| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON CONNECTICUT |
|
| 170.5 | 68 Final 94 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
613 | WASHINGTON | +175 | 614 | CONNECTICUT | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (365-146 since 1997.) (71.4%, +87.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (207-70 since 1997.) (74.7%, +67.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (54-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (177-57 since 1997.) (75.6%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (206-100 since 1997.) (67.3%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (23-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +9.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (55-22 since 1997.) (71.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (31-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +17 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +17.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (44-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +12.2 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (141-100 since 1997.) (58.5%, +62.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (112-78 since 1997.) (58.9%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after playing 2 consecutive road games, playing with 2 days rest. (35-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (44-30 since 1997.) (59.5%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (53-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (36-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 85 | | 30-69 | 44.4% | 9-23 | 36.9% | 15-18 | 85.4% | 40 | 11 | 13 | CONNECTICUT | 87 | | 33-71 | 46.5% | 7-21 | 35.8% | 13-17 | 73.9% | 45 | 13 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 540 times, while WASHINGTON won 436 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 14-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 78.8 | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 87.5, OPPONENT 82.6 | WASHINGTON is 13-5 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.6, OPPONENT 82.6 | WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 90.9, OPPONENT 82.6 | CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 85.0 | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 61-73 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 5-11 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 87.5 | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 90.3 | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 84.3 |
|
WASHINGTON is 13-22 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 83.2 | WASHINGTON is 39-105 against the money line (-74.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 78.5 | WASHINGTON is 3-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 83.1 | WASHINGTON is 79-121 against the money line (-50.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 75.4 | WASHINGTON is 12-22 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 85.6 | WASHINGTON is 13-26 against the money line (-17.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 88.6 | WASHINGTON is 6-22 against the money line (-20.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 92.0 | WASHINGTON is 43-112 against the money line (-75.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | WASHINGTON is 134-207 against the money line (-63.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.5 | CONNECTICUT is 78-35 against the money line (+43.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 97-75 against the money line (+19.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 41-21 against the money line (+22.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | CONNECTICUT is 29-6 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.8, OPPONENT 80.7 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 87.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-11 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-12 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-12 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 64-131 against the money line (-48.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-35 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 84-158 against the money line (-71.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-22 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-29 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-21 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-26 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 222-325 against the money line (-105.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-34 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-30 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-22 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-83 against the money line (-45.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 48-126 against the money line (-55.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-29 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-27 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-30 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+15.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 124-93 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 175-129 against the money line (+24.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 74-62 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 10-3 against the money line (+6.4 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 86.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-17 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 89.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-15 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-12 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-7 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.7, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-12 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-7 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-6 against the money line (-13.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-5 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-18 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-26 against the money line (-28.3 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 292-421 against the money line (-121.5 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 59-94 against the money line (-36.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 173-251 against the money line (-100.5 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 141-219 against the money line (-81.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 104-153 against the money line (-51.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 108-155 against the money line (-54.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 38-46 against the money line (-26.1 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 84-100 against the money line (-40.8 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 38-65 against the money line (-37.0 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in road games off a road win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 135-216 against the money line (-70.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 55-72 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after a win by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-37 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-27 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-12 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-17 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 20-31 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-28 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-17 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 128-162 against the money line (-56.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-67 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-49 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-19 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 14-10 | +3.3 | 12-11 | 12-12 | 84.8 | 42.6 | 44.3% | 39.2 | 82.2 | 41.1 | 45.4% | 41.4 | Road Games | 6-5 | +3.5 | 7-3 | 6-5 | 87.4 | 45.4 | 45.8% | 40.2 | 84.7 | 40.8 | 45.0% | 39.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 86.0 | 42.6 | 42.5% | 42.6 | 85.2 | 42.4 | 45.7% | 41.4 | Division Games | 10-3 | +6.4 | 8-5 | 7-6 | 86.3 | 46.3 | 44.4% | 39.8 | 79.6 | 40.1 | 44.0% | 41.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.8 | 42.6 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 8-23 | 35.6% | 16-19 | 85.4% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.5 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.4 | 45.4 | 30-66 | 45.8% | 8-21 | 37.2% | 19-22 | 84.0% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.2 | 41.1 | 30-66 | 45.4% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 16-19 | 80.8% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.7 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 18-21 | 83.8% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-12 | -11.4 | 10-15 | 11-13 | 85.4 | 42.0 | 45.0% | 46.0 | 81.6 | 41.0 | 44.1% | 39.3 | Home Games | 6-4 | -9.9 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 88.5 | 43.5 | 48.1% | 43.7 | 82.5 | 40.8 | 43.9% | 38.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 82.8 | 41.2 | 45.8% | 43.8 | 78.0 | 36.0 | 45.5% | 36.6 | Division Games | 6-6 | -13.2 | 4-8 | 6-5 | 86.4 | 43.7 | 44.6% | 48.1 | 81.2 | 41.6 | 43.7% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 42.0 | 33-73 | 45.0% | 7-21 | 35.3% | 12-17 | 73.9% | 46 | 12 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.6 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.5 | 43.5 | 34-70 | 48.1% | 7-18 | 39.4% | 14-18 | 75.7% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.6 | 41.0 | 29-66 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 35.4% | 17-21 | 80.7% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 80.5% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.5 | 40.8 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 7-18 | 39.6% | 17-21 | 82.4% | 38 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.5, CONNECTICUT 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86-97 | L | +155 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 31 | 12 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 31 | 16 | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-60 | W | -500 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | 6/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-77 | W | -220 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 92-80 | W | -165 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 6/28/2018 | NEW YORK | 80-77 | W | -450 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 10 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 15 | 6/30/2018 | PHOENIX | 74-84 | L | -165 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 12 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 7 | 7/5/2018 | NEW YORK | 86-67 | W | -400 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 10 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 43 | 15 | 7/7/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 83-74 | W | +200 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 13 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 7/8/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 91-97 | L | +200 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 37 | 8 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | 7/11/2018 | ATLANTA | 89-106 | L | -330 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 41-68 | 60.3% | 36 | 10 | 7/13/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-72 | W | -550 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 14 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 43 | 17 | 7/15/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 77-80 | L | -155 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 48 | 7 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 48 | 8 | 7/19/2018 | @ DALLAS | 81-90 | L | +170 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 44 | 9 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 54 | 13 | 7/21/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 95-78 | W | -250 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 39 | 13 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 26 | 14 | 7/24/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2018 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2018 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 92-103 | L | +105 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 72-89 | L | +180 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-75 | L | -220 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-78 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 31 | 12 | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-92 | L | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | 101-89 | W | -650 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 37 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 31 | 15 | 7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 70-84 | L | +180 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-72 | W | +350 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 17 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | L | +210 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | -200 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | -200 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | L | -330 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | -155 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 22 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-75 | W | +155 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 46-33 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 5-4 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 28-12 (+6.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 3-1 (+5.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 171.5 | Over | 46 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 46 | 15 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 92 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 37 | 8 | 7 | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 95 | 173 | SU ATS | 65 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 38 | 8 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -9 | Over | 37 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 42 | 12 | 11 | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 59 | 14 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | 172 | Under | 35 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 8/29/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 55 | 13 | 7 | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -2 | Under | 38 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 53 | 9 | 11 | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 92 | 168 | Over | 58 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 8 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 40 | 11 | 7 | 5/31/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 162.5 | ATS | 32 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 49 | 13 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -7.5 | SU Under | 34 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 48 | 12 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 19-19 against the money line (+13.6 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 68-64 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 64-56 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 56-53 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 30-24 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 55-53 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 42-38 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 42-35 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-11 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 10-5 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 17-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-24 against the money line (-23.7 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 19-26 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-14 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 10-18 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 17-28 against the money line (-14.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 5-11 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-19 against the money line (-16.8 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 6-12 against the money line (-10.3 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Thibault is 15-19 against the money line (-13.0 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 19-26 against the money line (-14.1 Units) off a road win as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-42 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 7-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 2-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 38-45 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-21 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 10-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-60 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 24-31 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 46-61 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 45-55 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 24-39 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 6-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 42-61 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 26-34 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 14-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-19 against the money line (+8.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 39-30 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+15.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 13-5 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-6 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 219 times, while the road underdog won straight up 83 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/21/2018 - Natasha Cloud is "?" Tuesday vs Conneticut Sun ( Concussion ) | [C] 05/19/2018 - Emma Meesseman is out for season ( Personal ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/28/2024 3:48:45 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|