| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
157.5
| 72
Final
74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 625 | WASHINGTON | +250 | | 626 | CONNECTICUT | -330 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Sunday games.
(78-14 since 1997.) (84.8%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Sunday games.
(79-17 since 1997.) (82.3%, +42.6 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(52-35 since 1997.) (59.8%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(37-22 since 1997.) (62.7%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(104-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +47.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 4 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(20-8 since 1997.) (71.4%, +19.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(27-10 since 1997.) (73%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +14.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +14.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +14.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(22-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +16.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(91-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(54-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +15.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(196-136 since 1997.) (59%, +64.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(250-186 since 1997.) (57.3%, +62.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(35-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.6%, +42.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(122-90 since 1997.) (57.5%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(50-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(41-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.4%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(94-66 since 1997.) (58.8%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in July games.
(26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +29.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(79-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.4%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(65-27 since 1997.) (70.7%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(42-25 since 1997.) (62.7%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(30-14 since 1997.) (68.2%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(30-14 since 1997.) (68.2%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(30-14 since 1997.) (68.2%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in July games.
(40-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.8%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(22-9 since 1997.) (71%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, in July games.
(41-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(30-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(39-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in May, June, or July games.
(36-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.4%, +27.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(21-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(32-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(44-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(39-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home win by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(29-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(56-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, in July games.
(21-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +23.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(88-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(33-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.4%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 78 | | 30-67 | 44.1% | 8-24 | 34.5% | 10-14 | 76.1% | 39 | 7 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 32-69 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 35.6% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 45 | 10 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 669 times, while WASHINGTON won 301 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 77.4 | WASHINGTON is 12-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 76.0 | WASHINGTON is 20-13 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.6, OPPONENT 81.0 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-14.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 86.5 | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 16-24 against the money line (-19.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 84.0 |
|
WASHINGTON is 184-241 against the money line (-69.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 79.3 | WASHINGTON is 11-17 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 83.8 | WASHINGTON is 54-103 against the money line (-52.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 76.3 | WASHINGTON is 77-144 against the money line (-89.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.7 | WASHINGTON is 2-4 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 78.7 | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 86.9 | WASHINGTON is 3-21 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 89.8 | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 85.9 | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in road games when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 84.2 | WASHINGTON is 158-231 against the money line (-73.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 99-44 against the money line (+50.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 127-86 against the money line (+31.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 71.1 | CONNECTICUT is 15-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 71.7 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 70.3 | CONNECTICUT is 96-42 against the money line (+39.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 74.0 | CONNECTICUT is 87-51 against the money line (+33.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 71.2 | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.7 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 111-183 against the money line (-65.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-23 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-198 against the money line (-72.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 206-274 against the money line (-89.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 180-260 against the money line (-89.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 278-375 against the money line (-115.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-82 against the money line (-34.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 72-114 against the money line (-44.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 32-61 against the money line (-28.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 130-170 against the money line (-57.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 42-100 against the money line (-41.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 65-150 against the money line (-55.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-67 against the money line (-34.9 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-131 against the money line (-50.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-180 against the money line (-55.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-19 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 167-111 against the money line (+32.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 239-160 against the money line (+33.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 67.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 107-77 against the money line (+35.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 152-116 against the money line (+27.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 33-24 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 42-32 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-26 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 2-6 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 361-480 against the money line (-130.0 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 92-134 against the money line (-52.9 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 209-286 against the money line (-107.8 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-6 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-4 against the money line (-10.7 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-8 against the money line (-10.5 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-10.0 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 119-166 against the money line (-51.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-5 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after a win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 19-25 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-21 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-19 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-21 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-39 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 59-68 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-7 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-8 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 5-7 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.1, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 1-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 60-80 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-14 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 160-137 against the money line (+23.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 117-101 against the money line (+24.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 107-78 against the money line (+22.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-11 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-19 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-10 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 143-139 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-23 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-9 | -4.8 | 13-9 | 8-14 | 79.7 | 40.1 | 43.7% | 42.1 | 76.0 | 36.3 | 43.0% | 40.9 | | Road Games | 6-5 | +2.6 | 7-4 | 4-7 | 78.3 | 38.6 | 43.3% | 42.4 | 76.6 | 37.5 | 42.9% | 41.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.6 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 80.6 | 41.8 | 44.1% | 41.6 | 78.4 | 36.0 | 42.4% | 42.2 | | Division Games | 7-5 | -6 | 7-5 | 3-9 | 77.2 | 40.2 | 43.4% | 39.7 | 74.2 | 35.8 | 43.7% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.7 | 40.1 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 8-24 | 34.7% | 12-16 | 76.5% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.1 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 34.7% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.3 | 38.6 | 29-68 | 43.3% | 8-25 | 33.7% | 11-14 | 77.7% | 42 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 36.3 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 8-22 | 33.6% | 12-16 | 76.6% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.6 | 37.5 | 29-67 | 42.9% | 8-21 | 36.5% | 12-16 | 74.7% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-7 | -6.8 | 10-10 | 11-9 | 85.0 | 43.0 | 45.7% | 44.6 | 77.8 | 39.2 | 43.6% | 36.3 | | Home Games | 7-3 | -7.1 | 5-5 | 4-6 | 85.7 | 44.7 | 46.0% | 46.9 | 76.5 | 36.5 | 42.8% | 35.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -6.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 75.4 | 36.6 | 42.5% | 44.6 | 75.0 | 40.6 | 43.8% | 37.4 | | Division Games | 7-5 | -9.4 | 5-7 | 5-7 | 83.6 | 42.0 | 45.0% | 44.4 | 76.7 | 39.7 | 44.1% | 36.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.0 | 43.0 | 31-68 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 16-21 | 79.6% | 45 | 10 | 21 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.6 | 40.6 | 30-69 | 43.4% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.7 | 44.7 | 32-70 | 46.0% | 6-18 | 36.5% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 47 | 11 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.8 | 39.2 | 28-65 | 43.6% | 8-23 | 34.3% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 36 | 7 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 43.2% | 8-24 | 34.8% | 14-17 | 78.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.5 | 36.5 | 28-67 | 42.8% | 8-22 | 35.4% | 12-14 | 80.0% | 36 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.5, CONNECTICUT 69.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/24/2022 | ATLANTA | 70-50 | W | -400 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 36 | 13 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 40 | 23 | | 5/28/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-79 | L | +375 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 28 | 8 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 50 | 18 | | 5/31/2022 | @ INDIANA | 87-75 | W | -300 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 50 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 39 | 13 | | 6/3/2022 | NEW YORK | 70-74 | L | -850 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 50 | 14 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 38 | 12 | | 6/5/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 82-91 | L | +180 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 38 | 15 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 16 | | 6/8/2022 | CHICAGO | 84-82 | W | -165 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 41 | 13 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 38 | 13 | | 6/10/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-59 | W | -360 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 9 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 45 | 17 | | 6/12/2022 | PHOENIX | 90-99 | L | -250 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 59 | 18 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 15 | | 6/14/2022 | PHOENIX | 83-65 | W | -400 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 9 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 16 | | 6/16/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 65-77 | L | -175 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 13 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | | 6/19/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 71-63 | W | +145 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 10 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 48 | 16 | | 6/21/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-84 | L | -140 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 41 | 17 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 16 | | 6/23/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 71-85 | L | +170 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 45 | 12 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 39 | 7 | | 6/25/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 87-86 | W | +350 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 47 | 18 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 45 | 15 | | 6/28/2022 | ATLANTA | 92-74 | W | -330 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 36 | 14 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 35 | 14 | | 7/3/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2022 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/24/2022 | DALLAS | 77-85 | L | -360 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 43 | 10 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 46 | 9 | | 5/26/2022 | DALLAS | 99-68 | W | -400 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 47 | 13 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 34 | 19 | | 5/28/2022 | WASHINGTON | 79-71 | W | -550 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 50 | 18 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 28 | 8 | | 5/31/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 81-89 | L | +145 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 48 | 14 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 44 | 14 | | 6/2/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 97-90 | W | +170 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/3/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 92-88 | W | -270 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 42 | 21 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 27 | 20 | | 6/5/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 93-86 | W | +145 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 41 | 14 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 32 | 14 | | 6/8/2022 | INDIANA | 88-69 | W | | 31-66 | 47.0% | 51 | 16 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 37 | 15 | | 6/10/2022 | CHICAGO | 79-83 | L | -250 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 42 | 10 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 35 | 12 | | 6/15/2022 | ATLANTA | 105-92 | W | -550 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 44 | 11 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 16 | | 6/17/2022 | SEATTLE | 82-71 | W | -330 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 47 | 14 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 31 | 12 | | 6/19/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-71 | L | -165 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 48 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 10 | | 6/22/2022 | NEW YORK | 77-81 | L | -600 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 45 | 10 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 11 | | 6/26/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 72-61 | W | -360 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 20 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 17 | | 6/29/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 83-91 | L | +105 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 35 | 4 | 32-54 | 59.3% | 38 | 22 | | 7/3/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2022 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2022 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2022 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 56-39 (+8.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-2 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 34-13 (+10.9 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/19/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 63 | -3.5 | Under | 27 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 48 | 11 | 16 | | | WASHINGTON | 71 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 39 | 5 | 10 | 5/28/2022 | WASHINGTON | 71 | 155 | ATS | 37 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 28 | 7 | 8 | | | CONNECTICUT | 79 | -10 | SU Under | 41 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 50 | 10 | 18 | 8/31/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | -10 | SU | 45 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 43 | 16 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 75 | 148.5 | Over | 37 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 27 | 3 | 14 | 6/29/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 90 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 12-24 | 50.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 58 | 17 | 20 | | | WASHINGTON | 71 | 158 | Over | 33 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 12-36 | 33.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 19 | 1 | 10 | 5/28/2021 | WASHINGTON | 81 | 156 | ATS | 47 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 9-30 | 30.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 41 | 9 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -7.5 | SU Over | 44 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 42 | 6 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 104-90 against the money line (+5.7 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 47-35 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 104-89 against the money line (+10.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 60-43 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 106-91 against the money line (+4.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 30-18 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 26-19 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 4 or more consecutive overs as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-10 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games off a home win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 102-88 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 76-69 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 22-12 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 63-45 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 86-64 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 77-87 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 37-41 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 63-58 against the money line (-29.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-11 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after a game attempting 80 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 4-8 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 1-6 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
|
Thibault is 15-21 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 37-49 against the money line (-20.0 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 58-61 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 28-29 against the money line (-21.2 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 51-51 against the money line (-18.9 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 46-45 against the money line (-26.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 110-107 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 89-89 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 74-73 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 80-79 against the money line (-26.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 82-77 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 40-43 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 19-29 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-44 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 42-46 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-28 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 23-33 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 135-141 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 95-108 against the money line (-27.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 96-100 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 129-91 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 47-30 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 46-17 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-15 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 49-30 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-12 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 27-22 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 80-59 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-18 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 111-72 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 102-65 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 104-68 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 85-57 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-33 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 68-53 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 75-44 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 111-72 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 72-40 against the money line (+22.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 106-65 against the money line (+22.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 56-29 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-48 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 67-39 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 105-66 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 40-21 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-38 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 76-44 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 111-74 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 19-19 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 71-44 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 106-72 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-41 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-67 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 55-35 against the money line (+22.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 79-56 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 27 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 07/01/2022 - Elena Delle Donne is "?" Sunday vs Connecticut Sun ( Possible Rest ) | |
| [G] 05/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 5:30:15 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|