| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
162.5
| 75
Final
84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 611 | LOS ANGELES | +105 | | 612 | CONNECTICUT | -125 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games.
(111-28 since 1997.) (79.9%, +62.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(189-76 since 1997.) (71.3%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games.
(95-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +42.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(157-58 since 1997.) (73%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(188-150 since 1997.) (55.6%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(148-58 since 1997.) (71.8%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(125-72 since 1997.) (63.5%, +50.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(124-50 since 1997.) (71.3%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(96-25 since 1997.) (79.3%, +48.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(161-59 since 1997.) (73.2%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(139-49 since 1997.) (73.9%, +47.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games.
(62-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(123-44 since 1997.) (73.7%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(111-38 since 1997.) (74.5%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, in August or September games.
(77-27 since 1997.) (74%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(86-18 since 1997.) (82.7%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(101-37 since 1997.) (73.2%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(64-10 since 1997.) (86.5%, +41.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(80-42 since 1997.) (65.6%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in the conference finals.
(85-26 since 1997.) (76.6%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(78-18 since 1997.) (81.2%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(66-16 since 1997.) (80.5%, +38.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(72-20 since 1997.) (78.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(44-9 since 1997.) (83%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(54-29 since 1997.) (65.1%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(34-5 since 1997.) (87.2%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(51-34 since 1997.) (60%, +22.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(39-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(69-51 since 1997.) (57.5%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(75-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(37-19 since 1997.) (66.1%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(83-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(72-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(94-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(234-165 since 1997.) (58.6%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(183-120 since 1997.) (60.4%, +69.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(162-118 since 1997.) (57.9%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(119-70 since 1997.) (63%, +55 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(28-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(107-76 since 1997.) (58.5%, +53.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(130-89 since 1997.) (59.4%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +47.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(108-62 since 1997.) (63.5%, +46.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(114-70 since 1997.) (62%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(86-59 since 1997.) (59.3%, +45.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(128-85 since 1997.) (60.1%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(114-71 since 1997.) (61.6%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(131-89 since 1997.) (59.5%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(119-76 since 1997.) (61%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season.
(97-57 since 1997.) (63%, +42.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(95-54 since 1997.) (63.8%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(60-37 since 1997.) (61.9%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(102-63 since 1997.) (61.8%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(93-58 since 1997.) (61.6%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(119-79 since 1997.) (60.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more.
(97-62 since 1997.) (61%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(86-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(84-46 since 1997.) (64.6%, +38.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(47-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +43.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(77-41 since 1997.) (65.3%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(57-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more.
(74-39 since 1997.) (65.5%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(111-72 since 1997.) (60.7%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(115-80 since 1997.) (59%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(120-85 since 1997.) (58.5%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(86-50 since 1997.) (63.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite.
(59-45 since 1997.) (56.7%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(136-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(109-73 since 1997.) (59.9%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(54-33 since 1997.) (62.1%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(83-49 since 1997.) (62.9%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(62-30 since 1997.) (67.4%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(88-58 since 1997.) (60.3%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%).
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(55-28 since 1997.) (66.3%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(58-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(94-62 since 1997.) (60.3%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(27-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(77-46 since 1997.) (62.6%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(50-27 since 1997.) (64.9%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(50-22 since 1997.) (69.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(55-30 since 1997.) (64.7%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(72-43 since 1997.) (62.6%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(63-38 since 1997.) (62.4%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(50-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(103-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +25.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(42-16 since 1997.) (72.4%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(48-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(39-20 since 1997.) (66.1%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(58-34 since 1997.) (63%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(64-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(63-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +49.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(61-37 since 1997.) (62.2%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(55-31 since 1997.) (64%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(35-25 since 1997.) (58.3%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(40-21 since 1997.) (65.6%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(29-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 20 points or more.
(56-28 since 1997.) (66.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(50-28 since 1997.) (64.1%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(33-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(28-15 since 1997.) (65.1%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(46-26 since 1997.) (63.9%, +19.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 20 points or more.
(27-11 since 1997.) (71.1%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(34-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(27-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +22 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(30-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(28-14 since 1997.) (66.7%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(32-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(42-19 since 1997.) (68.9%, +14.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(36-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(36-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(31-16 since 1997.) (66%, +9.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 20 points or more.
(25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +6.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +14.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, in August or September games.
(29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(77-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season.
(38-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(41-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(29-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 82 | | 32-68 | 47.1% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 10-12 | 84.4% | 41 | 9 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | | 30-71 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 35.7% | 12-18 | 69.4% | 45 | 14 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 529 times, while CONNECTICUT won 449 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-3 against the money line (+5.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | LOS ANGELES is 286-76 against the money line (+160.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 38-66 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 67-79 against the money line (-42.7 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 15-21 against the money line (-29.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 88.5 | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 83.3 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 30-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.2 | LOS ANGELES is 49-63 against the money line (-31.2 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 75.5 | LOS ANGELES is 72-62 against the money line (-41.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 76.3 | LOS ANGELES is 17-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 16-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 80.3 | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 86.0 | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 83.6 | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 82.6 | LOS ANGELES is 83-84 against the money line (-43.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 | LOS ANGELES is 23-20 against the money line (-23.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | CONNECTICUT is 71-46 against the money line (+28.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 91-52 against the money line (+26.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 83-36 against the money line (+36.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 73.5 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 71.1 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 73.0 | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 77.5 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 87-66 against the money line (+21.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 63-46 against the money line (+18.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-4 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-49 against the money line (-23.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-22 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-19 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-22 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 203-166 against the money line (-75.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-121 against the money line (-48.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-17 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-28 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-25 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-17 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-22 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 228-207 against the money line (-78.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-17 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 141-100 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 87-65 against the money line (+26.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 33-17 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 15 or less fouls since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 101-40 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-11 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-7 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-32 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after 5 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-18 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-15 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-14 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-4 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-20 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-19 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-24 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 17-33 against the money line (-29.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 87-104 against the money line (-42.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-42 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-21 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-8 against the money line (-18.9 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-38 against the money line (-27.8 Units) in road games off a home win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-22 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-20 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-19 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-18 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-15 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-10 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-6.6 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after playing a home game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-18 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-15 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-12 against the money line (+15.3 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 101-42 against the money line (+24.8 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 138-99 against the money line (+29.4 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 138-99 against the money line (+29.4 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 107-85 against the money line (+21.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 66-54 against the money line (+22.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 73-33 against the money line (+24.9 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 91-69 against the money line (+19.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-9 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 23-12 | +3.3 | 19-15 | 19-16 | 80.4 | 39.5 | 43.3% | 41.9 | 77.0 | 39.0 | 40.8% | 43.9 | | Road Games | 7-10 | -5.8 | 6-11 | 9-8 | 77.4 | 36.8 | 40.7% | 40.4 | 81.6 | 40.1 | 43.0% | 45.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 85.4 | 41.4 | 47.1% | 44.2 | 71.4 | 35.2 | 37.8% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.4 | 39.5 | 31-70 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 12-15 | 83.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40.1 | 29-69 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.4 | 36.8 | 29-71 | 40.7% | 7-21 | 33.8% | 12-14 | 83.7% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 39.0 | 28-68 | 40.8% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 15-18 | 79.4% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.7 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.6 | 40.1 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 7-19 | 37.2% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 23-11 | +1.2 | 14-19 | 17-17 | 80.8 | 40.8 | 42.3% | 45.7 | 77.9 | 40.3 | 43.9% | 40.8 | | Home Games | 15-2 | +8.9 | 10-7 | 9-8 | 85.2 | 41.7 | 44.8% | 46.2 | 75.2 | 38.6 | 43.0% | 38.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 93.0 | 46.8 | 46.9% | 46.8 | 87.8 | 40.6 | 47.9% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.8 | 40.8 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 35.6% | 13-18 | 70.4% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.2 | 41.7 | 32-72 | 44.8% | 8-21 | 38.2% | 13-17 | 73.6% | 46 | 11 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.9 | 40.3 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-21 | 30.8% | 13-17 | 80.2% | 41 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.2 | 38.6 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 6-21 | 26.9% | 13-16 | 79.9% | 38 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, CONNECTICUT 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/8/2019 | PHOENIX | 84-74 | W | -250 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 44 | 14 | | 8/11/2019 | CHICAGO | 84-81 | W | -300 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 23 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 24 | | 8/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 78-84 | L | -300 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 38 | 15 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 18 | | 8/16/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 81-91 | L | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 18 | | 8/20/2019 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | W | -250 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 38 | 17 | | 8/22/2019 | INDIANA | 98-65 | W | -450 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 51 | 13 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 37 | 18 | | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 84-72 | W | -210 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | | 8/27/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 66-95 | L | +250 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 44 | 15 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 41 | 9 | | 8/29/2019 | @ INDIANA | 87-83 | W | -210 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 36 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 49 | 13 | | 8/31/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 86-92 | L | +145 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 33 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 59 | 16 | | 9/3/2019 | ATLANTA | 70-60 | W | -550 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 56 | 18 | 23-74 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | | 9/5/2019 | SEATTLE | 102-68 | W | -270 | 41-75 | 54.7% | 52 | 8 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 32 | 13 | | 9/8/2019 | MINNESOTA | 77-68 | W | -165 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 35 | 14 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 45 | 16 | | 9/15/2019 | SEATTLE | 92-69 | W | -300 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 45 | 8 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 37 | 15 | | 9/17/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/19/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/9/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-89 | L | -155 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 20 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 48 | 19 | | 8/11/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 81-89 | L | +135 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 39 | 9 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 16 | | 8/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 78-71 | W | -300 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 50 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 40 | 19 | | 8/16/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-78 | W | -270 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 15 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 46 | 27 | | 8/18/2019 | DALLAS | 78-68 | W | -500 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 9 | | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 89-85 | W | -120 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 42 | 10 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 42 | 10 | | 8/25/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-84 | L | +175 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | | 8/27/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 89-70 | W | +135 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 50 | 8 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | | 8/30/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 94-84 | W | -600 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 45 | 9 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 39 | 13 | | 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | 102-72 | W | -600 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 48 | 16 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 23 | 9 | | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | 104-109 | L | -250 | 38-89 | 42.7% | 49 | 17 | 41-77 | 53.2% | 47 | 20 | | 9/8/2019 | @ INDIANA | 76-104 | L | -165 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 42 | 14 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 47 | 15 | | 9/17/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/19/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 24-18 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 4-5 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 10-11 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-1 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 157.5 | Under | 39 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 43 | 10 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 84 | -5 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 35 | 3 | 14 | 6/6/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 25 | 7 | 21 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -8 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 14 | 17 | 5/31/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -3 | Under | 31 | 24-78 | 30.8% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 18 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 164 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 9 | 10 | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86 | 160.5 | ATS | 41 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 44 | 10 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -5 | SU Over | 52 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 3 | 16 | 7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 162 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 41 | 6 | 17 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9.5 | Under | 25 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 162.5 | Over | 47 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 18 | 5 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 9 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Fisher is 13-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 17-4 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 16-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 21-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 12-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-22 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-23 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-23 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 11-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-8 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games off a road loss as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-15 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 2-5 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fisher is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after playing a home game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 43-28 against the money line (+20.2 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-9 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-2 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 18-8 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 43-28 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 32-24 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 46-26 against the money line (+14.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-13 against the money line (+19.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 34-24 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 47-29 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 35-23 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 157 times, while the road underdog won straight up 108 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 09/15/2019 - Alana Beard is not in the starting lineup Sunday vs Seattle Storm ( Facial ) | | [G] 07/21/2019 - Karlie Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 06/26/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is OUT 3-4 months ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 4:40:15 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|