Login  | Free Registration
Sunday, 10/25/2020
Texas 500 - FoxSheet

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Thursday 9/17/2020Line$ LineOU LineScore
CONNECTICUT
 
LOS ANGELES
+4.5  

-4.5  
+170

-200

160.5
 
73
Final
59

CONNECTICUT (11 - 12) at LOS ANGELES (15 - 7)
View Previous GameNo Next Game
Thursday, 9/17/2020 9:00 PM
WNBA Playoffs - 2nd Round - IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL
Board Money Line
607CONNECTICUT+170
608LOS ANGELES-200
BETTING TRENDS

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

CONNECTICUT (Money)

(0%)

OVER

(0%)
LOS ANGELES (Money) (0%)UNDER (0%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™
StatFox Super Situations favoring LOS ANGELES against the money line
There are 36 situations with a total rating of 93 stars.
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in August or September games.
(139-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(99-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(45-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games.
(110-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(156-49 since 1997.) (76.1%, +67.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(146-95 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games.
(172-108 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(38-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(98-25 since 1997.) (79.7%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(109-27 since 1997.) (80.1%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(119-71 since 1997.) (62.6%, +49.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(138-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in August or September games.
(60-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(66-10 since 1997.) (86.8%, +43.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(84-19 since 1997.) (81.6%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(68-16 since 1997.) (81%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +18.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games.
(67-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(59-18 since 1997.) (76.6%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(20-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(58-31 since 1997.) (65.2%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(73-45 since 1997.) (61.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(43-23 since 1997.) (65.2%, +27.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(32-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(48-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in August or September games.
(69-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(47-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +32 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(32-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +21 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game, in August or September games.
(41-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(39-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +27.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(29-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(36-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +23 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(43-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT against the money line
There are 14 situations with a total rating of 44 stars.
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(163-124 since 1997.) (56.8%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(131-94 since 1997.) (58.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(75-53 since 1997.) (58.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(30-11 since 1997.) (73.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 5*)
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record.
(20-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +33 units. Rating = 5*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(25-14 since 1997.) (64.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 4*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +27 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss against a division rival.
(75-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(18-7 since 1997.) (72%, +23.9 units. Rating = 4*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(28-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss against a division rival.
(96-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(47-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(56-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
CONNECTICUT78 28-6643.2%7-2034.2%14-1879.4%411017
LOS ANGELES83 32-6747.4%8-2037.6%12-1678.0%41815

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 636 times, while CONNECTICUT won 338 times.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
CONNECTICUT is 38-21 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 78.7
CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 77.6
CONNECTICUT is 83-48 against the money line (+32.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.4
CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3
CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.0
CONNECTICUT is 62-40 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.0
CONNECTICUT is 31-10 against the money line (+23.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 79.7
LOS ANGELES is 38-33 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 78.7
LOS ANGELES is 7-6 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 79.9
LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 79.1
LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-19.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.5
LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 80.1
LOS ANGELES is 10-21 against the money line (-25.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 85.2
LOS ANGELES is 34-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 81.6

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring LOS ANGELES to win against the money line
CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 83.4
CONNECTICUT is 44-68 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 80.8
CONNECTICUT is 17-18 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 80.6
CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 86.9
CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 88.6
CONNECTICUT is 5-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 93.3
CONNECTICUT is 3-15 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 88.1
CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 86.0
CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 82.9
LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 77.5
LOS ANGELES is 98-56 against the money line (+22.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 74.5
LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.5, OPPONENT 79.1
LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 76.7
LOS ANGELES is 41-13 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 78.5
LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.1, OPPONENT 79.1

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 38 trends with a total rating of 40 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-11 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 30-18 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 129-104 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 22-21 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 39-28 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 25-23 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 212-172 against the money line (-78.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 19-22 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 122-129 against the money line (-57.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 27-25 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 257-212 against the money line (-79.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 172-143 against the money line (-66.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 25-23 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*)
LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 27-25 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 45-33 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 16-23 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 4*)
LOS ANGELES is 31-29 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 23-24 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 237-215 against the money line (-82.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 17-23 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 32-28 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 15-19 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*)
LOS ANGELES is 26-23 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 18 trends with a total rating of 19 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 113-93 against the money line (+21.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 32-18 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 66-55 against the money line (-52.5 Units) on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 32-25 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 109-94 against the money line (-60.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 11-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 74-60 against the money line (-37.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 5-5 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in home games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 36-28 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 31-26 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 25-25 against the money line (-34.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*)
LOS ANGELES is 17-14 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 19-18 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to win against the money line
There are 9 trends with a total rating of 11 stars.
CONNECTICUT is 5-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-20 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games off a road win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 21-46 against the money line (-24.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 13-0 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 4*)
LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 27-13 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS
CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games11-12-0.411-1210-1281.039.542.7%44.280.038.244.5%39.8
Road Games11-12-0.411-1210-1281.039.542.7%44.280.038.244.5%39.8
Last 5 Games3-2+1.33-23-289.039.043.8%47.082.039.242.5%39.6
Division Games11-12-0.411-1210-1281.039.542.7%44.280.038.244.5%39.8
CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)81.039.530-7042.7%6-1931.0%16-2076.5%441018199133
vs opponents surrendering83.441.931-6944.7%7-2134.9%15-1880.6%41819188143
Team Stats (Road Games)81.039.530-7042.7%6-1931.0%16-2076.5%441018199133
Stats Against (All Games)80.038.229-6544.5%7-2133.3%15-1981.9%40718188154
vs opponents averaging83.441.831-6845.0%7-2135.0%15-1881.2%41819188144
Stats Against (Road Games)80.038.229-6544.5%7-2133.3%15-1981.9%40718188154

LOS ANGELES - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games15-7-0.112-1011-1184.942.448.1%37.980.338.844.9%40.1
Home Games0-000-00-0000.0%0000.0%0
Last 5 Games2-3-4.63-22-382.643.647.2%37.680.841.246.9%37.8
Division Games15-7-0.112-1011-1184.942.448.1%37.980.338.844.9%40.1
LOS ANGELES Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)84.942.432-6748.1%7-1839.8%13-1779.2%38620189143
vs opponents surrendering83.441.831-6844.6%7-2134.5%15-1981.0%41819188134
Team Stats (Home Games)000-00.0%0-00.0%0-00.0%0000000
Stats Against (All Games)80.338.829-6544.9%8-2237.3%13-1778.2%40820188172
vs opponents averaging82.941.530-6844.3%7-2134.3%15-1980.9%42819188144
Stats Against (Home Games)000-00.0%0-00.0%0-00.0%0000000
Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71,  LOS ANGELES 70.3
SCHEDULE AND RESULTS
CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
8/8/2020*CHICAGO93-100L+13535-6355.6%271932-5855.2%3521
8/10/2020*ATLANTA93-82W-21036-7746.8%45830-6546.2%4419
8/12/2020*DALLAS70-66W-20024-6437.5%38925-5942.4%4113
8/14/2020*CHICAGO77-74W+20029-7638.2%53828-6145.9%4015
8/16/2020*SEATTLE72-95L+37528-7736.4%491137-6556.9%3611
8/18/2020*INDIANA84-62W-21033-7245.8%451126-6639.4%3915
8/20/2020*LAS VEGAS78-99L+22030-6943.5%301636-6456.2%4315
8/22/2020*NEW YORK82-65W-85033-7444.6%42920-5437.0%3918
8/28/2020*LOS ANGELES76-80L+17531-6349.2%352329-6048.3%3217
8/30/2020*WASHINGTON76-63W-20031-6845.6%441319-5932.2%3916
9/1/2020*NEW YORK70-65W-75023-7032.9%481219-5534.5%4418
9/3/2020*LAS VEGAS78-93L+20025-6141.0%472138-7352.1%2910
9/5/2020*INDIANA96-77W-27036-7051.4%37628-6245.2%3419
9/7/2020*PHOENIX85-70W+13533-7544.0%45921-6035.0%4116
9/9/2020*PHOENIX95-100L+12031-8436.9%621635-8242.7%4711
9/11/2020*ATLANTA75-82L-11528-6443.7%421331-7740.3%518
9/15/2020@ CHICAGO94-81W+10531-7044.3%491230-6050.0%2512
9/17/2020@ LOS ANGELES           

LOS ANGELES - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
8/9/2020*MINNESOTA97-81W-30038-5865.5%392026-6440.6%2612
8/11/2020*NEW YORK93-78W-105035-7149.3%351624-6040.0%4126
8/13/2020*WASHINGTON81-64W-30031-6448.4%391225-6041.7%3721
8/15/2020*INDIANA90-76W-36033-6154.1%291324-5841.4%3922
8/19/2020*PHOENIX83-74W-22030-6943.5%42929-6643.9%4117
8/21/2020*ATLANTA93-85W 30-6744.8%442133-6947.8%4129
8/23/2020*DALLAS84-81W-27035-6454.7%371228-6741.8%3714
8/28/2020*CONNECTICUT80-76W-21029-6048.3%321731-6349.2%3523
8/30/2020*ATLANTA84-79W 36-7250.0%381331-7541.3%4915
8/31/2020*MINNESOTA78-96L-25030-6744.8%371037-6953.6%397
9/2/2020*DALLAS91-83W-27031-6051.7%431327-7237.5%4411
9/4/2020*SEATTLE89-90L+21033-6253.2%321332-6648.5%3714
9/6/2020*CHICAGO86-80W-21034-6750.7%411633-7444.6%4015
9/8/2020*NEW YORK96-70W 37-6854.4%391122-5837.9%3117
9/10/2020*WASHINGTON72-80L-36029-7041.4%441332-6350.8%3410
9/12/2020*LAS VEGAS70-84L+15527-7237.5%321232-6152.5%4715
9/17/2020CONNECTICUT           
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY
All games in this series since 1997
LOS ANGELES is 26-21 (-0.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
CONNECTICUT is 7-4 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons

All games played at LOS ANGELES since 1997
LOS ANGELES is 14-8 (-1.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997
Games played at LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons.
CONNECTICUT is 2-2 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
8/28/2020LOS ANGELES80-5SU Under3229-6048.3%6-1637.5%16-2080.0%32517
NCONNECTICUT76160 ATS3931-6349.2%7-1741.2%7-7100.0%35823
7/30/2020CONNECTICUT76167 ATS3626-7335.6%5-1533.3%19-2867.9%561314
NLOS ANGELES81-6SU Under4132-7244.4%5-1631.2%12-1580.0%43515
9/22/2019CONNECTICUT78160.5SU ATS4031-7143.7%8-2532.0%8-1172.7%54813
 LOS ANGELES56-6 Under3223-7530.7%2-219.5%8-1266.7%45610
9/19/2019LOS ANGELES68163 Under4026-6341.3%4-1526.7%12-1770.6%31413
 CONNECTICUT94-1SU ATS4136-7945.6%10-3033.3%12-1580.0%571612
9/17/2019LOS ANGELES75162.5 Under4030-6446.9%5-2222.7%10-1471.4%42717
 CONNECTICUT84-1SU ATS3733-7842.3%8-2236.4%10-1855.6%4989
8/25/2019CONNECTICUT72157.5 Under3928-6841.2%8-2236.4%8-1361.5%431015
 LOS ANGELES84-5SU ATS4231-6448.4%9-2437.5%13-13100.0%35314
6/6/2019LOS ANGELES77158 Over3229-6643.9%8-2532.0%11-1291.7%25721
 CONNECTICUT89-8SU ATS4334-7346.6%4-1526.7%17-2085.0%381417
5/31/2019CONNECTICUT70-3 Under3124-7830.8%6-2326.1%16-2564.0%631814
 LOS ANGELES77164SU ATS3828-7238.9%6-2030.0%15-1788.2%46910
COACHING TRENDS
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 19 trends with a total rating of 13 stars.
Miller is 52-36 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 35-24 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 35-26 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 73-52 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 55-35 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 55-31 against the money line (+20.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 78-50 against the money line (+18.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 39-23 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 47-30 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 23-10 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 39-21 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 56-35 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 52-35 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 76-57 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 41-27 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 56-44 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to win against the money line
There are 4 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.
Miller is 45-45 against the money line (-25.3 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 5-10 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games off a road win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 9-14 against the money line (-11.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Fisher is 13-0 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 4*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=-200 (Road=+170), Closing Money Line: Home=-200 (Road=+170)
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 294 times, while the road underdog won straight up 151 times. No Edge.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 20 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIES
CONNECTICUT
[G] 09/12/2020 - Bria Holmes is out for season ( Knee )
[F] 06/22/2020 - Jonquel Jones is out for season ( Personal )
LOS ANGELES
[G] 09/16/2020 - Sydney Wiese is "?" Thursday vs Connecticut Sun ( Ankle )
[G] 09/16/2020 - Tierra Ruffin-Pratt is "?" Thursday vs Connecticut Sun ( Shoulder )
[C] 07/23/2020 - Maria Vadeeva is out for season ( Personal )
[G] 06/26/2020 - Kristi Toliver is out for season ( Personal )
[F] 06/26/2020 - Chiney Ogwumike is out for season ( Personal )

Last Updated: 10/25/2020 11:09:42 PM EST


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.