| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES INDIANA |
|
| 155.5 | 90 Final 84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | LOS ANGELES | -140 | 602 | INDIANA | +120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (95-49 since 1997.) (66%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (95-49 since 1997.) (66%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a home loss, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (81-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games. (38-27 since 1997.) (58.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a road favorite, playing with 2 days rest. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +31.1 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite against opponent off a home loss. (37-19 since 1997.) (66.1%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a road favorite, in May, June, or July games. (42-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.8%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (123-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more. (137-47 since 1997.) (74.5%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less. (76-43 since 1997.) (63.9%, +48.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest. (79-85 since 1997.) (48.2%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (110-69 since 1997.) (61.5%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a close loss by 3 points or less. (42-39 since 1997.) (51.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog against opponent off a road loss. (56-40 since 1997.) (58.3%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (49-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +40.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a close loss by 3 points or less. (46-40 since 1997.) (53.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (38-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (56-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (54-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (47-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (123-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +31.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (34-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 77 | | 29-72 | 40.3% | 8-22 | 36.7% | 11-14 | 83.7% | 45 | 13 | 13 | INDIANA | 80 | | 30-71 | 42.1% | 6-17 | 37.9% | 13-16 | 81.7% | 47 | 14 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 567 times, while LOS ANGELES won 412 times. Edge against the money line=INDIANA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 72.8 | LOS ANGELES is 131-71 against the money line (+30.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 71.5 | INDIANA is 4-18 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 85.3 | INDIANA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 85.7 | INDIANA is 55-75 against the money line (-39.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 74.7 | INDIANA is 59-72 against the money line (-43.5 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 73.3 | INDIANA is 3-18 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 84.1 | INDIANA is 2-15 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 82.8, OPPONENT 89.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 18-20 against the money line (-26.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 102-87 against the money line (-43.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 73.6 | LOS ANGELES is 71-62 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 10-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 80.2 | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 85.4 | LOS ANGELES is 2-11 against the money line (-18.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.6, OPPONENT 82.4 | LOS ANGELES is 15-16 against the money line (-24.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 82.2 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 75.9 | INDIANA is 115-79 against the money line (+41.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 71.3 | INDIANA is 76-38 against the money line (+40.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 74.9 | INDIANA is 184-69 against the money line (+136.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 84.9, OPPONENT 78.0 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 1-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 1-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 3-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.0, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-18 against the money line (-29.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-18 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-20 against the money line (-27.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-9 against the money line (-14.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-16 against the money line (-20.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-14.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-24.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-15 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-17 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-11 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-16 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-54 against the money line (-26.0 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-20 against the money line (-29.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-18 against the money line (-29.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-18 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-16 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 72-61 against the money line (-72.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-83 against the money line (-67.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-15 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a game where opponent was called for 10 or less fouls since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 4-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 4-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 4-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 3-17 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 26-38 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 7-23 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 17-24 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-23 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 3-23 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.4, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 3-23 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-15 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games after a close loss by 3 points or less since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 4-17 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 3-17 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-15 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.3, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 3-17 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 1-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 3-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 70-92 against the money line (-47.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 26-23 against the money line (-23.8 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-100 against the money line (-41.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-18 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-13.9 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-12 against the money line (-19.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-10 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-10 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-12 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-13 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-9 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 124-83 against the money line (-60.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 209-185 against the money line (+25.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 172-168 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-7 | -5.3 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 78.1 | 38.8 | 41.2% | 42.3 | 79.4 | 40.5 | 41.2% | 45.2 | Road Games | 3-5 | -2.3 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 74.4 | 36.1 | 40.0% | 39.6 | 79.7 | 40.5 | 42.5% | 45.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.1 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 82.4 | 42.6 | 42.9% | 43.4 | 76.0 | 39.4 | 41.7% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.1 | 38.8 | 30-72 | 41.2% | 8-21 | 35.9% | 11-13 | 84.0% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 39 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-20 | 32.8% | 12-15 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.4 | 36.1 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.4 | 40.5 | 29-70 | 41.2% | 7-20 | 37.1% | 14-18 | 81.2% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 14 | 9 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 78.3 | 40.5 | 29-69 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 13-17 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.7 | 40.5 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 7-18 | 37.9% | 14-18 | 81.6% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 15 | 9 | 15 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-10 | -2.3 | 9-7 | 9-7 | 77.5 | 36.6 | 42.4% | 43.4 | 78.2 | 37.6 | 40.8% | 43.9 | Home Games | 2-5 | -3.8 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 78.4 | 33.9 | 42.3% | 43.7 | 77.3 | 37.9 | 39.4% | 44.9 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 77.4 | 35.6 | 41.4% | 43.2 | 80.2 | 41.2 | 42.9% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.5 | 36.6 | 30-70 | 42.4% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 12-15 | 81.4% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.4 | 38.9 | 29-69 | 41.5% | 7-20 | 32.6% | 13-16 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.4 | 33.9 | 30-70 | 42.3% | 6-16 | 36.4% | 13-16 | 83.8% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 37.6 | 28-69 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 16-19 | 82.0% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 38.3 | 28-69 | 41.1% | 6-20 | 32.2% | 13-16 | 79.6% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.3 | 37.9 | 28-70 | 39.4% | 6-17 | 35.9% | 16-19 | 84.7% | 45 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 72.3, INDIANA 70.4 |
| | |
|
|
6/4/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 78-73 | W | -200 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 50 | 12 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 50 | 16 | 6/6/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-89 | L | +280 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 25 | 21 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 38 | 17 | 6/8/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 89-85 | W | +170 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 37 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 50 | 21 | 6/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 85-68 | W | +145 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 9 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 6/15/2019 | NEW YORK | 92-98 | L | -650 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 47 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 39 | 9 | 6/18/2019 | WASHINGTON | 52-81 | L | -120 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 53 | 26 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 41 | 17 | 6/21/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 62-84 | L | -120 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 14 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 50 | 13 | 6/23/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 72-82 | L | -115 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 43 | 10 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 43 | 11 | 6/27/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 86-74 | W | +105 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 41 | 14 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 48 | 19 | 6/30/2019 | CHICAGO | 94-69 | W | -220 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 45 | 14 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 42 | 14 | 7/7/2019 | WASHINGTON | 98-81 | W | +135 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 43 | 6 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 38 | 10 | 7/9/2019 | @ DALLAS | 62-74 | L | -210 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 21 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 15 | 7/12/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2019 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2019 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2019 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/7/2019 | DALLAS | 79-64 | W | -210 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 48 | 10 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 40 | 10 | 6/9/2019 | PHOENIX | 87-94 | L | +120 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 42 | 11 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 44 | 6 | 6/11/2019 | SEATTLE | 82-84 | L | -115 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 33 | 13 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 11 | 6/13/2019 | @ DALLAS | 76-72 | W | -140 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 43 | 17 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 38 | 13 | 6/15/2019 | CHICAGO | 64-70 | L | -165 | 26-78 | 33.3% | 50 | 10 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 53 | 10 | 6/19/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 78-88 | L | -115 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 45 | 8 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 49 | 6 | 6/21/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 76-69 | W | +175 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 34 | 10 | 6/23/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 61-65 | L | +200 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 50 | 19 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 12 | 6/25/2019 | MINNESOTA | 74-78 | L | +135 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 42 | 17 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 17 | 6/28/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 69-91 | L | +175 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 39 | 11 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 41 | 12 | 6/29/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 97-102 | L | | 39-89 | 43.8% | 41 | 6 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 58 | 10 | 7/5/2019 | @ DALLAS | 76-56 | W | +145 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 46 | 10 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 39 | 9 | 7/10/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 71-74 | L | +180 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 48 | 9 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 49 | 11 | 7/12/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2019 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2019 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2019 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 25-12 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 2-3 (+5.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 10-8 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 1-2 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/20/2018 | INDIANA | 78 | 153.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 43 | 10 | 8 | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -13 | Over | 40 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 42 | 12 | 11 | 6/19/2018 | INDIANA | 55 | 153.5 | Under | 33 | 21-69 | 30.4% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 54 | 14 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | -12 | SU ATS | 35 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 6-6 | 100.0% | 34 | 3 | 7 | 5/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -8 | SU ATS | 50 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 37 | 5 | 10 | | INDIANA | 70 | 152.5 | Over | 36 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 16-16 | 100.0% | 36 | 5 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Chatman is 19-56 against the money line (-24.4 Units) in all games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-30 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in home games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-30 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-30 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-44 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-78 against the money line (-35.0 Units) against Western conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 46-77 against the money line (-36.6 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 7-23 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 83-111 against the money line (-46.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 78.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-78 against the money line (-35.0 Units) in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 7-23 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-23 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 73.4, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Chatman is 3-23 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 2-11 against the money line (-9.5 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 12-43 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 5-19 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-17 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 1-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 1-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-31 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 76.7, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 4-27 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 6*) | Chatman is 22-30 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 52-91 against the money line (-40.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 76.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 46-80 against the money line (-43.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-93 against the money line (-42.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 76.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-45 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 60-106 against the money line (-53.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 76.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-46 against the money line (-30.7 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 79.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 94-131 against the money line (-51.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Chatman 77.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 3-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 6-25 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-37 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 6-25 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fisher is 2-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 75 times, while the home underdog won straight up 51 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/11/2019 - Alexis Jones is downgraded to OUT Friday vs Indiana Fever ( Knee ) | [F] 07/11/2019 - Candace Parker is downgraded to OUT Friday vs Indiana Fever ( Foot ) | [C] 05/29/2019 - Maria Vadeeva is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[G] 04/05/2019 - Victoria Vivians is out for season ( ACL ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 6:55:03 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|