| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
160
| 97
Final
71 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 619 | CONNECTICUT | -400 | | 620 | LOS ANGELES | +300 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(43-37 since 1997.) (53.8%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a close road loss of 3 points or less.
(45-29 since 1997.) (60.8%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(34-18 since 1997.) (65.4%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win by 3 points or less, tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(25-7 since 1997.) (78.1%, +18.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a loss against a division rival.
(97-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(66-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +13.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(59-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.7%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(326-123 since 1997.) (72.6%, +83 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(171-94 since 1997.) (64.5%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(105-78 since 1997.) (57.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(75-34 since 1997.) (68.8%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +21.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games, on Tuesday nights.
(63-40 since 1997.) (61.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(43-27 since 1997.) (61.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(31-16 since 1997.) (66%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(31-16 since 1997.) (66%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(31-16 since 1997.) (66%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(33-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 32-68 | 47.1% | 6-18 | 36.1% | 14-18 | 78.1% | 45 | 10 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | | 30-67 | 45.5% | 5-17 | 31.8% | 13-16 | 77.4% | 37 | 6 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 627 times, while LOS ANGELES won 353 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 28-18 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 103-46 against the money line (+52.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 90-53 against the money line (+32.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 77.5 | CONNECTICUT is 98-49 against the money line (+31.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 30-11 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 81.2 | LOS ANGELES is 287-224 against the money line (-87.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.1 | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 85.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 78-73 against the money line (-49.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.2 | LOS ANGELES is 10-18 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 82.7 | LOS ANGELES is 8-17 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 88.5 | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 91.8 | LOS ANGELES is 90-98 against the money line (-51.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.8 | LOS ANGELES is 240-207 against the money line (-111.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 82.3 | LOS ANGELES is 10-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 81.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 50-75 against the money line (-65.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 80.4 | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 86.3 | CONNECTICUT is 21-28 against the money line (-20.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 84.1 | CONNECTICUT is 8-20 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 80.8 | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | LOS ANGELES is 63-12 against the money line (+31.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 70.5 | LOS ANGELES is 13-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.5, OPPONENT 85.1 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 30-6 against the money line (+17.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 112-53 against the money line (+29.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-21 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-21 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-26 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-17 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 176-114 against the money line (+36.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-19 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-26 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-26 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-26 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 44-25 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 111-81 against the money line (+33.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 156-120 against the money line (+25.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 115-117 against the money line (-83.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 178-169 against the money line (-102.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 158-148 against the money line (-75.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 232-205 against the money line (-87.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-112 against the money line (-48.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 143-162 against the money line (-64.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-92 against the money line (-42.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 122-127 against the money line (-47.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 188-171 against the money line (-74.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 279-246 against the money line (-88.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 182-165 against the money line (-74.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-33 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-32 against the money line (-26.7 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-46 against the money line (-24.1 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 184-152 against the money line (-79.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 269-217 against the money line (-99.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 119-98 against the money line (-57.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 176-145 against the money line (-76.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-55 against the money line (-33.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-78 against the money line (-33.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 178-178 against the money line (-77.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 259-249 against the money line (-91.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 122-124 against the money line (-49.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 179-177 against the money line (-67.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 58-30 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in home games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-25 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-14 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-7 against the money line (+16.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-15 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-7 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-6 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-4 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 109-78 against the money line (+24.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-1 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-15 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-14 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-23 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-22 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-13 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-17 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.5 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in road games after playing a road game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 115-71 against the money line (+39.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 180-159 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 75-99 against the money line (-39.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-19 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-18 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-16 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 22-11 | -3.6 | 17-15 | 18-15 | 85.1 | 42.6 | 45.7% | 45.3 | 78.1 | 38.8 | 43.9% | 36.3 | | Road Games | 10-6 | +1.2 | 9-7 | 12-4 | 85.5 | 42.6 | 46.1% | 42.1 | 80.0 | 40.1 | 45.7% | 36.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 87.0 | 42.8 | 43.9% | 50.2 | 79.8 | 41.0 | 45.9% | 33.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.1 | 42.6 | 31-69 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 45 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.3 | 41 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 34.1% | 15-18 | 79.0% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.5 | 42.6 | 31-67 | 46.1% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 17-21 | 81.1% | 42 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.1 | 38.8 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 7-22 | 32.7% | 13-16 | 80.5% | 36 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.0 | 40.1 | 29-64 | 45.7% | 7-21 | 32.3% | 15-18 | 80.6% | 37 | 6 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-20 | -6.5 | 16-17 | 19-14 | 79.8 | 40.5 | 44.7% | 38.4 | 85.2 | 44.4 | 45.9% | 42.2 | | Home Games | 7-8 | -2.8 | 7-8 | 8-7 | 79.5 | 40.1 | 45.1% | 36.5 | 84.9 | 44.4 | 48.4% | 41.3 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | 0 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 75.2 | 41.6 | 41.2% | 36.2 | 82.8 | 42.4 | 45.2% | 45.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.8 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 38 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 40.7 | 30-69 | 43.8% | 8-22 | 34.1% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.5 | 40.1 | 30-68 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 37.1% | 12-16 | 75.9% | 37 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.2 | 44.4 | 30-66 | 45.9% | 9-23 | 37.3% | 16-20 | 80.8% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.9 | 44.4 | 31-65 | 48.4% | 8-22 | 39.0% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 41 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 17 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 69.9, LOS ANGELES 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/3/2022 | WASHINGTON | 74-72 | W | -330 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 49 | 17 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 19 | | 7/5/2022 | @ DALLAS | 71-82 | L | -210 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 38 | 13 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 9 | | 7/13/2022 | @ INDIANA | 89-81 | W | -500 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 17 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 16 | | 7/15/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 93-68 | W | -360 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 48 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 37 | 18 | | 7/17/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 83-91 | L | +155 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 50 | 22 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 33 | 7 | | 7/19/2022 | NEW YORK | 82-63 | W | -210 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 12 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 18 | | 7/22/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-84 | W | -105 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 28 | 9 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 35 | 16 | | 7/24/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-79 | W | -220 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 34 | 17 | | 7/28/2022 | SEATTLE | 88-83 | W | -165 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 31 | 15 | | 7/31/2022 | CHICAGO | 92-95 | L | -175 | 39-91 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 37 | 19 | | 8/2/2022 | PHOENIX | 87-63 | W | -600 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 50 | 11 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 41 | 18 | | 8/4/2022 | PHOENIX | 77-64 | W | -1050 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 69 | 18 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 31 | 14 | | 8/7/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 91-94 | L | +155 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 43 | 13 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 29 | 15 | | 8/9/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/1/2022 | @ DALLAS | 97-89 | W | +175 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 43 | 10 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 40 | 13 | | 7/3/2022 | NEW YORK | 84-74 | W | -175 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 45 | 14 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 38 | 17 | | 7/4/2022 | PHOENIX | 78-75 | W | -105 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 40 | 20 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 31 | 21 | | 7/7/2022 | SEATTLE | 69-106 | L | +170 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 32 | 12 | 42-65 | 64.6% | 39 | 12 | | 7/12/2022 | WASHINGTON | 81-94 | L | +170 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 32 | 18 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 37 | 12 | | 7/14/2022 | CHICAGO | 68-80 | L | +200 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 36 | 14 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 45 | 18 | | 7/19/2022 | INDIANA | 86-79 | W | -360 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 33 | 16 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 24 | | 7/21/2022 | ATLANTA | 85-78 | W | -125 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 31 | 12 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 21 | | 7/23/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 66-84 | L | +350 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 39 | 14 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 45 | 9 | | 7/28/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 80-90 | L | +175 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 37 | 17 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 44 | 18 | | 7/31/2022 | MINNESOTA | 77-84 | L | +135 | 30-83 | 36.1% | 37 | 7 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 48 | 19 | | 8/2/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 73-102 | L | +180 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 30 | 11 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 46 | 19 | | 8/3/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 61-64 | L | +220 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 16 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 51 | 10 | | 8/5/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 86-88 | L | +180 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 37 | 15 | | 8/7/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-76 | W | +400 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 38 | 7 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 47 | 10 | | 8/9/2022 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2022 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2022 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 26-26 (-6.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-2 (+3.7 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 14-9 (-2.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 1-0 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/14/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | 158 | Under | 25 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 32 | 8 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 53 | 19 | 19 | 9/9/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -10 | SU ATS | 45 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 39 | 9 | 19 | | | LOS ANGELES | 57 | 142 | Under | 28 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 27 | 5 | 17 | 8/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 61 | 144.5 | Under | 37 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 24 | 3 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 50 | 8 | 18 | 8/26/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 145.5 | ATS | 39 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 29 | 3 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -11.5 | SU Over | 36 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 41 | 9 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 138-95 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-31 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-35 against the money line (+40.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 41-35 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-15 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-31 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-4 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 71-35 against the money line (+40.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 23-14 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 67-41 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 26-21 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 34-21 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-12 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-9 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 17-5 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-60 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 34-20 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 120-76 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 111-69 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-67 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 73-49 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 112-71 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 90-55 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 91-59 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 60-35 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 41-41 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 73-53 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 41-23 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 69-24 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 46-9 against the money line (+24.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 74-37 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 106-61 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 67-42 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 88-60 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 84-48 against the money line (+22.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 120-76 against the money line (+16.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 80-44 against the money line (+24.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 114-69 against the money line (+24.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 65-32 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 96-51 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-43 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 114-70 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-11 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 50-23 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 85-48 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 120-78 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 36-26 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 52-43 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 80-48 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 115-76 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-45 against the money line (+18.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 96-71 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 59-39 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 83-60 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 10-20 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 25-35 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 8-15 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 7-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 7-14 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 1-5 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 17-25 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 30-35 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 2-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 19-28 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 35-43 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 2-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 36-47 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 14-19 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 18-25 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-19 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 15-2 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 12-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 20-10 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 20-11 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 21-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 16-9 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 21-9 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 30-12 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 21-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 20-12 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 21-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 30-15 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 19-11 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/27/2022 - Bria Hartley is out for season ( ACL ) | | [G] 07/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( ACL ) | |
| [G] 08/08/2022 - Kristi Toliver is downgraded to OUT Tuesday vs Connecticut Sun ( Calf ) | | [F] 08/07/2022 - Chiney Ogwumike is "?" Tuesday vs Connecticut Sun ( Facial ) | | [F] 08/02/2022 - Rae Burrell is out for season ( Knee ) | | [C] 07/26/2022 - Liz Cambage is out indefinitely ( Left Team ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/23/2024 2:27:15 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|