| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
163.5
| 68
Final
93 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - First Round - Best of 3 | | |  | |
| 605 | DALLAS | +350 | | 606 | CONNECTICUT | -500 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(332-123 since 1997.) (73%, +89 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(169-31 since 1997.) (84.5%, +83.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(170-32 since 1997.) (84.2%, +83.5 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(163-54 since 1997.) (75.1%, +61 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(214-128 since 1997.) (62.6%, +60.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(115-20 since 1997.) (85.2%, +56.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(51-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(117-22 since 1997.) (84.2%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(126-40 since 1997.) (75.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(70-6 since 1997.) (92.1%, +49.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(70-6 since 1997.) (92.1%, +49.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(49-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (79%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(125-58 since 1997.) (68.3%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(158-78 since 1997.) (66.9%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(71-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(98-56 since 1997.) (63.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(37-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(54-6 since 1997.) (90%, +39.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +15.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(120-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +60.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(73-17 since 1997.) (81.1%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(44-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +21.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(68-38 since 1997.) (64.2%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(61-21 since 1997.) (74.4%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(46-17 since 1997.) (73%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(70-42 since 1997.) (62.5%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(81-42 since 1997.) (65.9%, +28.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(35-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +16 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +14.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(40-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +20.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(37-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(34-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(80-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +27.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(76-53 since 1997.) (58.9%, +20.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(41-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +21.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(29-11 since 1997.) (72.5%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +15.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(45-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after leading in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(27-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +17 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(102-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(20-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +2.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(77-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +18 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(48-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.7%, +13.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(50-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +13.4 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(96-70 since 1997.) (57.8%, +58.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(77-57 since 1997.) (57.5%, +50.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(34-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.7%, +9.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(43-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +7.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(40-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 79 | | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 13-17 | 75.0% | 38 | 8 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | | 34-70 | 47.9% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 46 | 11 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 740 times, while DALLAS won 230 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 9-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 82.2 | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | DALLAS is 11-7 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 81.2 | DALLAS is 13-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 80.2 | DALLAS is 17-8 against the money line (+17.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 88.6, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 80.4 | CONNECTICUT is 9-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 86.2 | CONNECTICUT is 23-28 against the money line (-18.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.9 |
|
DALLAS is 5-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.0 | DALLAS is 21-51 against the money line (-27.8 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 86.0 | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 88.0 | DALLAS is 14-34 against the money line (-22.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 87.5 | DALLAS is 7-16 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 88.3 | DALLAS is 5-12 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 83.9 | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | CONNECTICUT is 48-24 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 103-46 against the money line (+52.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 131-87 against the money line (+34.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 73.1 | CONNECTICUT is 90-53 against the money line (+32.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 216-150 against the money line (+37.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 77.0 | CONNECTICUT is 98-49 against the money line (+31.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.7, OPPONENT 80.2 | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 72.4 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 8-5 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-8 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 37-60 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 38-66 against the money line (-38.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 15-39 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 43-74 against the money line (-44.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 38-65 against the money line (-39.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 43-72 against the money line (-42.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 72-109 against the money line (-39.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 4-16 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 45-73 against the money line (-41.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 41-57 against the money line (-33.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 42-74 against the money line (-43.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 72-115 against the money line (-40.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 36-67 against the money line (-41.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 61-105 against the money line (-41.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-23 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-21 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-21 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 54-26 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-25 against the money line (+14.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 179-114 against the money line (+39.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-19 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 54-26 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-6 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-26 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-24 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-26 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-9 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-25 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 113-81 against the money line (+35.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 158-120 against the money line (+27.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 8-6 against the money line (+9.4 Units) as a road underdog this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games in non-conference games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 16-13 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 24-46 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-23 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-7.3 Units) after a game outrebounding opponent by 15 or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 68-103 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 59-90 against the money line (-38.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 50-81 against the money line (-40.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 45-69 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 61-89 against the money line (-40.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 51-74 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 38-64 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 32-52 against the money line (-29.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 39-59 against the money line (-32.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 24-44 against the money line (-31.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 55-81 against the money line (-35.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 14-26 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 33-54 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 53-79 against the money line (-36.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 47-66 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 42-57 against the money line (-27.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 62-97 against the money line (-44.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 23-41 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 42-68 against the money line (-38.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 65-96 against the money line (-45.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-77 against the money line (-43.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-19 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 33-48 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 47-71 against the money line (-30.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 30-45 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-20 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-34 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-19 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-2 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) on Thursday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-7 against the money line (+19.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-24 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-7 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-4 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 35 or less rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 162-139 against the money line (+23.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 126-103 against the money line (+24.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 72-61 against the money line (+21.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 119-103 against the money line (+23.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-1 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-1 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-15 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-14 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-23 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-22 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-1 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-9 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-9 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 118-71 against the money line (+42.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 67-34 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 18-18 | +2.8 | 20-14 | 22-14 | 82.9 | 41.5 | 43.5% | 42.3 | 82.7 | 40.8 | 45.9% | 41.0 | | Road Games | 10-8 | +8.4 | 12-5 | 10-8 | 83.2 | 40.3 | 44.1% | 41.1 | 82.3 | 40.3 | 45.6% | 41.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 88.8 | 46.0 | 46.9% | 43.0 | 86.6 | 38.8 | 47.6% | 35.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.9 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 34.3% | 16-21 | 76.4% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.3 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-23 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.2 | 40.3 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-23 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 40.8 | 30-66 | 45.9% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 8-22 | 34.5% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.3 | 40.3 | 30-66 | 45.6% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 25-11 | -0.7 | 20-15 | 20-16 | 85.8 | 43.3 | 46.2% | 45.4 | 77.7 | 38.6 | 43.9% | 35.8 | | Home Games | 13-5 | -3.8 | 9-8 | 7-11 | 85.0 | 42.8 | 45.8% | 48.1 | 76.6 | 37.4 | 42.4% | 35.9 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-0 | 3-2 | 89.6 | 48.6 | 47.2% | 50.6 | 76.2 | 40.8 | 44.4% | 30.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.8 | 43.3 | 32-69 | 46.2% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 16-20 | 78.9% | 45 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.8 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 34.6% | 15-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.0 | 42.8 | 32-70 | 45.8% | 6-17 | 36.2% | 14-19 | 76.2% | 48 | 11 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.7 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 7-22 | 32.8% | 13-16 | 80.4% | 36 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.6 | 37.4 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 12-15 | 80.3% | 36 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 71.8, CONNECTICUT 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/12/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 74-83 | L | +325 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 43 | 13 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 14 | | 7/14/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 92-87 | W | +170 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 34 | 12 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 51 | 14 | | 7/16/2022 | CHICAGO | 81-89 | L | +170 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 38 | 7 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 46 | 8 | | 7/22/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 83-89 | L | +250 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 34 | 15 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 38 | 10 | | 7/24/2022 | @ INDIANA | 96-86 | W | -270 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 40 | 14 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 43 | 17 | | 7/28/2022 | WASHINGTON | 77-87 | L | -120 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 53 | 14 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 35 | 16 | | 7/30/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 81-68 | W | +100 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 42 | 11 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 45 | 19 | | 8/2/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 84-78 | W | +300 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 39 | 9 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 42 | 15 | | 8/4/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 82-80 | W | +300 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 8 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 37 | 9 | | 8/6/2022 | INDIANA | 95-91 | W | -1050 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 50 | 14 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 19 | | 8/8/2022 | NEW YORK | 86-77 | W | -200 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 10 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 14 | | 8/10/2022 | NEW YORK | 73-91 | L | -140 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 40 | 9 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 38 | 12 | | 8/12/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 74-86 | L | -120 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 40 | 16 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 33 | 9 | | 8/14/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 116-88 | W | -250 | 42-64 | 65.6% | 43 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 28 | 8 | | 8/18/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/21/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/13/2022 | @ INDIANA | 89-81 | W | -500 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 17 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 16 | | 7/15/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 93-68 | W | -360 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 48 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 37 | 18 | | 7/17/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 83-91 | L | +155 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 50 | 22 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 33 | 7 | | 7/19/2022 | NEW YORK | 82-63 | W | -210 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 12 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 18 | | 7/22/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-84 | W | -105 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 28 | 9 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 35 | 16 | | 7/24/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-79 | W | -220 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 34 | 17 | | 7/28/2022 | SEATTLE | 88-83 | W | -165 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 31 | 15 | | 7/31/2022 | CHICAGO | 92-95 | L | -175 | 39-91 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 37 | 19 | | 8/2/2022 | PHOENIX | 87-63 | W | -600 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 50 | 11 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 41 | 18 | | 8/4/2022 | PHOENIX | 77-64 | W | -1050 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 69 | 18 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 31 | 14 | | 8/7/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 91-94 | L | +155 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 43 | 13 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 29 | 15 | | 8/9/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 97-71 | W | -400 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 45 | 18 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 27 | 20 | | 8/11/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 93-69 | W | -650 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 51 | 19 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 31 | 17 | | 8/14/2022 | MINNESOTA | 90-83 | W | -250 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 45 | 9 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 34 | 12 | | 8/18/2022 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/21/2022 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 41-35 (-9.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 6-2 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 15-22 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 1-2 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/5/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 71 | -5 | Under | 38 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 38 | 4 | 13 | | | DALLAS | 82 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 46 | 11 | 9 | 5/26/2022 | DALLAS | 68 | 160.5 | Over | 35 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 10-30 | 33.3% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 34 | 10 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 99 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 25-27 | 92.6% | 47 | 16 | 13 | 5/24/2022 | DALLAS | 85 | 160.5 | SU ATS | 27 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 46 | 13 | 9 | | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | -8 | Over | 39 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 43 | 11 | 10 | 9/7/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 48 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 52 | 10 | 13 | | | DALLAS | 56 | 148.5 | Under | 25 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 7-32 | 21.9% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 9 | 12 | 8/15/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 38 | 9 | 11 | | | DALLAS | 59 | 156.5 | Under | 27 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 26 | 1 | 19 | 6/22/2021 | DALLAS | 70 | 155.5 | Under | 38 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 33 | 6 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 0 | SU ATS | 30 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 45 | 12 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Johnson is 14-13 against the money line (+13.2 Units) as a road underdog as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-18 against the money line (-11.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Johnson is 3-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 78.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 1-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a game outrebounding opponent by 15 or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 81.5, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 10-19 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 3-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 76.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Johnson is 11-20 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 1-7 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 141-95 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 64-31 against the money line (+22.4 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-10 against the money line (+15.4 Units) on Thursday as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 29-9 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 74-35 against the money line (+43.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 66-39 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 49-19 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-13 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 74-35 against the money line (+43.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 69-41 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 47-27 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-21 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-12 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 31-9 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 20-5 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 9-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 35 or less rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 51-25 against the money line (+12.8 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 88-60 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 123-76 against the money line (+27.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 114-69 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 101-67 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-49 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 115-71 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 93-55 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-45 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 56-33 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 94-59 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 62-35 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 59-27 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 67-37 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-53 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 44-23 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 26-10 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 89-52 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 56-37 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-57 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 73-34 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 77-37 against the money line (+18.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 109-61 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 70-42 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 91-60 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-48 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 123-76 against the money line (+19.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 83-44 against the money line (+27.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 117-69 against the money line (+27.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 68-32 against the money line (+21.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 99-51 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 79-43 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 117-70 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 34-11 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 52-23 against the money line (+22.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 46-25 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 67-42 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 88-48 against the money line (+26.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 123-78 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-42 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 83-48 against the money line (+21.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 118-76 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-45 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 99-71 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-39 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 85-60 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 106 times, while the road underdog won straight up 27 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 07/27/2022 - Bria Hartley is out for season ( ACL ) | | [G] 07/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( ACL ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/25/2024 10:36:52 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|