| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA NEW YORK |
|
| 159 | 92 Final 81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
615 | ATLANTA | +180 | 616 | NEW YORK | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (266-91 since 1997.) (74.5%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (266-91 since 1997.) (74.5%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (266-91 since 1997.) (74.5%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (261-87 since 1997.) (75%, +74.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (261-87 since 1997.) (75%, +74.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (261-87 since 1997.) (75%, +74.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (299-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (299-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (299-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (299-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (299-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (299-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (189-64 since 1997.) (74.7%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (189-64 since 1997.) (74.7%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (146-45 since 1997.) (76.4%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (146-45 since 1997.) (76.4%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (146-45 since 1997.) (76.4%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (146-45 since 1997.) (76.4%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (146-45 since 1997.) (76.4%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (146-45 since 1997.) (76.4%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (119-34 since 1997.) (77.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (119-34 since 1997.) (77.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (119-34 since 1997.) (77.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (119-34 since 1997.) (77.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (119-34 since 1997.) (77.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (119-34 since 1997.) (77.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (123-41 since 1997.) (75%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (123-41 since 1997.) (75%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (123-41 since 1997.) (75%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (42-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +21 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (57-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road wins. (38-12 since 1997.) (76%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (62-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (43-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more. (24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (46-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (119-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +49.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (82-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (72-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (128-80 since 1997.) (61.5%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog. (103-77 since 1997.) (57.2%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (56-54 since 1997.) (50.9%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +25.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (62-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (103-69 since 1997.) (59.9%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, with a losing record. (46-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (20-10 since 1997.) (66.7%, +30.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (49-33 since 1997.) (59.8%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (46-25 since 1997.) (64.8%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (40-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in May, June, or July games. (27-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.2%, +21.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO's). (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) - 15+ games. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.5 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 72 | | 28-70 | 39.1% | 7-21 | 32.7% | 10-14 | 76.9% | 45 | 9 | 13 | NEW YORK | 76 | | 27-66 | 41.3% | 9-28 | 33.9% | 12-15 | 81.4% | 46 | 8 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 564 times, while ATLANTA won 403 times. Edge against the money line=ATLANTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 86-67 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 79.8 | ATLANTA is 61-38 against the money line (+25.3 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | NEW YORK is 80-117 against the money line (-44.3 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.9, OPPONENT 74.2 |
|
ATLANTA is 185-238 against the money line (-92.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.7 | ATLANTA is 1-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 69.0, OPPONENT 78.5 | ATLANTA is 32-67 against the money line (-34.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 115-145 against the money line (-49.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.1 | ATLANTA is 40-75 against the money line (-39.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 78.4 | NEW YORK is 107-43 against the money line (+78.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.0, OPPONENT 67.4 | NEW YORK is 99-82 against the money line (+24.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 73.7 | NEW YORK is 4-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 77.3 | NEW YORK is 99-69 against the money line (+42.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 6-20 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 114-116 against the money line (-64.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-28 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-27 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-25 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-29 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-28 against the money line (-19.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-26 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-29 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-21 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 61-85 against the money line (-38.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 1-20 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-28 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-24 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 54-51 against the money line (-37.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-28 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 7-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was NEW YORK 84.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 66-56 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 54-56 against the money line (+21.4 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 43-70 against the money line (-36.8 Units) on Thursday since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 34-47 against the money line (-37.0 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 69.9, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 4-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 5-22 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 6-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-24 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 3-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 66-99 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 46-77 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 72-86 against the money line (-40.0 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 69.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 229-280 against the money line (-82.5 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 53-81 against the money line (-52.0 Units) in June games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 142-167 against the money line (-65.3 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 49-72 against the money line (-30.5 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 20-29 against the money line (-18.5 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-21 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 32-59 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 65-93 against the money line (-37.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 24-50 against the money line (-30.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) off 2 consecutive losses by 10 points or more to division rivals since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 61-89 against the money line (-38.7 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 27-47 against the money line (-22.8 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-25 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 116-151 against the money line (-57.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 53-75 against the money line (-42.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 42-83 against the money line (-52.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 21-46 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 101-136 against the money line (-59.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-23 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-22 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 55-97 against the money line (-37.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 24-68 against the money line (-35.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-3 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in June games this season. The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 282-270 against the money line (+25.3 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 5-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was NEW YORK 84.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 77-56 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 77.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 168-154 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 215-188 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 5-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-11 | 0 | 10-9 | 9-10 | 76.9 | 37.9 | 41.5% | 44.3 | 79.3 | 40.4 | 41.2% | 43.4 | Road Games | 3-6 | -1.2 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 79.6 | 37.1 | 42.9% | 44.8 | 83.6 | 42.0 | 42.4% | 42.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 78.4 | 38.0 | 40.7% | 41.0 | 86.8 | 48.0 | 45.5% | 45.2 | Division Games | 3-8 | -5.1 | 4-7 | 6-5 | 77.5 | 35.9 | 41.9% | 41.8 | 82.6 | 42.9 | 44.2% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.9 | 37.9 | 28-69 | 41.5% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 12-16 | 77.7% | 44 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.6 | 37.1 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 14-18 | 77.5% | 45 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.3 | 40.4 | 27-67 | 41.2% | 8-24 | 34.4% | 16-21 | 76.6% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.6 | 42.0 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 10-25 | 39.0% | 16-20 | 77.9% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-10 | +4.7 | 10-8 | 8-10 | 77.3 | 37.2 | 42.8% | 41.9 | 80.6 | 40.5 | 41.0% | 44.0 | Home Games | 4-6 | -2.8 | 5-5 | 4-6 | 79.0 | 39.2 | 44.2% | 41.0 | 80.5 | 40.9 | 41.2% | 44.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 81.0 | 45.2 | 45.0% | 43.8 | 77.6 | 40.6 | 41.0% | 42.6 | Division Games | 7-4 | +10.4 | 8-3 | 5-6 | 79.4 | 38.6 | 44.0% | 40.5 | 80.0 | 40.0 | 40.8% | 44.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.3 | 37.2 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 9-28 | 33.2% | 11-14 | 79.1% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.8 | 40.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 78.5% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.0 | 39.2 | 29-66 | 44.2% | 9-27 | 32.5% | 12-15 | 75.8% | 41 | 6 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.6 | 40.5 | 29-70 | 41.0% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 16-19 | 81.9% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-22 | 35.1% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.5 | 40.9 | 28-69 | 41.2% | 7-21 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 81.7% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.1, NEW YORK 70.1 |
| | |
|
|
5/24/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 50-70 | L | +300 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 40 | 23 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 36 | 13 | 5/29/2022 | PHOENIX | 81-54 | W | +100 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 56 | 23 | 18-68 | 26.5% | 38 | 14 | 6/1/2022 | MINNESOTA | 84-76 | W | -200 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 43 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 45 | 24 | 6/3/2022 | CHICAGO | 65-73 | L | +170 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 42 | 12 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | 6/5/2022 | INDIANA | 75-66 | W | -300 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 22 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 43 | 21 | 6/7/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 60-72 | L | +280 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 47 | 15 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 39 | 19 | 6/10/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 88-90 | L | +170 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 41 | 4 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 47 | 9 | 6/15/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-105 | L | +375 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 16 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 44 | 11 | 6/17/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 100-106 | L | +250 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 47 | 15 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 15 | 6/21/2022 | DALLAS | 80-75 | W | +155 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 47 | 22 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 39 | 13 | 6/24/2022 | NEW YORK | 77-89 | L | -115 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 37 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 52 | 16 | 6/26/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 61-72 | L | +280 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 17 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 20 | 6/28/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 74-92 | L | +250 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 35 | 14 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 36 | 14 | 6/30/2022 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2022 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2022 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/24/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-84 | L | +175 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 46 | 13 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 52 | 10 | 5/27/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 71-79 | L | +300 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 55 | 21 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 44 | 11 | 5/29/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 61-92 | L | +220 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 17 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 43 | 11 | 6/1/2022 | INDIANA | 87-74 | W | -200 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 47 | 12 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 42 | 8 | 6/3/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 74-70 | W | +550 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 38 | 12 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 50 | 14 | 6/5/2022 | MINNESOTA | 77-84 | L | -140 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 11 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 39 | 15 | 6/7/2022 | MINNESOTA | 88-69 | W | -140 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 13 | 22-67 | 32.8% | 43 | 12 | 6/10/2022 | @ INDIANA | 97-83 | W | -120 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 39 | 12 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 5 | 6/12/2022 | CHICAGO | 86-88 | L | +220 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 33 | 14 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 45 | 12 | 6/16/2022 | WASHINGTON | 77-65 | W | +155 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 13 | 6/19/2022 | SEATTLE | 72-81 | L | +135 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 49 | 12 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 43 | 10 | 6/22/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 81-77 | W | +400 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 11 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 45 | 10 | 6/24/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 89-77 | W | -105 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 52 | 16 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 37 | 10 | 6/30/2022 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2022 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2022 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 31-22 (+14.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 4-2 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 15-9 (+3.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 1-0 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/24/2022 | NEW YORK | 89 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 16-35 | 45.7% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 52 | 9 | 16 | | ATLANTA | 77 | -1 | Over | 43 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 37 | 9 | 10 | 6/29/2021 | NEW YORK | 69 | 170.5 | Under | 34 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 48 | 7 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 73 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 44 | 12 | 8 | 6/26/2021 | NEW YORK | 101 | 170 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-59 | 54.2% | 13-32 | 40.6% | 24-28 | 85.7% | 42 | 6 | 18 | | ATLANTA | 78 | -5 | Over | 40 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 34 | 7 | 14 | 5/29/2021 | ATLANTA | 90 | 169 | SU ATS | 49 | 40-87 | 46.0% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 52 | 10 | 17 | | NEW YORK | 87 | -2.5 | Over | 45 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 14-34 | 41.2% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 43 | 4 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Brondello is 55-43 against the money line (-33.6 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 56-66 against the money line (-29.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 80.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 7-12 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in home games off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 17-20 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 80.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 57-49 against the money line (-32.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 54-47 against the money line (-31.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 77-82 against the money line (-40.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 16-25 against the money line (-33.4 Units) in home games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 40-37 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 41-47 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 46-37 against the money line (-29.8 Units) in home games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Brondello is 48-25 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 7-3 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in June games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 7-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 5-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 84.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 11-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 84.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 68-36 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 98-63 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 114-69 against the money line (+26.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 75-44 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 84.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 5-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 69-45 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 59-34 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 18-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 68-24 against the money line (+24.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 44-18 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 32-12 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 7-2 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Brondello is 41-18 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 89-58 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 112-84 against the money line (+21.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 115-85 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 97-58 against the money line (+32.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 84.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 253 times, while the road underdog won straight up 105 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/30/2022 - Tiffany Hayes is upgraded to probable Thursday vs NY Liberty ( Knee ) | [F] 06/30/2022 - Nia Coffey is downgraded to OUT Thursday vs NY Liberty ( Knee ) | |
[F] 06/30/2022 - Rebecca Allen is downgraded to OUT Thursday vs Atlanta Dream ( Concussion ) | [F] 05/31/2022 - Betnijah Laney is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [F] 05/19/2022 - Jocelyn Willoughby is OUT 6-8 weeks ( Knee ) | [F] 05/05/2022 - Nyara Sabally is out for season ( Undisclosed ) | [C] 05/04/2022 - Kylee Shook is out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 1:47:43 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|