44.3% | 40.5 | 89.8 | 45.2 | 46.6% | 43.6 | Home Games | 6-9 | +1.2 | 5-8 | 10-5 | 82.1 | 39.1 | 44.1% | 41.7 | 89.0 | 45.2 | 46.3% | 43.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +4.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 81.4 | 46.0 | 45.3% | 38.2 | 89.0 | 40.0 | 46.0% | 45.2 | Division Games | 4-8 | -2.9 | 4-8 | 7-5 | 79.5 | 38.1 | 43.4% | 40.4 | 89.3 | 45.7 | 45.9% | 45.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.0 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 40 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.1 | 39.1 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 36.9% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 89.8 | 45.2 | 34-72 | 46.6% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 44 | 11 | 22 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.0 | 45.2 | 33-71 | 46.3% | 7-19 | 38.1% | 15-20 | 77.3% | 43 | 10 | 23 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.8, CHICAGO 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 70-84 | L | +180 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-72 | W | +350 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 17 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | L | +210 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | -200 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | -200 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | L | -330 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | -155 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 22 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-75 | W | +155 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | 94-68 | W | -220 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 41 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 35 | 9 | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 92-77 | W | -850 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 15 | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 109-88 | W | -400 | 46-77 | 59.7% | 41 | 10 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 31 | 14 | 8/8/2018 | @ DALLAS | 101-92 | W | -125 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 40 | 9 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 41 | 13 | 8/10/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2018 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/17/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 94-97 | L | -155 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 48 | 15 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 13 | 7/3/2018 | @ DALLAS | 85-108 | L | +210 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 15 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 40 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 80-84 | L | +170 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 41 | 16 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 50 | 9 | 7/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 77-63 | W | +300 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 14 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 7/10/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 74-98 | L | -175 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 42 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 49 | 14 | 7/13/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-88 | L | +375 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 43 | 17 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 84-107 | L | +175 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 28 | 17 | 41-67 | 61.2% | 44 | 14 | 7/18/2018 | SEATTLE | 83-101 | L | +300 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 37 | 16 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 38 | 13 | 7/20/2018 | DALLAS | 114-99 | W | +220 | 42-74 | 56.8% | 46 | 19 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 36 | 11 | 7/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 76-93 | L | +135 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 13 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 38 | 9 | 7/25/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 101-87 | W | +220 | 39-70 | 55.7% | 41 | 12 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 12 | 7/31/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-91 | W | +550 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 8 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 53 | 15 | 8/3/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 74-89 | L | +325 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 52 | 12 | 8/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 64-85 | L | +155 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 37 | 20 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 43 | 20 | 8/10/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 21-25 (-3.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 3-4 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 13-12 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-1 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/1/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 110 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 56 | 18 | 16 | | CHICAGO | 72 | 170 | Over | 35 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 30 | 4 | 23 | 8/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 96 | 174.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 46 | 6 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -9.5 | Over | 37 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 46 | 11 | 13 | 7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 72 | 174.5 | Under | 32 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 36 | 5 | 18 | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -7 | SU ATS | 38 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 52 | 13 | 11 | 5/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 97 | 162 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 28-39 | 71.8% | 69 | 15 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 79 | -2.5 | Over | 37 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-31 | 61.3% | 48 | 8 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 35-28 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-15 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-4 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 7-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 35-30 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 34-24 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-11 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 22-17 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-19 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 43-30 against the money line (+15.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-6 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 23-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Stocks is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 3-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 4-20 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 0-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 3-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in home games after a blowout loss by 20 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 1-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 93.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 3-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 94.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 20-24 against the money line (-21.7 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-19 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 1-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Stocks is 7-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 07/05/2018 - Jamierra Faulkner is out for season ( ACL ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 3:47:02 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|