| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS CONNECTICUT |
|
| 160.5 | 68 Final 99 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
615 | DALLAS | +300 | 616 | CONNECTICUT | -400 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (168-63 since 1997.) (72.7%, +54.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (115-52 since 1997.) (68.9%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (30-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.1%, +23.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off a upset loss as a favorite. (81-46 since 1997.) (63.8%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (63-35 since 1997.) (64.3%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games. (48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (36-2 since 1997.) (94.7%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (20-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (24-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +21.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (39-8 since 1997.) (83%, +29.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off an upset win as an underdog, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (59-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games. (32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights. (20-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +18.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (57-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (26-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +17.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off an upset win as a road underdog, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (25-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (108-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +48.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (421-294 since 1997.) (58.9%, +81.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (64-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.4%, +51.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG). (52-34 since 1997.) (60.5%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, in non-conference games. (53-32 since 1997.) (62.4%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games. (31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May games. (32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games. (98-121 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.7%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 73 | | 27-67 | 40.0% | 7-22 | 33.4% | 12-15 | 82.0% | 39 | 8 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | | 32-68 | 46.5% | 7-18 | 37.4% | 15-19 | 81.2% | 47 | 10 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 799 times, while DALLAS won 179 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 5-0 against the money line (+8.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.6, OPPONENT 79.2 | CONNECTICUT is 10-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 84.0 |
|
DALLAS is 63-98 against the money line (-38.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.2 | DALLAS is 4-11 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 84.6 | DALLAS is 17-45 against the money line (-28.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 86.0 | DALLAS is 3-12 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 77.2, OPPONENT 81.8 | DALLAS is 6-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 87.6 | DALLAS is 4-15 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 89.6 | DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 81.2 | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 78.8, OPPONENT 86.4 | CONNECTICUT is 32-16 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 73.5 | CONNECTICUT is 98-43 against the money line (+51.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 125-85 against the money line (+30.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 85-52 against the money line (+39.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 104-55 against the money line (+36.3 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 69.4 | CONNECTICUT is 94-41 against the money line (+43.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 86-50 against the money line (+33.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 207-144 against the money line (+41.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 71-47 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 67.6 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 69.0 | CONNECTICUT is 24-10 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 71.1 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 59-99 against the money line (-39.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 48-89 against the money line (-40.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-12 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-12 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-17 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-16 against the money line (+12.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 100-81 against the money line (+18.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-12 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-17 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-17 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-16 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-17 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 146-112 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 4-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) as a road underdog this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games in May games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 13-8 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-4 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ more fouls than opponent since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 78.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-0 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-34 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 35-59 against the money line (-39.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 33-56 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-35 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-25 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 35-59 against the money line (-39.6 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-18 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) off an upset win as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 57-91 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-80 against the money line (-39.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 42-72 against the money line (-39.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 38-62 against the money line (-32.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 51-78 against the money line (-38.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 42-66 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 31-58 against the money line (-41.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 46-71 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 53-81 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-22 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 47-74 against the money line (-40.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 51-86 against the money line (-47.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 39-63 against the money line (-34.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 27-47 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 33-56 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 53-82 against the money line (-43.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 39-64 against the money line (-37.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 26-41 against the money line (-25.5 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 17-29 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-25 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games on Thursday since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 157-135 against the money line (+23.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 122-99 against the money line (+26.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 69-51 against the money line (+29.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 115-100 against the money line (+22.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 56-45 against the money line (+16.5 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-7 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-16 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-2 | +4.1 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 82.1 | 37.6 | 41.6% | 41.9 | 78.0 | 40.3 | 43.8% | 41.6 | Road Games | 4-0 | +7.7 | 4-0 | 3-1 | 88.5 | 37.7 | 44.8% | 41.2 | 79.5 | 40.2 | 44.6% | 39.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 84.4 | 37.4 | 44.0% | 42.8 | 78.8 | 39.8 | 44.5% | 38.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.1 | 37.6 | 28-68 | 41.6% | 9-23 | 36.8% | 17-21 | 82.3% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 79.5 | 38.8 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 7-22 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 88.5 | 37.7 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 21 | 5 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.0 | 40.3 | 28-64 | 43.8% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 42 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 79.3 | 39.8 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.5 | 40.2 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 14-19 | 77.3% | 39 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 4-2 | -3.8 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 85.2 | 43.3 | 44.2% | 44.3 | 74.3 | 33.0 | 42.4% | 36.5 | Home Games | 2-1 | -2.6 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 82.7 | 41.7 | 41.1% | 47.7 | 76.7 | 29.0 | 43.3% | 36.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 86.4 | 46.0 | 44.5% | 44.2 | 73.0 | 32.0 | 41.4% | 36.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.2 | 43.3 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-16 | 37.1% | 20-25 | 79.3% | 44 | 11 | 19 | 21 | 10 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 85.4 | 42.2 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 37.2% | 18-23 | 80.4% | 45 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.7 | 41.7 | 29-70 | 41.1% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 19-25 | 77.0% | 48 | 14 | 20 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.3 | 33.0 | 25-60 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 17-21 | 83.2% | 36 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 78.2 | 37.5 | 28-68 | 41.8% | 7-22 | 33.5% | 14-18 | 77.4% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.7 | 29.0 | 27-62 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 32.7% | 17-20 | 88.1% | 37 | 8 | 14 | 25 | 7 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 69, CONNECTICUT 64.3 |
| | |
|
|
5/7/2022 | ATLANTA | 59-66 | L | -360 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 48 | 17 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 57 | 21 | 5/13/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 94-86 | W | +250 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 41 | 18 | 5/15/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 81-71 | W | +105 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 34 | 17 | 5/17/2022 | WASHINGTON | 68-84 | L | +145 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 34 | 14 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 42 | 13 | 5/19/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 94-84 | W | +135 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 47 | 9 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 39 | 4 | 5/21/2022 | MINNESOTA | 94-78 | W | -140 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 46 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 35 | 13 | 5/24/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 85-77 | W | +280 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 46 | 9 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 43 | 10 | 5/26/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2022 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2022 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/7/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 79-81 | L | -220 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 45 | 15 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 15 | 5/14/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 77-60 | W | -330 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 53 | 19 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 32 | 19 | 5/17/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 92-65 | W | -450 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 17 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 33 | 29 | 5/20/2022 | INDIANA | 94-85 | W | | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 15 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 32 | 19 | 5/22/2022 | @ INDIANA | 92-70 | W | | 35-68 | 51.5% | 42 | 12 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 40 | 13 | 5/24/2022 | DALLAS | 77-85 | L | -360 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 43 | 10 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 46 | 9 | 5/26/2022 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2022 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2022 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2022 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2022 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 40-34 (-8.0 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 5-1 (+1.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
DALLAS is 15-21 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
DALLAS is 1-1 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/24/2022 | DALLAS | 85 | 160.5 | SU ATS | 27 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 46 | 13 | 9 | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | -8 | Over | 39 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 43 | 11 | 10 | 9/7/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 48 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 52 | 10 | 13 | | DALLAS | 56 | 148.5 | Under | 25 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 7-32 | 21.9% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 9 | 12 | 8/15/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 38 | 9 | 11 | | DALLAS | 59 | 156.5 | Under | 27 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 26 | 1 | 19 | 6/22/2021 | DALLAS | 70 | 155.5 | Under | 38 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 33 | 6 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 0 | SU ATS | 30 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 45 | 12 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Johnson is 10-7 against the money line (+11.6 Units) as a road underdog as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Johnson is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 1-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Johnson is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 121-86 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-10 against the money line (+9.7 Units) on Thursday as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-32 against the money line (+33.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 44-28 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 22-10 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 61-32 against the money line (+33.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 33-8 against the money line (+15.6 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 60-43 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 29-13 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 104-68 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 95-62 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 96-65 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 46-30 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 64-25 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 51-21 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 58-31 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 89-52 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 73-51 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 103-67 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-60 against the money line (+25.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 64-40 against the money line (+24.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 80-44 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 97-61 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-42 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 104-69 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-67 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 81-63 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 73-52 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 101 times, while the road underdog won straight up 34 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 05/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 8:23:35 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|