| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 157 | 85 Final 84 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | | | |
663 | LOS ANGELES | +175 | 664 | MINNESOTA | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (168-50 since 1997.) (77.1%, +85.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (227-74 since 1997.) (75.4%, +85 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (385-165 since 1997.) (70%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (202-47 since 1997.) (81.1%, +79.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (148-31 since 1997.) (82.7%, +79.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (202-67 since 1997.) (75.1%, +63.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (184-60 since 1997.) (75.4%, +60.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games. (56-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +38.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (96-30 since 1997.) (76.2%, +56.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games. (138-45 since 1997.) (75.4%, +56.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (88-12 since 1997.) (88%, +54.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (140-65 since 1997.) (68.3%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (88-21 since 1997.) (80.7%, +52.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (88-14 since 1997.) (86.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (80-12 since 1997.) (87%, +52 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival. (172-135 since 1997.) (56%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (78-13 since 1997.) (85.7%, +50.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (104-25 since 1997.) (80.6%, +47.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (114-41 since 1997.) (73.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (153-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +59.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (112-46 since 1997.) (70.9%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (90-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (46-6 since 1997.) (88.5%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (52-14 since 1997.) (78.8%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (40-6 since 1997.) (87%, +31.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (65-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +41.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (123-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (62-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.1%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win by 3 points or less. (33-16 since 1997.) (67.3%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (35-5 since 1997.) (87.5%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more. (38-7 since 1997.) (84.4%, +26.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (79-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (91-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.8%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (42-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (62-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.5%, +28.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%) after 15+ games. (28-11 since 1997.) (71.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (58-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.1%, +27.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +15.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (40-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +22 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (103-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (98-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +21.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (38-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.6%, +13.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (45-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +11.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (33-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season. (88-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (168-50 since 1997.) (77.1%, +85.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (195-68 since 1997.) (74.1%, +69.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (202-67 since 1997.) (75.1%, +63.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (96-30 since 1997.) (76.2%, +56.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (140-65 since 1997.) (68.3%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (88-21 since 1997.) (80.7%, +52.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (121-40 since 1997.) (75.2%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (104-40 since 1997.) (72.2%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (114-41 since 1997.) (73.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (74-24 since 1997.) (75.5%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (80-36 since 1997.) (69%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (52-14 since 1997.) (78.8%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (42-21 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (42-23 since 1997.) (64.6%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (128-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (45-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +11.6 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 77 | | 31-68 | 45.8% | 5-16 | 30.3% | 10-11 | 83.1% | 37 | 8 | 13 | MINNESOTA | 81 | | 32-66 | 47.9% | 6-16 | 38.6% | 12-16 | 76.6% | 43 | 11 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 615 times, while LOS ANGELES won 351 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 80.9 | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.7, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 32-10 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 75.6 | MINNESOTA is 57-79 against the money line (-46.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 78.6 | MINNESOTA is 19-11 against the money line (-25.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.7 | MINNESOTA is 14-10 against the money line (-24.8 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 75.5 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 45-55 against the money line (-27.5 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 87.9 | LOS ANGELES is 71-75 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 187-156 against the money line (-82.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | LOS ANGELES is 9-9 against the money line (-18.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.2 | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.5 | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.6, OPPONENT 74.8 | MINNESOTA is 108-45 against the money line (+39.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 72.8 | MINNESOTA is 217-67 against the money line (+108.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.3, OPPONENT 78.5 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-4 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-21 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-5 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 5-6 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 274-252 against the money line (-78.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 3-4 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 3-6 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 7*) | MINNESOTA is 11-23 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-43 against the money line (-34.8 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 130-115 against the money line (-50.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 78-73 against the money line (-55.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-107 against the money line (-70.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-100 against the money line (-47.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 166-140 against the money line (-58.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 89-99 against the money line (-38.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 200-150 against the money line (-67.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 68-109 against the money line (-49.4 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-1 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 90.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-0 against the money line (+6.4 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-2 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-1 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 40-23 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+10.6 Units) off a win against a division rival this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) off a road win this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-3 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 98-37 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-13 against the money line (-20.2 Units) on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-20 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-5 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 149-156 against the money line (-83.2 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 35-45 against the money line (-31.6 Units) in road games when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-15 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-24.0 Units) off a road no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-17 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-12 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-35 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-34 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 71-28 against the money line (+27.0 Units) in home games in August or September games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-7 against the money line (+13.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 89.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 74-24 against the money line (+32.5 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 54-16 against the money line (+28.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 80-38 against the money line (+22.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-3 against the money line (+16.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 24-3 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 72-37 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 49-20 against the money line (+18.9 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-3 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 28-4 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 129-60 against the money line (+35.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-6 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 70-27 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 60-16 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 45-18 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 126-43 against the money line (+31.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 67-14 against the money line (+29.0 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 29-8 | +3.3 | 24-13 | 12-25 | 83.6 | 43.0 | 47.9% | 38.9 | 75.2 | 37.2 | 43.2% | 38.7 | Road Games | 11-7 | -4.2 | 10-8 | 8-10 | 84.3 | 41.7 | 48.4% | 37.2 | 80.6 | 38.3 | 45.2% | 40.1 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 83.2 | 42.2 | 49.0% | 40.6 | 70.2 | 34.2 | 40.1% | 35.4 | Division Games | 15-4 | +5.9 | 11-8 | 6-13 | 81.9 | 43.2 | 47.4% | 38.2 | 74.3 | 36.2 | 43.3% | 38.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.6 | 43.0 | 32-66 | 47.9% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 15-18 | 82.7% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.2 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.3 | 41.7 | 32-66 | 48.4% | 5-15 | 35.7% | 14-17 | 84.2% | 37 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.2 | 37.2 | 28-64 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 79.3% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 38.3 | 30-67 | 45.2% | 7-17 | 40.1% | 13-17 | 78.1% | 40 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 30-7 | -0.7 | 20-17 | 18-18 | 85.9 | 45.2 | 48.3% | 42.7 | 74.5 | 37.6 | 42.3% | 38.0 | Home Games | 17-2 | +3.8 | 9-10 | 10-9 | 88.4 | 46.1 | 49.5% | 42.8 | 73.6 | 37.3 | 41.3% | 38.7 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 94.2 | 49.4 | 54.4% | 42.6 | 78.6 | 42.4 | 41.7% | 37.8 | Division Games | 13-3 | +2.8 | 8-8 | 8-8 | 85.9 | 44.1 | 48.4% | 43.4 | 74.0 | 37.1 | 42.7% | 35.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.9 | 45.2 | 33-68 | 48.3% | 6-16 | 38.2% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.4 | 46.1 | 34-68 | 49.5% | 6-16 | 39.9% | 14-19 | 77.9% | 43 | 9 | 22 | 16 | 9 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.5 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 38 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.6 | 37.3 | 28-68 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 11-14 | 78.2% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.8, MINNESOTA 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
8/16/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 95-62 | W | -250 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 38 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 30 | 20 | 8/18/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 115-106 | W | -300 | 45-99 | 45.5% | 49 | 6 | 41-82 | 50.0% | 49 | 21 | 8/22/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 75-55 | W | -1050 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 14 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 38 | 18 | 8/24/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 82-67 | W | -220 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 35 | 20 | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | 78-67 | W | -155 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 35 | 8 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 18 | 9/1/2017 | ATLANTA | 81-56 | W | -950 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 42 | 16 | 17-59 | 28.8% | 36 | 19 | 9/3/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 81-70 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 37 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 39 | 17 | 9/12/2017 | PHOENIX | 79-66 | W | -360 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 42 | 10 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 39 | 16 | 9/14/2017 | PHOENIX | 86-72 | W | -550 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 34 | 18 | 9/17/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 89-87 | W | -200 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 39 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 29 | 13 | 9/24/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/26/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/16/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 61-62 | L | -300 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 49 | 11 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 38 | 12 | 8/18/2017 | INDIANA | 111-52 | W | | 42-71 | 59.2% | 50 | 12 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 27 | 19 | 8/20/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 61-70 | L | -200 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 12 | 8/22/2017 | PHOENIX | 105-69 | W | -330 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 40 | 13 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 28 | 20 | 8/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 89-70 | W | -950 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 43 | 12 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 36 | 13 | 8/27/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 67-78 | L | +135 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 18 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 35 | 8 | 8/30/2017 | @ INDIANA | 80-69 | W | | 30-61 | 49.2% | 35 | 9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 9 | 9/1/2017 | CHICAGO | 110-87 | W | -950 | 45-67 | 67.2% | 36 | 16 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 38 | 15 | 9/3/2017 | WASHINGTON | 86-72 | W | -750 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 36 | 15 | 9/12/2017 | WASHINGTON | 101-81 | W | -600 | 41-69 | 59.4% | 38 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 35 | 11 | 9/14/2017 | WASHINGTON | 93-83 | W | -600 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 48 | 5 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 43 | 9 | 9/17/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-70 | W | -270 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 43 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 37 | 10 | 9/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/26/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 49-34 (+13.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-10 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 20-22 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 4-6 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | 67 | 155 | Under | 32 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 37 | 3 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | -3 | SU ATS | 46 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 35 | 6 | 8 | 8/11/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 70 | 161.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 38 | 6 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 64 | -5.5 | Under | 36 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 7/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 166.5 | Under | 36 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 32 | 9 | 17 | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 46 | 15 | 15 | 10/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 43 | 14 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -5.5 | Under | 34 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 33 | 6 | 9 | 10/16/2016 | MINNESOTA | 85 | -1 | SU ATS | 46 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 44 | 14 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | 160 | Over | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 36 | 8 | 9 | 10/14/2016 | MINNESOTA | 75 | 159.5 | Over | 40 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 29 | 5 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | 0 | SU ATS | 48 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 37 | 11 | 8 | 10/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | 159.5 | Under | 25 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 45 | 8 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 52 | 13 | 14 | 10/9/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 78 | 161 | SU ATS | 34 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 34 | 5 | 11 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -6.5 | Under | 36 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 0-4 | 0.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 35 | 8 | 15 | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 77 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 42 | 6 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | 0 | Under | 37 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 37 | 5 | 8 | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 157 | SU ATS | 38 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 37 | 6 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -5.5 | Over | 36 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 38 | 8 | 18 | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 72 | 163 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 39 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 39 | 5 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 64-44 against the money line (+23.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.4, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 159-103 against the money line (+44.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-6 against the money line (+13.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 20-5 against the money line (+11.3 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 129-80 against the money line (+31.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 39-17 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 14-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 27-9 against the money line (+17.4 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 12-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 17-6 against the money line (+11.6 Units) off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.0, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 53-19 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 36-11 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 80.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 27-5 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 82.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 55-17 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 78.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 61-31 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 44-15 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 32-10 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 25-6 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 6 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 81.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 25-13 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 132-105 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 78-38 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 110-59 against the money line (+32.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-7 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 186-135 against the money line (+37.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 189-123 against the money line (+30.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 15-8 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 21-14 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 132-96 against the money line (+26.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 42-38 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 5-8 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 4-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games on Sunday games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 21-26 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 2-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-15 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 5-9 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 10-10 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 80.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-17 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 14-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-12 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 12-28 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 67.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-12 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 18-19 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 13-15 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-12 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-11 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 15-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 5-8 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 8-10 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 3-5 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-27 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 70.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-10 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 201-87 against the money line (+18.6 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 105-25 against the money line (+26.5 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 109-28 against the money line (+29.4 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 109-28 against the money line (+29.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 81-37 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 123-51 against the money line (+40.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 81-26 against the money line (+18.4 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 36-10 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 13-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 89-26 against the money line (+30.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 68-17 against the money line (+33.9 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 52-12 against the money line (+30.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 67-16 against the money line (+32.7 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 37-6 against the money line (+23.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 20-3 against the money line (+15.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 72-14 against the money line (+44.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 33-11 against the money line (+13.6 Units) as a # 1 seed in the playoffs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 38-6 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in home games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-31 against the money line (+12.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 35-9 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 29-12 against the money line (+15.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 47-18 against the money line (+22.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 23-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 39-18 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 25-13 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 88-29 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 77-28 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 46-16 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-10 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 147-59 against the money line (+20.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 124-48 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 108-39 against the money line (+30.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 92-31 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 152-61 against the money line (+30.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 119-42 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 95-30 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 79-23 against the money line (+31.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 65-18 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 57-10 against the money line (+29.7 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 121-46 against the money line (+29.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 75-20 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-8 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 36-6 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 168-62 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 124-40 against the money line (+26.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 110-34 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 146-58 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-12 against the money line (+18.9 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 52-16 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-13 against the money line (+19.5 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 31-8 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 61-34 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 36-7 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 44-10 against the money line (+19.6 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 68-14 against the money line (+26.5 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 81-20 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 50-11 against the money line (+19.3 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 168 times, while the road underdog won straight up 98 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 24 times, while the road underdog won straight up 13 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 09/19/2017 - Candace Parker probable Sunday vs. Min Lynx ( Shoulder ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:11:41 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|