Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Friday 8/10/2018Line$ LineOU LineScore
CONNECTICUT
 
CHICAGO
-10  

+10  
-550

+375

178.5
 
86
Final
97

CONNECTICUT (17 - 12) at CHICAGO (10 - 19)
No Previous GameView Next Game
Friday, 8/10/2018 9:00 PM
Board Money Line
301CONNECTICUT-500
302CHICAGO+350
BETTING TRENDS

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)

(0%)

OVER

(0%)
(Money) (0%)UNDER (0%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™
StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO against the money line
There are 24 situations with a total rating of 38 stars.
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(81-52 since 1997.) (60.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(175-134 since 1997.) (56.6%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(103-65 since 1997.) (61.3%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(208-161 since 1997.) (56.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(57-22 since 1997.) (72.2%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(70-32 since 1997.) (68.6%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(71-39 since 1997.) (64.5%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(51-23 since 1997.) (68.9%, +29.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(73-35 since 1997.) (67.6%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(68-36 since 1997.) (65.4%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better.
(42-17 since 1997.) (71.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(31-15 since 1997.) (67.4%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(32-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +16 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(50-31 since 1997.) (61.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +11.4 units. Rating = 0*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(29-15 since 1997.) (65.9%, +12 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(33-25 since 1997.) (56.9%, +11.9 units. Rating = 0*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(113-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +16.8 units. Rating = 0*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT against the money line
There are 44 situations with a total rating of 99 stars.
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(146-106 since 1997.) (57.9%, +65 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(127-33 since 1997.) (79.4%, +60.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(121-32 since 1997.) (79.1%, +58.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(105-24 since 1997.) (81.4%, +56.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(115-80 since 1997.) (59%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(111-67 since 1997.) (62.4%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(92-39 since 1997.) (70.2%, +47 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(59-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +41.4 units. Rating = 5*)
- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(71-15 since 1997.) (82.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(85-55 since 1997.) (60.7%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(74-20 since 1997.) (78.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(55-9 since 1997.) (85.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(90-55 since 1997.) (62.1%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(83-29 since 1997.) (74.1%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(49-31 since 1997.) (61.2%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(71-49 since 1997.) (59.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(63-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +45.5 units. Rating = 5*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(63-44 since 1997.) (58.9%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(78-50 since 1997.) (60.9%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(76-44 since 1997.) (63.3%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(55-29 since 1997.) (65.5%, +31 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(52-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 5*)
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(34-5 since 1997.) (87.2%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(55-21 since 1997.) (72.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(43-8 since 1997.) (84.3%, +23 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(30-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +25 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more, with a losing record.
(29-5 since 1997.) (85.3%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a blowout loss by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(26-12 since 1997.) (68.4%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +13.8 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - shooting 35% or lower, allowing 50% or higher.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +19 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(24-3 since 1997.) (88.9%, +18.2 units. Rating = 0*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more, with a losing record.
(35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game - shooting 35% or lower, allowing 50% or higher against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +15.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(32-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.1%, +28.4 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 consecutive covers as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +28.6 units. Rating = 5*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +12.5 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(64-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(54-25 since 1997.) (68.4%, +11 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a home blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more.
(28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +18.9 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(37-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(32-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(32-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
CONNECTICUT89 35-7547.2%8-2237.5%10-1472.6%471614
CHICAGO81 30-6645.0%7-2037.0%14-1879.0%391015

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 713 times, while CHICAGO won 268 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO

Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
CONNECTICUT is 79-35 against the money line (+44.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.2
CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.4
CONNECTICUT is 45-33 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in road games when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 77.1
CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.8
CONNECTICUT is 33-6 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.5, OPPONENT 80.8
CHICAGO is 7-19 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 90.6
CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 90.2
CHICAGO is 31-56 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 81.2
CHICAGO is 6-22 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 92.1
CHICAGO is 5-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in home games when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 94.5
CHICAGO is 0-10 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 89.2
CHICAGO is 1-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 89.8
CHICAGO is 65-68 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 90.0
CHICAGO is 14-37 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 88.4

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 83.4
CONNECTICUT is 6-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 85.6
CONNECTICUT is 62-83 against the money line (-33.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 74.4
CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.1
CONNECTICUT is 61-73 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1
CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-15.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 80.0
CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 87.8
CHICAGO is 64-43 against the money line (+23.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 79.3
CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.7, OPPONENT 89.8
CHICAGO is 9-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.5, OPPONENT 91.6

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 29 trends with a total rating of 23 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 71-52 against the money line (+24.3 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-17 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 30-19 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 43-30 against the money line (+15.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 126-93 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 177-129 against the money line (+26.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 23-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 39-9 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 86-147 against the money line (-64.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 27-63 against the money line (-29.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 93.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 73-117 against the money line (-53.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 86-148 against the money line (-63.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 88-90 against the money line (-40.1 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 57-60 against the money line (-34.6 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 84-89 against the money line (-43.8 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 29-40 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 25-34 against the money line (-24.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 46-50 against the money line (-33.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 69-82 against the money line (-38.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 42-61 against the money line (-27.5 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 94.1 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 11 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-8.7 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 13-15 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 23-22 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 16-14 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 23-18 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 13-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 30-43 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 6-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 42 trends with a total rating of 42 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 16-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-15 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 25-14 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 15-0 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 27-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 34-24 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 94.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 28-15 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 111-114 against the money line (-45.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 108-110 against the money line (-44.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 20-37 against the money line (-19.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 4-20 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 0-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 108-168 against the money line (-58.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 85-134 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 64-80 against the money line (-44.8 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 44-58 against the money line (-31.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 44-57 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in home games after a blowout loss by 20 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 85-127 against the money line (-44.6 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 57-69 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 11 trends with a total rating of 28 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 20-24 against the money line (-21.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 7-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS
CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games17-12-7.414-1514-1487.243.346.4%45.581.540.744.3%38.9
Road Games8-8-0.57-96-984.441.443.9%47.181.640.544.5%40.2
Last 5 Games5-0+5.65-03-297.649.854.1%42.480.038.645.2%36.8
Division Games8-6-11.26-87-687.444.145.7%47.480.040.943.3%39.4
CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)87.243.334-7346.4%8-2136.7%12-1673.9%451120207133
vs opponents surrendering82.441.530-6844.4%7-1934.2%15-1979.4%42919187134
Team Stats (Road Games)84.441.433-7443.9%8-2233.7%12-1673.0%471319217134
Stats Against (All Games)81.540.730-6744.3%7-1935.1%16-1980.4%39818187134
vs opponents averaging82.141.330-6844.2%7-1934.0%15-1980.2%42919187134
Stats Against (Road Games)81.640.530-6744.5%6-1932.9%15-2079.0%40819176133

CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games10-19+2.411-1617-1282.041.344.3%40.589.845.246.6%43.6
Home Games6-9+1.25-810-582.139.144.1%41.789.045.246.3%43.0
Last 5 Games2-3+4.72-32-381.446.045.3%38.289.040.046.0%45.2
Division Games4-8-2.94-87-579.538.143.4%40.489.345.745.9%45.1
CHICAGO Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)82.041.330-6844.3%7-2036.1%15-1879.7%40820187154
vs opponents surrendering8241.230-6844.1%7-1934.1%15-1979.5%42919197134
Team Stats (Home Games)82.139.130-6844.1%7-2036.9%15-1980.0%42821197164
Stats Against (All Games)89.845.234-7246.6%7-1935.7%16-2079.5%441122189135
vs opponents averaging82.641.630-6844.5%7-1933.9%15-1979.6%42919187134
Stats Against (Home Games)89.045.233-7146.3%7-1938.1%15-2077.3%431023189145
Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.8,  CHICAGO 72.3
SCHEDULE AND RESULTS
CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
7/1/2018@ SEATTLE70-84L+18027-7237.5%491434-7346.6%4110
7/3/2018@ LOS ANGELES73-72W+35029-5949.2%411727-6442.2%3013
7/5/2018@ PHOENIX77-84L+21028-8134.6%451226-5944.1%4617
7/7/2018@ LAS VEGAS90-94L-20037-8245.1%44937-7549.3%4511
7/11/2018NEW YORK76-79L-45029-6842.6%511132-7145.1%4113
7/13/2018PHOENIX91-87W-20038-7451.4%38730-5851.7%3514
7/15/2018@ MINNESOTA83-64W+13531-7243.1%511427-6442.2%3315
7/17/2018ATLANTA83-86L-33034-7843.6%431230-6546.2%4315
7/20/2018SEATTLE65-78L-15525-6240.3%432229-6842.6%3412
7/22/2018@ DALLAS92-75W+15537-7450.0%44830-6645.5%3812
7/24/2018WASHINGTON94-68W-22039-6857.4%411328-7338.4%359
8/1/2018NEW YORK92-77W-85036-7647.4%461029-6643.9%3915
8/5/2018LAS VEGAS109-88W-40046-7759.7%411035-6950.7%3114
8/8/2018@ DALLAS101-92W-12540-7156.3%40938-8047.5%4113
8/10/2018@ CHICAGO           
8/12/2018CHICAGO           
8/14/2018DALLAS           
8/17/2018MINNESOTA           
8/19/2018LOS ANGELES           

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
7/1/2018NEW YORK94-97L-15531-7441.9%481531-7243.1%4713
7/3/2018@ DALLAS85-108L+21031-7243.1%381545-7957.0%4013
7/5/2018@ LAS VEGAS80-84L+17030-7042.9%411633-7842.3%509
7/7/2018MINNESOTA77-63W+30030-6347.6%421427-7635.5%4415
7/10/2018LAS VEGAS74-98L-17527-7138.0%421235-7347.9%4914
7/13/2018@ WASHINGTON72-88L+37529-6743.3%431730-7341.1%4414
7/15/2018@ NEW YORK84-107L+17530-6546.2%281741-6761.2%4414
7/18/2018SEATTLE83-101L+30033-6947.8%371638-7153.5%3813
7/20/2018DALLAS114-99W+22042-7456.8%461930-7142.3%3611
7/22/2018LOS ANGELES76-93L+13531-6944.9%401338-7352.1%389
7/25/2018@ PHOENIX101-87W+22039-7055.7%411228-7040.0%4012
7/31/2018@ DALLAS92-91W+55037-7152.1%33830-7440.5%5315
8/3/2018@ ATLANTA74-89L+32525-6538.5%401735-7844.9%5212
8/7/2018MINNESOTA64-85L+15523-6734.3%372034-6453.1%4320
8/10/2018CONNECTICUT           
8/12/2018@ CONNECTICUT           
8/14/2018@ MINNESOTA           
8/18/2018@ INDIANA           
8/19/2018INDIANA           
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY
All games in this series since 1997
CHICAGO is 21-25 (-3.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
CHICAGO is 3-4 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CHICAGO since 1997
CONNECTICUT is 13-12 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997
Games played at CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons.
CONNECTICUT is 3-1 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
6/1/2018CONNECTICUT110-9.5SU ATS4842-8251.2%8-2532.0%18-2378.3%561816
 CHICAGO72170 Over3523-6038.3%5-1241.7%21-2584.0%30423
8/25/2017CHICAGO96174.5SU ATS4738-7650.0%7-1838.9%13-1586.7%46612
 CONNECTICUT83-9.5 Over3732-7841.0%4-1822.2%15-2171.4%461113
7/25/2017CHICAGO72174.5 Under3232-7145.1%6-1442.9%2-540.0%36518
 CONNECTICUT93-7SU ATS3834-7744.2%6-2128.6%19-2286.4%521311
5/28/2017CONNECTICUT97162SU ATS4933-8439.3%3-1030.0%28-3971.8%69157
 CHICAGO79-2.5 Over3727-7038.6%6-2128.6%19-3161.3%48811
COACHING TRENDS
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 38 trends with a total rating of 60 stars.
Miller is 35-28 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 17-15 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 15-4 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 6*)
Miller is 7-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 18-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 13-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 9-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 35-30 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 34-24 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 18-11 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 6*)
Miller is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 7-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 17-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 13-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 8-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 17-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 16-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 22-17 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 30-19 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 43-30 against the money line (+15.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 15-6 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 23-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 4*)
Stocks is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Stocks is 3-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Stocks is 4-20 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Stocks is 0-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Stocks is 3-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Stocks is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in home games after a blowout loss by 20 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Stocks is 1-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Stocks is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 93.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Stocks is 3-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 94.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Stocks is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 5 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.
Miller is 20-24 against the money line (-21.7 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 8-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 16-19 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 1-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 4*)
Stocks is 7-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=+375 (Road=-550), Closing Money Line: Home=+350 (Road=-500)
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge.
Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIES
CONNECTICUT
No significant injuries.
CHICAGO
[G] 07/05/2018 - Jamierra Faulkner is out for season ( ACL )

Last Updated: 3/28/2024 3:47:02 PM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.