| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
155
| 71
Final
79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 633 | WASHINGTON | +375 | | 634 | CONNECTICUT | -550 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(114-18 since 1997.) (86.4%, +59.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(153-71 since 1997.) (68.3%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(125-38 since 1997.) (76.7%, +55 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(117-52 since 1997.) (69.2%, +49.2 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(87-20 since 1997.) (81.3%, +48.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(129-96 since 1997.) (57.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games.
(65-13 since 1997.) (83.3%, +42.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, on Saturday games.
(85-44 since 1997.) (65.9%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(32-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +23.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(38-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(29-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(27-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.4%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(41-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(29-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(64-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.1%, +50.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season, on Saturday games.
(52-23 since 1997.) (69.3%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 125 points or less.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +15.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(99-123 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.6%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 71 | | 26-64 | 40.8% | 7-24 | 31.0% | 12-15 | 79.0% | 35 | 6 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 32-67 | 46.8% | 7-18 | 35.7% | 15-19 | 81.8% | 47 | 11 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 823 times, while WASHINGTON won 162 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 10-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 84.0 |
|
WASHINGTON is 98-150 against the money line (-75.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 84.8 | WASHINGTON is 51-103 against the money line (-58.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 76.3 | WASHINGTON is 74-141 against the money line (-83.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.7 | WASHINGTON is 3-20 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 88.7 | WASHINGTON is 2-17 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 90.1 | WASHINGTON is 47-123 against the money line (-100.7 Units) when they grab 32 to 36 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 76.9 | WASHINGTON is 27-96 against the money line (-73.3 Units) when they grab 10+ fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 79.6 | WASHINGTON is 46-98 against the money line (-67.1 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 73.8 | WASHINGTON is 154-226 against the money line (-65.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 33-16 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 73.4 | CONNECTICUT is 98-43 against the money line (+51.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 125-85 against the money line (+30.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 85-52 against the money line (+39.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 105-55 against the money line (+37.3 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 69.4 | CONNECTICUT is 86-50 against the money line (+33.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 207-144 against the money line (+41.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 15-1 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 68.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 67.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 67.9 | CONNECTICUT is 19-0 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when they grab 10+ more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 66.6 | CONNECTICUT is 25-10 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 76.1 | CONNECTICUT is 19-6 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 76.0 | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 70.8 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 24-58 against the money line (-35.3 Units) versus good pressure defensive teams - forcing >=17 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 62-148 against the money line (-59.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-66 against the money line (-38.9 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-92 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-12 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-12 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-17 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-16 against the money line (+13.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+10.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-12 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-17 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-15 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-17 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-17 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 147-112 against the money line (+27.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 28-34 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 5 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 354-473 against the money line (-122.8 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 49-84 against the money line (-34.1 Units) on Saturday games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 205-282 against the money line (-100.4 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 127-186 against the money line (-61.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 80-130 against the money line (-55.2 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 178-249 against the money line (-87.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 162-233 against the money line (-84.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-112 against the money line (-49.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-59 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-25 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after 4 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 61-100 against the money line (-53.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 80-118 against the money line (-61.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-95 against the money line (-44.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-71 against the money line (-52.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 54-63 against the money line (-29.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-37 against the money line (-33.8 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 10-31 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after allowing 55 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 65.6, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 39-65 against the money line (-31.5 Units) after a combined score of 125 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 42-52 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-2 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-12 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 65.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-10 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ less fouls than opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 71-32 against the money line (+23.8 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-9 against the money line (+14.2 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-9 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-7 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-16 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-16 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-5 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 6-2 | +2.4 | 6-2 | 1-7 | 80.2 | 41.7 | 45.0% | 40.2 | 72.4 | 35.6 | 42.2% | 39.6 | | Road Games | 3-0 | +3.2 | 3-0 | 0-3 | 80.0 | 42.7 | 46.3% | 43.7 | 69.0 | 33.7 | 38.9% | 37.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.5 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 78.2 | 40.2 | 45.8% | 39.8 | 73.4 | 36.4 | 44.1% | 36.2 | | Division Games | 3-1 | +1.8 | 3-1 | 0-4 | 76.2 | 42.5 | 42.6% | 37.7 | 68.7 | 34.5 | 43.2% | 41.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.2 | 41.7 | 29-65 | 45.0% | 7-21 | 35.7% | 14-17 | 81.5% | 40 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.7 | 29-68 | 42.7% | 7-22 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 78.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.0 | 42.7 | 29-63 | 46.3% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 15-18 | 83.6% | 44 | 7 | 21 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.4 | 35.6 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 7-21 | 31.4% | 11-15 | 76.0% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 39.9 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 8-22 | 36.2% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.0 | 33.7 | 25-64 | 38.9% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 12-17 | 71.2% | 38 | 7 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 5-2 | -2.8 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 87.1 | 43.9 | 44.8% | 44.7 | 73.4 | 33.3 | 41.5% | 36.1 | | Home Games | 3-1 | -1.6 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 86.7 | 43.0 | 43.0% | 47.5 | 74.5 | 30.5 | 41.7% | 36.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 5-0 | 90.8 | 45.6 | 46.3% | 43.0 | 74.6 | 34.0 | 41.5% | 37.0 | | Division Games | 3-1 | -1.2 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 89.2 | 43.0 | 46.4% | 42.5 | 75.2 | 36.5 | 44.7% | 35.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.1 | 43.9 | 30-68 | 44.8% | 6-17 | 35.6% | 21-25 | 81.4% | 45 | 12 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 85.3 | 42.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 36.7% | 18-23 | 80.6% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.7 | 43.0 | 30-70 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 20-25 | 81.2% | 47 | 14 | 21 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.4 | 33.3 | 25-61 | 41.5% | 7-20 | 32.2% | 16-20 | 83.2% | 36 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 7 | 18 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 79 | 37.6 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.5 | 30.5 | 26-63 | 41.7% | 6-20 | 32.9% | 15-18 | 87.3% | 36 | 8 | 14 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 69, CONNECTICUT 65.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/6/2022 | INDIANA | 84-70 | W | -450 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 35 | 7 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 50 | 14 | | 5/8/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-66 | W | +120 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 46 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 15 | | 5/10/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 89-76 | W | +175 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 42 | 9 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 42 | 16 | | 5/13/2022 | DALLAS | 86-94 | L | -330 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 41 | 18 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | | 5/17/2022 | @ DALLAS | 84-68 | W | -165 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 42 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 34 | 14 | | 5/20/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 78-73 | W | -120 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 43 | 17 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 35 | 14 | | 5/22/2022 | CHICAGO | 73-82 | L | -120 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 37 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 41 | 15 | | 5/24/2022 | ATLANTA | 70-50 | W | -400 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 36 | 13 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 40 | 23 | | 5/28/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2022 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2022 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2022 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/12/2022 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/7/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 79-81 | L | -220 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 45 | 15 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 15 | | 5/14/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 77-60 | W | -330 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 53 | 19 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 32 | 19 | | 5/17/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 92-65 | W | -450 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 17 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 33 | 29 | | 5/20/2022 | INDIANA | 94-85 | W | | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 15 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 32 | 19 | | 5/22/2022 | @ INDIANA | 92-70 | W | | 35-68 | 51.5% | 42 | 12 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 40 | 13 | | 5/24/2022 | DALLAS | 77-85 | L | -360 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 43 | 10 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 46 | 9 | | 5/26/2022 | DALLAS | 99-68 | W | -400 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 47 | 13 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 34 | 19 | | 5/28/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2022 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2022 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2022 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2022 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 55-38 (+9.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 4-1 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 33-13 (+9.9 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 1-0 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/31/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | -10 | SU | 45 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 43 | 16 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 75 | 148.5 | Over | 37 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 27 | 3 | 14 | 6/29/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 90 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 12-24 | 50.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 58 | 17 | 20 | | | WASHINGTON | 71 | 158 | Over | 33 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 12-36 | 33.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 19 | 1 | 10 | 5/28/2021 | WASHINGTON | 81 | 156 | ATS | 47 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 9-30 | 30.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 41 | 9 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -7.5 | SU Over | 44 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 42 | 6 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 11-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games in May games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 97-83 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 47-34 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 100-85 against the money line (+18.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 104-88 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games off a home win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 61-42 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-12 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 84-60 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 37-28 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 74-84 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 60-54 against the money line (-21.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 32-43 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 32-50 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 44-47 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-26 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 32-33 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 7-12 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 83-84 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 21-30 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 43-60 against the money line (-22.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 18-29 against the money line (-13.5 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 9-34 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 122-86 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 64-27 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 64-27 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 45-28 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 23-10 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 14-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 15-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 42-34 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 42-28 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 34-8 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-10 against the money line (+15.6 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 47-19 against the money line (+18.8 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 49-25 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 105-68 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 96-62 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 97-65 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 47-30 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 65-25 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 52-21 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 59-31 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-16 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 66-47 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 78-44 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 33-20 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 90-52 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 74-51 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 104-67 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 99-60 against the money line (+26.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 65-40 against the money line (+25.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 81-44 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-61 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-26 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 99-67 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 82-63 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 74-52 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 119 times, while the road underdog won straight up 19 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 05/27/2022 - Alysha Clark is downgraded to OUT Saturday vs Connecticut Sun ( Quarantine ) | | [F] 05/26/2022 - Elena Delle Donne is OUT Saturday vs Connecticut Sun ( Rest ) | |
| [G] 05/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/19/2024 1:38:43 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|