| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA CHICAGO |
|
| 153 | 76 Final 77 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
623 | ATLANTA | +210 | 624 | CHICAGO | -270 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (284-98 since 1997.) (74.3%, +80.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (279-94 since 1997.) (74.8%, +80.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (266-113 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (266-113 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (266-113 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (266-113 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (266-113 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (266-113 since 1997.) (70.2%, +79.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (236-77 since 1997.) (75.4%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (236-77 since 1997.) (75.4%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (236-77 since 1997.) (75.4%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (240-81 since 1997.) (74.8%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (240-81 since 1997.) (74.8%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (240-81 since 1997.) (74.8%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (23-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.5%, +19.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse. (21-5 since 1997.) (80.8%, +17.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (29-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.3%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (126-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +30.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (74-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, vs. division opponents. (64-55 since 1997.) (53.8%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor three point shooting team (<=30%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (41-23 since 1997.) (64.1%, +34.5 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 67 | | 25-70 | 35.5% | 6-21 | 27.3% | 12-16 | 74.2% | 44 | 12 | 13 | CHICAGO | 81 | | 31-72 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 11-14 | 83.2% | 51 | 13 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 837 times, while ATLANTA won 145 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 14-3 against the money line (+13.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 77.7 | CHICAGO is 129-184 against the money line (-64.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 3-18 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 89.2 | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 88.6 | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 83.8 | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 86.7 |
|
ATLANTA is 164-184 against the money line (-69.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.1 | ATLANTA is 22-58 against the money line (-57.5 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 72.8, OPPONENT 79.9 | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.8, OPPONENT 82.9 | ATLANTA is 30-47 against the money line (-31.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 86.9 | ATLANTA is 3-16 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 86.7 | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 69.1, OPPONENT 80.1 | CHICAGO is 39-29 against the money line (+22.8 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 75.7 | CHICAGO is 5-0 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 69.3 | CHICAGO is 13-7 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 85.1 | CHICAGO is 45-36 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 78.5 | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 80.4 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 17-12 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-13 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-7 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 23-18 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-7 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 24-18 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 15-7 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-17 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-11 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 20-7 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 27-20 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-7 against the money line (+17.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 17-7 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 23-20 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-7 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 24-20 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 86.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-1 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 19-7 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 26-19 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 17-7 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 85.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 22-14 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 20-7 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 27-19 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-7 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 24-17 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 90.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 14-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 54-60 against the money line (-34.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-18 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 82-124 against the money line (-51.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 96-156 against the money line (-59.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 93-94 against the money line (-39.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 62-64 against the money line (-34.4 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 89-93 against the money line (-43.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 39-47 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 34-51 against the money line (-24.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 49-75 against the money line (-32.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 77-96 against the money line (-46.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 46-73 against the money line (-39.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 71-105 against the money line (-52.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-12 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-9 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 94.3, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-8 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 30-25 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-18 against the money line (+12.9 Units) as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-5 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-3 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 17-9 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-9 against the money line (+20.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 12-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 85.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-3 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 86.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 6*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 87.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 19-13 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-15 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in home games after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 43-65 against the money line (-30.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-44 against the money line (-30.4 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 56-64 against the money line (-37.8 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 66-84 against the money line (-42.6 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 56-68 against the money line (-30.6 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 69-83 against the money line (-43.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 48-60 against the money line (-28.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-78 against the money line (-41.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 43-52 against the money line (-26.4 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-52 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-69 against the money line (-42.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-42 against the money line (-27.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-16 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 56-64 against the money line (-34.8 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 43-55 against the money line (-30.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-29 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 93.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 125-130 against the money line (-49.9 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 35-46 against the money line (-22.8 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-25 against the money line (-24.0 Units) in road games after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 66.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 90-107 against the money line (-44.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 91-117 against the money line (-52.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-11 against the money line (+15.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-15 against the money line (+15.2 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-2 against the money line (+12.2 Units) off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-2 against the money line (+12.2 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-11 | -6.1 | 7-9 | 6-10 | 69.9 | 33.1 | 36.9% | 45.4 | 76.6 | 38.6 | 40.6% | 47.0 | Road Games | 1-5 | -2.4 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 70.0 | 30.5 | 38.8% | 41.5 | 78.2 | 35.0 | 42.4% | 45.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.2 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 69.8 | 33.4 | 35.9% | 50.6 | 67.0 | 31.6 | 35.7% | 47.2 | Division Games | 2-5 | -3 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 72.4 | 36.1 | 38.3% | 45.1 | 80.4 | 43.0 | 42.4% | 47.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 33.1 | 25-69 | 36.9% | 6-21 | 28.4% | 13-17 | 74.6% | 45 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.1 | 38.5 | 29-68 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 32.7% | 12-15 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.0 | 30.5 | 26-68 | 38.8% | 6-20 | 30.9% | 11-15 | 70.3% | 41 | 10 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 38.6 | 29-72 | 40.6% | 6-21 | 31.0% | 12-16 | 75.1% | 47 | 12 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.2 | 39.3 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-20 | 33.1% | 13-16 | 79.2% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.2 | 35.0 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 13-17 | 73.8% | 45 | 11 | 18 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-8 | +1.5 | 10-6 | 8-9 | 80.1 | 42.5 | 44.3% | 42.6 | 80.0 | 42.5 | 41.3% | 43.7 | Home Games | 6-3 | +3 | 6-3 | 2-7 | 80.9 | 43.9 | 45.1% | 43.2 | 75.4 | 39.6 | 39.8% | 43.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 84.0 | 44.6 | 46.0% | 41.0 | 78.2 | 42.2 | 40.4% | 41.6 | Division Games | 4-3 | +1.2 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 83.0 | 42.9 | 45.7% | 42.3 | 80.7 | 40.0 | 41.8% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.1 | 42.5 | 31-69 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 36.4% | 11-14 | 82.9% | 43 | 7 | 21 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.6 | 38.6 | 29-68 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 13-16 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.9 | 43.9 | 32-70 | 45.1% | 8-21 | 35.2% | 10-12 | 84.4% | 43 | 6 | 22 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.0 | 42.5 | 30-73 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 31.1% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.1 | 39.1 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 32.8% | 13-16 | 80.5% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.4 | 39.6 | 28-71 | 39.8% | 5-18 | 26.6% | 14-17 | 81.2% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 14 | 9 | 13 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 72.6, CHICAGO 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/9/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 59-65 | L | +210 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 53 | 18 | 21-74 | 28.4% | 58 | 11 | 6/15/2019 | @ DALLAS | 61-71 | L | -165 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 48 | 20 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 49 | 12 | 6/19/2019 | INDIANA | 88-78 | W | -105 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 49 | 6 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 45 | 8 | 6/21/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-86 | L | +650 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 45 | 10 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 43 | 12 | 6/23/2019 | WASHINGTON | 73-89 | L | +350 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 45 | 12 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 43 | 8 | 6/30/2019 | NEW YORK | 58-74 | L | -200 | 19-70 | 27.1% | 43 | 15 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 54 | 14 | 7/2/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 68-85 | L | +250 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 26 | 15 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 38 | 13 | 7/5/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 77-66 | W | +325 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 43 | 15 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 45 | 19 | 7/7/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 63-65 | L | +180 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 51 | 12 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 54 | 10 | 7/10/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 78-75 | W | +200 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 45 | 20 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 43 | 14 | 7/12/2019 | MINNESOTA | 60-53 | W | +100 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 51 | 12 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 42 | 12 | 7/14/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 71-76 | L | +135 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 63 | 11 | 30-87 | 34.5% | 52 | 5 | 7/17/2019 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/9/2019 | SEATTLE | 78-71 | W | +105 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 56 | 20 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 34 | 11 | 6/11/2019 | PHOENIX | 82-75 | W | +155 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 44 | 14 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 13 | 6/15/2019 | @ INDIANA | 70-64 | W | +145 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 53 | 10 | 26-78 | 33.3% | 50 | 10 | 6/19/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 91-83 | W | +105 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 47 | 10 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 41 | 9 | 6/21/2019 | INDIANA | 69-76 | L | -210 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 34 | 10 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 6/23/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 93-75 | W | +175 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 42 | 14 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 45 | 15 | 6/26/2019 | WASHINGTON | 74-81 | L | +210 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 40 | 17 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 46 | 10 | 6/28/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 76-79 | L | +135 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 46 | 15 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 44 | 8 | 6/30/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-94 | L | +180 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 42 | 14 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 45 | 14 | 7/2/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 82-90 | L | +325 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 34 | 17 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 29 | 14 | 7/7/2019 | DALLAS | 78-66 | W | -210 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 40 | 16 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 45 | 14 | 7/10/2019 | MINNESOTA | 72-73 | L | -120 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 48 | 12 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 52 | 8 | 7/12/2019 | NEW YORK | 99-83 | W | -165 | 38-70 | 54.3% | 43 | 12 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 15 | 7/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 89-79 | W | -105 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 42 | 7 | 7/17/2019 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2019 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 29-19 (+15.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 4-3 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 15-8 (+4.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 2-2 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/3/2018 | CHICAGO | 74 | 169 | Under | 43 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 89 | -9 | SU ATS | 42 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 52 | 13 | 12 | 6/27/2018 | ATLANTA | 80 | 158 | Over | 38 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | | CHICAGO | 93 | -2 | SU ATS | 30 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 46 | 13 | 14 | 5/23/2018 | ATLANTA | 81 | -2 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 53 | 12 | 16 | | CHICAGO | 63 | 163.5 | Under | 27 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 34 | 8 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Collen is 30-25 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 18-18 against the money line (+12.9 Units) as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 12-5 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in July games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 10-3 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 17-9 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 19-9 against the money line (+20.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 12-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 11-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 10-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 85.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 15-3 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 86.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 6*) | Collen is 9-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 87.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 19-13 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 19-15 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 17-11 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 9-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 17-12 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 13-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 18-13 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 6-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 17-7 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 23-18 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 18-7 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 24-18 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 15-7 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 21-17 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 13-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 17-11 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 20-7 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Collen is 27-20 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 19-7 against the money line (+17.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 17-7 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 23-20 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 18-7 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 24-20 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 14-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 86.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 8-1 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 19-7 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 26-19 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 17-7 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 85.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 22-14 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 20-7 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Collen is 27-19 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 17-7 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 24-17 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 10-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 90.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Collen is 14-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 198 times, while the road underdog won straight up 69 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 05/10/2019 - Angel McCoughtry is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[G] 06/11/2019 - Jamierra Faulkner is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [FW] 06/11/2019 - Katie Lou Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Hand ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/18/2024 2:16:33 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|