| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
DALLAS |
|
|
162.5
| 71
Final
82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 637 | CONNECTICUT | -210 | | 638 | DALLAS | +175 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(120-55 since 1997.) (68.6%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(120-55 since 1997.) (68.6%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(120-55 since 1997.) (68.6%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(61-49 since 1997.) (55.5%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread against opponent after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread.
(104-60 since 1997.) (63.4%, +32 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(40-19 since 1997.) (67.8%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in July games.
(41-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.2%, +38.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in July games.
(22-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(29-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.3%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in July games.
(42-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +48 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(118-158 over the last 5 seasons.) (42.8%, +62.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(44-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +33 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(426-300 since 1997.) (58.7%, +83.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(96-51 since 1997.) (65.3%, +48.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(50-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(78-73 since 1997.) (51.7%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss against a division rival.
(93-23 since 1997.) (80.2%, +44.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(41-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite.
(33-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +28.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(66-33 since 1997.) (66.7%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss against a division rival, with a losing record.
(70-16 since 1997.) (81.4%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home loss against a division rival.
(65-14 since 1997.) (82.3%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(50-40 since 1997.) (55.6%, +36.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(83-59 since 1997.) (58.5%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(45-30 since 1997.) (60%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(31-20 since 1997.) (60.8%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss against a division rival, on Tuesday nights.
(29-4 since 1997.) (87.9%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite.
(24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +26.9 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in July games.
(45-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(25-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +13.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +15.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +15.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, dominant rebounding team (>=+6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +15.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(66-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(66-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(66-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a loss against a division rival.
(90-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(39-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(41-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(88-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 32-69 | 46.3% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 14-19 | 77.8% | 45 | 10 | 14 | | DALLAS | 81 | | 28-68 | 41.9% | 9-24 | 35.4% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 41 | 9 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 594 times, while DALLAS won 376 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 24-16 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 99-44 against the money line (+50.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 127-86 against the money line (+31.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 70.3 | CONNECTICUT is 87-51 against the money line (+33.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 71.2 | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | DALLAS is 67-107 against the money line (-46.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.1 | DALLAS is 4-17 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 84.7 | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 84.5 | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-8.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 87.2 | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 88.8 | DALLAS is 1-5 against the money line (-8.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 75.0, OPPONENT 81.3 | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 82.5 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-14.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 86.5 | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 17-24 against the money line (-18.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 83.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 80.3 | DALLAS is 11-8 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 78.8 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 16-4 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 57-28 against the money line (+32.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-19 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-12 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-12 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-22 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-15 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 168-111 against the money line (+33.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-22 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-5 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-16 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-14 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-16 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-21 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 108-77 against the money line (+36.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 153-116 against the money line (+28.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 20-47 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 54-84 against the money line (-35.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-17 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 55-94 against the money line (-39.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-17 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-37 against the money line (-33.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 67-108 against the money line (-43.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-17 against the money line (-11.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 54-85 against the money line (-41.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 17-26 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-36 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-18 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 76.6, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-13 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-21 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-25 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 78.2, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-15 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 78.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 17-27 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 77.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 52-99 against the money line (-49.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 20-5 against the money line (+14.3 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-5 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-0 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-11 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-10 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-19 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 83-127 against the money line (-46.8 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-30 against the money line (-35.2 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 36-61 against the money line (-41.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 37-71 against the money line (-36.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-23 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 36-61 against the money line (-41.4 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 74.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 36-74 against the money line (-31.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 27-58 against the money line (-29.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-39 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 61-97 against the money line (-44.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 53-84 against the money line (-39.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 55-84 against the money line (-41.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 46-70 against the money line (-34.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 34-56 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 21-42 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 25-44 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 51-79 against the money line (-41.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 55-92 against the money line (-50.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 22-39 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 37-62 against the money line (-38.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 57-91 against the money line (-51.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-18 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 5-15 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 44-68 against the money line (-31.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 26-42 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 17-32 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 31-59 against the money line (-35.9 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-34 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-22 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 24-45 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 11-17 against the money line (-16.7 Units) off a close home win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-18 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-7 | -5.8 | 10-11 | 11-10 | 84.5 | 42.6 | 45.6% | 44.9 | 77.6 | 39.7 | 43.4% | 36.8 | | Road Games | 6-4 | +0.3 | 5-5 | 7-3 | 84.4 | 41.3 | 45.5% | 42.4 | 79.2 | 41.9 | 44.5% | 36.8 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -6.6 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 73.8 | 35.0 | 40.8% | 45.0 | 75.2 | 44.0 | 43.1% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 42.6 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 16-20 | 78.5% | 45 | 10 | 21 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.4 | 41.3 | 30-67 | 45.5% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 18-22 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.6 | 39.7 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 8-23 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 37 | 7 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.7 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 8-24 | 34.8% | 14-17 | 78.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.2 | 41.9 | 28-63 | 44.5% | 8-23 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 80.6% | 37 | 6 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-12 | -4.8 | 11-9 | 12-9 | 81.4 | 40.3 | 41.9% | 42.7 | 82.3 | 41.8 | 45.2% | 42.0 | | Home Games | 4-7 | -8.7 | 5-5 | 7-4 | 82.9 | 44.3 | 43.4% | 42.9 | 82.8 | 40.8 | 45.4% | 41.5 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -6.8 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 78.8 | 42.6 | 42.3% | 41.2 | 84.0 | 45.8 | 43.7% | 47.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.4 | 40.3 | 29-68 | 41.9% | 9-24 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 77.6% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 8-23 | 35.0% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.9 | 44.3 | 30-69 | 43.4% | 8-22 | 36.0% | 15-20 | 75.8% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.3 | 41.8 | 30-66 | 45.2% | 7-21 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.8 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 45.4% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 78.2% | 42 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 69.3, DALLAS 72.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/26/2022 | DALLAS | 99-68 | W | -400 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 47 | 13 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 34 | 19 | | 5/28/2022 | WASHINGTON | 79-71 | W | -550 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 50 | 18 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 28 | 8 | | 5/31/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 81-89 | L | +145 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 48 | 14 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 44 | 14 | | 6/2/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 97-90 | W | +170 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/3/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 92-88 | W | -270 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 42 | 21 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 27 | 20 | | 6/5/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 93-86 | W | +145 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 41 | 14 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 32 | 14 | | 6/8/2022 | INDIANA | 88-69 | W | | 31-66 | 47.0% | 51 | 16 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 37 | 15 | | 6/10/2022 | CHICAGO | 79-83 | L | -250 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 42 | 10 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 35 | 12 | | 6/15/2022 | ATLANTA | 105-92 | W | -550 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 44 | 11 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 16 | | 6/17/2022 | SEATTLE | 82-71 | W | -330 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 47 | 14 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 31 | 12 | | 6/19/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-71 | L | -165 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 48 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 10 | | 6/22/2022 | NEW YORK | 77-81 | L | -600 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 45 | 10 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 11 | | 6/26/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 72-61 | W | -360 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 20 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 17 | | 6/29/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 83-91 | L | +105 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 35 | 4 | 32-54 | 59.3% | 38 | 22 | | 7/3/2022 | WASHINGTON | 74-72 | W | -330 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 49 | 17 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 19 | | 7/5/2022 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2022 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2022 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2022 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/26/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 68-99 | L | +300 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 34 | 19 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 47 | 13 | | 5/31/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 91-93 | L | -105 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 43 | 9 | 36-56 | 64.3% | 33 | 15 | | 6/3/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 68-51 | W | +200 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 51 | 17 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 38 | 16 | | 6/5/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 78-84 | L | +280 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 57 | 17 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 40 | 10 | | 6/10/2022 | SEATTLE | 88-89 | L | +180 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 34 | 14 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 40 | 17 | | 6/12/2022 | SEATTLE | 79-84 | L | +145 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 46 | 19 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 29 | 10 | | 6/15/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 84-92 | L | +325 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 45 | 11 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 45 | 7 | | 6/17/2022 | PHOENIX | 93-88 | W | -210 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 41 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 36 | 12 | | 6/19/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 92-82 | W | -175 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 47 | 13 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 47 | 17 | | 6/21/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 75-80 | L | -175 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 39 | 13 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 47 | 22 | | 6/23/2022 | INDIANA | 94-68 | W | -450 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 42 | 13 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 38 | 18 | | 6/25/2022 | PHOENIX | 72-83 | L | -300 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 15 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 9 | | 6/28/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-92 | L | +135 | 17-59 | 28.8% | 36 | 10 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 64 | 13 | | 7/1/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 89-97 | L | -210 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 40 | 13 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 43 | 10 | | 7/5/2022 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2022 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| DALLAS is 34-41 (-5.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 6-1 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 19-17 (-4.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/26/2022 | DALLAS | 68 | 160.5 | Over | 35 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 10-30 | 33.3% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 34 | 10 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 99 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 25-27 | 92.6% | 47 | 16 | 13 | 5/24/2022 | DALLAS | 85 | 160.5 | SU ATS | 27 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 46 | 13 | 9 | | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | -8 | Over | 39 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 43 | 11 | 10 | 9/7/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -9 | SU ATS | 48 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 52 | 10 | 13 | | | DALLAS | 56 | 148.5 | Under | 25 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 7-32 | 21.9% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 9 | 12 | 8/15/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 38 | 9 | 11 | | | DALLAS | 59 | 156.5 | Under | 27 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 26 | 1 | 19 | 6/22/2021 | DALLAS | 70 | 155.5 | Under | 38 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 33 | 6 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 0 | SU ATS | 30 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 45 | 12 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 130-91 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 66-33 against the money line (+38.5 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 38-33 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 66-33 against the money line (+38.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 49-22 against the money line (+15.6 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 33-18 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 65-44 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 112-72 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 103-65 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 90-63 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 56-24 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 63-34 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 82-48 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-23 against the money line (+17.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 39-8 against the money line (+19.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-6 against the money line (+22.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 20-1 against the money line (+24.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 10*) | Miller is 49-33 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 69-53 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 66-33 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 76-44 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 112-72 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 73-40 against the money line (+23.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 107-65 against the money line (+23.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 57-29 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 88-48 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 68-39 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 106-66 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 29-10 against the money line (+18.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 47-22 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 41-21 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-38 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-44 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 112-74 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-24 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-41 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 72-44 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 107-72 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 63-41 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 88-67 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 56-35 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 80-56 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 11-16 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in home games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 11-15 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 10-14 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 10-22 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 81.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Johnson is 5-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 76.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 12-23 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 1-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 2-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 74.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 3-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 9-18 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 5-15 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Johnson is 9-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 1-14 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 71.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Johnson is 2-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 75.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 9-15 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 9-13 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 9-15 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 17-26 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 9-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 17-26 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 8-13 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 15-21 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 8-15 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Johnson is 17-27 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 7-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 77.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 5-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 50 times, while the home underdog won straight up 21 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/16/2024 7:58:00 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|