| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON CHICAGO |
|
| 175 | 86 Final 88 |
|
|
| | |
|
IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL | | | | |
603 | WASHINGTON | -210 | 604 | CHICAGO | +175 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog, on Saturday games. (58-41 since 1997.) (58.6%, +35.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more. (27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor foul drawing team from last season - attempted <=18 free throws/game, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (62-15 since 1997.) (80.5%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (62-36 since 1997.) (63.3%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (30-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (40-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (39-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (20-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +14.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (25-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +21.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (31-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (25-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (32-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (26-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.7%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 92 | | 34-74 | 46.0% | 11-25 | 42.1% | 13-15 | 85.9% | 40 | 9 | 12 | CHICAGO | 93 | | 36-72 | 50.4% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 13-17 | 77.0% | 44 | 9 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 516 times, while WASHINGTON won 457 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.0, OPPONENT 81.3 | WASHINGTON is 17-1 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 94.5, OPPONENT 80.6 | WASHINGTON is 35-17 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.0, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.9, OPPONENT 78.8 | WASHINGTON is 28-6 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 92.1, OPPONENT 79.3 | WASHINGTON is 25-2 against the money line (+22.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 94.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | CHICAGO is 141-192 against the money line (-63.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 81.9 | CHICAGO is 28-64 against the money line (-45.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 41-65 against the money line (-27.9 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 89.9 | CHICAGO is 80-195 against the money line (-134.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 87.7 | CHICAGO is 49-139 against the money line (-112.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 91.2 | CHICAGO is 83-122 against the money line (-60.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 81.1 | CHICAGO is 92-145 against the money line (-59.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 80.3 |
|
WASHINGTON is 22-152 against the money line (-165.7 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 85.6 | WASHINGTON is 47-97 against the money line (-55.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 75.9 | WASHINGTON is 69-134 against the money line (-87.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 158-237 against the money line (-95.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 75.6 | WASHINGTON is 76-253 against the money line (-197.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 85.9 | WASHINGTON is 16-22 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 86.2, OPPONENT 90.5 | WASHINGTON is 50-118 against the money line (-78.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 76.2 | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 94.0, OPPONENT 84.4 | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 79.9 | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 80.9 | CHICAGO is 78-63 against the money line (+33.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 77.8 | CHICAGO is 21-10 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.0, OPPONENT 84.4 | CHICAGO is 17-7 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 91.7, OPPONENT 86.5 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 17-21 against the money line (+16.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 30-11 against the money line (+16.1 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 91.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 86.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 93.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 14-21 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 331-439 against the money line (-114.1 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 109-156 against the money line (-51.0 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 45-77 against the money line (-32.3 Units) on Saturday games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 192-260 against the money line (-97.4 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-114 against the money line (-47.6 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 83-134 against the money line (-54.2 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-51 against the money line (-35.7 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 18-30 against the money line (-22.0 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-16 against the money line (-16.5 Units) off a win by 15 points or more as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 53-82 against the money line (-39.3 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-37 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-56 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 162-270 against the money line (-99.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-48 against the money line (-28.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-31 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-29 against the money line (+16.1 Units) as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) on Saturday games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-10 against the money line (+12.3 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.9, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.6, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-12 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-17 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-8 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.1, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 91.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +4.1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 94.7 | 53.3 | 49.1% | 41.7 | 78.7 | 39.7 | 41.4% | 40.7 | Road Games | 3-0 | +4.1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 94.7 | 53.3 | 49.1% | 41.7 | 78.7 | 39.7 | 41.4% | 40.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-0 | +4.1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 94.7 | 53.3 | 49.1% | 41.7 | 78.7 | 39.7 | 41.4% | 40.7 | Division Games | 3-0 | +4.1 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 94.7 | 53.3 | 49.1% | 41.7 | 78.7 | 39.7 | 41.4% | 40.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 94.7 | 53.3 | 35-71 | 49.1% | 10-25 | 41.9% | 14-17 | 86.0% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 1 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.9 | 42.6 | 30-69 | 43.1% | 7-22 | 31.5% | 17-21 | 82.4% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.7 | 53.3 | 35-71 | 49.1% | 10-25 | 41.9% | 14-17 | 86.0% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.7 | 39.7 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 7-23 | 29.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41.6 | 29-70 | 42.1% | 7-21 | 31.1% | 17-21 | 78.1% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.7 | 39.7 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 7-23 | 29.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +0.7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 88.3 | 40.0 | 48.3% | 41.0 | 82.3 | 40.7 | 45.5% | 41.7 | Road Games | 2-1 | +0.7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 88.3 | 40.0 | 48.3% | 41.0 | 82.3 | 40.7 | 45.5% | 41.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | +0.7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 88.3 | 40.0 | 48.3% | 41.0 | 82.3 | 40.7 | 45.5% | 41.7 | Division Games | 2-1 | +0.7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 88.3 | 40.0 | 48.3% | 41.0 | 82.3 | 40.7 | 45.5% | 41.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 88.3 | 40.0 | 34-70 | 48.3% | 9-25 | 34.2% | 12-15 | 77.8% | 41 | 7 | 23 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.1 | 40.6 | 31-68 | 45.5% | 8-23 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 71.2% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 88.3 | 40.0 | 34-70 | 48.3% | 9-25 | 34.2% | 12-15 | 77.8% | 41 | 7 | 23 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.3 | 40.7 | 32-70 | 45.5% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 14-19 | 75.0% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 85 | 40.4 | 32-69 | 45.9% | 5-15 | 36.0% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 2 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.3 | 40.7 | 32-70 | 45.5% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 14-19 | 75.0% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 67.7, CHICAGO 77 |
| | |
|
|
7/25/2020 | *INDIANA | 101-76 | W | +100 | 38-68 | 55.9% | 45 | 13 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 33 | 13 | 7/28/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 94-89 | W | -175 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 16 | 7/30/2020 | *SEATTLE | 89-71 | W | +210 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 39 | 8 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 46 | 18 | 8/1/2020 | *CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2020 | *MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/26/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 88-86 | W | -155 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 38 | 16 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 51 | 17 | 7/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 96-78 | W | +170 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 42 | 15 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 36 | 16 | 7/30/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 81-83 | L | -200 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 14 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 38 | 15 | 8/1/2020 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2020 | *DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 28-26 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 6-1 (+3.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
9/8/2019 | CHICAGO | 86 | 178.5 | Over | 39 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 36 | 4 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 100 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 11-29 | 37.9% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 46 | 14 | 11 | 8/23/2019 | WASHINGTON | 78 | -6.5 | Under | 49 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 8-29 | 27.6% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 45 | 8 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 85 | 175.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 47 | 8 | 16 | 6/26/2019 | WASHINGTON | 81 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 46 | 7 | 10 | | CHICAGO | 74 | 164.5 | Under | 45 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 6/5/2019 | CHICAGO | 85 | 169.5 | Over | 42 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 37 | 12 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 103 | -12 | SU ATS | 57 | 43-86 | 50.0% | 13-34 | 38.2% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 47 | 16 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 136-125 against the money line (+0.2 Units) in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 8-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games on Saturday games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 87.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 84-64 against the money line (+17.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 22-20 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 85-69 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 82-63 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 63-46 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 19-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 60-43 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 28-23 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 31-33 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-6 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 63-68 against the money line (+7.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 8-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 8-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) off a win by 15 points or more as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-34 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-25 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 13-23 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 6-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 18-26 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 7-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 21-28 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 13-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 12-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 10-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 91.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
[F] 07/30/2020 - Tianna Hawkins is OUT Saturday vs Chicago Sky ( Back ) | [G] 07/18/2020 - Natasha Cloud is out for season ( Personal ) | [F] 07/18/2020 - LaToya Sanders is out for season ( Undisclosed ) | [C] 07/18/2020 - Tina Charles is out for season ( Medical ) | [F] 07/17/2020 - Elena Delle Donne is out indefinitely ( Back ) | |
[C] 07/31/2020 - Stefanie Dolson is downgraded to OUT Saturday vs Wash Mystics ( Ankle ) | [F/C] 07/31/2020 - Jantel Lavender is OUT Saturday vs Wash Mystics ( Foot ) | [G] 07/31/2020 - Sydney Colson is OUT Saturday vs Wash Mystics ( Illness ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 5:42:30 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|