| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 609 | ATLANTA | +375 | | 610 | CONNECTICUT | -550 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win.
(181-85 since 1997.) (68%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(130-38 since 1997.) (77.4%, +57.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win against a division rival against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(108-25 since 1997.) (81.2%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(55-33 since 1997.) (62.5%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(43-6 since 1997.) (87.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a close win by 3 points or less.
(41-19 since 1997.) (68.3%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(27-5 since 1997.) (84.4%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(41-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor shooting team - shooting <=40% on the season, averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(29-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +37 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(53-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.5%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(50-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.6%, +45.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(58-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.6%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a win by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(52-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(73-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, in June games.
(32-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.5%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in June games.
(67-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(88-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.7%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(53-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(85-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.7%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(127-108 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(125-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 74 | | 27-66 | 40.4% | 6-18 | 30.4% | 14-18 | 79.9% | 43 | 8 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 31-70 | 45.0% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 15-20 | 75.4% | 45 | 9 | 10 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 781 times, while ATLANTA won 196 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (-29.6 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.0 | CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 81.5 |
|
ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 82.5 | ATLANTA is 68-108 against the money line (-59.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.9 | ATLANTA is 6-17 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 87.0 | ATLANTA is 82-108 against the money line (-49.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 8-16 against the money line (-14.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 82.6 | ATLANTA is 9-26 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 89.9 | ATLANTA is 0-6 against the money line (-9.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 90.8 | ATLANTA is 60-112 against the money line (-49.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 85.3 | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 87.4 | ATLANTA is 41-83 against the money line (-46.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 72.1 | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 76.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.8 | CONNECTICUT is 123-61 against the money line (+41.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 133-95 against the money line (+21.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in home games when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 74.0 | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 73.8 | CONNECTICUT is 36-10 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 76.5 | CONNECTICUT is 18-4 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 74.2 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 297-105 against the money line (+175.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 45-12 against the money line (+17.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 72.4 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-19 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-19 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-19 against the money line (-28.4 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-19 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-19 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-13 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-18 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-9 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-19 against the money line (-28.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-19 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-7 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-16 against the money line (-22.9 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 199-265 against the money line (-79.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 202-270 against the money line (-84.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 58-108 against the money line (-52.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 93-156 against the money line (-64.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-36 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-60 against the money line (-33.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 183-252 against the money line (-75.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-8 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-15 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 61-67 against the money line (+30.7 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+12.1 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 6-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-8 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-8 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.6, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 94.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-13 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-7 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 259-320 against the money line (-86.2 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in June games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 157-187 against the money line (-68.2 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 29-54 against the money line (-37.3 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 32-58 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 71.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 26-42 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 27-54 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 20-34 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 30-59 against the money line (-30.1 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 48-75 against the money line (-36.2 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-39 against the money line (-28.2 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 137-175 against the money line (-60.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 67-90 against the money line (-42.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 52-100 against the money line (-58.3 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 27-54 against the money line (-27.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 118-161 against the money line (-65.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 123-183 against the money line (-77.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-28 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-20 against the money line (+17.9 Units) when playing on back-to-back days since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-24 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) off a win against a division rival this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.5 Units) off a road no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 45-12 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-10 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-11 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 6-9 | -4.2 | 5-10 | 7-7 | 75.9 | 38.6 | 39.2% | 43.1 | 80.9 | 44.3 | 42.9% | 44.4 | | Road Games | 3-3 | -0.8 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 79.7 | 41.3 | 41.7% | 43.2 | 79.2 | 43.0 | 40.5% | 44.5 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 76.0 | 39.6 | 37.4% | 46.0 | 84.0 | 50.6 | 44.4% | 43.0 | | Division Games | 2-6 | -6.2 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 72.4 | 38.0 | 37.5% | 41.7 | 82.4 | 45.7 | 45.6% | 44.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.9 | 38.6 | 26-67 | 39.2% | 6-19 | 31.1% | 17-22 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.7 | 41.3 | 27-66 | 41.7% | 7-21 | 34.7% | 17-22 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.9 | 44.3 | 29-69 | 42.9% | 8-24 | 35.0% | 14-17 | 81.8% | 44 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 8-24 | 34.9% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.2 | 43.0 | 28-70 | 40.5% | 7-23 | 30.7% | 15-18 | 84.4% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-3 | +9 | 7-9 | 7-9 | 79.2 | 39.3 | 44.0% | 42.7 | 71.7 | 35.9 | 42.9% | 38.7 | | Home Games | 8-1 | +6 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 80.2 | 40.6 | 44.8% | 41.3 | 70.2 | 33.8 | 43.4% | 38.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 76.4 | 36.2 | 44.4% | 39.6 | 73.8 | 35.6 | 45.0% | 38.6 | | Division Games | 8-1 | +7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 82.4 | 41.4 | 44.6% | 43.9 | 72.4 | 37.9 | 42.8% | 35.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.2 | 39.3 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 30.4% | 16-22 | 74.7% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 8-23 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.2 | 40.6 | 30-66 | 44.8% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 16-21 | 74.5% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.7 | 35.9 | 26-62 | 42.9% | 6-20 | 28.5% | 13-17 | 77.7% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.2% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.2 | 33.8 | 26-60 | 43.4% | 6-22 | 28.9% | 12-16 | 73.6% | 39 | 6 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 17 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.9, CONNECTICUT 69.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/21/2024 | DALLAS | 83-78 | W | -270 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 12 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 14 | | 5/26/2024 | MINNESOTA | 79-92 | L | -175 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 38 | 10 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | | 5/29/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-67 | W | -140 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 51 | 17 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 38 | 13 | | 5/31/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 78-74 | W | +300 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 46 | 11 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 42 | 11 | | 6/2/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 50-69 | L | +120 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 41 | 12 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 54 | 15 | | 6/6/2024 | NEW YORK | 61-78 | L | +200 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 37 | 12 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 55 | 13 | | 6/8/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 89-80 | W | -115 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 13 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | | 6/11/2024 | WASHINGTON | 68-87 | L | -270 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 8 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 11 | | 6/13/2024 | @ INDIANA | 84-91 | L | -155 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 39 | 11 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 45 | 14 | | 6/16/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 87-74 | W | -210 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 49 | 10 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 38 | 12 | | 6/19/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 55-68 | L | +350 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 53 | 13 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 51 | 9 | | 6/21/2024 | INDIANA | 79-91 | L | +120 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 40 | 11 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 40 | 14 | | 6/23/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-96 | L | +325 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 10 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 12 | | 6/28/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2024 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2024 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -200 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | 70-47 | W | -360 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 52 | 9 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 59 | 20 | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | 74-72 | W | -400 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 69-50 | W | -140 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 54 | 15 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 41 | 12 | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | 76-59 | W | -1050 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-82 | L | +120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | 89-72 | W | -550 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 48 | 10 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 11 | | 6/12/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 83-75 | W | -330 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 14 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | | 6/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | 85-67 | W | -270 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 7 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 11 | | 6/18/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 79-70 | W | | 34-65 | 52.3% | 31 | 10 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 35 | 22 | | 6/21/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 74-85 | L | +175 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 47 | 12 | | 6/23/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 61-72 | L | +100 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 46 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 43 | 14 | | 6/27/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2024 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 30-30 (-8.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 7-1 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 18-10 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 1-2 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
07/22/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 52 | 6 | 13 | | | ATLANTA | 78 | -1 | Under | 38 | 21-69 | 30.4% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 30-37 | 81.1% | 47 | 10 | 9 | 07/20/2023 | ATLANTA | 71 | 169.5 | Under | 41 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 46 | 10 | 21 | | | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 11-23 | 47.8% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 42 | 7 | 15 | 06/15/2023 | ATLANTA | 92 | 164 | SU ATS | 40 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 50 | 6 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -9 | Over | 50 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 37 | 9 | 10 | 06/11/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 21-30 | 70.0% | 44 | 10 | 16 | | | ATLANTA | 77 | 163 | Over | 44 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 46 | 10 | 26 | 06/02/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 69 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 54 | 7 | 15 | | | ATLANTA | 50 | 159 | Under | 27 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 41 | 8 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Wright is 16-17 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wright is 13-9 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wright is 24-25 against the money line (+12.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wright is 11-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wright is 14-10 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wright is 15-15 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Wright is 9-2 against the money line (+12.1 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Wright is 6-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Wright is 10-8 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wright is 11-6 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wright is 10-8 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.6, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Wright is 13-9 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Wright is 8-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 17-13 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 16-13 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-9 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 5-5 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in home games off an road win where they scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 13-10 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 18-16 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 5-7 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-8 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 17-13 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 83.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-10 against the money line (-29.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 6*) | White is 5-6 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 4-6 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 21-19 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-13 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 23-18 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 8-9 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 11-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 28-23 against the money line (-25.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 22-19 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 6-6 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in home games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 6-7 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Wright is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wright is 8-20 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wright is 3-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 49-29 against the money line (+15.4 Units) vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 12-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 22-13 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 22-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 12-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 17-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 22 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 7/2/2024 5:14:11 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|