| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON DALLAS |
|
| 177.5 | 81 Final 90 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
311 | WASHINGTON | +170 | 312 | DALLAS | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (364-145 since 1997.) (71.5%, +88.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (206-69 since 1997.) (74.9%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (53-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (176-56 since 1997.) (75.9%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (205-97 since 1997.) (67.9%, +53.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season. (47-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (149-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (22-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +10.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (117-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (44-21 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (54-21 since 1997.) (72%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (67-31 since 1997.) (68.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (47-15 since 1997.) (75.8%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (44-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (35-11 since 1997.) (76.1%, +26.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (35-11 since 1997.) (76.1%, +26.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (35-11 since 1997.) (76.1%, +26.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (46-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.2%, +27.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (173-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +32.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (46-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.7%, +24.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (31-12 since 1997.) (72.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (22-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (49-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.5%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (66-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (47-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (47-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (197-119 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (40-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (51-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (41-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (60-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (82-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (42-13 since 1997.) (76.4%, +32.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (31-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +18 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (46-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (33-23 since 1997.) (58.9%, +13.9 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 82 | | 29-69 | 41.9% | 8-23 | 35.4% | 16-19 | 84.8% | 39 | 12 | 13 | DALLAS | 89 | | 31-66 | 46.9% | 7-21 | 32.2% | 20-25 | 79.8% | 46 | 13 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, DALLAS won the game straight up 656 times, while WASHINGTON won 318 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 87.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | WASHINGTON is 13-7 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 78.4 | WASHINGTON is 12-4 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.7, OPPONENT 82.4 | DALLAS is 6-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 89.4 | DALLAS is 28-47 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 89.9 |
|
WASHINGTON is 13-22 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 83.2 | WASHINGTON is 38-105 against the money line (-75.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 78.5 | WASHINGTON is 78-121 against the money line (-51.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.4 | WASHINGTON is 41-93 against the money line (-48.6 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 74.5 | WASHINGTON is 16-31 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 84.1 | WASHINGTON is 12-25 against the money line (-17.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.1, OPPONENT 88.8 | WASHINGTON is 6-21 against the money line (-19.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 92.0 | WASHINGTON is 43-112 against the money line (-75.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | DALLAS is 14-8 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 90.0, OPPONENT 84.7 | DALLAS is 13-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.0, OPPONENT 82.7 | DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.6, OPPONENT 77.7 | DALLAS is 8-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.7, OPPONENT 80.1 | DALLAS is 15-9 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 91.0, OPPONENT 86.0 | DALLAS is 12-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 92.3, OPPONENT 82.6 | DALLAS is 11-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 94.2, OPPONENT 83.2 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 14-25 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 64-130 against the money line (-47.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-28 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 76-119 against the money line (-43.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-7.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-29 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 15-21 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-82 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 48-125 against the money line (-54.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-53 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-28 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-26 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 92.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-6 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 93.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-6 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 93.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 16-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-6 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 90.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-6 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 95.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 19-14 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-11 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-6 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-9 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 291-420 against the money line (-121.5 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-21 against the money line (-15.8 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 173-250 against the money line (-99.5 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 105-164 against the money line (-66.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 68-110 against the money line (-49.0 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 140-218 against the money line (-81.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-21 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 133-207 against the money line (-83.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 58-97 against the money line (-42.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 103-152 against the money line (-51.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 107-154 against the money line (-54.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 65-121 against the money line (-59.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 88-150 against the money line (-59.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-81 against the money line (-34.6 Units) off a road loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-14 against the money line (-15.8 Units) off an upset loss as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 83-140 against the money line (-52.4 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 37-64 against the money line (-37.0 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 134-215 against the money line (-70.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 83-142 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-26 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-34 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 20-30 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-27 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 140-225 against the money line (-72.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 153-248 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 45-66 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 36-48 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 29-27 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was DALLAS 92.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-10 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-10 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-10 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-8 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season. The average score was DALLAS 94.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in non-conference games this season. The average score was DALLAS 94.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 92.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-6 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-7 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-7 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 89.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 22-18 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 87.8, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-9 | +3.3 | 11-10 | 11-11 | 84.5 | 42.7 | 44.2% | 39.0 | 82.1 | 41.1 | 45.4% | 41.5 | Road Games | 5-4 | +3.5 | 6-2 | 5-4 | 87.2 | 46.3 | 46.0% | 39.9 | 84.9 | 40.7 | 45.0% | 39.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 85.6 | 41.4 | 41.7% | 41.6 | 85.8 | 41.6 | 46.7% | 40.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 42.7 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 8-23 | 36.0% | 16-19 | 84.9% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.2 | 46.3 | 30-65 | 46.0% | 8-20 | 38.7% | 19-23 | 82.8% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.1 | 41.1 | 30-66 | 45.4% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 81.2% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.9 | 40.7 | 30-67 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 18-21 | 85.6% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-9 | +5.8 | 15-7 | 14-6 | 87.9 | 45.4 | 45.1% | 45.7 | 81.6 | 41.8 | 42.2% | 40.7 | Home Games | 8-3 | +5.3 | 8-3 | 6-4 | 90.5 | 48.2 | 47.1% | 44.7 | 78.4 | 39.5 | 42.7% | 37.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4 | 4-1 | 4-0 | 95.6 | 51.0 | 49.4% | 45.4 | 82.8 | 43.2 | 42.9% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.9 | 45.4 | 30-67 | 45.1% | 7-21 | 31.3% | 20-26 | 79.7% | 46 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.3 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.5 | 48.2 | 31-66 | 47.1% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 22-27 | 80.5% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.6 | 41.8 | 29-69 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 18-22 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.4 | 39.5 | 28-67 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 82.1% | 37 | 7 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.4, DALLAS 73 |
| | |
|
|
6/13/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-91 | W | +325 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86-97 | L | +155 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 31 | 12 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 31 | 16 | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-60 | W | -500 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | 6/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-77 | W | -220 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 92-80 | W | -165 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 6/28/2018 | NEW YORK | 80-77 | W | -450 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 10 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 15 | 6/30/2018 | PHOENIX | 74-84 | L | -165 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 12 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 7 | 7/5/2018 | NEW YORK | 86-67 | W | -400 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 10 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 43 | 15 | 7/7/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 83-74 | W | +200 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 13 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 7/8/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 91-97 | L | +200 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 37 | 8 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | 7/11/2018 | ATLANTA | 89-106 | L | -330 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 41-68 | 60.3% | 36 | 10 | 7/13/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-72 | W | -550 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 14 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 43 | 17 | 7/15/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 77-80 | L | -155 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 48 | 7 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 48 | 8 | 7/19/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2018 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2018 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/12/2018 | PHOENIX | 72-75 | L | -115 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 12 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 17 | 6/15/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 77-67 | W | -330 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 48 | 12 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 36 | 11 | 6/19/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-91 | L | +300 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 22 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 41 | 12 | 6/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 101-72 | W | +170 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 46 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 27 | 12 | 6/24/2018 | SEATTLE | 76-97 | L | -125 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 32 | 13 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 46 | 15 | 6/26/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 83-87 | L | +350 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 47 | 17 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 39 | 12 | 6/27/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 97-91 | W | -120 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 40 | 11 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 13 | 7/1/2018 | MINNESOTA | 72-76 | L | +145 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 16 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 42 | 13 | 7/3/2018 | CHICAGO | 108-85 | W | -270 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 40 | 13 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 15 | 7/5/2018 | INDIANA | 90-63 | W | -550 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 60 | 18 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 27 | 12 | 7/8/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 97-87 | W | -165 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 53 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | 7/10/2018 | PHOENIX | 101-72 | W | -140 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 45 | 14 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 21 | 7/12/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 92-77 | W | +200 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 11 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 7/14/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 84-91 | L | +170 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 15 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 50 | 14 | 7/17/2018 | NEW YORK | 104-87 | W | -360 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 41 | 11 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 38 | 16 | 7/19/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
WASHINGTON is 31-30 (+4.7 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
DALLAS is 3-4 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 14-15 (+8.0 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 3-0 (+4.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/6/2017 | DALLAS | 76 | 172 | Under | 34 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 2-21 | 9.5% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 51 | 13 | 6 | | WASHINGTON | 86 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 59 | 20 | 10 | 8/26/2017 | DALLAS | 83 | 173.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 21-31 | 67.7% | 43 | 8 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -4.5 | Under | 50 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 48 | 11 | 13 | 6/18/2017 | DALLAS | 87 | 176 | SU ATS | 39 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 49 | 11 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 83 | -8 | Under | 49 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 38 | 10 | 7 | 6/6/2017 | WASHINGTON | 101 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 21-22 | 95.5% | 44 | 11 | 7 | | DALLAS | 89 | 167 | Over | 42 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 25-28 | 89.3% | 47 | 14 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 19-18 against the money line (+14.6 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 67-63 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-8 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 55-52 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 54-52 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 41-37 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 129-111 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 16-30 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in July games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 42-55 against the money line (-26.8 Units) in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 82.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 14-30 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-34 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 45-69 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 40-58 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 34-51 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 29-45 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 34-51 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-18 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 19-34 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 28-48 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 5-16 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-46 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-39 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 43-61 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 30-45 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 52-74 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 32-49 against the money line (-27.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 30-45 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 68-90 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 81.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-33 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 38-52 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-44 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 46-70 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 18-35 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 32-57 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Thibault is 11-19 against the money line (-13.7 Units) off an upset loss as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 73.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 35-41 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 6-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 3-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 1-6 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 39-59 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-30 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 14-22 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 45-60 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 44-54 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 24-38 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 6-14 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 41-60 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 25-33 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 29-15 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 82.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 32-20 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 41-30 against the money line (+16.1 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 80.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in home games after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 51-26 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 84.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 46-36 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-18 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 12-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 237 times, while the road underdog won straight up 142 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 05/19/2018 - Emma Meesseman is out for season ( Personal ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 8:37:32 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|