| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
First Half Results
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
80.5
| 40
Final
37 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 611 | LOS ANGELES | 80.5 | | 612 | CONNECTICUT | -1 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(41-14 since 1997.) (74.5%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(149-83 since 1997.) (64.2%, +57.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(112-63 since 1997.) (64%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(83-40 since 1997.) (67.5%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(45-13 since 1997.) (77.6%, +30.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(58-25 since 1997.) (69.9%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(31-7 since 1997.) (81.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(39-12 since 1997.) (76.5%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(72-38 since 1997.) (65.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(41-12 since 1997.) (77.4%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(42-17 since 1997.) (71.2%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(45-13 since 1997.) (77.6%, +30.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(83-44 since 1997.) (65.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(31-7 since 1997.) (81.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(27-5 since 1997.) (84.4%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(40-12 since 1997.) (76.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(41-12 since 1997.) (77.4%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(65-31 since 1997.) (67.7%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(43-18 since 1997.) (70.5%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(82-48 since 1997.) (63.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(65-33 since 1997.) (66.3%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(72-41 since 1997.) (63.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(51-20 since 1997.) (71.8%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams where the 1rst half line is +1.5 to -1.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(94-56 since 1997.) (62.7%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(87-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(56-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games.
(134-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +60.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(83-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(64-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(64-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(64-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread.
(50-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +32.4 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games.
(123-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +57 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season.
(81-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(180-114 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +54.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season.
(70-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(260-191 since 1997.) (57.6%, +49.9 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(198-139 since 1997.) (58.8%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(145-84 since 1997.) (63.3%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(105-58 since 1997.) (64.4%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(110-73 since 1997.) (60.1%, +29.7 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(82-52 since 1997.) (61.2%, +24.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(113-68 since 1997.) (62.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(91-58 since 1997.) (61.1%, +27.2 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(211-148 since 1997.) (58.8%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - poor free throw shooting team - making <=71% of their free throws.
(194-127 since 1997.) (60.4%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(41-21 since 1997.) (66.1%, +17.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 82 | | 41 | | 32-68 | 47.1% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 10-12 | 84.4% | 41 | 9 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | | 40 | | 30-71 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 35.7% | 12-18 | 69.4% | 45 | 14 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 548 times, while CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 405 times.
Edge against first half line=LOS ANGELES | In 1000 simulated games, 515 games went over first half total, while 485 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.2, OPPONENT 38.5 | CONNECTICUT is 61-86 against the 1rst half line (-33.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.1, OPPONENT 38.7 | CONNECTICUT is 28-58 against the 1rst half line (-35.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 39.6 | CONNECTICUT is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 45.5 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 40.5 | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) in road games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 40.4 | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) in road games when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 40.0 | LOS ANGELES is 41-67 against the 1rst half line (-32.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 39.1 | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.1, OPPONENT 43.6 | LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 41.1 | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 42.3 | LOS ANGELES is 68-102 against the 1rst half line (-44.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 36.6 | CONNECTICUT is 45-29 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.3, OPPONENT 40.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 47.7, OPPONENT 42.1 | CONNECTICUT is 14-0 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 47.2 | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 43.1 | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.0, OPPONENT 41.2 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 127-93 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 37.5 | LOS ANGELES is 126-94 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 36.0 | LOS ANGELES is 110-82 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 36.7 | LOS ANGELES is 243-186 UNDER (+38.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 35.4 | LOS ANGELES is 91-61 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 36.2 | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.4, OPPONENT 39.2 | LOS ANGELES is 233-190 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.4 |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | -1 |  | | CONNECTICUT | | |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 14-6 against the 1rst half line (+7.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in road games vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 31.1, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-32 against the 1rst half line (-20.2 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-47 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-29 against the 1rst half line (-15.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.0, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.6, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-9 OVER (+7.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.9, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-10 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.5, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.4, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 47.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 OVER (+7.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.8, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-4 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.2, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-5 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-5 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 92-63 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-31 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 73-50 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 175-138 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 31.1, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-13 UNDER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-64 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 254-203 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 352-298 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 83-52 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 106-75 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 89-64 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 127-95 against the 1rst half line (+22.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.5, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 55-79 against the 1rst half line (-31.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the 1rst half line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.9, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-60 against the 1rst half line (-27.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 46.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-48 against the 1rst half line (-24.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-15 against the 1rst half line (-9.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.4, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-126 against the 1rst half line (-42.6 Units) in road games after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-39 against the 1rst half line (-23.9 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 73-100 against the 1rst half line (-37.0 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 34-64 against the 1rst half line (-36.4 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-97 against the 1rst half line (-37.7 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in road games off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 45-66 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) in road games after a win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 47-69 against the 1rst half line (-28.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in road games after playing a home game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.0, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.0, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off 3 or more consecutive home wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.0, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-10 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-33 OVER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.5, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.2, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 66-42 UNDER (+19.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 448-380 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-89 UNDER (+26.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.8, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 94-66 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 237-178 UNDER (+41.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 208-152 UNDER (+40.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-59 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 279-222 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 222-164 UNDER (+41.6 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 93-64 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 90-54 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 55-28 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 129-89 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-69 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 120-89 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 183-146 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-47 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 252-207 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-69 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 83-56 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 184-139 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 149-115 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in the 1rst game of a playoff series since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.8, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 23-12 | +3.3 | 19-15 | 19-16 | 80.4 | 39.5 | 43.3% | 41.9 | 77.0 | 39.0 | 40.8% | 43.9 | | Road Games | 7-10 | -5.8 | 6-11 | 9-8 | 77.4 | 36.8 | 40.7% | 40.4 | 81.6 | 40.1 | 43.0% | 45.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 85.4 | 41.4 | 47.1% | 44.2 | 71.4 | 35.2 | 37.8% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.4 | 39.5 | 31-70 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 12-15 | 83.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40.1 | 29-69 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.4 | 36.8 | 29-71 | 40.7% | 7-21 | 33.8% | 12-14 | 83.7% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 39.0 | 28-68 | 40.8% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 15-18 | 79.4% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.7 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.6 | 40.1 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 7-19 | 37.2% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 23-11 | +1.2 | 14-19 | 17-17 | 80.8 | 40.8 | 42.3% | 45.7 | 77.9 | 40.3 | 43.9% | 40.8 | | Home Games | 15-2 | +8.9 | 10-7 | 9-8 | 85.2 | 41.7 | 44.8% | 46.2 | 75.2 | 38.6 | 43.0% | 38.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 93.0 | 46.8 | 46.9% | 46.8 | 87.8 | 40.6 | 47.9% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.8 | 40.8 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 35.6% | 13-18 | 70.4% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.2 | 41.7 | 32-72 | 44.8% | 8-21 | 38.2% | 13-17 | 73.6% | 46 | 11 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.9 | 40.3 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-21 | 30.8% | 13-17 | 80.2% | 41 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.2 | 38.6 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 6-21 | 26.9% | 13-16 | 79.9% | 38 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, CONNECTICUT 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/8/2019 | PHOENIX | 84-74 | 44-32 | -3 | W | 74.5 | O | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 44 | 14 | | 8/11/2019 | CHICAGO | 84-81 | 39-44 | -3.5 | L | 80 | O | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 23 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 24 | | 8/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 78-84 | 42-39 | -3.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 30-68 | 44.1% | 38 | 15 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 18 | | 8/16/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 81-91 | 37-45 | -1 | L | 82 | P | 30-71 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 18 | | 8/20/2019 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | 49-32 | -3 | W | 77.5 | O | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 38 | 17 | | 8/22/2019 | INDIANA | 98-65 | 43-31 | -5 | W | 79 | U | 38-76 | 50.0% | 51 | 13 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 37 | 18 | | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 84-72 | 42-39 | -2.5 | W | 78 | O | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | | 8/27/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 66-95 | 37-54 | 4 | L | 82.5 | O | 23-67 | 34.3% | 44 | 15 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 41 | 9 | | 8/29/2019 | @ INDIANA | 87-83 | 33-42 | -2.5 | L | 78.5 | U | 35-72 | 48.6% | 36 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 49 | 13 | | 8/31/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 86-92 | 44-36 | 2 | W | 81.5 | U | 31-77 | 40.3% | 33 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 59 | 16 | | 9/3/2019 | ATLANTA | 70-60 | 34-35 | -6 | L | 78 | U | 27-66 | 40.9% | 56 | 18 | 23-74 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | | 9/5/2019 | SEATTLE | 102-68 | 50-35 | -3.5 | W | 76 | O | 41-75 | 54.7% | 52 | 8 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 32 | 13 | | 9/8/2019 | MINNESOTA | 77-68 | 36-34 | -2 | T | 78.5 | U | 34-67 | 50.7% | 35 | 14 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 45 | 16 | | 9/15/2019 | SEATTLE | 92-69 | 43-36 | -3.5 | W | 76 | O | 37-76 | 48.7% | 45 | 8 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 37 | 15 | | 9/17/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/19/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/9/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-89 | 25-54 | -1.5 | L | 76 | O | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 20 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 48 | 19 | | 8/11/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 81-89 | 42-43 | 1.5 | W | 78.5 | O | 32-81 | 39.5% | 39 | 9 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 16 | | 8/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 78-71 | 49-34 | -3.5 | W | 76 | O | 30-67 | 44.8% | 50 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 40 | 19 | | 8/16/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-78 | 34-46 | -3.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 15 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 46 | 27 | | 8/18/2019 | DALLAS | 78-68 | 37-34 | -5.5 | L | 73 | U | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 9 | | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 89-85 | 47-56 | -1 | L | 81 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 42 | 10 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 42 | 10 | | 8/25/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-84 | 39-42 | 2.5 | L | 78 | O | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | | 8/27/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 89-70 | 44-36 | 1.5 | W | 74 | O | 37-70 | 52.9% | 50 | 8 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | | 8/30/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 94-84 | 50-41 | -6 | W | 80.5 | O | 34-67 | 50.7% | 45 | 9 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 39 | 13 | | 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | 102-72 | 49-26 | -6 | W | 77 | U | 36-63 | 57.1% | 48 | 16 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 23 | 9 | | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | 104-109 | 52-52 | -3 | L | 86.5 | O | 38-89 | 42.7% | 49 | 17 | 41-77 | 53.2% | 47 | 20 | | 9/8/2019 | @ INDIANA | 76-104 | 39-48 | -2 | L | 79 | O | 24-71 | 33.8% | 42 | 14 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 47 | 15 | | 9/17/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/19/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 26-18 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 27 of 43 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 5-4 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 11-10 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 15 of 21 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 157.5 | Under | 39 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 43 | 10 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 84 | -5 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 35 | 3 | 14 | 6/6/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 25 | 7 | 21 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -8 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 14 | 17 | 5/31/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -3 | Under | 31 | 24-78 | 30.8% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 18 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 164 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 9 | 10 | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86 | 160.5 | ATS | 41 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 44 | 10 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -5 | SU Over | 52 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 3 | 16 | 7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 162 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 41 | 6 | 17 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9.5 | Under | 25 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 162.5 | Over | 47 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 18 | 5 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 9 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 8-18 against the 1rst half line (-11.8 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fisher is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in road games after playing a home game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-14 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-20 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-4 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.6, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 24-10 against the 1rst half line (+13.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 33-21 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.8, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 54-42 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 42-30 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 38-26 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 36-23 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fisher is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.0, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.9, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-16 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.4, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 47-34 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-36 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 52-38 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 35-24 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.2, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-13 OVER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 129 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 126 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 8 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 7 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 20 games went under the first half total, while 18 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 7 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 7 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 6 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times. | | Since 1997, 7 games went over the first half total, while 6 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 09/15/2019 - Alana Beard is not in the starting lineup Sunday vs Seattle Storm ( Facial ) | | [G] 07/21/2019 - Karlie Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 06/26/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is OUT 3-4 months ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/20/2024 8:02:47 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|