| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO CONNECTICUT |
|
| 154 | 101 Final 95 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | | | |
613 | CHICAGO | +250 | 614 | CONNECTICUT | -330 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (186-60 since 1997.) (75.6%, +84.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games. (161-29 since 1997.) (84.7%, +81 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games. (162-30 since 1997.) (84.4%, +81 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (165-37 since 1997.) (81.7%, +80.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (226-57 since 1997.) (79.9%, +77.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (251-90 since 1997.) (73.6%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season. (77-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.7%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (139-29 since 1997.) (82.7%, +67.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (153-47 since 1997.) (76.5%, +66.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in August or September games. (160-51 since 1997.) (75.8%, +66.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in August or September games. (42-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (64-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.1%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season. (82-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.4%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (113-21 since 1997.) (84.3%, +64.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games. (118-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (124-37 since 1997.) (77%, +64 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (104-18 since 1997.) (85.2%, +57.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more. (145-37 since 1997.) (79.7%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more. (86-8 since 1997.) (91.5%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more. (86-8 since 1997.) (91.5%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (104-38 since 1997.) (73.2%, +54.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (136-48 since 1997.) (73.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (97-16 since 1997.) (85.8%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (132-42 since 1997.) (75.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (67-4 since 1997.) (94.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (67-4 since 1997.) (94.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (155-78 since 1997.) (66.5%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (122-31 since 1997.) (79.7%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, in August or September games. (85-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (85-17 since 1997.) (83.3%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (109-30 since 1997.) (78.4%, +50.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (97-18 since 1997.) (84.3%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins. (90-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in August or September games. (64-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (41-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (99-27 since 1997.) (78.6%, +48.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (135-59 since 1997.) (69.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in August or September games. (109-29 since 1997.) (79%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (143-95 since 1997.) (60.1%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, in August or September games. (55-5 since 1997.) (91.7%, +42.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in the conference finals. (95-30 since 1997.) (76%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more. (51-4 since 1997.) (92.7%, +41.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, in August or September games. (55-6 since 1997.) (90.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games. (51-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (85%, +41.2 units. Rating = 6*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games. (47-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (94%, +40.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games. (149-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +34.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more. (58-6 since 1997.) (90.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more. (58-6 since 1997.) (90.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, in August or September games. (35-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.5%, +30.5 units. Rating = 6*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (46-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (79-31 since 1997.) (71.8%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games. (47-7 since 1997.) (87%, +36 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (63-27 since 1997.) (70%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - as a # 1 seed in the playoffs, in the conference finals. (56-10 since 1997.) (84.8%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (25-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +22 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%). (66-20 since 1997.) (76.7%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (52-10 since 1997.) (83.9%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (33-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (37-2 since 1997.) (94.9%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (21-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.8%, +15.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (39-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +29.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games. (28-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games. (40-5 since 1997.) (88.9%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (34-2 since 1997.) (94.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (34-2 since 1997.) (94.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (46-13 since 1997.) (78%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog. (47-13 since 1997.) (78.3%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two excellent free throw shooting teams (>=80%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (61-35 since 1997.) (63.5%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more. (25-2 since 1997.) (92.6%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, in August or September games. (56-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two excellent FT shooting teams (>=80%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (42-21 since 1997.) (66.7%, +18.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (36-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +18.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (43-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +14.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season. (42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two excellent free throw shooting teams (>=80%), red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +13.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games. (80-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (40-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (47-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +19.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (46-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +17.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (58-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +19.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +15.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (75-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (88-66 since 1997.) (57.1%, +48.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (69-53 since 1997.) (56.6%, +40.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (62-43 since 1997.) (59%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (125-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +58.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, on Tuesday nights. (41-32 since 1997.) (56.2%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (30-14 since 1997.) (68.2%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (100-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (53-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a road favorite. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +15.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 76 | | 29-66 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 32.5% | 11-13 | 83.7% | 37 | 6 | 14 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 16-19 | 83.7% | 46 | 11 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 675 times, while CHICAGO won 304 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 49-49 against the money line (+27.0 Units) in road games when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.9 | CHICAGO is 14-7 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 77.8 |
|
CHICAGO is 164-211 against the money line (-70.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 83.4 | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 84.6 | CHICAGO is 23-52 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 81.3 | CHICAGO is 9-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.8 | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 82.6 | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 88.0 | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 92.2 | CHICAGO is 34-64 against the money line (-39.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 68.0 | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 67.4 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 70.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 69.1 | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 70.4 | CONNECTICUT is 93-40 against the money line (+44.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 67.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 69.0 | CONNECTICUT is 71-47 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 66.6 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 69.0 | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 71.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 71.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 73.3 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 18-10 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 83-77 against the money line (+31.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 124-118 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 55-52 against the money line (+24.9 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 31-35 against the money line (+23.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 56-56 against the money line (+28.7 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 113-174 against the money line (-65.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 114-148 against the money line (-61.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 129-180 against the money line (-60.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-56 against the money line (-31.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-21 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-16 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-5 against the money line (+17.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 against the money line (+13.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 6*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games on Tuesday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.9, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 16-9 against the money line (+19.0 Units) off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 27-16 against the money line (+20.3 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 36-55 against the money line (-34.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-28 against the money line (-21.7 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 56-74 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 0-9 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 69.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 6*) | CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-20 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-16 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-32 against the money line (-28.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-5 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-1 against the money line (+17.6 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-3 against the money line (+22.5 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-12 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) on Tuesday this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 226-168 against the money line (+28.4 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 2 straight games outrebounding opponent by 10 or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-25 against the money line (+18.3 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 67.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-8 against the money line (+17.5 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) off a home win this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-1 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after a win by 10 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-21 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-3 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 66.7 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 66.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 66.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-1 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 67.0 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-7 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-6 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 5 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-3 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 18-16 | -8.6 | 14-19 | 19-15 | 83.4 | 42.4 | 44.3% | 41.6 | 81.2 | 40.1 | 43.1% | 43.7 | Road Games | 11-6 | +6.5 | 9-7 | 7-10 | 83.8 | 44.1 | 45.1% | 42.6 | 78.4 | 38.1 | 42.2% | 42.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 81.8 | 41.6 | 45.1% | 38.6 | 81.8 | 44.2 | 46.4% | 41.0 | Division Games | 10-5 | -5.3 | 7-7 | 8-7 | 83.4 | 43.7 | 43.5% | 42.8 | 78.3 | 38.4 | 42.3% | 43.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.4 | 42.4 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 84.7% | 42 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.6 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 34.2% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.8 | 44.1 | 31-69 | 45.1% | 8-21 | 35.8% | 14-17 | 82.7% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 40.1 | 30-70 | 43.1% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 80.4 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 80.5% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.4 | 38.1 | 29-70 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 31.0% | 14-18 | 76.0% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 26-6 | +20.5 | 22-9 | 12-20 | 79.7 | 40.7 | 44.4% | 45.2 | 69.9 | 34.9 | 40.9% | 34.2 | Home Games | 15-1 | +13.8 | 12-4 | 5-11 | 80.4 | 39.7 | 45.6% | 44.7 | 69.1 | 36.6 | 41.2% | 33.1 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 5-0 | 1-4 | 83.2 | 46.4 | 43.9% | 46.6 | 62.6 | 36.0 | 39.0% | 33.2 | Division Games | 12-3 | +8.8 | 8-6 | 8-7 | 82.1 | 42.3 | 45.4% | 46.9 | 71.1 | 35.8 | 39.9% | 34.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.7 | 40.7 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 14-18 | 81.6% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 41.5 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 7-21 | 34.7% | 14-17 | 80.7% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.4 | 39.7 | 29-64 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 15-19 | 81.1% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.9 | 34.9 | 26-62 | 40.9% | 6-20 | 31.0% | 13-15 | 82.4% | 34 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 14-17 | 80.6% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.1 | 36.6 | 26-63 | 41.2% | 6-19 | 31.2% | 11-13 | 84.4% | 33 | 6 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.6, CONNECTICUT 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
8/21/2021 | MINNESOTA | 95-101 | L | +120 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 27 | 9 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 48 | 13 | 8/24/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 86-79 | W | -300 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 41 | 12 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 7 | 8/27/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 73-69 | W | +200 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 18 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 40 | 17 | 8/29/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 107-75 | W | +210 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 43 | 9 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 27 | 12 | 8/31/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 83-103 | L | -110 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 11 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 42 | 8 | 9/2/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 83-90 | L | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 13 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 49 | 12 | 9/5/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 92-84 | W | +105 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 7 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 6 | 9/12/2021 | WASHINGTON | 71-79 | L | -400 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 41 | 15 | 9/17/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 70-103 | L | +145 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 22 | 12 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 54 | 15 | 9/19/2021 | INDIANA | 98-87 | W | -950 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 37 | 15 | 9/23/2021 | DALLAS | 81-64 | W | -220 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 51 | 12 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 39 | 11 | 9/26/2021 | @ MINNESOTA | 89-76 | W | +155 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 40 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 34 | 20 | 9/28/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/3/2021 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/19/2021 | MINNESOTA | 82-71 | W | -300 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 41 | 17 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 27 | 10 | 8/24/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 76-62 | W | -155 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 11 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 36 | 14 | 8/26/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 76-72 | W | -750 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 14 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 29 | 15 | 8/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 76-61 | W | -600 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 50 | 18 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 24 | 14 | 8/31/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 85-75 | W | -550 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 43 | 15 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 27 | 14 | 9/7/2021 | @ DALLAS | 83-56 | W | -450 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 52 | 13 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 38 | 12 | 9/9/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-57 | W | -550 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 39 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 27 | 17 | 9/11/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 76-67 | W | -165 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 35 | 9 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 36 | 15 | 9/15/2021 | NEW YORK | 98-69 | W | -950 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 46 | 20 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 29 | 28 | 9/19/2021 | ATLANTA | 84-64 | W | -1050 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 61 | 10 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 36 | 7 | 9/28/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/3/2021 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 30-27 (-11.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-5 (-1.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 10-15 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-1 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/27/2021 | CHICAGO | 58 | -5 | Under | 30 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 7-7 | 100.0% | 38 | 14 | 18 | | CONNECTICUT | 74 | 157.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 50 | 13 | 18 | 6/19/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 156 | Over | 34 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 8 | 18 | | CHICAGO | 91 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 20-21 | 95.2% | 32 | 5 | 12 | 6/17/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | 155.5 | Over | 36 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 43 | 8 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 81 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 44 | 10 | 12 | 9/15/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 165.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 27-29 | 93.1% | 49 | 17 | 12 | N | CHICAGO | 81 | -2 | Over | 41 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 25 | 5 | 12 | 8/14/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 168 | SU ATS | 37 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 53 | 12 | 8 | N | CHICAGO | 74 | -6 | Under | 28 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 8/8/2020 | CHICAGO | 100 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 29-32 | 90.6% | 35 | 7 | 21 | N | CONNECTICUT | 93 | 167 | Over | 46 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 27 | 4 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 28-15 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 17-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 16-9 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 14-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 18-10 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Wade is 17-20 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 10-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-30 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 10-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 32-30 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 36-34 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 16-21 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 37-34 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 26-24 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 16-20 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 118-81 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-25 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-25 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 57-25 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 58-29 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-12 against the money line (+14.5 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 63-42 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-24 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 44-27 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-47 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 44-25 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 22-9 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 13-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 61-41 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 41-25 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 31-15 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 23-9 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 18-6 against the money line (+12.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 34-23 against the money line (+10.9 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-5 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 29-8 against the money line (+19.6 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 13-2 against the money line (+14.3 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 46-17 against the money line (+22.8 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 22-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 48-22 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-8 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 30-14 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 102-64 against the money line (+27.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 94-58 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 82-56 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 93-61 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 75-45 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 59-36 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 79-37 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-21 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 49-15 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 49-19 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-8 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 56-29 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 30-14 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 65-44 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 39-19 against the money line (+28.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 23-8 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 13-6 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 77-41 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 51-24 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 52-49 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-25 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 46-29 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 60-47 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 59-24 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 84-45 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 63-27 against the money line (+25.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 88-48 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 57-32 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 72-47 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 32-22 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 43-36 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 73-38 against the money line (+32.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 102-63 against the money line (+25.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 70-34 against the money line (+36.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 97-56 against the money line (+35.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 48-21 against the money line (+37.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 63-36 against the money line (+34.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 54-23 against the money line (+27.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 79-40 against the money line (+25.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 65-33 against the money line (+27.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 96-57 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-38 against the money line (+33.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 103-65 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-33 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 88-56 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 69-38 against the money line (+28.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 97-63 against the money line (+26.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 60-36 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 80-59 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 54-30 against the money line (+31.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 72-48 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 187 times, while the road underdog won straight up 56 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 05/12/2021 - Gabby Williams is out for season ( Suspension ) | |
[F] 09/27/2021 - DeWanna Bonner is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Chicago Sky ( Back ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:02:06 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|