| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
NEW YORK
CHICAGO |
|
|
167.5
| 98
Final
91 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - First Round - Best of 3 | | |  | |
| 601 | NEW YORK | +375 | | 602 | CHICAGO | -550 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in August or September games.
(56-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team, in August or September games.
(43-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (86%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team, in August or September games.
(50-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games, in August or September games.
(40-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +24.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +14.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +14.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in August or September games.
(70-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +26.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(72-40 since 1997.) (64.3%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(27-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games against opponent after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(55-31 since 1997.) (64%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(52-34 since 1997.) (60.5%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(36-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +21.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(31-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +36.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(36-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +17 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(39-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(60-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +22.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(49-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +23 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(103-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| NEW YORK | 81 | | 30-69 | 43.9% | 11-29 | 38.0% | 9-11 | 82.7% | 40 | 7 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 88 | | 33-70 | 46.9% | 7-22 | 33.3% | 15-18 | 82.6% | 44 | 9 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 662 times, while NEW YORK won 321 times.
Edge against the money line=NEW YORK |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 140-128 against the money line (+34.9 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | NEW YORK is 12-11 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.4, OPPONENT 81.7 | NEW YORK is 5-4 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.6, OPPONENT 84.3 | NEW YORK is 77-100 against the money line (+27.1 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 83.6 | NEW YORK is 88-45 against the money line (+56.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.9, OPPONENT 76.5 | NEW YORK is 13-7 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.3, OPPONENT 82.5 | CHICAGO is 103-103 against the money line (-47.4 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-16.8 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 84.2 | CHICAGO is 13-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 88.1 |
|
NEW YORK is 1-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 87.6 | NEW YORK is 14-45 against the money line (-27.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.0, OPPONENT 88.6 | NEW YORK is 7-27 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 91.4 | NEW YORK is 5-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 84-58 against the money line (+19.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 81.3 | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 83.9 | CHICAGO is 18-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 81.4 | CHICAGO is 9-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 82.3 | CHICAGO is 14-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.2, OPPONENT 80.4 | CHICAGO is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 99-71 against the money line (+39.4 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 11-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 79.8 | CHICAGO is 45-19 against the money line (+18.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 17-4 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.5, OPPONENT 85.7 | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 79.6 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 13-9 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 15-16 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-16 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-15 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-16 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-15 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-16 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-16 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-16 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 11-10 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-15 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 125-115 against the money line (-63.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 76-71 against the money line (-46.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 41-50 against the money line (-33.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-38 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-30 against the money line (-27.7 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 66-95 against the money line (-44.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-28 against the money line (-22.4 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-43 against the money line (-29.9 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 68-63 against the money line (-37.7 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 37-19 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 43-21 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-22 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 43-22 against the money line (+12.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 44-23 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+5.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 3-0 against the money line (+14.5 Units) as a road underdog of +350 to +550 this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 7*) | NEW YORK is 5-1 against the money line (+11.2 Units) on Wednesday this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 48-53 against the money line (+28.3 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-8 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 136-129 against the money line (+22.1 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 45-46 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 79-62 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 11-8 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 9-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 20-21 against the money line (-27.7 Units) in home games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-24 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 60-54 against the money line (-32.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 7-24 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-23 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-28 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 34-48 against the money line (-39.2 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 70.0, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-23 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-16 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 28-41 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-22 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 71-104 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 50-81 against the money line (-43.1 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 74-89 against the money line (-42.2 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-11 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 16-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 15-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 30-17 against the money line (+23.8 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 15-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 24-10 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-16 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 55-41 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 24-10 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 16-20 | +6 | 18-17 | 18-18 | 79.6 | 38.6 | 43.1% | 41.4 | 82.0 | 42.3 | 41.8% | 43.2 | | Road Games | 7-11 | +7.4 | 9-8 | 9-9 | 77.5 | 38.4 | 42.5% | 40.7 | 81.9 | 42.0 | 42.1% | 43.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 43.0 | 44.0% | 39.8 | 77.6 | 43.4 | 38.8% | 44.8 | | Division Games | 10-8 | +8.7 | 10-7 | 8-10 | 78.7 | 40.1 | 43.3% | 40.7 | 80.8 | 40.8 | 40.8% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.6 | 38.6 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 10-28 | 35.1% | 12-15 | 82.3% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 8-22 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.5 | 38.4 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 10-28 | 34.8% | 11-13 | 85.3% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 18 | 5 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.0 | 42.3 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 17-21 | 82.2% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 8-22 | 34.5% | 15-18 | 79.1% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.9 | 42.0 | 29-69 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-21 | 80.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 26-11 | +8.4 | 17-18 | 20-16 | 86.2 | 43.2 | 47.9% | 41.5 | 81.6 | 40.5 | 43.9% | 40.3 | | Home Games | 14-5 | +2.6 | 7-11 | 13-6 | 88.4 | 43.9 | 48.7% | 41.2 | 83.7 | 41.0 | 44.9% | 39.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 89.4 | 46.4 | 50.6% | 36.2 | 88.2 | 43.6 | 49.0% | 37.6 | | Division Games | 15-3 | +9.2 | 10-6 | 13-5 | 88.6 | 44.8 | 49.3% | 40.9 | 81.7 | 39.5 | 43.0% | 41.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.2 | 43.2 | 33-68 | 47.9% | 7-21 | 33.9% | 14-17 | 82.3% | 41 | 7 | 24 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-23 | 34.5% | 15-18 | 79.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.4 | 43.9 | 33-67 | 48.7% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 15-19 | 80.7% | 41 | 8 | 24 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.6 | 40.5 | 31-71 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 12-16 | 78.6% | 40 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 8-23 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.7 | 41.0 | 32-71 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 13-16 | 79.6% | 40 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: NEW YORK 70.5, CHICAGO 71.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/12/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 101-107 | L | +210 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 34 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 44 | 14 | | 7/14/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 74-108 | L | +200 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 33 | 12 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 49 | 10 | | 7/19/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 63-82 | L | +175 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 18 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 12 | | 7/21/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 69-78 | L | +280 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 35 | 15 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 42 | 11 | | 7/23/2022 | CHICAGO | 83-80 | W | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 49 | 19 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 45 | 8 | | 7/29/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 81-89 | L | +280 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 18 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 13 | | 7/31/2022 | PHOENIX | 89-69 | W | +100 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 47 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 32 | 12 | | 8/2/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 102-73 | W | -220 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 46 | 19 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 30 | 11 | | 8/3/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 64-61 | W | -300 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 51 | 10 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 16 | | 8/6/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 62-76 | L | -125 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 12 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 55 | 13 | | 8/8/2022 | @ DALLAS | 77-86 | L | +170 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 14 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 10 | | 8/10/2022 | @ DALLAS | 91-73 | W | +120 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 38 | 12 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 40 | 9 | | 8/12/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 80-70 | W | -120 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 11 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 44 | 12 | | 8/14/2022 | ATLANTA | 87-83 | W | -200 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 44 | 16 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 10 | | 8/17/2022 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2022 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/12/2022 | ATLANTA | 90-75 | W | -450 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 41 | 13 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 39 | 17 | | 7/14/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 80-68 | W | -250 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 45 | 18 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 36 | 14 | | 7/16/2022 | @ DALLAS | 89-81 | W | -200 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 46 | 8 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 38 | 7 | | 7/20/2022 | SEATTLE | 78-74 | W | -125 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 44 | 12 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 34 | 14 | | 7/22/2022 | DALLAS | 89-83 | W | -330 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 38 | 10 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 34 | 15 | | 7/23/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 80-83 | L | -175 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 45 | 8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 49 | 19 | | 7/26/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 83-93 | L | -155 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 45 | 12 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 47 | 15 | | 7/29/2022 | NEW YORK | 89-81 | W | -360 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 13 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 18 | | 7/31/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-92 | W | +155 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 37 | 19 | 39-91 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | | 8/2/2022 | DALLAS | 78-84 | L | -400 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 42 | 15 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 39 | 9 | | 8/5/2022 | WASHINGTON | 93-83 | W | -250 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 40 | 7 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 39 | 11 | | 8/7/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 94-91 | W | -175 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 29 | 15 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 43 | 13 | | 8/9/2022 | SEATTLE | 100-111 | L | -210 | 39-70 | 55.7% | 37 | 13 | 44-75 | 58.7% | 31 | 8 | | 8/11/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 78-89 | L | +100 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 44 | 17 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 33 | 9 | | 8/14/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 82-67 | W | -330 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 12 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 42 | 18 | | 8/17/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 32-28 (-1.6 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 5-2 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 13-17 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 2-1 (-0.2 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/29/2022 | NEW YORK | 81 | 166 | | 46 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 39 | 7 | 18 | | | CHICAGO | 89 | -8 | SU Over | 44 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 42 | 8 | 13 | 7/23/2022 | CHICAGO | 80 | -4 | Under | 39 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 3-24 | 12.5% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 45 | 12 | 8 | | | NEW YORK | 83 | 164 | SU ATS | 37 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 49 | 11 | 19 | 6/12/2022 | CHICAGO | 88 | -7 | SU Over | 44 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 45 | 12 | 12 | | | NEW YORK | 86 | 159 | ATS | 45 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 11-23 | 47.8% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 33 | 2 | 14 | 5/11/2022 | NEW YORK | 50 | 165 | Under | 17 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 36 | 6 | 14 | | | CHICAGO | 83 | -5 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 44 | 7 | 7 | 6/24/2021 | CHICAGO | 91 | -7 | SU ATS | 55 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 41 | 5 | 14 | | | NEW YORK | 68 | 171 | Under | 27 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 4-25 | 16.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 6/22/2021 | CHICAGO | 92 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 36-80 | 45.0% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 49 | 7 | 9 | | | NEW YORK | 72 | 171 | Under | 32 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 6-28 | 21.4% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 37 | 3 | 16 | 5/23/2021 | NEW YORK | 93 | 165 | SU ATS | 52 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 14-28 | 50.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 48 | 12 | 22 | | | CHICAGO | 85 | -5.5 | Over | 52 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 42 | 10 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Brondello is 52-29 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 3-0 against the money line (+14.5 Units) as a road underdog of +350 to +550 as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 6*) | Brondello is 5-1 against the money line (+11.2 Units) on Wednesday as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 49-26 against the money line (+20.9 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 69-32 against the money line (+28.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 35-18 against the money line (+16.3 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 54-34 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 7-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 38-20 against the money line (+18.5 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 64-39 against the money line (+21.9 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 80.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 70-54 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 80-59 against the money line (+24.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 68-52 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 61-47 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 119-73 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 93-54 against the money line (+33.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 74-39 against the money line (+31.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 55-29 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 79-48 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 53-29 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 36-23 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 34-22 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 61-45 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 94-71 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 80.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 46-21 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 11-8 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 74-50 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 63-38 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 9-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 13-9 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 15-15 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 97-67 against the money line (+25.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 120-94 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 86-55 against the money line (+29.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 116-74 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 67-61 against the money line (+22.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 80.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 123-95 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 105-67 against the money line (+35.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 15-15 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 89-70 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 8-10 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Brondello is 83-94 against the money line (-40.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 45-56 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) in home games on Wednesday as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 24-8 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 54-26 against the money line (+25.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 8-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 37-18 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 20-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 64-38 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 59-32 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 53-30 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 47-26 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 39-25 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 66-44 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 08/16/2022 - Li Yueru is out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/26/2024 5:49:31 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|