| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT LOS ANGELES |
|
| 162.5 | 93 Final 69 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
627 | CONNECTICUT | -650 | 628 | LOS ANGELES | +450 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games. (213-125 since 1997.) (63%, +62.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games. (69-39 since 1997.) (63.9%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (73-48 since 1997.) (60.3%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 20 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (27-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +18 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (28-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +6.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (59-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +9.7 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games. (328-123 since 1997.) (72.7%, +85 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (434-310 since 1997.) (58.3%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (129-84 since 1997.) (60.6%, +55.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (166-59 since 1997.) (73.8%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (159-56 since 1997.) (74%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (143-48 since 1997.) (74.9%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games. (36-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +22.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more. (35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +13.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (44-22 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more. (30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +23 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more. (41-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (39-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +27.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more. (36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (51-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more. (38-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +15.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 32-68 | 47.0% | 7-18 | 37.2% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 45 | 10 | 17 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | | 30-66 | 45.2% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 13-16 | 78.7% | 37 | 6 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 697 times, while LOS ANGELES won 287 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 29-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 103-46 against the money line (+52.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 90-53 against the money line (+32.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 72-47 against the money line (+19.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 77.5 | CONNECTICUT is 98-49 against the money line (+31.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 31-11 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 77.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.8, OPPONENT 80.7 | LOS ANGELES is 287-224 against the money line (-87.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.1 | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 85.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 78-74 against the money line (-50.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.3 | LOS ANGELES is 6-18 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 84.3 | LOS ANGELES is 10-19 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 83.1 | LOS ANGELES is 13-25 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 81.7 | LOS ANGELES is 8-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 88.8 | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 92.1 | LOS ANGELES is 14-22 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 80.5 | LOS ANGELES is 90-98 against the money line (-51.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.8 | LOS ANGELES is 240-208 against the money line (-112.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 82.4 | LOS ANGELES is 3-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 10-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 81.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 51-75 against the money line (-64.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 22-28 against the money line (-19.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 83.9 | CONNECTICUT is 9-20 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 80.5 | LOS ANGELES is 68-28 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 73.1 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 31-6 against the money line (+18.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-21 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-21 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-26 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-17 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 177-114 against the money line (+37.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-19 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-26 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-26 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-10 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-16 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-12 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-26 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-15 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 45-25 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 112-81 against the money line (+34.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 157-120 against the money line (+26.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 115-118 against the money line (-84.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 178-170 against the money line (-103.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 158-149 against the money line (-76.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 232-206 against the money line (-88.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-113 against the money line (-49.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 143-163 against the money line (-65.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-93 against the money line (-43.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 122-128 against the money line (-48.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 188-172 against the money line (-75.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 279-247 against the money line (-89.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 182-166 against the money line (-75.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-34 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 49-64 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-33 against the money line (-27.7 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-47 against the money line (-25.1 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 184-153 against the money line (-80.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 269-218 against the money line (-100.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-22 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-16 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-56 against the money line (-34.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-79 against the money line (-34.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 178-179 against the money line (-78.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 259-250 against the money line (-92.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 122-125 against the money line (-50.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 179-178 against the money line (-68.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 58-31 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in home games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-26 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 59-34 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) on Thursday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-7 against the money line (+17.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-15 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-7 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 93-62 against the money line (+24.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-4 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 35 or less rebounds since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games off a road win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-24 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-15 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-14 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 44-23 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-22 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after scoring 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-8 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after playing a road game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 116-71 against the money line (+40.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 65-34 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-64 against the money line (-57.0 Units) on Thursday since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 180-160 against the money line (-70.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 75-100 against the money line (-40.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-37 against the money line (-21.7 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-15 against the money line (-10.5 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-20 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-18 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-19 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-28 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-29 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 80-70 against the money line (-44.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 23-11 | -2.7 | 18-15 | 19-15 | 85.4 | 42.9 | 45.9% | 45.3 | 77.9 | 38.6 | 43.9% | 36.0 | Road Games | 11-6 | +2.2 | 10-7 | 13-4 | 86.2 | 43.2 | 46.4% | 42.2 | 79.5 | 39.6 | 45.7% | 36.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 88.8 | 44.6 | 44.5% | 51.2 | 77.4 | 39.4 | 45.4% | 33.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 42.9 | 32-69 | 45.9% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 45 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.6 | 41.2 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 15-18 | 79.2% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.2 | 43.2 | 31-68 | 46.4% | 6-19 | 34.8% | 17-21 | 81.8% | 42 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.9 | 38.6 | 29-65 | 43.9% | 7-22 | 32.8% | 13-16 | 80.4% | 36 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 8-23 | 34.3% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.5 | 39.6 | 29-64 | 45.7% | 7-21 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 80.5% | 36 | 6 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-21 | -7.5 | 16-18 | 20-14 | 79.5 | 40.2 | 44.7% | 38.0 | 85.5 | 44.6 | 46.0% | 42.3 | Home Games | 7-9 | -3.8 | 7-9 | 9-7 | 78.9 | 39.6 | 45.1% | 35.9 | 85.7 | 44.9 | 48.5% | 41.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | 0 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 74.0 | 39.4 | 43.3% | 34.2 | 85.4 | 42.6 | 44.8% | 45.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.5 | 40.2 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 14-18 | 78.4% | 38 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.9 | 39.6 | 30-67 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 37.3% | 12-16 | 76.1% | 36 | 6 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.5 | 44.6 | 30-66 | 46.0% | 9-23 | 37.4% | 16-20 | 81.1% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 8-23 | 34.5% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 85.7 | 44.9 | 32-65 | 48.5% | 8-22 | 39.1% | 14-17 | 80.7% | 42 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 17 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.3, LOS ANGELES 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
7/3/2022 | WASHINGTON | 74-72 | W | -330 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 49 | 17 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 19 | 7/5/2022 | @ DALLAS | 71-82 | L | -210 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 38 | 13 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 9 | 7/13/2022 | @ INDIANA | 89-81 | W | -500 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 17 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 16 | 7/15/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 93-68 | W | -360 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 48 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 37 | 18 | 7/17/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 83-91 | L | +155 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 50 | 22 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 33 | 7 | 7/19/2022 | NEW YORK | 82-63 | W | -210 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 12 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 18 | 7/22/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-84 | W | -105 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 28 | 9 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 35 | 16 | 7/24/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 86-79 | W | -220 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 34 | 17 | 7/28/2022 | SEATTLE | 88-83 | W | -165 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 31 | 15 | 7/31/2022 | CHICAGO | 92-95 | L | -175 | 39-91 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 37 | 19 | 8/2/2022 | PHOENIX | 87-63 | W | -600 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 50 | 11 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 41 | 18 | 8/4/2022 | PHOENIX | 77-64 | W | -1050 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 69 | 18 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 31 | 14 | 8/7/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 91-94 | L | +155 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 43 | 13 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 29 | 15 | 8/9/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 97-71 | W | -400 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 45 | 18 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 27 | 20 | 8/11/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/3/2022 | NEW YORK | 84-74 | W | -175 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 45 | 14 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 38 | 17 | 7/4/2022 | PHOENIX | 78-75 | W | -105 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 40 | 20 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 31 | 21 | 7/7/2022 | SEATTLE | 69-106 | L | +170 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 32 | 12 | 42-65 | 64.6% | 39 | 12 | 7/12/2022 | WASHINGTON | 81-94 | L | +170 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 32 | 18 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 37 | 12 | 7/14/2022 | CHICAGO | 68-80 | L | +200 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 36 | 14 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 45 | 18 | 7/19/2022 | INDIANA | 86-79 | W | -360 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 33 | 16 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 24 | 7/21/2022 | ATLANTA | 85-78 | W | -125 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 31 | 12 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 21 | 7/23/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 66-84 | L | +350 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 39 | 14 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 45 | 9 | 7/28/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 80-90 | L | +175 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 37 | 17 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 44 | 18 | 7/31/2022 | MINNESOTA | 77-84 | L | +135 | 30-83 | 36.1% | 37 | 7 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 48 | 19 | 8/2/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 73-102 | L | +180 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 30 | 11 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 46 | 19 | 8/3/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 61-64 | L | +220 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 16 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 51 | 10 | 8/5/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 86-88 | L | +180 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 37 | 15 | 8/7/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 79-76 | W | +400 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 38 | 7 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 47 | 10 | 8/9/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 71-97 | L | +300 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 27 | 20 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 45 | 18 | 8/11/2022 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2022 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 27-26 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 6-2 (+4.7 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 10-14 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/9/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 97 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 45 | 11 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 71 | 160 | Over | 32 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 27 | 1 | 20 | 5/14/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | 158 | Under | 25 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 32 | 8 | 19 | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 53 | 19 | 19 | 9/9/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -10 | SU ATS | 45 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 39 | 9 | 19 | | LOS ANGELES | 57 | 142 | Under | 28 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 27 | 5 | 17 | 8/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 61 | 144.5 | Under | 37 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 24 | 3 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 50 | 8 | 18 | 8/26/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 145.5 | ATS | 39 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 29 | 3 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -11.5 | SU Over | 36 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 41 | 9 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 139-95 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-31 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-10 against the money line (+14.4 Units) on Thursday as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 72-35 against the money line (+41.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 64-39 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more shots than opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 30-13 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 54-31 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-13 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 17-4 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 72-35 against the money line (+41.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 24-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 68-41 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 56-35 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-19 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 45-27 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 35-21 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-12 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-9 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 18-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 5 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 7 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 35 or less rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 54-30 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 69-46 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 121-76 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 112-69 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 99-67 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 113-71 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 91-55 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 92-59 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 61-35 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 74-53 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 42-23 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 24-10 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 87-52 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 70-24 against the money line (+23.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 47-9 against the money line (+25.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 32-21 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 75-37 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 107-61 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 68-42 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 89-60 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 85-48 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 121-76 against the money line (+17.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 81-44 against the money line (+25.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 115-69 against the money line (+25.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 66-32 against the money line (+19.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 97-51 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-43 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 115-70 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 33-11 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 51-23 against the money line (+21.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 11-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 86-48 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 121-78 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-26 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-43 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 81-48 against the money line (+19.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 116-76 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 72-45 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 97-71 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 60-39 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 84-60 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 10-21 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 6-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 31-37 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 25-36 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 19-27 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 21-25 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 11-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 7-13 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 7-15 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 17-26 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 30-36 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 2-12 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 6-14 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 1-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 19-29 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 35-44 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 2-15 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.2, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 36-48 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 19-25 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-19 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 15-3 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 15-8 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 19-8 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in home games after playing a home game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 20-11 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 20-12 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 21-12 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 21-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 30-13 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 21-12 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 21-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/27/2022 - Bria Hartley is out for season ( ACL ) | [G] 07/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( ACL ) | |
[F] 08/10/2022 - Chiney Ogwumike is "?" Thursday vs Connecticut Sun ( Head ) | [G] 08/10/2022 - Kristi Toliver is downgraded to OUT Thursday vs Connecticut Sun ( Calf ) | [F] 08/02/2022 - Rae Burrell is out for season ( Knee ) | [C] 07/26/2022 - Liz Cambage is out indefinitely ( Left Team ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 6:26:46 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|