| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
First Half Results
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
79
| 41
Final
52 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | LOS ANGELES | 79 | | 602 | CONNECTICUT | -2.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, averaging 45 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(55-22 since 1997.) (71.4%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, averaging 45 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(46-16 since 1997.) (74.2%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, with a winning record on the season.
(152-93 since 1997.) (62%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread against opponent after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(95-48 since 1997.) (66.4%, +42.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread against opponent hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(51-22 since 1997.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(51-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(65-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(81-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home win.
(78-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(57-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(158-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite.
(89-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(66-36 since 1997.) (64.7%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(176-118 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite.
(110-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(156-97 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%).
(51-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(154-93 since 1997.) (62.3%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(116-65 since 1997.) (64.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(86-41 since 1997.) (67.7%, +40.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(68-34 since 1997.) (66.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(132-79 since 1997.) (62.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(101-57 since 1997.) (63.9%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(81-45 since 1997.) (64.3%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(226-148 since 1997.) (60.4%, +63.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(190-116 since 1997.) (62.1%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 79 | | 40 | | 31-68 | 45.7% | 7-18 | 35.9% | 10-13 | 80.6% | 38 | 8 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 42 | | 33-69 | 47.1% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 11-15 | 76.1% | 45 | 12 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 502 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 498 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 601 games went over first half total, while 360 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.8, OPPONENT 35.7 | LOS ANGELES is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.5, OPPONENT 37.5 | CONNECTICUT is 47-69 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 38.3 | CONNECTICUT is 27-55 against the 1rst half line (-33.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.0, OPPONENT 39.4 | CONNECTICUT is 85-156 against the 1rst half line (-86.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.9, OPPONENT 42.2 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 68-101 against the 1rst half line (-43.1 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.9, OPPONENT 41.2 | LOS ANGELES is 34-54 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) in road games when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 37.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 46.8, OPPONENT 38.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 46.0, OPPONENT 37.4 | CONNECTICUT is 32-21 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.4, OPPONENT 40.8 | CONNECTICUT is 29-17 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.0, OPPONENT 40.7 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 121-64 OVER (+50.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.1, OPPONENT 41.7 | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.9, OPPONENT 43.1 | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.9, OPPONENT 42.4 | CONNECTICUT is 30-14 OVER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 43.9 | CONNECTICUT is 180-107 OVER (+62.3 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 40.4 | CONNECTICUT is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.4, OPPONENT 41.2 | CONNECTICUT is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.8, OPPONENT 41.1 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 118-85 UNDER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 37.2 | LOS ANGELES is 120-82 UNDER (+29.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.7 | LOS ANGELES is 140-106 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 35.4 | LOS ANGELES is 233-174 UNDER (+41.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 35.2 | LOS ANGELES is 88-59 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 36.0 | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 38.1 | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.5, OPPONENT 34.7 | LOS ANGELES is 69-47 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 36.6 |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | | | | CONNECTICUT | -3.5 | |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 9-17 against the 1rst half line (-9.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-31 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-46 against the 1rst half line (-25.6 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 97-69 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 70-47 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-44 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-7 UNDER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 168-123 UNDER (+32.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 234-190 UNDER (+25.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-6 UNDER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 UNDER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 120-87 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 161-120 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 53-32 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-27 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 53-34 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 85-57 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 59-39 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.1, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 172-117 UNDER (+43.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-27 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 108-79 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 58-37 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 128-94 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 178-140 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 106-77 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 132-96 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 174-134 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 127-96 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 84-59 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-58 against the 1rst half line (-26.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-75 against the 1rst half line (-31.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.7, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-56 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-46 against the 1rst half line (-24.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 46.8, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.8, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.8, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off an home win scoring 85 or more points this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 47.5, OPPONENT 47.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a home win this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 47.9, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-29 OVER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.7, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.7, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 433-359 UNDER (+38.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 91-63 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 228-169 UNDER (+42.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 199-143 UNDER (+41.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 82-55 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-20 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 191-152 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-49 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-22 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 43-23 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-12 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 134-98 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a close loss by 3 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 212-162 UNDER (+33.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 172-130 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 19-14 | -17.5 | 14-18 | 13-19 | 78.7 | 40.2 | 45.5% | 36.5 | 76.6 | 38.2 | 44.9% | 41.7 | | Road Games | 8-8 | -2 | 7-8 | 10-6 | 81.2 | 39.5 | 44.8% | 35.4 | 81.8 | 39.6 | 47.4% | 42.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 37.2 | 40.2% | 39.8 | 76.2 | 40.4 | 46.0% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.7 | 40.2 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 6-17 | 34.9% | 12-15 | 80.8% | 37 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.1 | 41.8 | 31-69 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.2 | 39.5 | 31-69 | 44.8% | 7-18 | 39.1% | 12-15 | 83.7% | 35 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 10 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 38.2 | 29-64 | 44.9% | 5-17 | 30.5% | 14-17 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.8 | 41.6 | 30-69 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.8 | 39.6 | 30-64 | 47.4% | 6-17 | 35.7% | 15-18 | 81.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 16 | 6 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 20-13 | -9.9 | 16-17 | 16-16 | 87.6 | 43.1 | 46.5% | 45.5 | 81.5 | 41.1 | 44.5% | 38.7 | | Home Games | 12-4 | -3.9 | 9-7 | 9-7 | 90.9 | 45.0 | 49.4% | 44.0 | 80.5 | 40.8 | 43.8% | 37.1 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 92.2 | 42.8 | 48.9% | 44.2 | 83.8 | 41.6 | 46.3% | 37.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.6 | 43.1 | 34-73 | 46.5% | 7-21 | 36.2% | 13-17 | 74.4% | 45 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.9 | 41.7 | 31-69 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.9 | 45.0 | 35-71 | 49.4% | 7-19 | 39.4% | 14-18 | 75.3% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.5 | 41.1 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 80.7% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.5 | 40.8 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 36.0% | 15-18 | 82.7% | 37 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.6, CONNECTICUT 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/10/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 77-75 | 36-34 | 1.5 | W | 79 | U | 30-75 | 40.0% | 39 | 12 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 21 | | 7/12/2018 | DALLAS | 77-92 | 50-48 | -3 | L | 81 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 11 | | 7/15/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 99-78 | 48-47 | -2.5 | L | 79.5 | O | 37-76 | 48.7% | 39 | 7 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 50 | 13 | | 7/20/2018 | INDIANA | 76-78 | 40-37 | -7.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 32-70 | 45.7% | 42 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 43 | 8 | | 7/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-76 | 40-38 | -1.5 | W | 81.5 | U | 38-73 | 52.1% | 38 | 9 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 13 | | 7/24/2018 | ATLANTA | 71-81 | 41-37 | -1.5 | W | 78.5 | U | 26-63 | 41.3% | 32 | 12 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 47 | 11 | | 8/2/2018 | MINNESOTA | 79-57 | 40-29 | -1.5 | W | 76.5 | U | 32-65 | 49.2% | 37 | 9 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 40 | 14 | | 8/5/2018 | PHOENIX | 78-75 | 40-30 | -3.5 | W | 79.5 | U | 30-63 | 47.6% | 45 | 7 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 33 | 4 | | 8/8/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 82-81 | 41-41 | -5 | L | 76 | O | 29-67 | 43.3% | 37 | 10 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 13 | | 8/9/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 73-79 | 33-36 | -1 | L | 76.5 | U | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 12 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 41 | 19 | | 8/12/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 78-86 | 34-41 | -1.5 | L | 80 | U | 29-69 | 42.0% | 34 | 9 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 41 | 15 | | 8/14/2018 | NEW YORK | 74-66 | 38-44 | -7.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 29-79 | 36.7% | 46 | 5 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 48 | 18 | | 8/17/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-69 | 40-40 | 2 | W | 78.5 | O | 25-67 | 37.3% | 45 | 10 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 42 | 8 | | 8/19/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | 42-38 | -5 | L | 81.5 | U | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | 43-45 | -2.5 | L | 83.5 | O | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | 44-33 | 1.5 | W | 81.5 | U | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | 42-35 | -4 | W | 85 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | 33-29 | -1.5 | W | 88 | U | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 22 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-75 | 44-38 | 2 | W | 88 | U | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | 94-68 | 45-35 | -3 | W | 84.5 | U | 39-68 | 57.4% | 41 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 35 | 9 | | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 92-77 | 48-39 | -7 | W | 82.5 | O | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 15 | | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 109-88 | 64-49 | -5 | W | 86 | O | 46-77 | 59.7% | 41 | 10 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 31 | 14 | | 8/8/2018 | @ DALLAS | 101-92 | 48-32 | -1 | W | 86.5 | U | 40-71 | 56.3% | 40 | 9 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 41 | 13 | | 8/10/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 86-97 | 38-54 | -6 | L | 88.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 39 | 11 | | 8/12/2018 | CHICAGO | 82-75 | 35-38 | -7 | L | 88.5 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 55 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 16 | | 8/14/2018 | DALLAS | 96-76 | 50-38 | -3.5 | W | 88 | P | 36-69 | 52.2% | 46 | 9 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 38 | 13 | | 8/17/2018 | MINNESOTA | 96-79 | 43-46 | -3 | L | 79.5 | O | 35-63 | 55.6% | 38 | 10 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 31 | 13 | | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 24-16 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 25 of 39 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-3 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 11-8 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 14 of 19 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 162 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 41 | 6 | 17 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9.5 | Under | 25 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 162.5 | Over | 47 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 18 | 5 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 9 | 20 | 9/3/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 161.5 | Under | 27 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 39 | 7 | 17 | | | LOS ANGELES | 81 | -8 | SU ATS | 38 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 6-6 | 100.0% | 37 | 5 | 13 | 7/13/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 167.5 | Under | 45 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 45 | 9 | 18 | | | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -7 | SU ATS | 46 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 44 | 9 | 15 | 6/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 39 | 8 | 9 | | | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 168.5 | Under | 39 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 16 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 40-18 against the 1rst half line (+20.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 61-47 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 27-44 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-27 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 57-44 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-22 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.2, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 30-19 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 46.8, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.8, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.8, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 48.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 47.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.6, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 46.2, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.1, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 87-67 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 25-11 UNDER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.7, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 51-18 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 47-31 UNDER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 47-30 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 68-44 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 119-77 UNDER (+34.3 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 122-72 UNDER (+42.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 60-35 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 54-41 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 145-92 UNDER (+43.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 71-47 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 119-77 UNDER (+34.3 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.5, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 25-5 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.3, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 164-116 UNDER (+36.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-21 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 96-50 UNDER (+41.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 54-31 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as a home favorite of 7 or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.3, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-16 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 55-26 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 134-82 UNDER (+43.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 99-60 UNDER (+33.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 63-34 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 90-47 UNDER (+38.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a close loss by 3 points or less as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 20-4 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 127-72 UNDER (+47.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 102-55 UNDER (+41.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 155-87 UNDER (+59.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 44-32 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 68-46 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 46-27 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 85-59 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 49-34 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 96-66 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 47-32 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 39-20 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 22-7 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 54-42 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 76-57 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 37-23 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 54-33 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 52-34 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 70-46 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 88-55 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 58-42 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 91-64 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.7, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 131-95 UNDER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 69-43 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 51-39 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 72-51 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 56-43 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 59-35 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.2, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 29-17 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 71-54 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 55-34 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 62-45 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 122-87 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-20 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 139 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 130 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 15 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 14 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 20 games went over the first half total, while 10 games went under the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 10 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 08/18/2018 - Chiney Ogwumike is "?" Sunday vs LA Sparks ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/7/2024 6:15:23 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|