| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
150
| 64
Final
84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 631 | ATLANTA | +650 | | 632 | CONNECTICUT | -1050 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(185-60 since 1997.) (75.5%, +83.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(160-29 since 1997.) (84.7%, +80 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(161-30 since 1997.) (84.3%, +80 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(164-37 since 1997.) (81.6%, +79.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(225-57 since 1997.) (79.8%, +76.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(250-90 since 1997.) (73.5%, +76.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(76-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.4%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(138-29 since 1997.) (82.6%, +66.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(63-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (84%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(81-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (81%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(152-47 since 1997.) (76.4%, +65.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(116-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +50.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(112-21 since 1997.) (84.2%, +63.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(123-37 since 1997.) (76.9%, +63 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(103-18 since 1997.) (85.1%, +56.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(96-26 since 1997.) (78.7%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(135-48 since 1997.) (73.8%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(96-16 since 1997.) (85.7%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(121-31 since 1997.) (79.6%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(89-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, in August or September games.
(83-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.8%, +46.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(87-16 since 1997.) (84.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(108-30 since 1997.) (78.3%, +49.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(96-18 since 1997.) (84.2%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(61-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(61-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(61-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(40-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (90.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(98-27 since 1997.) (78.4%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(57-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.1%, +35.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(57-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.1%, +35.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(57-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.1%, +35.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, in August or September games.
(54-5 since 1997.) (91.5%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(146-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +36 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, in August or September games.
(54-6 since 1997.) (90%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(53-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(53-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(53-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(49-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.5%, +39.2 units. Rating = 6*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(45-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.8%, +38.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, in August or September games.
(33-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +28.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(24-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +21 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after a loss by 6 points or less.
(27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +24 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, on Sunday games.
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(54-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.4%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(88-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(50-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(54-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +16.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, on Sunday games.
(28-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(48-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(35-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.1%, +17.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(41-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +11.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, on Sunday games.
(74-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +15.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(77-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(41-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, on Sunday games.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +10.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(38-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +33.9 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(34-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(45-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +16.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(44-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +31.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(57-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(58-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.4%, +38.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +27.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(39-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.6%, +28.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(139-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +59.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(88-65 since 1997.) (57.5%, +49.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(69-52 since 1997.) (57%, +41.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Sunday games.
(122-91 since 1997.) (57.3%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(62-42 since 1997.) (59.6%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(21-12 since 1997.) (63.6%, +27.9 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 70 | | 28-69 | 40.2% | 6-19 | 30.0% | 9-12 | 72.1% | 36 | 7 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 31-66 | 47.1% | 7-19 | 38.2% | 16-19 | 82.8% | 50 | 10 | 16 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 852 times, while ATLANTA won 137 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 8-19 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 84.7 | ATLANTA is 58-94 against the money line (-55.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.9 | ATLANTA is 22-79 against the money line (-77.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 85.3 | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 83.6 | ATLANTA is 2-15 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 87.4 | ATLANTA is 6-16 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 87.7 | ATLANTA is 6-24 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 91.5 | ATLANTA is 12-25 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they grab 32 to 36 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 85.6 | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.2 Units) when they grab 10+ fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 84.1 | ATLANTA is 1-17 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 68.6, OPPONENT 82.7 | CONNECTICUT is 15-2 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.2 | CONNECTICUT is 96-43 against the money line (+49.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 70.4 | CONNECTICUT is 17-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 76.9 | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 69.1 | CONNECTICUT is 93-40 against the money line (+44.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 67.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 69.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.1 | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 72.8 | CONNECTICUT is 15-0 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they grab 10+ more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 65.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 72.2 | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 72.5 | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 73.3 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-16 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 40-67 against the money line (-31.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 58-98 against the money line (-39.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 60-83 against the money line (-38.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-9.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 54-90 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 80-130 against the money line (-63.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-30 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 15-47 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-2 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-2 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-2 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-4 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-6 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-13 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 8-20 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 88-113 against the money line (-44.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 54-69 against the money line (-35.2 Units) on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 139-158 against the money line (-59.2 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 79-109 against the money line (-45.9 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-16 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-24 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 100-129 against the money line (-49.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 66-87 against the money line (-35.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-18 against the money line (-16.0 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 12-37 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 32-51 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-19 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-24 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 8-32 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-15 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-5 against the money line (+19.5 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-1 against the money line (+16.6 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-3 against the money line (+21.5 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-12 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 225-168 against the money line (+27.4 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) off a home win this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-1 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after a win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-21 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-3 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-0 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 65.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-7 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-2 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-2 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 67.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-23 | -11.6 | 16-14 | 14-17 | 79.2 | 39.6 | 41.8% | 41.6 | 84.3 | 40.8 | 45.9% | 45.4 | | Road Games | 4-11 | -1.8 | 9-6 | 9-6 | 80.7 | 39.3 | 42.7% | 42.5 | 85.7 | 40.1 | 45.8% | 45.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.1 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 74.2 | 36.8 | 42.9% | 42.2 | 74.8 | 36.6 | 40.6% | 44.6 | | Division Games | 6-8 | -1.7 | 7-6 | 6-8 | 80.7 | 39.6 | 41.7% | 41.2 | 83.2 | 40.9 | 44.2% | 47.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.2 | 39.6 | 31-73 | 41.8% | 6-20 | 31.7% | 11-16 | 72.1% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 9 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.6 | 41.1 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.7 | 39.3 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 10-14 | 68.2% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.3 | 40.8 | 30-66 | 45.9% | 8-22 | 38.6% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 45 | 8 | 21 | 16 | 6 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.5 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.4% | 7-22 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 81.5% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.7 | 40.1 | 31-68 | 45.8% | 9-23 | 38.9% | 15-18 | 78.7% | 46 | 8 | 22 | 15 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 25-6 | +19.5 | 21-9 | 12-19 | 79.6 | 40.6 | 44.6% | 44.7 | 70.1 | 34.9 | 41.0% | 34.1 | | Home Games | 14-1 | +12.8 | 11-4 | 5-10 | 80.2 | 39.3 | 46.2% | 43.7 | 69.4 | 36.6 | 41.4% | 32.9 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-0 | 2-3 | 83.4 | 46.2 | 46.3% | 43.0 | 64.8 | 36.0 | 40.4% | 31.4 | | Division Games | 11-3 | +7.8 | 7-6 | 8-6 | 82.0 | 42.0 | 46.0% | 45.9 | 71.6 | 35.7 | 40.1% | 34.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.6 | 40.6 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 14-18 | 81.5% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.5 | 41.5 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 80.7% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.2 | 39.3 | 29-64 | 46.2% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 15-18 | 80.8% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.1 | 34.9 | 25-62 | 41.0% | 6-20 | 31.7% | 13-15 | 82.7% | 34 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 41 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 14-17 | 80.9% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.4 | 36.6 | 26-63 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 11-13 | 85.2% | 33 | 6 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 71.9, CONNECTICUT 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/15/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 81-92 | L | +200 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 46 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 50 | 17 | | 8/17/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 80-85 | L | +155 | 34-88 | 38.6% | 61 | 13 | 36-80 | 45.0% | 50 | 14 | | 8/19/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 64-66 | L | +155 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 42 | 18 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 38 | 19 | | 8/21/2021 | PHOENIX | 69-84 | L | +180 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 26 | 9 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 53 | 22 | | 8/24/2021 | CHICAGO | 79-86 | L | +220 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 7 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 41 | 12 | | 8/26/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 71-78 | L | +600 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 42 | 8 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 52 | 10 | | 9/2/2021 | @ DALLAS | 68-72 | L | +210 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 14 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 52 | 9 | | 9/5/2021 | @ DALLAS | 69-64 | W | +210 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 45 | 9 | 26-78 | 33.3% | 53 | 14 | | 9/8/2021 | PHOENIX | 75-76 | L | +155 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 38 | 8 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 39 | 16 | | 9/10/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 74-82 | L | +175 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 45 | 7 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 50 | 10 | | 9/14/2021 | INDIANA | 85-78 | W | -165 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 43 | 13 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 42 | 13 | | 9/16/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 68-74 | L | +105 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 40 | 14 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 39 | 13 | | 9/19/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/15/2021 | @ DALLAS | 80-59 | W | -200 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 11 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 26 | 19 | | 8/17/2021 | MINNESOTA | 72-60 | W | -165 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 14 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 32 | 17 | | 8/19/2021 | MINNESOTA | 82-71 | W | -300 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 41 | 17 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 27 | 10 | | 8/24/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 76-62 | W | -155 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 11 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 36 | 14 | | 8/26/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 76-72 | W | -750 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 14 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 29 | 15 | | 8/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 76-61 | W | -600 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 50 | 18 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 24 | 14 | | 8/31/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 85-75 | W | -550 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 43 | 15 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 27 | 14 | | 9/7/2021 | @ DALLAS | 83-56 | W | -450 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 52 | 13 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 38 | 12 | | 9/9/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-57 | W | -550 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 39 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 27 | 17 | | 9/11/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 76-67 | W | -165 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 35 | 9 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 36 | 15 | | 9/15/2021 | NEW YORK | 98-69 | W | -950 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 46 | 20 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 29 | 28 | | 9/19/2021 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 29-22 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-2 (+1.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 15-9 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/9/2021 | ATLANTA | 72 | 159.5 | ATS | 39 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 36 | 3 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -14 | SU Under | 43 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 48 | 5 | 11 | 5/14/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 54 | 12 | 20 | | | ATLANTA | 67 | 163.5 | Under | 33 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 9/11/2020 | ATLANTA | 82 | 165.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 51 | 10 | 8 | | N | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -1 | Under | 36 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 42 | 5 | 13 | 8/10/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -5 | SU ATS | 56 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 45 | 15 | 8 | | N | ATLANTA | 82 | 166.5 | Over | 46 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 44 | 5 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Petersen is 5-16 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 2-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Petersen is 3-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Petersen is 2-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Petersen is 2-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Petersen is 1-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Petersen is 5-15 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Petersen is 2-8 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Petersen is 5-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 3-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Petersen is 5-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 3-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Petersen is 5-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 4-12 against the money line (-9.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Petersen is 1-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Petersen is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Petersen is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 117-81 against the money line (+20.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 60-25 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 60-25 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 56-25 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 57-29 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 62-42 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 43-27 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-47 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-11 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 43-25 against the money line (+24.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 21-9 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 40-25 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 17-10 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-15 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 22-9 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 17-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 33-23 against the money line (+9.9 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 28-8 against the money line (+18.6 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 12-2 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 45-17 against the money line (+21.8 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 47-22 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 29-14 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 101-64 against the money line (+26.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 93-58 against the money line (+27.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 81-56 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 92-61 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-45 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 58-36 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 78-37 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-21 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 48-15 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 48-19 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 55-29 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 64-44 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 38-19 against the money line (+27.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 22-8 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-41 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 58-22 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-7 against the money line (+23.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 58-24 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 83-45 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 62-27 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 87-48 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 56-32 against the money line (+20.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 71-47 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 72-38 against the money line (+31.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 101-63 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-23 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 78-40 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 64-33 against the money line (+26.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 95-57 against the money line (+23.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-10 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 45-21 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 73-38 against the money line (+32.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 102-65 against the money line (+21.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-33 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-56 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 68-38 against the money line (+27.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 96-63 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 59-36 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 79-59 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-10 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 53-30 against the money line (+30.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 71-48 against the money line (+21.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 40 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
| | |
| [F] 09/19/2021 - Tianna Hawkins is downgraded to doubtful Sunday vs Connecticut Sun ( Foot ) | | [G] 09/19/2021 - Odyssey Sims is downgraded to doubtful Sunday vs Connecticut Sun ( Illness ) | | [G] 08/25/2021 - Crystal Bradford is out for season ( Foot ) | | [F] 07/14/2021 - Cheyenne Parker is out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 07/04/2021 - Chennedy Carter is out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | |
| [F] 09/19/2021 - DeWanna Bonner injured last game, is "?" ( Undisclosed ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 6:48:17 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|