| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON LOS ANGELES |
|
| 166 | 81 Final 52 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
639 | WASHINGTON | +100 | 640 | LOS ANGELES | -120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (232-159 since 1997.) (59.3%, +75.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (214-73 since 1997.) (74.6%, +70.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (52-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (45-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less. (74-42 since 1997.) (63.8%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (62-41 since 1997.) (60.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (123-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss. (68-25 since 1997.) (73.1%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home loss, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (78-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%). (54-12 since 1997.) (81.8%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (119-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.9%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, in a game involving two marginal winning teams (51% to 60%). (52-13 since 1997.) (80%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (50-18 since 1997.) (73.5%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (45-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (40-12 since 1997.) (76.9%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (71-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (45-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (62-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (53-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (26-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (92.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (78-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (88-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (70-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (51-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (45-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss as a home favorite. (58-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (20-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (32-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (89-48 since 1997.) (65%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (123-83 since 1997.) (59.7%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (102-61 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (109-69 since 1997.) (61.2%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (109-70 since 1997.) (60.9%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (113-72 since 1997.) (61.1%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (98-62 since 1997.) (61.2%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (110-75 since 1997.) (59.5%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - excellent 3 point shooting team - making >=36% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games. (101-66 since 1997.) (60.5%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (101-63 since 1997.) (61.6%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (88-53 since 1997.) (62.4%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in June games. (98-65 since 1997.) (60.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (73-40 since 1997.) (64.6%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (81-48 since 1997.) (62.8%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more. (69-38 since 1997.) (64.5%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%). (21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +16.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games. (39-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game) against a horrible rebounding team (<=-6 reb/game). (29-16 since 1997.) (64.4%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (33-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (45-21 since 1997.) (68.2%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (52-29 since 1997.) (64.2%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +16.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (37-16 since 1997.) (69.8%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (19-6 since 1997.) (76%, +14.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 85 | | 31-71 | 44.0% | 8-24 | 32.3% | 14-16 | 87.2% | 44 | 12 | 11 | LOS ANGELES | 81 | | 31-72 | 43.2% | 8-21 | 36.5% | 11-13 | 84.2% | 45 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 582 times, while LOS ANGELES won 390 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | WASHINGTON is 24-7 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 90.2, OPPONENT 81.6 | WASHINGTON is 22-4 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 91.9, OPPONENT 80.8 | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 79.3 | LOS ANGELES is 101-87 against the money line (-44.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 73.6 | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 81.2 | LOS ANGELES is 5-17 against the money line (-36.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 87.1 | LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the money line (-24.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 89.9 | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.6, OPPONENT 83.6 | LOS ANGELES is 13-15 against the money line (-25.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 82.6 |
|
WASHINGTON is 89-134 against the money line (-63.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 75.0 | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 82.2 | WASHINGTON is 18-26 against the money line (-14.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 83.9 | WASHINGTON is 34-93 against the money line (-56.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 19-34 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 88.0 | WASHINGTON is 82-128 against the money line (-57.0 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 75.2 | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 73.3 | LOS ANGELES is 129-69 against the money line (+31.2 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 71.4 | LOS ANGELES is 92-38 against the money line (+24.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 272-72 against the money line (+152.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 77.8 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 20-13 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-10 against the money line (+17.0 Units) vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-14 against the money line (-26.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-15 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 105-115 against the money line (-53.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-16 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-12 against the money line (-17.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-21.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-11 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-16 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-16 against the money line (-25.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-15 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 141-222 against the money line (-63.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 167-243 against the money line (-83.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 231-334 against the money line (-110.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 51-22 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in home games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 89.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 18-10 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 91.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-19 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-11 against the money line (-21.8 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-7 against the money line (-21.0 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-14 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-20.8 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 157-133 against the money line (-63.5 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-4 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-14 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-12 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-8 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-17 against the money line (-26.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-15 against the money line (-26.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-14 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-14 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-6 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-5 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-3 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-4 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in home games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 306-431 against the money line (-122.4 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-27 against the money line (-21.1 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 150-226 against the money line (-84.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-84 against the money line (-33.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-56 against the money line (-42.8 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 10-35 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 15-27 against the money line (-21.1 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 141-214 against the money line (-87.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 63-101 against the money line (-47.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-53 against the money line (-35.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 110-155 against the money line (-50.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 111-157 against the money line (-54.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-113 against the money line (-48.0 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 132-201 against the money line (-65.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 35-51 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 146-230 against the money line (-74.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 158-253 against the money line (-73.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 57-76 against the money line (-35.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 4-3 | -4 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 84.9 | 46.1 | 44.3% | 40.7 | 78.3 | 39.3 | 45.7% | 41.0 | Road Games | 1-2 | -1 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 79.3 | 42.7 | 41.0% | 38.7 | 84.0 | 42.0 | 45.3% | 44.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 85.8 | 46.0 | 43.3% | 39.4 | 77.8 | 39.2 | 47.0% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.9 | 46.1 | 31-71 | 44.3% | 8-26 | 32.4% | 14-16 | 84.8% | 41 | 10 | 22 | 15 | 9 | 10 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 40 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 6-20 | 30.2% | 13-17 | 79.1% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.3 | 42.7 | 29-70 | 41.0% | 5-22 | 24.2% | 17-18 | 90.9% | 39 | 8 | 21 | 15 | 8 | 9 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.3 | 39.3 | 31-68 | 45.7% | 6-20 | 32.1% | 10-12 | 77.9% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.2 | 28-70 | 40.5% | 6-20 | 30.9% | 13-17 | 77.5% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.0 | 42.0 | 32-71 | 45.3% | 8-23 | 36.8% | 11-12 | 89.2% | 45 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 4-3 | -3 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 81.1 | 38.4 | 42.0% | 41.3 | 80.9 | 39.4 | 40.4% | 48.1 | Home Games | 1-1 | -5.2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 84.5 | 44.0 | 42.9% | 46.5 | 84.0 | 39.5 | 38.5% | 51.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -3.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 84.2 | 40.0 | 43.7% | 39.2 | 82.6 | 40.0 | 42.3% | 44.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.1 | 38.4 | 31-74 | 42.0% | 8-21 | 36.3% | 12-14 | 85.3% | 41 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 38.7 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 32.0% | 14-17 | 80.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.5 | 44.0 | 33-78 | 42.9% | 7-21 | 32.6% | 10-12 | 87.5% | 46 | 10 | 18 | 22 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.9 | 39.4 | 29-72 | 40.4% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 17-21 | 80.0% | 48 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 79.3 | 39.9 | 29-69 | 41.7% | 7-20 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.0 | 39.5 | 28-74 | 38.5% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 19-25 | 76.5% | 51 | 12 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.3, LOS ANGELES 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
5/25/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-84 | L | +180 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 45 | 11 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 48 | 9 | 6/1/2019 | ATLANTA | 96-75 | W | -450 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 43 | 14 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 36 | 13 | 6/5/2019 | CHICAGO | 103-85 | W | -850 | 43-86 | 50.0% | 47 | 11 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 37 | 17 | 6/7/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 94-85 | W | -500 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 36 | 7 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 42 | 17 | 6/9/2019 | DALLAS | 86-62 | W | | 30-68 | 44.1% | 42 | 12 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 15 | 6/11/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-83 | L | +120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 35 | 8 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 44 | 15 | 6/14/2019 | SEATTLE | 71-74 | L | -500 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 37 | 10 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 46 | 18 | 6/18/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/20/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2019 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2019 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/26/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 70-83 | L | +120 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 47 | 14 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 54 | 16 | 5/31/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 77-70 | W | +135 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 46 | 10 | 24-78 | 30.8% | 63 | 14 | 6/4/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 78-73 | W | -200 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 50 | 12 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 50 | 16 | 6/6/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-89 | L | +280 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 25 | 21 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 38 | 17 | 6/8/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 89-85 | W | +170 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 37 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 50 | 21 | 6/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 85-68 | W | +145 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 9 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 6/15/2019 | NEW YORK | 92-98 | L | -650 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 47 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 39 | 9 | 6/18/2019 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/21/2019 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2019 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2019 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 30-15 (-2.6 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 3-4 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 6-15 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 1-2 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/23/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 64 | 158 | Over | 29 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 40 | 9 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 96 | -4 | SU ATS | 50 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 38 | 3 | 9 | 8/17/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 67 | 159 | ATS | 40 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 45 | 11 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 69 | -4 | SU Under | 40 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 7-25 | 28.0% | 6-6 | 100.0% | 42 | 12 | 8 | 7/7/2018 | WASHINGTON | 83 | 160 | SU ATS | 30 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 1-16 | 6.2% | 32-35 | 91.4% | 41 | 8 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | -6 | Under | 35 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 34 | 5 | 14 | 6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 97 | -4 | SU ATS | 52 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 19-20 | 95.0% | 31 | 4 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 86 | 159 | Over | 34 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 31 | 13 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 43-37 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in road games in June games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 72-68 against the money line (+5.7 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-25 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-9 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-21 against the money line (+15.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-4 against the money line (+12.5 Units) off a close home loss by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 75.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 65-58 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 43-34 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 61-47 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 11-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 75.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-22 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-25 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 27-28 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Thibault is 39-56 against the money line (-19.7 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 4-8 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 39-56 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 27-36 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 48-54 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 25-31 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 35-40 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-22 against the money line (-15.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 57-72 against the money line (-22.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 28-40 against the money line (-16.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 106 times, while the road underdog won straight up 88 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 5 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 06/09/2019 - Emma Meesseman is out indefinitely ( Personal ) | [G] 06/09/2019 - Kim Mestdagh is out indefinitely ( Personal ) | [G] 05/30/2019 - Kiara Leslie is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[F] 06/17/2019 - Candace Parker is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Wash Mystics ( Hamstring ) | [G] 06/16/2019 - Alana Beard is "?" Tuesday vs Wash Mystics ( Leg ) | [C] 05/29/2019 - Maria Vadeeva is out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/18/2024 7:50:49 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|