| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON LAS VEGAS |
|
| 167 | 87 Final 86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
655 | WASHINGTON | +350 | 656 | LAS VEGAS | -500 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (265-90 since 1997.) (74.6%, +78.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (265-90 since 1997.) (74.6%, +78.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (265-90 since 1997.) (74.6%, +78.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (260-86 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (260-86 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (260-86 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (298-135 since 1997.) (68.8%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (298-135 since 1997.) (68.8%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (298-135 since 1997.) (68.8%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (298-135 since 1997.) (68.8%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (298-135 since 1997.) (68.8%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (298-135 since 1997.) (68.8%, +78.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (228-82 since 1997.) (73.5%, +67.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (195-135 since 1997.) (59.1%, +66.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (249-185 since 1997.) (57.4%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (42-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (47-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (47-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (47-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (57-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, on Saturday games. (65-14 since 1997.) (82.3%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games, on Saturday games. (68-15 since 1997.) (81.9%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread against opponent after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread. (104-59 since 1997.) (63.8%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (66-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (104-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +54.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (35-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd road game in 5 days. (23-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +15.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (61-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (104-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (42-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.8%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, tired team - playing their 3rd road game in 5 days. (30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread against opponent after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread. (30-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (29-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (91-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (26-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 of their last 5 games. (70-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (117-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +52.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (80-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (70-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (424-300 since 1997.) (58.6%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (195-135 since 1997.) (59.1%, +66.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (249-185 since 1997.) (57.4%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (92-67 since 1997.) (57.9%, +54.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (73-54 since 1997.) (57.5%, +45.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (65-44 since 1997.) (59.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (32-16 since 1997.) (66.7%, +32.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (75-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.9%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after going over the total by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (55-33 since 1997.) (62.5%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after going over the total by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (46-27 since 1997.) (63%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 80 | | 31-72 | 43.1% | 8-26 | 31.9% | 9-12 | 77.2% | 42 | 8 | 12 | LAS VEGAS | 89 | | 33-69 | 47.7% | 8-22 | 36.9% | 15-19 | 81.0% | 44 | 6 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LAS VEGAS won the game straight up 734 times, while WASHINGTON won 245 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 26-19 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 82.2 | LAS VEGAS is 93-91 against the money line (-40.5 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.2, OPPONENT 83.2 | LAS VEGAS is 101-135 against the money line (-64.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 | LAS VEGAS is 89-231 against the money line (-197.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.7, OPPONENT 86.9 | LAS VEGAS is 111-186 against the money line (-78.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.9, OPPONENT 80.5 | LAS VEGAS is 107-146 against the money line (-48.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.8, OPPONENT 78.0 |
|
WASHINGTON is 17-23 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 80.3 | WASHINGTON is 11-17 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 83.8 | WASHINGTON is 53-103 against the money line (-56.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.3 | WASHINGTON is 76-144 against the money line (-92.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.7 | WASHINGTON is 2-4 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 78.7 | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 87.0 | WASHINGTON is 0-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 90.6 | WASHINGTON is 0-4 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 82.5 | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 81.6 | WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-13.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 84.8 | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 82.5 | LAS VEGAS is 17-2 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.7, OPPONENT 81.5 | LAS VEGAS is 17-3 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.8, OPPONENT 79.9 | LAS VEGAS is 14-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.4, OPPONENT 81.1 | LAS VEGAS is 14-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.7, OPPONENT 77.1 | LAS VEGAS is 14-0 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 93.5, OPPONENT 79.4 | LAS VEGAS is 50-14 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.3, OPPONENT 82.3 | LAS VEGAS is 156-56 against the money line (+119.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.8, OPPONENT 83.1 |
|
| | |
|
LAS VEGAS is 73-122 against the money line (-47.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 110-152 against the money line (-58.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 162-207 against the money line (-65.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 102-126 against the money line (-47.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 66-112 against the money line (-62.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 113-104 against the money line (-48.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 156-202 against the money line (-62.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 85-108 against the money line (-47.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 127-154 against the money line (-50.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 37-70 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 8-31 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 109-183 against the money line (-70.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-22 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-24 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-21 against the money line (-13.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-17 against the money line (-16.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 178-260 against the money line (-93.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-23 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-13 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 8-19 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 49-82 against the money line (-37.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 71-114 against the money line (-47.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-45 against the money line (-25.1 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 82-123 against the money line (-44.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 128-170 against the money line (-61.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-22 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 41-100 against the money line (-45.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-150 against the money line (-58.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-34 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-67 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 84-131 against the money line (-54.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-20 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LAS VEGAS is 293-364 against the money line (-92.8 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 114-73 against the money line (-47.3 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 162-157 against the money line (-56.4 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 139-132 against the money line (-52.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 61-64 against the money line (-31.3 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 90-116 against the money line (-43.7 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 146-211 against the money line (-92.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 154-210 against the money line (-86.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 61-64 against the money line (-31.3 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 140-179 against the money line (-56.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 63-86 against the money line (-36.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 76-107 against the money line (-43.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 40-55 against the money line (-32.0 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 0-4 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LAS VEGAS is 3-5 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 93.8, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 60-77 against the money line (-30.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 140-157 against the money line (-53.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 106-115 against the money line (-50.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 57-59 against the money line (-36.0 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 84-77 against the money line (-38.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 41-49 against the money line (-37.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 24-29 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 22-26 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-12 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-12 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 33-55 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-23 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-17 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 22-29 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-6 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in June games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-85 against the money line (-35.1 Units) on Saturday games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-11.7 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 91-148 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-9 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 12-14 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-83 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 125-173 against the money line (-53.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 70-120 against the money line (-48.4 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 76-135 against the money line (-60.3 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 96-155 against the money line (-58.9 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 167-231 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 178-253 against the money line (-81.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 17-25 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-7 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 176-290 against the money line (-103.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 126-192 against the money line (-65.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-11 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 8*) | WASHINGTON is 171-250 against the money line (-69.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 85-128 against the money line (-44.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) on Saturday games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 20-3 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 19-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 42-12 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 39-12 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 44-28 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | -9.2 | 11-9 | 6-14 | 78.7 | 39.2 | 43.0% | 42.2 | 75.6 | 36.3 | 43.3% | 40.9 | Road Games | 5-5 | -0.9 | 6-4 | 3-7 | 77.4 | 37.9 | 42.9% | 41.9 | 75.7 | 37.3 | 43.5% | 41.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 74.4 | 38.0 | 39.9% | 42.6 | 74.8 | 36.4 | 43.3% | 44.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.7 | 39.2 | 29-68 | 43.0% | 8-23 | 33.3% | 12-16 | 76.8% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41.1 | 30-69 | 43.6% | 8-22 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.4 | 37.9 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 11-14 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.6 | 36.3 | 28-65 | 43.3% | 8-22 | 33.6% | 12-16 | 75.6% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 8-22 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.7 | 37.3 | 28-65 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 35.9% | 12-16 | 73.4% | 41 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-3 | +4.3 | 9-7 | 10-6 | 91.5 | 47.7 | 46.3% | 43.7 | 83.0 | 40.6 | 42.6% | 42.9 | Home Games | 8-2 | +1.4 | 5-5 | 7-3 | 92.2 | 47.4 | 46.1% | 42.6 | 84.6 | 43.1 | 43.9% | 43.6 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -0.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 91.2 | 45.6 | 45.7% | 41.8 | 86.6 | 43.6 | 43.4% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 91.5 | 47.7 | 32-70 | 46.3% | 9-25 | 36.2% | 17-21 | 80.8% | 44 | 6 | 21 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 8-23 | 35.1% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.2 | 47.4 | 32-70 | 46.1% | 10-27 | 36.3% | 18-22 | 79.6% | 43 | 6 | 21 | 16 | 7 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.0 | 40.6 | 31-73 | 42.6% | 8-26 | 31.4% | 12-15 | 81.7% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 7-22 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.6 | 43.1 | 32-73 | 43.9% | 9-27 | 32.1% | 11-14 | 80.9% | 44 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.8, LAS VEGAS 72.9 |
| | |
|
|
5/17/2022 | @ DALLAS | 84-68 | W | -165 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 42 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 34 | 14 | 5/20/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 78-73 | W | -120 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 43 | 17 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 35 | 14 | 5/22/2022 | CHICAGO | 73-82 | L | -120 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 37 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 41 | 15 | 5/24/2022 | ATLANTA | 70-50 | W | -400 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 36 | 13 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 40 | 23 | 5/28/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-79 | L | +375 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 28 | 8 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 50 | 18 | 5/31/2022 | @ INDIANA | 87-75 | W | -300 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 50 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 39 | 13 | 6/3/2022 | NEW YORK | 70-74 | L | -850 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 50 | 14 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 38 | 12 | 6/5/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 82-91 | L | +180 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 38 | 15 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 16 | 6/8/2022 | CHICAGO | 84-82 | W | -165 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 41 | 13 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 38 | 13 | 6/10/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-59 | W | -360 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 9 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 45 | 17 | 6/12/2022 | PHOENIX | 90-99 | L | -250 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 59 | 18 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 15 | 6/14/2022 | PHOENIX | 83-65 | W | -400 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 9 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 16 | 6/16/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 65-77 | L | -175 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 13 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | 6/19/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 71-63 | W | +145 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 10 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 48 | 16 | 6/21/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-84 | L | -140 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 41 | 17 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 16 | 6/23/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 71-85 | L | +170 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 45 | 12 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 39 | 7 | 6/25/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2022 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/17/2022 | PHOENIX | 86-74 | W | -360 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 38 | 9 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 37 | 15 | 5/19/2022 | MINNESOTA | 93-87 | W | -550 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 41 | 10 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 42 | 10 | 5/21/2022 | PHOENIX | 100-80 | W | -550 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 48 | 9 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 44 | 15 | 5/23/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 104-76 | W | -600 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 45 | 7 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 40 | 5 | 5/28/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 83-76 | W | -115 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 57 | 7 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 57 | 10 | 5/31/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 89-81 | W | -165 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 44 | 14 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 48 | 14 | 6/2/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 90-97 | L | -200 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 13 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | 6/5/2022 | DALLAS | 84-78 | W | -360 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 40 | 10 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 57 | 17 | 6/11/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 89-72 | W | -270 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 47 | 19 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 35 | 13 | 6/15/2022 | @ DALLAS | 92-84 | W | -450 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 45 | 7 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 45 | 11 | 6/19/2022 | MINNESOTA | 96-95 | W | | 35-78 | 44.9% | 40 | 6 | 39-81 | 48.1% | 49 | 10 | 6/21/2022 | CHICAGO | 95-104 | L | -360 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 37 | 9 | 43-75 | 57.3% | 41 | 9 | 6/25/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2022 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LAS VEGAS is 27-25 (-1.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
LAS VEGAS is 5-1 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 13-12 (+2.1 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
LAS VEGAS is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/10/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 76 | -5 | Under | 49 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 42 | 5 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 89 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 42 | 8 | 9 | 8/17/2021 | WASHINGTON | 83 | 172 | Over | 49 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 5-27 | 18.5% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 33 | 5 | 8 | | LAS VEGAS | 93 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 34-60 | 56.7% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 39 | 3 | 14 | 8/15/2021 | WASHINGTON | 83 | 174 | ATS | 50 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 10-29 | 34.5% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 38 | 6 | 11 | | LAS VEGAS | 84 | -11.5 | SU Under | 35 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 46 | 8 | 11 | 6/5/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 96 | -7.5 | SU Over | 56 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 49 | 8 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 93 | 167 | ATS | 57 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 11-30 | 36.7% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 45 | 6 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 49-50 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 79-55 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 80.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 34-28 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 41-43 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 100-88 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 69-61 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-32 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-37 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 76-87 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 61-77 against the money line (-29.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 22-28 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 61-77 against the money line (-29.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 4-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 33-48 against the money line (-19.9 Units) off a road loss as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 108-107 against the money line (-27.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 87-89 against the money line (-31.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 41-58 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 65-87 against the money line (-45.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 29-42 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 133-141 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 93-108 against the money line (-32.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 45-65 against the money line (-35.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 127-135 against the money line (-28.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 49-64 against the money line (-28.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 76-92 against the money line (-47.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 47-56 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 4-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 7-20 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 46-62 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 130-132 against the money line (-28.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-35 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 48-50 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 59-71 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 56 times, while the road underdog won straight up 15 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 06/24/2022 - Elizabeth Williams missed last game, is probable Saturday vs Las Vegas Aces ( Personal ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 4:54:55 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|