| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
LAS VEGAS |
|
|
162.5
| 87
Final
62 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Bradenton, FL | | |  | |
| 611 | CONNECTICUT | +200 | | 612 | LAS VEGAS | -250 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(213-54 since 1997.) (79.8%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(238-87 since 1997.) (73.2%, +74.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(189-52 since 1997.) (78.4%, +68.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(210-79 since 1997.) (72.7%, +63.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(131-28 since 1997.) (82.4%, +62.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(145-46 since 1997.) (75.9%, +61.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(136-32 since 1997.) (81%, +60.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(128-25 since 1997.) (83.7%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as an underdog, on Sunday games.
(60-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +42.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(107-25 since 1997.) (81.1%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as an underdog, on Sunday games.
(48-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in the conference finals.
(89-28 since 1997.) (76.1%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - as a # 1 seed in the playoffs, in the conference finals.
(53-8 since 1997.) (86.9%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(73-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(20-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(32-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(118-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(84-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(29-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +12.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - off a road win against a division rival against opponent off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(82-50 since 1997.) (62.1%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(31-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +13.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in August or September games.
(52-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(30-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.6%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(26-10 since 1997.) (72.2%, +20.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(55-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(43-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 29-67 | 42.4% | 7-21 | 31.6% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 14 | | LAS VEGAS | 84 | | 32-70 | 45.5% | 5-17 | 30.4% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 45 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LAS VEGAS won the game straight up 645 times, while CONNECTICUT won 332 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 39-21 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 93-53 against the money line (+29.1 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 83-48 against the money line (+32.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 62-40 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 31-10 against the money line (+23.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 79.7 | LAS VEGAS is 16-14 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.8, OPPONENT 82.5 | LAS VEGAS is 5-7 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.9, OPPONENT 81.6 | LAS VEGAS is 86-123 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.6, OPPONENT 78.0 | LAS VEGAS is 5-6 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.9, OPPONENT 80.7 | LAS VEGAS is 17-17 against the money line (-24.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.0, OPPONENT 87.3 | LAS VEGAS is 95-141 against the money line (-50.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.8, OPPONENT 77.7 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 44-68 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 17-18 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 88.6 | CONNECTICUT is 5-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 93.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-15 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 88.1 | CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 86.0 | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 82.9 | LAS VEGAS is 13-4 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 81.1 | LAS VEGAS is 21-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 80.8 | LAS VEGAS is 32-31 against the money line (+21.7 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.4, OPPONENT 78.8 | LAS VEGAS is 46-22 against the money line (+25.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.9, OPPONENT 82.7 | LAS VEGAS is 28-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.9, OPPONENT 81.8 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 18-11 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-30 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-7 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+12.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+7.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-8 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+6.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-7 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-7 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-7 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 130-104 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 32-53 against the money line (-25.3 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 51-99 against the money line (-49.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 72-99 against the money line (-38.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 42-25 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 44-30 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 33-25 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 44-30 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 38-24 against the money line (+18.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LAS VEGAS is 44-27 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-6 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 43-30 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 41-29 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 32-25 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 24-15 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-8 against the money line (+8.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 65-48 against the money line (+27.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 69-59 against the money line (+19.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset wins as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 99-64 against the money line (+33.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-14 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-21 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 257-345 against the money line (-89.8 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 138-87 against the money line (-52.9 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 91-134 against the money line (-57.9 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 151-215 against the money line (-69.6 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 7-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-10 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.5, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-34 against the money line (-31.8 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 63-91 against the money line (-51.7 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 18-25 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 39-59 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 41-51 against the money line (-28.3 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 119-144 against the money line (-48.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 89-105 against the money line (-47.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 71-76 against the money line (-37.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 118-162 against the money line (-52.0 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 118-164 against the money line (-59.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-15 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 6*) | LAS VEGAS is 24-8 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 31-19 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 13-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-0 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 27-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 13-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-0 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 24-9 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LAS VEGAS is 14-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 12-12 | +1.3 | 12-12 | 10-13 | 80.6 | 39.5 | 42.5% | 44.2 | 79.1 | 37.6 | 44.1% | 39.8 | | Road Games | 12-12 | +1.3 | 12-12 | 10-13 | 80.6 | 39.5 | 42.5% | 44.2 | 79.1 | 37.6 | 44.1% | 39.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 84.4 | 37.4 | 41.2% | 48.6 | 78.4 | 36.4 | 40.4% | 40.8 | | Division Games | 12-12 | +1.3 | 12-12 | 10-13 | 80.6 | 39.5 | 42.5% | 44.2 | 79.1 | 37.6 | 44.1% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.6 | 39.5 | 30-70 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 15-20 | 77.0% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.3 | 41.8 | 31-68 | 44.7% | 7-21 | 35.1% | 15-18 | 80.6% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.6 | 39.5 | 30-70 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 15-20 | 77.0% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.1 | 37.6 | 28-65 | 44.1% | 7-21 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 82.4% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.3 | 41.7 | 31-68 | 45.1% | 7-21 | 35.1% | 15-18 | 81.2% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.1 | 37.6 | 28-65 | 44.1% | 7-21 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 82.4% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 18-4 | +6.8 | 12-8 | 11-11 | 88.7 | 46.4 | 47.7% | 44.8 | 80.1 | 41.5 | 43.1% | 39.0 | | Road Games | 18-4 | +6.8 | 12-8 | 11-11 | 88.7 | 46.4 | 47.7% | 44.8 | 80.1 | 41.5 | 43.1% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 91.0 | 49.6 | 48.5% | 47.0 | 81.6 | 43.6 | 43.5% | 36.4 | | Division Games | 18-4 | +6.8 | 12-8 | 11-11 | 88.7 | 46.4 | 47.7% | 44.8 | 80.1 | 41.5 | 43.1% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 88.7 | 46.4 | 33-69 | 47.7% | 4-11 | 37.5% | 19-23 | 81.5% | 45 | 8 | 21 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.3 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.7% | 7-21 | 35.1% | 15-19 | 81.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 88.7 | 46.4 | 33-69 | 47.7% | 4-11 | 37.5% | 19-23 | 81.5% | 45 | 8 | 21 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.1 | 41.5 | 31-71 | 43.1% | 8-25 | 31.1% | 11-14 | 78.1% | 39 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 80.8% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.1 | 41.5 | 31-71 | 43.1% | 8-25 | 31.1% | 11-14 | 78.1% | 39 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.2, LAS VEGAS 71 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/12/2020 | *DALLAS | 70-66 | W | -200 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 9 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 13 | | 8/14/2020 | *CHICAGO | 77-74 | W | +200 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 53 | 8 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 40 | 15 | | 8/16/2020 | *SEATTLE | 72-95 | L | +375 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 49 | 11 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 36 | 11 | | 8/18/2020 | *INDIANA | 84-62 | W | -210 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 45 | 11 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 39 | 15 | | 8/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 78-99 | L | +220 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 30 | 16 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 43 | 15 | | 8/22/2020 | *NEW YORK | 82-65 | W | -850 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 42 | 9 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 39 | 18 | | 8/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 76-80 | L | +175 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 23 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | | 8/30/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 76-63 | W | -200 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 44 | 13 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 39 | 16 | | 9/1/2020 | *NEW YORK | 70-65 | W | -750 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 48 | 12 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 44 | 18 | | 9/3/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 78-93 | L | +200 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 47 | 21 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 29 | 10 | | 9/5/2020 | *INDIANA | 96-77 | W | -270 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 37 | 6 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 34 | 19 | | 9/7/2020 | *PHOENIX | 85-70 | W | +135 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 9 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 41 | 16 | | 9/9/2020 | *PHOENIX | 95-100 | L | +120 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 62 | 16 | 35-82 | 42.7% | 47 | 11 | | 9/11/2020 | *ATLANTA | 75-82 | L | -115 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 13 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 51 | 8 | | 9/15/2020 | *CHICAGO | 94-81 | W | +105 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 49 | 12 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 25 | 12 | | 9/17/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 73-59 | W | +170 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 45 | 8 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 40 | 14 | | 9/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/24/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/11/2020 | *INDIANA | 98-79 | W | -270 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 48 | 9 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 35 | 11 | | 8/13/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 87-77 | W | -210 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 11 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 42 | 19 | | 8/15/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 88-73 | W | -450 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 33 | 10 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 48 | 18 | | 8/18/2020 | *CHICAGO | 82-84 | L | -200 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 44 | 8 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 42 | 14 | | 8/20/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 99-78 | W | -300 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 43 | 15 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 30 | 16 | | 8/22/2020 | *SEATTLE | 82-74 | W | +175 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 51 | 16 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 13 | | 8/25/2020 | *DALLAS | 96-92 | W | -450 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 42 | 8 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 43 | 11 | | 8/29/2020 | *NEW YORK | 80-63 | W | | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 8 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 48 | 17 | | 9/1/2020 | *PHOENIX | 85-92 | L | -400 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 48 | 12 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 40 | 8 | | 9/3/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 93-78 | W | -250 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 29 | 10 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 47 | 21 | | 9/5/2020 | *ATLANTA | 89-79 | W | -600 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 16 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 37 | 9 | | 9/8/2020 | *INDIANA | 92-86 | W | | 32-70 | 45.7% | 48 | 9 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 32 | 13 | | 9/10/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 104-89 | W | -210 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 6 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 35 | 12 | | 9/12/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 84-70 | W | -175 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 47 | 15 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 32 | 12 | | 9/13/2020 | @ SEATTLE | 86-84 | W | -125 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 50 | 9 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 46 | 11 | | 9/20/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/24/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 26-17 (+8.2 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
| LAS VEGAS is 4-3 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
9/3/2020 | LAS VEGAS | 93 | -6 | SU ATS | 43 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 29 | 6 | 10 | | N | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 161.5 | Over | 36 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 24-29 | 82.8% | 47 | 17 | 21 | 8/20/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 163 | Over | 42 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 30 | 6 | 16 | | N | LAS VEGAS | 99 | -7 | SU ATS | 53 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 43 | 7 | 15 | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 85 | 163.5 | Over | 56 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 42 | 4 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 42 | 7 | 10 | 8/11/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 159 | Over | 42 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 39 | 11 | 9 | | | LAS VEGAS | 89 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 11 | 16 | 6/2/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 46 | 11 | 9 | | | LAS VEGAS | 74 | -5.5 | Under | 43 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 49 | 6 | 21 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 53-36 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-21 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 21-12 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-24 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-21 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-20 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-11 against the money line (+9.9 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 8-0 against the money line (+12.5 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-52 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-16 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 27-16 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 27-22 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 26-19 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 56-35 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 81-57 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 56-31 against the money line (+22.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 79-50 against the money line (+20.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-18 against the money line (+25.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 47-30 against the money line (+21.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 48-30 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 57-35 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-35 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-57 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 46-33 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 42-27 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 57-44 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 7-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 11-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.7, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 2-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.5, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 36-44 against the money line (-27.0 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 46-45 against the money line (-23.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-26 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-13 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Lambeer is 29-21 against the money line (+9.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 24-8 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 41-26 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 16-5 against the money line (+14.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Lambeer is 12-3 against the money line (+12.0 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Lambeer is 8-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 24-17 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 13-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 24-10 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 53-32 against the money line (+25.6 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 77.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 37-27 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 34-22 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 29-21 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 50-37 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 82.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 36-23 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 27-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 90-59 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 81.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 156-100 against the money line (+24.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 119-71 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 79.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 93-54 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 80.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 29-20 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 40-26 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 80.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 21-10 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 85.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 22-14 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 28-18 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 49-31 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 34-20 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 14-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 56-39 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 42-25 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 44-30 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 66-49 against the money line (+26.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 79.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 33-25 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 44-30 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 38-24 against the money line (+18.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 152-92 against the money line (+42.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 42-22 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 44-27 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 16-6 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 43-30 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 116-86 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 41-29 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 32-25 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 105-73 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 28-21 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
| [G] 09/12/2020 - Bria Holmes is out for season ( Knee ) | | [F] 06/22/2020 - Jonquel Jones is out for season ( Personal ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 7:27:43 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|