| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
CHICAGO |
|
|
166.5
| 91
Final
94 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | CONNECTICUT | +155 | | 606 | CHICAGO | -175 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games.
(227-100 since 1997.) (69.4%, +65 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(208-163 since 1997.) (56.1%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(177-65 since 1997.) (73.1%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(133-43 since 1997.) (75.6%, +59.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(136-55 since 1997.) (71.2%, +56.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(119-38 since 1997.) (75.8%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win by 10 points or more, on Sunday games.
(25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(55-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.4%, +37.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(41-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +20.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(77-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +26.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +10 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +13.2 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(325-122 since 1997.) (72.7%, +82.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(120-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +63.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(64-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(49-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(42-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after leading in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(26-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(100-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(50-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +38.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(61-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(52-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +18.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(29-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +26.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(48-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +37 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, playing with 2 days rest.
(24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +12 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(95-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.8%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in August or September games.
(48-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(33-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +32.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(23-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(57-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 32-71 | 45.0% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 11-14 | 77.7% | 42 | 10 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 86 | | 33-68 | 49.0% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 13-15 | 82.9% | 40 | 7 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 598 times, while CONNECTICUT won 379 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 28-17 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 103-45 against the money line (+53.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 90-53 against the money line (+32.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 76.4 | CONNECTICUT is 70-44 against the money line (+23.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 30-10 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 76.7 | CHICAGO is 102-102 against the money line (-46.3 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 82.6 | CHICAGO is 37-73 against the money line (-52.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 83.2 | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 61-101 against the money line (-50.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.4 | CHICAGO is 47-52 against the money line (-39.0 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 78.7 | CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 87.2 | CHICAGO is 117-158 against the money line (-55.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 80.1 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 91.1 | CONNECTICUT is 33-50 against the money line (-24.1 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 86.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 77.3 | CONNECTICUT is 8-9 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 85.9 | CONNECTICUT is 6-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 88.8 | CONNECTICUT is 21-27 against the money line (-19.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 83.9 | CONNECTICUT is 8-19 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 80.4 | CHICAGO is 13-1 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.1, OPPONENT 82.5 | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+12.1 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.2, OPPONENT 80.6 | CHICAGO is 9-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.2, OPPONENT 81.4 | CHICAGO is 90-78 against the money line (+25.3 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 81.4 | CHICAGO is 21-7 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 16-3 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.0, OPPONENT 84.2 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 37-22 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-20 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-20 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-37 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-25 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-16 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 176-113 against the money line (+37.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-18 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-25 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-8 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-25 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-15 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-25 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-14 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 44-24 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 111-80 against the money line (+34.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 156-119 against the money line (+26.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 67-62 against the money line (-36.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 against the money line (+16.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 14-6 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-5 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 35-17 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-20 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-21 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-15 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 36-37 against the money line (+22.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 37-37 against the money line (+30.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-6 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 21-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-4 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 6*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 58-33 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-13 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 162-138 against the money line (+24.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 126-102 against the money line (+25.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 72-52 against the money line (+32.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 119-102 against the money line (+24.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in road games after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-14 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-13 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-22 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-10 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-20 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in home games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-23 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 78-74 against the money line (-43.2 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-46 against the money line (-23.7 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 167-212 against the money line (-61.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 135-172 against the money line (-54.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 94-99 against the money line (-53.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 70-74 against the money line (-38.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 68-72 against the money line (-42.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 66-65 against the money line (-35.7 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 66-66 against the money line (-36.7 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-15 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 150-180 against the money line (-55.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 48-54 against the money line (-40.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-27 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 175 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 62-71 against the money line (-32.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-38 against the money line (-32.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 43-70 against the money line (-29.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 68-69 against the money line (-34.7 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-37 against the money line (-32.1 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-6 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 28-26 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-8 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 53-39 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 138-94 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-30 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 64-38 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 41-34 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-4 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 55-34 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 45-26 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 34-20 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-8 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 17-4 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-15 against the money line (+13.9 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 29-23 against the money line (+9.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 34-12 against the money line (+15.4 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 51-24 against the money line (+13.8 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 34-19 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 54-29 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 120-75 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 111-68 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-66 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 112-70 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 90-54 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 59-26 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-12 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 67-36 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-18 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 73-52 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 87-51 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 55-36 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 75-56 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-20 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 74-36 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 106-60 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 67-41 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 88-59 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 84-47 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 120-75 against the money line (+17.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 80-43 against the money line (+25.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 114-68 against the money line (+25.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-28 against the money line (+25.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 73-46 against the money line (+21.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 65-31 against the money line (+19.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 96-50 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-42 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 114-69 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 45-24 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 66-41 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 85-47 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 120-77 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-25 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 52-42 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 21-21 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 80-47 against the money line (+19.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 115-75 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-44 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 96-70 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 59-38 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 83-59 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 7-9 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 17-23 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 24-27 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 8-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 67-59 against the money line (-27.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-24 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-18 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-15 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 52-26 against the money line (+23.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 17-9 against the money line (+8.5 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 39-16 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 33-17 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 14-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 62-36 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 57-30 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 51-28 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 45-24 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 36-26 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 20-15 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 19-14 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-22 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 62-37 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 30-17 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 38-24 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 31-17 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 45-26 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 17-8 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 20-11 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 14-6 against the money line (+14.7 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 18-11 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 27-17 against the money line (+21.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 10-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 15-9 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 64-42 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 173 times, while the road underdog won straight up 107 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/27/2022 - Bria Hartley is out for season ( ACL ) | | [G] 07/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( ACL ) | |
| [F] 08/05/2022 - Li Yueru is upgraded to probable Friday vs Wash Mystics ( Illness ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 12/7/2023 12:00:27 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|