| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
First Half Results
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
75.5
| 47
Final
46 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 613 | CHICAGO | 75.5 | | 614 | CONNECTICUT | -4 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road win by 10 points or more.
(84-47 since 1997.) (64.1%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(52-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(194-122 since 1997.) (61.4%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 6 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(126-73 since 1997.) (63.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(152-100 since 1997.) (60.3%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, on Tuesday nights.
(35-12 since 1997.) (74.5%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, on Tuesday nights.
(35-13 since 1997.) (72.9%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(96-55 since 1997.) (63.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(30-9 since 1997.) (76.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in August or September games.
(198-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +71.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest, in August or September games.
(65-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(44-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in August or September games.
(98-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in August or September games.
(160-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +61 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(164-105 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(101-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(94-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(44-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(48-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in August or September games.
(137-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(172-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +64.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(181-104 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +66.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(163-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +66.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games.
(171-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +62.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in August or September games.
(143-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games.
(104-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +46.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games.
(119-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +51.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(189-108 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +70.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(291-199 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(229-143 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(209-126 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(157-93 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(108-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +46.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in August or September games.
(180-112 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +56.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(44-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in August or September games.
(90-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in August or September games.
(145-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(125-74 since 1997.) (62.8%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(59-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +38.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in August or September games.
(125-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(74-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(53-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(94-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(61-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(196-123 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +60.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(182-111 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +59.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(50-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +34.6 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(40-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.6%, +30.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(112-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +51.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season, in August or September games.
(50-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +33.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(77-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (74%, +47.3 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games, in August or September games.
(50-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +33.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(56-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(42-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +29.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(45-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(38-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season.
(77-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(46-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(39-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(219-140 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +65 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(168-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(176-106 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(156-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games.
(179-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +70.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(195-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +68.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(212-140 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +58 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(151-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(188-109 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +68.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(218-140 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +64 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(150-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(111-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season.
(71-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(42-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +29.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(43-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.2%, +29.8 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - in August or September games.
(180-112 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +56.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in August or September games.
(142-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(81-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(55-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.3%, +35.2 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(69-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(48-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(53-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(195-123 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(181-111 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(49-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +33.6 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(39-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +29.1 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(59-29 since 1997.) (67%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(106-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +47.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season, in August or September games.
(46-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(72-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +44.5 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games, in August or September games.
(46-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(53-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(39-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(54-24 since 1997.) (69.2%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(42-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in August or September games.
(126-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(154-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(163-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(150-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games.
(155-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season.
(76-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(45-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(214-138 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(152-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, in August or September games.
(159-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(146-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games.
(162-97 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(179-112 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(209-138 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(144-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(176-109 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(213-138 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(143-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.1%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(106-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season.
(69-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(41-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(42-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +29.9 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in August or September games.
(132-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games.
(92-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games.
(110-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(175-106 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(283-196 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(226-143 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(207-126 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(149-91 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(99-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in August or September games.
(198-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +71.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in August or September games.
(157-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(86-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +43.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog.
(40-13 since 1997.) (75.5%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win as an underdog.
(191-129 since 1997.) (59.7%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 76 | | 39 | | 29-66 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 32.5% | 11-13 | 83.7% | 37 | 6 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | | 42 | Over | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 16-19 | 83.7% | 46 | 11 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 509 times, while CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 442 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 697 games went over first half total, while 303 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 66-39 against the 1rst half line (+23.1 Units) in road games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 40.4 |
|
CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 48.1 | CHICAGO is 61-91 against the 1rst half line (-39.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 40.1 | CHICAGO is 126-185 against the 1rst half line (-77.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 43.8 | CHICAGO is 79-132 against the 1rst half line (-66.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 45.4 | CHICAGO is 38-60 against the 1rst half line (-28.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 39.4 | CHICAGO is 112-148 against the 1rst half line (-50.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.1 | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the 1rst half line (+7.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 34.5 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 32.7 | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 34.5 | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.2, OPPONENT 33.4 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 33.9 | CONNECTICUT is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.2, OPPONENT 38.3 | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.4, OPPONENT 38.3 | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.4, OPPONENT 37.1 |
|
CHICAGO is 47-29 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 42.7 | CHICAGO is 12-2 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 48.1 | CHICAGO is 29-17 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.1, OPPONENT 42.3 | CHICAGO is 29-13 OVER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 42.9 | CHICAGO is 25-11 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 44.4 | CHICAGO is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.9, OPPONENT 47.8 | CHICAGO is 30-17 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 42.4 | CHICAGO is 50-24 OVER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.7, OPPONENT 43.4 | CONNECTICUT is 213-129 OVER (+71.1 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 40.5 | CONNECTICUT is 35-22 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.6, OPPONENT 39.0 | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.5, OPPONENT 37.0 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.2, OPPONENT 33.4 | CONNECTICUT is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 34.0 |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | | | | CONNECTICUT | -6.5 |  |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) in road games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 84-122 against the 1rst half line (-50.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 137-174 against the 1rst half line (-54.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-27 against the 1rst half line (-16.7 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 45.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in road games vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.0, OPPONENT 51.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-10 against the 1rst half line (-11.0 Units) in road games vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.6, OPPONENT 50.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-14 against the 1rst half line (-9.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.4, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-14 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.3, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the 1rst half line (+7.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the 1rst half line (+6.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.0, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-14 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-15 against the 1rst half line (+15.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-16 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.7, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the 1rst half line (+7.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 17-3 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 46.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-7 OVER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 96-64 OVER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-10 OVER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 29-10 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 41-27 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-7 OVER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 39-22 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.9, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 48-27 OVER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-24 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-14 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-10 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 47-27 OVER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-9 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-5 OVER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 95-64 OVER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 142-105 OVER (+26.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-1 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 47.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 15-3 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 46.1, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 48.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.0, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.7, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 49-31 OVER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 48.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 42-25 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 127-89 OVER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.3, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.4, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 50-81 against the 1rst half line (-39.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-68 against the 1rst half line (-32.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 28-46 against the 1rst half line (-22.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 102-142 against the 1rst half line (-54.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 81-113 against the 1rst half line (-43.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-39 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-16 against the 1rst half line (-9.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-10 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) on Tuesday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-13 against the 1rst half line (+15.7 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-13 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the 1rst half line (+6.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the 1rst half line (+6.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.0, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) off a win against a division rival this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) off a home win this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.6, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.8, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the 1rst half line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the 1rst half line (+6.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-14 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-12 against the 1rst half line (+10.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-16 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.5, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the 1rst half line (+6.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after 8 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 54-35 OVER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-10 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.6, OPPONENT 49.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 5 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 48.5, OPPONENT 48.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 32-14 OVER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 181-140 OVER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-11 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.3, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-12 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 142-110 OVER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 71-46 OVER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-26 OVER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 176-134 OVER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 142-100 OVER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 120-74 OVER (+38.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 31-18 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 38-22 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 41-27 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 44-25 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-31 OVER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 66-43 OVER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 OVER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games outrebounding opponent by 10 or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 47.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 6 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 7 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 UNDER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a road win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 UNDER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in the 1rst game of a playoff series since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 18-16 | -8.6 | 14-19 | 19-15 | 83.4 | 42.4 | 44.3% | 41.6 | 81.2 | 40.1 | 43.1% | 43.7 | | Road Games | 11-6 | +6.5 | 9-7 | 7-10 | 83.8 | 44.1 | 45.1% | 42.6 | 78.4 | 38.1 | 42.2% | 42.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 81.8 | 41.6 | 45.1% | 38.6 | 81.8 | 44.2 | 46.4% | 41.0 | | Division Games | 10-5 | -5.3 | 7-7 | 8-7 | 83.4 | 43.7 | 43.5% | 42.8 | 78.3 | 38.4 | 42.3% | 43.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.4 | 42.4 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 84.7% | 42 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.6 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 34.2% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.8 | 44.1 | 31-69 | 45.1% | 8-21 | 35.8% | 14-17 | 82.7% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 40.1 | 30-70 | 43.1% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.4 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 80.5% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.4 | 38.1 | 29-70 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 31.0% | 14-18 | 76.0% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 26-6 | +20.5 | 22-9 | 12-20 | 79.7 | 40.7 | 44.4% | 45.2 | 69.9 | 34.9 | 40.9% | 34.2 | | Home Games | 15-1 | +13.8 | 12-4 | 5-11 | 80.4 | 39.7 | 45.6% | 44.7 | 69.1 | 36.6 | 41.2% | 33.1 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 5-0 | 1-4 | 83.2 | 46.4 | 43.9% | 46.6 | 62.6 | 36.0 | 39.0% | 33.2 | | Division Games | 12-3 | +8.8 | 8-6 | 8-7 | 82.1 | 42.3 | 45.4% | 46.9 | 71.1 | 35.8 | 39.9% | 34.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.7 | 40.7 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 14-18 | 81.6% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 41.5 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 7-21 | 34.7% | 14-17 | 80.7% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.4 | 39.7 | 29-64 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 15-19 | 81.1% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.9 | 34.9 | 26-62 | 40.9% | 6-20 | 31.0% | 13-15 | 82.4% | 34 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 14-17 | 80.6% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.1 | 36.6 | 26-63 | 41.2% | 6-19 | 31.2% | 11-13 | 84.4% | 33 | 6 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.6, CONNECTICUT 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/21/2021 | MINNESOTA | 95-101 | 44-48 | 1.5 | L | 80 | O | 35-73 | 47.9% | 27 | 9 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 48 | 13 | | 8/24/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 86-79 | 40-33 | -3.5 | W | 83 | U | 34-66 | 51.5% | 41 | 12 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 7 | | 8/27/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 73-69 | 28-32 | 3 | L | 82.5 | U | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 18 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 40 | 17 | | 8/29/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 107-75 | 63-41 | 3.5 | W | 81 | O | 41-73 | 56.2% | 43 | 9 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 27 | 12 | | 8/31/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 83-103 | 46-49 | 0 | L | 82 | O | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 11 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 42 | 8 | | 9/2/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 83-90 | 36-52 | 2 | L | 84 | O | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 13 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 49 | 12 | | 9/5/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 92-84 | 54-46 | 1 | W | 84 | O | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 7 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 6 | | 9/12/2021 | WASHINGTON | 71-79 | 37-47 | -5 | L | 82.5 | O | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 41 | 15 | | 9/17/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 70-103 | 39-61 | 2 | L | 84.5 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 22 | 12 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 54 | 15 | | 9/19/2021 | INDIANA | 98-87 | 46-46 | -7.5 | L | 82 | O | 35-71 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 37 | 15 | | 9/23/2021 | DALLAS | 81-64 | 44-29 | -3 | W | 82.5 | U | 33-73 | 45.2% | 51 | 12 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 39 | 11 | | 9/26/2021 | @ MINNESOTA | 89-76 | 42-38 | 2 | W | 82 | U | 32-65 | 49.2% | 40 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 34 | 20 | | 9/28/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/3/2021 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/19/2021 | MINNESOTA | 82-71 | 42-36 | -3.5 | W | 74 | O | 27-55 | 49.1% | 41 | 17 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 27 | 10 | | 8/24/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 76-62 | 40-32 | -1.5 | W | 76.5 | U | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 11 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 36 | 14 | | 8/26/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 76-72 | 36-39 | -6.5 | L | 72 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 14 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 29 | 15 | | 8/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 76-61 | 40-37 | -6 | L | 71.5 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 50 | 18 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 24 | 14 | | 8/31/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 85-75 | 45-37 | -6 | W | 73 | O | 34-69 | 49.3% | 43 | 15 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 27 | 14 | | 9/7/2021 | @ DALLAS | 83-56 | 48-25 | -5 | W | 73 | P | 33-68 | 48.5% | 52 | 13 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 38 | 12 | | 9/9/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-57 | 45-28 | -6 | W | 70 | O | 23-52 | 44.2% | 39 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 27 | 17 | | 9/11/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 76-67 | 49-43 | -2 | W | 74 | O | 24-64 | 37.5% | 35 | 9 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 36 | 15 | | 9/15/2021 | NEW YORK | 98-69 | 44-47 | -7.5 | L | 72.5 | O | 36-71 | 50.7% | 46 | 20 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 29 | 28 | | 9/19/2021 | ATLANTA | 84-64 | 46-37 | -7.5 | W | 74 | O | 29-75 | 38.7% | 61 | 10 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 36 | 7 | | 9/28/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/3/2021 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 31-27 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 31 of 57 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-4 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 14-12 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 17 of 26 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-1 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/27/2021 | CHICAGO | 58 | -5 | Under | 30 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 7-7 | 100.0% | 38 | 14 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 74 | 157.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 50 | 13 | 18 | 6/19/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 156 | Over | 34 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 8 | 18 | | | CHICAGO | 91 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 20-21 | 95.2% | 32 | 5 | 12 | 6/17/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | 155.5 | Over | 36 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 43 | 8 | 14 | | | CHICAGO | 81 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 44 | 10 | 12 | 9/15/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 165.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 27-29 | 93.1% | 49 | 17 | 12 | | N | CHICAGO | 81 | -2 | Over | 41 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 25 | 5 | 12 | 8/14/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 168 | SU ATS | 37 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 53 | 12 | 8 | | N | CHICAGO | 74 | -6 | Under | 28 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 8/8/2020 | CHICAGO | 100 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 29-32 | 90.6% | 35 | 7 | 21 | | N | CONNECTICUT | 93 | 167 | Over | 46 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 27 | 4 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 40-52 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 24-35 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 30-45 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-46 against the 1rst half line (-22.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-39 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 23-40 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-45 against the 1rst half line (-23.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 21-33 against the 1rst half line (-15.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 25-39 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-44 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 19-31 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 19-30 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 13-25 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 15-25 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 9-22 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 15-28 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 45.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 15-34 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 118-85 against the 1rst half line (+24.5 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 70-52 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 52-34 against the 1rst half line (+14.6 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-11 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 34-20 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 65-45 against the 1rst half line (+15.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 63-45 against the 1rst half line (+13.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 47-27 against the 1rst half line (+17.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 71-58 against the 1rst half line (+7.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 45-26 against the 1rst half line (+16.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-10 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 64-40 against the 1rst half line (+20.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after 2 straight games outrebounding opponent by 10 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-8 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) after a game outrebounding opponent by 15 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 36-24 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 44-28 against the 1rst half line (+13.2 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 30-16 against the 1rst half line (+12.4 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.9, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 97-72 against the 1rst half line (+17.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 88-66 against the 1rst half line (+15.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-64 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 87-71 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 68-55 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 69-49 against the 1rst half line (+15.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 67-44 against the 1rst half line (+18.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-51 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 58-43 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 36-22 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-28 against the 1rst half line (+17.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 62-47 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 51-35 against the 1rst half line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 73-59 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 54-37 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 75-62 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 59-34 against the 1rst half line (+21.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 72-52 against the 1rst half line (+14.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-18 against the 1rst half line (+16.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 49-31 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 72-44 against the 1rst half line (+23.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 97-72 against the 1rst half line (+17.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 67-41 against the 1rst half line (+21.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 90-67 against the 1rst half line (+16.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 46-24 against the 1rst half line (+19.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 58-41 against the 1rst half line (+12.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-34 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 63-40 against the 1rst half line (+19.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 89-69 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 72-45 against the 1rst half line (+22.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 97-74 against the 1rst half line (+15.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-38 against the 1rst half line (+20.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 85-62 against the 1rst half line (+16.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 68-44 against the 1rst half line (+19.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 93-71 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.3, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 63-35 against the 1rst half line (+24.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 83-58 against the 1rst half line (+19.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 56-30 against the 1rst half line (+23.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 70-52 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Wade is 54-35 OVER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-10 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 45.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.6, OPPONENT 49.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 5 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 48.5, OPPONENT 48.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 32-14 OVER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 25-11 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.3, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 30-19 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 28-12 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 35-23 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 46-26 OVER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 33-21 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 31-18 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 38-22 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 41-27 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 36-25 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 44-25 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.2, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.1, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 17-3 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 23-7 OVER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 27-10 OVER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 40-27 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.7, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 29-10 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 41-27 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-7 OVER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.3, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 39-22 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 33-10 OVER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 48-27 OVER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 28-9 OVER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 40-24 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.5, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-14 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-10 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 33-10 OVER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 47-27 OVER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 25-9 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 24-5 OVER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Wade is 33-8 OVER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 45.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Wade is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.1, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 30-18 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 11-1 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 47.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 15-3 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 46.1, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 48.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.0, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.7, OPPONENT 45.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 48.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 46.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 30-8 OVER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 42-25 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.0, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-8 OVER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.7, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 23-9 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 67-54 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 46.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.8, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games outrebounding opponent by 10 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 45.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 38-24 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-17 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 40-28 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 49-36 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 5 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-19 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-10 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 17-4 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 11-1 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 6 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 8-0 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 7 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.9, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 47-35 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 50-37 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.6, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 37-25 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 34-23 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 127 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 112 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 11 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 6 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 18 games went over the first half total, while 15 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 12 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 9 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 12 games went over the first half total, while 11 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 05/12/2021 - Gabby Williams is out for season ( Suspension ) | |
| [F] 09/27/2021 - DeWanna Bonner is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Chicago Sky ( Back ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/17/2024 9:19:21 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|