| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
164.5
| 83
Final
90 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 641 | MINNESOTA | +200 | | 642 | CONNECTICUT | -250 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(330-123 since 1997.) (72.8%, +87 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(47-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(167-31 since 1997.) (84.3%, +81.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(168-32 since 1997.) (84%, +81.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(436-310 since 1997.) (58.4%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(121-39 since 1997.) (75.6%, +60.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(95-70 since 1997.) (57.6%, +57.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(124-57 since 1997.) (68.5%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(76-57 since 1997.) (57.1%, +49.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(69-6 since 1997.) (92%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(69-6 since 1997.) (92%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Sunday games.
(79-15 since 1997.) (84%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Sunday games.
(80-19 since 1997.) (80.8%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(53-6 since 1997.) (89.8%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in August or September games.
(53-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team, in August or September games.
(41-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.4%, +24.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(52-25 since 1997.) (67.5%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, in non-conference games.
(55-34 since 1997.) (61.8%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(42-8 since 1997.) (84%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more.
(36-7 since 1997.) (83.7%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(32-15 since 1997.) (68.1%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(36-7 since 1997.) (83.7%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(27-2 since 1997.) (93.1%, +24 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(27-3 since 1997.) (90%, +23 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(24-2 since 1997.) (92.3%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(78-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +25.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(28-9 since 1997.) (75.7%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(37-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(49-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(42-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a loss against a division rival.
(97-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(52-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team, in August or September games.
(48-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games, in August or September games.
(38-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.6%, +22.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(19-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +1.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games.
(36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(46-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +11.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in August or September games.
(67-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(48-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.2%, +11.4 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(33-18 since 1997.) (64.7%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(95-94 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.3%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 80 | | 31-67 | 45.8% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 12-15 | 79.6% | 41 | 7 | 17 | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | | 33-72 | 46.0% | 7-19 | 34.9% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 44 | 10 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 708 times, while MINNESOTA won 268 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 117-45 against the money line (+82.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.3 | MINNESOTA is 16-8 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 78.3 | MINNESOTA is 16-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 80.7 | MINNESOTA is 32-15 against the money line (+19.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 82.0 | CONNECTICUT is 51-75 against the money line (-64.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 80.4 | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 86.3 | CONNECTICUT is 22-28 against the money line (-19.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 83.9 |
|
MINNESOTA is 114-127 against the money line (-46.0 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 81.3 | MINNESOTA is 73-103 against the money line (-67.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.7 | MINNESOTA is 94-105 against the money line (-42.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 76.0 | MINNESOTA is 6-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 88.0 | MINNESOTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 90.6 | MINNESOTA is 8-16 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 83.5 | CONNECTICUT is 103-46 against the money line (+52.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 90-53 against the money line (+32.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 77.0 | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 72.7 | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.8, OPPONENT 80.1 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 24-12 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 33-22 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-12 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 32-23 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-13 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 25-13 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 35-24 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-13 against the money line (+11.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-12 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-13 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 35-24 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-11 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 35-22 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-9 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 34-17 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 25-13 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 33-23 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-13 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 2-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 109-136 against the money line (-48.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 51-67 against the money line (-31.1 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 252-242 against the money line (-85.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 72-77 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 41-48 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 32-45 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 56-76 against the money line (-43.9 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-25 against the money line (-21.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 19-36 against the money line (-25.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 57-90 against the money line (-40.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 90-127 against the money line (-45.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-41 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 31-66 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-6 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 114-53 against the money line (+31.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 60-29 against the money line (+33.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-23 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-21 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-21 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-26 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 178-114 against the money line (+38.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-19 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-26 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-26 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-26 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-15 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-25 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 7-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 29-18 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-8 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-4 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-14 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-11 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ less fouls than opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-19 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-13 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-9 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-13 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-15 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-11 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when playing with 2 days rest this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 71-95 against the money line (-38.1 Units) in road games in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 91-88 against the money line (-40.7 Units) on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 175-141 against the money line (-63.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 255-238 against the money line (-75.8 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 3-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 83-99 against the money line (-45.0 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 175-141 against the money line (-63.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-25 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 102-110 against the money line (-50.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 76-90 against the money line (-43.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-18 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 86-119 against the money line (-41.3 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 171-187 against the money line (-71.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-19 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 110-45 against the money line (+28.1 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-2 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-7 against the money line (+18.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-5 against the money line (+13.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-7 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-11 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 94-62 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-4 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 35 or less rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) off a road win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-15 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-14 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 45-23 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-22 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-13 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-9 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-8 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 117-71 against the money line (+41.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 66-34 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-21 | -5.8 | 19-16 | 20-14 | 82.4 | 40.0 | 45.0% | 44.4 | 83.7 | 42.3 | 43.6% | 39.5 | | Road Games | 7-10 | -0.3 | 10-7 | 11-6 | 81.1 | 41.4 | 45.4% | 43.6 | 84.1 | 42.3 | 43.9% | 39.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.9 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 39.0 | 45.9% | 41.4 | 82.0 | 44.0 | 43.8% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.4 | 40.0 | 30-67 | 45.0% | 7-19 | 34.8% | 15-20 | 78.4% | 44 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.1 | 41.4 | 30-67 | 45.4% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 44 | 8 | 21 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.7 | 42.3 | 30-70 | 43.6% | 9-26 | 35.0% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 40 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.1 | 42.3 | 31-70 | 43.9% | 9-25 | 34.8% | 14-17 | 79.3% | 39 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 24-11 | -1.7 | 19-15 | 19-16 | 85.7 | 43.3 | 46.0% | 45.4 | 77.6 | 38.7 | 43.8% | 35.9 | | Home Games | 12-5 | -4.8 | 8-8 | 6-11 | 84.7 | 42.6 | 45.4% | 48.3 | 76.2 | 37.6 | 42.2% | 36.1 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-0 | 2-3 | 89.0 | 46.6 | 45.9% | 51.6 | 72.2 | 39.0 | 42.5% | 31.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.7 | 43.3 | 32-69 | 46.0% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 45 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.6 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 8-22 | 34.5% | 15-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.7 | 42.6 | 32-70 | 45.4% | 6-18 | 36.2% | 14-19 | 76.9% | 48 | 11 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.6 | 38.7 | 29-65 | 43.8% | 7-22 | 32.7% | 13-16 | 80.4% | 36 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.2 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 8-23 | 33.1% | 12-15 | 80.3% | 36 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70.2, CONNECTICUT 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/6/2022 | CHICAGO | 81-78 | W | +100 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 38 | 15 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 45 | 14 | | 7/12/2022 | PHOENIX | 118-107 | W | -330 | 41-86 | 47.7% | 72 | 19 | 37-100 | 37.0% | 52 | 8 | | 7/14/2022 | DALLAS | 87-92 | L | -200 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 51 | 14 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 34 | 12 | | 7/15/2022 | @ INDIANA | 87-77 | W | -175 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 49 | 15 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 12 | | 7/17/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 57-70 | L | +175 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 51 | 16 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 40 | 8 | | 7/22/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 84-94 | L | -115 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 35 | 16 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 28 | 9 | | 7/24/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 79-86 | L | +180 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 34 | 17 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | | 7/28/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 92-85 | W | -105 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 46 | 16 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 35 | 10 | | 7/31/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-77 | W | -155 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 48 | 19 | 30-83 | 36.1% | 37 | 7 | | 8/3/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 77-89 | L | +210 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 38 | 14 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | | 8/7/2022 | ATLANTA | 81-71 | W | -210 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 13 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 40 | 10 | | 8/10/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 86-77 | W | -165 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 46 | 12 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 32 | 12 | | 8/12/2022 | SEATTLE | 69-96 | L | -110 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 35 | 14 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 44 | 11 | | 8/14/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/5/2022 | @ DALLAS | 71-82 | L | -210 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 38 | 13 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 9 | | 7/13/2022 | @ INDIANA | 89-81 | W | -500 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 17 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 16 | | 7/15/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 93-68 | W | -360 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 48 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 37 | 18 | | 7/17/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 83-91 | L | +155 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 50 | 22 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 33 | 7 | | 7/19/2022 | NEW YORK | 82-63 | W | -210 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 12 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 18 | | 7/22/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-84 | W | -105 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 28 | 9 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 35 | 16 | | 7/24/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-79 | W | -220 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 34 | 17 | | 7/28/2022 | SEATTLE | 88-83 | W | -165 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 31 | 15 | | 7/31/2022 | CHICAGO | 92-95 | L | -175 | 39-91 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 37 | 19 | | 8/2/2022 | PHOENIX | 87-63 | W | -600 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 50 | 11 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 41 | 18 | | 8/4/2022 | PHOENIX | 77-64 | W | -1050 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 69 | 18 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 31 | 14 | | 8/7/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 91-94 | L | +155 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 43 | 13 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 29 | 15 | | 8/9/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 97-71 | W | -400 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 45 | 18 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 27 | 20 | | 8/11/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 93-69 | W | -650 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 51 | 19 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 31 | 17 | | 8/14/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 26-24 (+8.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 4-3 (-0.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 15-9 (+7.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/24/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 47 | 13 | 18 | | | MINNESOTA | 79 | 164 | Over | 32 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 34 | 10 | 17 | 7/22/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 28 | 4 | 9 | | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -1 | Over | 38 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 35 | 7 | 16 | 8/19/2021 | MINNESOTA | 71 | 150.5 | Over | 36 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 27 | 5 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -7 | SU ATS | 42 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 41 | 3 | 17 | 8/17/2021 | MINNESOTA | 60 | 154 | Under | 28 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 5-7 | 71.4% | 32 | 3 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 72 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 41 | 2 | 14 | 5/30/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 74 | -2.5 | Under | 37 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 39 | 5 | 11 | | | MINNESOTA | 79 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 10-25 | 40.0% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 51 | 10 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 290-164 against the money line (+5.9 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 114-59 against the money line (+20.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 182-96 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 33-23 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 145-69 against the money line (+32.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 63-28 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 19-4 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ less fouls than opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 38-27 against the money line (+12.3 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 97-71 against the money line (+10.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 49-35 against the money line (+13.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 78-48 against the money line (+25.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 109-66 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 88-50 against the money line (+29.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 66-40 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 108-57 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 79-33 against the money line (+36.3 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 174-89 against the money line (+33.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-50 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-50 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 34-23 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 229-128 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 167-74 against the money line (+23.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Reeve is 57-54 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 64-54 against the money line (-38.5 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 115-68 against the money line (-30.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 79-70 against the money line (-25.8 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 2-8 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 64-58 against the money line (-34.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 115-68 against the money line (-30.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 9-17 against the money line (-20.9 Units) off a home loss against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 116-104 against the money line (-33.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 77-72 against the money line (-26.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 50-51 against the money line (-26.4 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 35-39 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 49-55 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 152-111 against the money line (-33.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 36-42 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 72-63 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 55-56 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 79-78 against the money line (-39.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 66-58 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 6-15 against the money line (-20.4 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 9-21 against the money line (-23.3 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 42-51 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 61-70 against the money line (-33.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 28-41 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 64-62 against the money line (-28.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 49-52 against the money line (-22.1 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 140-95 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 63-31 against the money line (+21.4 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 73-35 against the money line (+42.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 65-39 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-13 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 73-35 against the money line (+42.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 57-35 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 34-19 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 46-27 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-13 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 36-21 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-12 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-9 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 19-5 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 11-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 8-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 35 or less rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in home games off 2 or more consecutive road wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 55-30 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 122-76 against the money line (+26.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 113-69 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 100-67 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 114-71 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 92-55 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 75-45 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 93-59 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 75-53 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 43-23 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 25-10 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 88-52 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-24 against the money line (+24.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-9 against the money line (+26.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 29-7 against the money line (+23.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 23-2 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 9*) | Miller is 55-37 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 75-57 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 72-34 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 76-37 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 108-61 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 69-42 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 90-60 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 86-48 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 122-76 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 82-44 against the money line (+26.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 116-69 against the money line (+26.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 67-32 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-51 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 78-43 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 116-70 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 45-25 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 66-42 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-16 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-48 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 122-78 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 82-48 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 117-76 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 73-45 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-71 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/01/2022 - Damiris Dantas is out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
| [G] 07/27/2022 - Bria Hartley is out for season ( ACL ) | | [G] 07/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( ACL ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 12/1/2023 3:25:35 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|