| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA CONNECTICUT |
|
| 171.5 | 86 Final 83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
303 | ATLANTA | +280 | 304 | CONNECTICUT | -360 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents. (164-136 since 1997.) (54.7%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (147-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (86-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +28.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog. (33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (116-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (73-34 since 1997.) (68.2%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (172-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +36.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (58-15 since 1997.) (79.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a road favorite against opponent off an upset win over a division rival as a home underdog. (29-4 since 1997.) (87.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (49-29 since 1997.) (62.8%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (40-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (40-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (40-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (56-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (33-21 since 1997.) (61.1%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (196-117 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +29 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (29-14 since 1997.) (67.4%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season. (61-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +40.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (44-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +37.1 units. Rating = 5*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (220-156 since 1997.) (58.5%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (171-112 since 1997.) (60.4%, +63.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (200-155 since 1997.) (56.3%, +43.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (46-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +20.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (59-40 since 1997.) (59.6%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (52-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (26-10 since 1997.) (72.2%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games. (39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (35-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 75 | | 27-67 | 40.4% | 5-17 | 31.1% | 16-21 | 75.6% | 42 | 12 | 14 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 32-74 | 43.8% | 7-22 | 34.4% | 13-18 | 74.4% | 50 | 16 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 760 times, while ATLANTA won 218 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 13-8 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 79.5 | ATLANTA is 14-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.3 | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.0 | CONNECTICUT is 5-7 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 88.1 | CONNECTICUT is 61-73 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 |
|
ATLANTA is 149-169 against the money line (-70.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 46-72 against the money line (-49.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.2 | ATLANTA is 61-67 against the money line (-36.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.7 | ATLANTA is 92-108 against the money line (-44.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 8-26 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 87.3 | ATLANTA is 15-34 against the money line (-18.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.4, OPPONENT 90.4 | ATLANTA is 1-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 88.3 | ATLANTA is 121-141 against the money line (-48.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 84.5, OPPONENT 85.2 | ATLANTA is 34-57 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 77.2 | CONNECTICUT is 97-74 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 79-49 against the money line (+21.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 74.6 | CONNECTICUT is 40-20 against the money line (+24.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 28-5 against the money line (+17.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.1, OPPONENT 80.8 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 7-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-16 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-33 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 14-47 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 143-168 against the money line (-63.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.4, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-22 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 16-35 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 28-49 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-29 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 73-60 against the money line (+21.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 12-9 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in July games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 88.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-9 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 55-38 against the money line (+18.4 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-4 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 83.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 7-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 85.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 8-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 85.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 9-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 85.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 7-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-23 against the money line (-20.4 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-4 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-17 against the money line (-11.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-25 against the money line (-25.0 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 34-53 against the money line (-35.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 48-71 against the money line (-39.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 80-95 against the money line (-42.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 50-60 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in road games off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-14 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 64-31 against the money line (+20.8 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-11 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 70-41 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 6*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 12-9 | +8.4 | 12-9 | 10-11 | 78.4 | 38.1 | 41.0% | 45.2 | 79.4 | 37.7 | 41.8% | 45.6 | Road Games | 5-6 | +1.4 | 6-5 | 8-3 | 78.2 | 39.1 | 42.7% | 43.3 | 82.5 | 37.5 | 43.1% | 44.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.6 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 89.2 | 44.4 | 46.0% | 45.6 | 81.0 | 40.2 | 41.7% | 41.6 | Division Games | 8-3 | +8.1 | 7-4 | 6-5 | 81.5 | 40.8 | 43.4% | 46.6 | 78.9 | 35.5 | 40.5% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.4 | 38.1 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 5-18 | 29.9% | 16-22 | 75.4% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.6% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 16-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.2 | 39.1 | 29-69 | 42.7% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 14-19 | 76.5% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.4 | 37.7 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-20 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 46 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.5 | 37.5 | 30-70 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-10 | -8 | 9-13 | 11-10 | 86.1 | 42.3 | 45.0% | 46.4 | 81.8 | 41.9 | 44.0% | 39.5 | Home Games | 6-2 | -5 | 4-4 | 6-2 | 92.1 | 45.0 | 49.6% | 43.9 | 82.6 | 43.0 | 43.7% | 37.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -5.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 83.4 | 42.0 | 43.2% | 45.8 | 81.6 | 41.4 | 46.5% | 40.0 | Division Games | 6-5 | -9.9 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 86.7 | 43.8 | 44.7% | 48.5 | 80.8 | 42.2 | 43.5% | 39.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.1 | 42.3 | 33-73 | 45.0% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 13-18 | 73.9% | 46 | 12 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.1 | 45.0 | 35-70 | 49.6% | 7-18 | 41.3% | 15-20 | 74.8% | 44 | 9 | 21 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.8 | 41.9 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 17-21 | 80.5% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 80.6% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.6 | 43.0 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 7-18 | 39.2% | 18-22 | 81.2% | 38 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.2, CONNECTICUT 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
6/8/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 87-83 | W | -200 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 46 | 11 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 49 | 12 | 6/10/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 67-64 | W | +250 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 43 | 14 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 57 | 17 | 6/12/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 64-72 | L | +300 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 39 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 6/14/2018 | INDIANA | 72-67 | W | -400 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 48 | 8 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 50 | 13 | 6/16/2018 | @ INDIANA | 64-96 | L | -165 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 40 | 18 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 49 | 11 | 6/19/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 72-79 | L | +200 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 55 | 17 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 48 | 12 | 6/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 75-70 | W | +180 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 6/27/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 80-93 | L | +105 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 43 | 16 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 14 | 6/29/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-85 | L | +550 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 37 | 14 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 38 | 18 | 7/1/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-83 | W | -155 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 40 | 14 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 35 | 14 | 7/6/2018 | SEATTLE | 86-95 | L | +170 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 41 | 11 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 49 | 13 | 7/8/2018 | PHOENIX | 76-70 | W | +170 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 53 | 15 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 16 | 7/11/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 106-89 | W | +250 | 41-68 | 60.3% | 36 | 10 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 7/13/2018 | INDIANA | 98-74 | W | -550 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 50 | 16 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 30 | 12 | 7/15/2018 | WASHINGTON | 80-77 | W | +135 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 48 | 8 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 48 | 7 | 7/17/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/7/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 88-86 | W | -220 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 52 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 48 | 11 | 6/9/2018 | MINNESOTA | 89-75 | W | -250 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 91-95 | L | -450 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 92-103 | L | +105 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 72-89 | L | +180 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-75 | L | -220 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-78 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 31 | 12 | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-92 | L | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | 101-89 | W | -650 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 37 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 31 | 15 | 7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 70-84 | L | +180 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-72 | W | +350 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 17 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | L | +210 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | -200 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | -200 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 26-17 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 7-2 (+7.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 13-8 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 3-1 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -5.5 | Under | 37 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 47 | 12 | 21 | | ATLANTA | 75 | 164 | SU ATS | 29 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 27-41 | 65.9% | 55 | 11 | 16 | 6/5/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | -6.5 | Under | 40 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 7-32 | 21.9% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 54 | 13 | 16 | | ATLANTA | 82 | 165 | SU ATS | 46 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 45 | 3 | 13 | 8/15/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -5 | SU ATS | 49 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 43 | 9 | 11 | | ATLANTA | 75 | 166.5 | Over | 32 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 56 | 13 | 12 | 6/10/2017 | ATLANTA | 71 | 159 | Over | 32 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 39 | 7 | 20 | | CONNECTICUT | 104 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 27-32 | 84.4% | 45 | 12 | 8 | 5/13/2017 | ATLANTA | 81 | 159 | SU ATS | 51 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 25-27 | 92.6% | 42 | 3 | 8 | | CONNECTICUT | 74 | -5 | Under | 42 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 55 | 10 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Collen is 8-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 9-4 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 8-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 83.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 7-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 6-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 85.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 9-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 8-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 8-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 7-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 85.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 9-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 9-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 8-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 7-1 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 85.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Collen is 7-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 9-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 5-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-23 against the money line (-20.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 7-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-17 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-16 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 10-17 against the money line (-11.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-7 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 5-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 13-9 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-8 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-3 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 8-1 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 6*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 137 times, while the road underdog won straight up 62 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 5:05:29 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|