| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
153.5
| 64
Final
79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | PHOENIX | +175 | | 606 | CONNECTICUT | -210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(215-74 since 1997.) (74.4%, +70 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win.
(150-146 since 1997.) (50.7%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(101-72 since 1997.) (58.4%, +48.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival.
(151-107 since 1997.) (58.5%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(55-13 since 1997.) (80.9%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%).
(53-14 since 1997.) (79.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win.
(94-63 since 1997.) (59.9%, +27.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - cold team - failing to cover the spread in 8 or more of their last 10, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(43-23 since 1997.) (65.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(32-18 since 1997.) (64%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(37-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite of 6 or more, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread against opponent cold team - failing to cover the spread in 8 or more of their last 10.
(23-3 since 1997.) (88.5%, +19.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a road underdog of 6 more.
(19-7 since 1997.) (73.1%, +19 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win by 15 points or more as a road underdog.
(19-8 since 1997.) (70.4%, +11.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(38-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG).
(49-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +16.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(46-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.4%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(188-156 since 1997.) (54.7%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(75-68 since 1997.) (52.4%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(84-74 since 1997.) (53.2%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss as a road favorite, in May, June, or July games.
(21-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +31 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(50-36 since 1997.) (58.1%, +41 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite.
(58-43 since 1997.) (57.4%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(125-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.1%, +33.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in July games.
(50-35 since 1997.) (58.8%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(44-17 since 1997.) (72.1%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(46-24 since 1997.) (65.7%, +20.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after beating the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game, with a winning record on the season.
(27-11 since 1997.) (71.1%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - in non-conference games, off a road win by 10 points or more.
(33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in May, June, or July games.
(21-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +32.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(52-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +39.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss as a road favorite, in May, June, or July games.
(42-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.8%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in May, June, or July games.
(41-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 20 points or more.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +9.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(56-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(54-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| PHOENIX | 76 | | 29-68 | 43.1% | 7-22 | 31.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 43 | 8 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | | 29-71 | 40.9% | 8-20 | 36.8% | 12-17 | 71.2% | 47 | 12 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 519 times, while PHOENIX won 453 times.
Edge against the money line=PHOENIX |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 137-101 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 77.5 | PHOENIX is 16-7 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 80.5 | PHOENIX is 10-5 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 88.1, OPPONENT 82.1 | PHOENIX is 115-75 against the money line (+35.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 77.7 | PHOENIX is 22-14 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.3, OPPONENT 84.6 | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 84.1 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.7 | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 81.4 |
|
PHOENIX is 5-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.8, OPPONENT 83.4 | PHOENIX is 1-5 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 72.0, OPPONENT 76.8 | PHOENIX is 73-88 against the money line (-40.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.9, OPPONENT 79.6 | PHOENIX is 62-102 against the money line (-57.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 74.6, OPPONENT 77.2 | PHOENIX is 66-89 against the money line (-55.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.8, OPPONENT 78.4 | PHOENIX is 64-91 against the money line (-55.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 77.0, OPPONENT 79.1 | PHOENIX is 2-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 73.8, OPPONENT 80.2 | CONNECTICUT is 105-77 against the money line (+21.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 68-45 against the money line (+26.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 86-52 against the money line (+21.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 81-34 against the money line (+38.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 73.2 | CONNECTICUT is 74-41 against the money line (+21.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 75.6 |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 159-108 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 79.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 20-17 against the money line (+21.0 Units) in road games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 244-160 against the money line (+27.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-20 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-18 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-5 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-19 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-16 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-18 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-13.7 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-5 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-17 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-16 against the money line (-16.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 19-27 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 127-128 against the money line (-54.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 6-14 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 15-30 against the money line (-17.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 9-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 90.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 13-9 against the money line (+10.0 Units) as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 16-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 17-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 19-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 79-38 against the money line (+27.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 40-16 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 124-115 against the money line (+21.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 53-40 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 6-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-10 against the money line (-16.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) off a road loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-14 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-18 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-5 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-4 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 4-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 17-42 against the money line (-24.9 Units) in road games off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 73.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 2-6 against the money line (-9.2 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 78.0, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-14 against the money line (-13.8 Units) off a road win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 20-26 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 99-41 against the money line (+25.3 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 130-96 against the money line (+24.6 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 130-96 against the money line (+24.6 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 90-68 against the money line (+19.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-6 | -3.1 | 6-6 | 5-8 | 75.0 | 38.6 | 41.9% | 39.2 | 73.9 | 36.2 | 41.4% | 43.5 | | Road Games | 3-4 | -2.3 | 3-3 | 2-5 | 72.4 | 37.1 | 41.3% | 36.3 | 72.6 | 35.0 | 41.9% | 44.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 78.4 | 40.6 | 44.2% | 41.0 | 69.4 | 36.0 | 40.1% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.0 | 38.6 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 13-15 | 84.8% | 39 | 7 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 39.1 | 29-69 | 41.5% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 13-16 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.4 | 37.1 | 27-66 | 41.3% | 7-21 | 31.1% | 12-13 | 87.1% | 36 | 7 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.9 | 36.2 | 28-68 | 41.4% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 10-13 | 76.6% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 38.8 | 29-69 | 41.7% | 7-20 | 33.0% | 13-16 | 80.5% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.6 | 35.0 | 28-68 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 9-11 | 76.9% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 5 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-6 | -5.4 | 6-9 | 6-9 | 77.6 | 39.0 | 40.6% | 46.1 | 76.9 | 39.8 | 43.4% | 40.5 | | Home Games | 6-1 | +2.4 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 83.1 | 40.9 | 45.1% | 44.6 | 73.6 | 35.6 | 43.1% | 36.0 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -13.7 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 70.6 | 36.6 | 38.7% | 42.8 | 84.2 | 47.2 | 47.4% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 39.0 | 29-71 | 40.6% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 13-18 | 71.1% | 46 | 11 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.9 | 39.1 | 29-69 | 41.7% | 7-20 | 33.1% | 12-16 | 78.6% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.1 | 40.9 | 31-70 | 45.1% | 8-20 | 40.7% | 12-16 | 75.2% | 45 | 11 | 20 | 14 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.9 | 39.8 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 6-20 | 30.3% | 12-15 | 84.0% | 40 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.3 | 39.5 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-21 | 33.0% | 13-16 | 80.3% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.6 | 35.6 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 5-21 | 26.4% | 10-12 | 82.7% | 36 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 71.1, CONNECTICUT 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/6/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 56-58 | L | +105 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 25 | 16 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 35 | 17 | | 6/9/2019 | @ INDIANA | 94-87 | W | -140 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 44 | 6 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 42 | 11 | | 6/11/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 75-82 | L | -175 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 13 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 44 | 14 | | 6/14/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 68-85 | L | -165 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 9 | | 6/20/2019 | @ DALLAS | 54-69 | L | -270 | 15-61 | 24.6% | 35 | 14 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 57 | 18 | | 6/23/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 82-72 | W | -105 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 43 | 11 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 43 | 10 | | 6/28/2019 | INDIANA | 91-69 | W | -210 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 12 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 39 | 11 | | 6/30/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 69-67 | W | -105 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 37 | 6 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 45 | 12 | | 7/5/2019 | NEW YORK | 76-80 | L | -330 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 34 | 10 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 12 | | 7/7/2019 | ATLANTA | 65-63 | W | -220 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 54 | 10 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 51 | 12 | | 7/10/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 91-68 | W | +280 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 39 | 7 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 8 | | 7/12/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2019 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2019 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/2/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 80-74 | W | +180 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 46 | 9 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 49 | 21 | | 6/6/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 89-77 | W | -360 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 38 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 25 | 21 | | 6/9/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 65-59 | W | -270 | 21-74 | 28.4% | 58 | 11 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 53 | 18 | | 6/11/2019 | WASHINGTON | 83-75 | W | -140 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 44 | 15 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 35 | 8 | | 6/14/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-81 | W | -220 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 48 | 14 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 35 | 9 | | 6/16/2019 | SEATTLE | 81-67 | W | -450 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 32 | 15 | | 6/21/2019 | ATLANTA | 86-76 | W | -1050 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 43 | 12 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 45 | 10 | | 6/23/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 75-93 | L | -210 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 45 | 15 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 42 | 14 | | 6/26/2019 | @ DALLAS | 73-74 | L | -450 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 36 | 11 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | | 6/29/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 59-102 | L | +220 | 22-73 | 30.1% | 41 | 14 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 43 | 12 | | 7/6/2019 | MINNESOTA | 71-74 | L | -360 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 49 | 18 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 37 | 13 | | 7/10/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 75-78 | L | -250 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 43 | 14 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 45 | 20 | | 7/12/2019 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2019 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2019 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| PHOENIX is 22-19 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 5-3 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 13-7 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 2-3 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/23/2018 | PHOENIX | 96 | 176 | SU ATS | 40 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 10-27 | 37.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 43 | 7 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -4 | Over | 44 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 37 | 9 | 5 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 87 | 169 | ATS | 45 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 35 | 5 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -4.5 | SU Over | 43 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 38 | 8 | 7 | 7/5/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 170 | Under | 41 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 45 | 17 | 12 | | | PHOENIX | 84 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 24-28 | 85.7% | 46 | 11 | 17 | 6/16/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 172.5 | Under | 21 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 41 | 14 | 16 | | | PHOENIX | 89 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 15-15 | 100.0% | 46 | 9 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Brondello is 16-6 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 86.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 47-19 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 52-19 against the money line (+24.6 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 33-9 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 19-2 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 7*) | Brondello is 100-54 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 79-45 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 45-21 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 81-43 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 20-8 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 9-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 85.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 43-29 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 37-23 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 18-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 87.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 37-23 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 39-27 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 72-48 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 55-32 against the money line (+18.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 82-49 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 70-44 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 100-64 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 56-31 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 83-41 against the money line (+24.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 41-28 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 72-44 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 103-61 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 62-43 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-18 against the money line (-12.9 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-12 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-30 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-30 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Brondello is 19-30 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 79.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 54-49 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 81.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 35-25 against the money line (+15.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-11 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 35-25 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 29-22 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 262 times, while the road underdog won straight up 109 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/10/2019 - Diana Taurasi missed last game, is "?" Friday vs Connecticut Sun ( Back ) | |
| [G] 06/26/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is OUT 3-4 months ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/18/2024 9:01:49 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|