| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
NEW YORK |
|
|
160.5
| 83
Final
87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 643 | ATLANTA | +170 | | 644 | NEW YORK | -200 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(269-93 since 1997.) (74.3%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(269-93 since 1997.) (74.3%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(269-93 since 1997.) (74.3%, +68.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(264-89 since 1997.) (74.8%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(264-89 since 1997.) (74.8%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(264-89 since 1997.) (74.8%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(190-65 since 1997.) (74.5%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(190-65 since 1997.) (74.5%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(303-140 since 1997.) (68.4%, +66.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(303-140 since 1997.) (68.4%, +66.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(303-140 since 1997.) (68.4%, +66.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(303-140 since 1997.) (68.4%, +66.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(303-140 since 1997.) (68.4%, +66.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(303-140 since 1997.) (68.4%, +66.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(147-46 since 1997.) (76.2%, +64 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(147-46 since 1997.) (76.2%, +64 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(147-46 since 1997.) (76.2%, +64 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(147-46 since 1997.) (76.2%, +64 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(147-46 since 1997.) (76.2%, +64 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(147-46 since 1997.) (76.2%, +64 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(119-35 since 1997.) (77.3%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(119-35 since 1997.) (77.3%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(119-35 since 1997.) (77.3%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(119-35 since 1997.) (77.3%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(119-35 since 1997.) (77.3%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(119-35 since 1997.) (77.3%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(124-42 since 1997.) (74.7%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(124-42 since 1997.) (74.7%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(124-42 since 1997.) (74.7%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in August or September games.
(53-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(58-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(56-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +38.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(24-2 since 1997.) (92.3%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off 2 consecutive road wins by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(28-9 since 1997.) (75.7%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(37-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(49-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(42-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(52-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in August or September games.
(67-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(30-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(48-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(36-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +18 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in August or September games.
(67-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 78 | | 29-70 | 40.9% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 14-18 | 77.1% | 44 | 9 | 13 | | NEW YORK | 85 | | 31-68 | 45.4% | 10-28 | 36.5% | 13-16 | 82.8% | 44 | 7 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 660 times, while ATLANTA won 306 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 89.7, OPPONENT 83.1 | ATLANTA is 11-6 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 88.4, OPPONENT 83.1 | ATLANTA is 9-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 83.1 | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 85.6 | NEW YORK is 45-89 against the money line (-58.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 79.9 | NEW YORK is 4-19 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.0, OPPONENT 87.6 | NEW YORK is 4-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 82.9 |
|
ATLANTA is 190-245 against the money line (-86.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.7 | ATLANTA is 60-101 against the money line (-60.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 83.0 | ATLANTA is 24-88 against the money line (-85.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 85.5 | ATLANTA is 73-97 against the money line (-49.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.1 | ATLANTA is 5-17 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 87.6 | ATLANTA is 1-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 92.8 | ATLANTA is 60-87 against the money line (-35.0 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.5 | ATLANTA is 34-47 against the money line (-29.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.2 | NEW YORK is 7-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.2, OPPONENT 78.3 | NEW YORK is 6-3 against the money line (+11.3 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.1, OPPONENT 76.2 | NEW YORK is 140-128 against the money line (+34.9 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 75.8 | NEW YORK is 12-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.3, OPPONENT 82.5 | NEW YORK is 9-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 92.9, OPPONENT 82.7 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 29-17 against the money line (+14.8 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 118-121 against the money line (-64.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 179-240 against the money line (-75.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-36 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 182-245 against the money line (-81.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-24 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 63-91 against the money line (-36.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 91-130 against the money line (-56.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 120-149 against the money line (-48.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 171-223 against the money line (-77.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 163-227 against the money line (-72.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 57-28 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-9 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 13-15 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-15 against the money line (+10.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-15 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 5-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-13 against the money line (+13.1 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-3 against the money line (+14.8 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 6-24 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in home games on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.9, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 2-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 91.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 5-12 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-16 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.8, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 70-104 against the money line (-38.5 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 235-290 against the money line (-78.8 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 90-117 against the money line (-46.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 59-73 against the money line (-32.3 Units) on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 144-171 against the money line (-66.5 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 32-55 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 26-48 against the money line (-33.6 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 106-140 against the money line (-48.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 23-48 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-20 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in road games after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 24-39 against the money line (-19.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 67-95 against the money line (-36.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 26-52 against the money line (-29.1 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 43-65 against the money line (-33.3 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-31 against the money line (-25.4 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 85-123 against the money line (-49.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 62-99 against the money line (-44.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 121-159 against the money line (-58.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 67-93 against the money line (-39.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-32 against the money line (-21.1 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 55-79 against the money line (-43.3 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 45-87 against the money line (-52.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-24 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-19 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-25 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-19 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 2-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 48-57 against the money line (-37.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 71-94 against the money line (-41.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 103-146 against the money line (-64.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-29 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 58-101 against the money line (-37.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 27-69 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 15 or less fouls this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 220-193 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-21 | +3.7 | 15-19 | 18-17 | 78.4 | 39.6 | 42.2% | 43.7 | 81.3 | 41.7 | 43.1% | 42.0 | | Road Games | 6-11 | +4.2 | 9-8 | 10-7 | 80.6 | 39.5 | 43.0% | 44.8 | 83.5 | 42.1 | 43.6% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 82.0 | 46.2 | 44.8% | 39.6 | 85.0 | 44.0 | 45.6% | 40.8 | | Division Games | 5-12 | -6.3 | 5-11 | 10-7 | 77.4 | 38.6 | 41.9% | 42.5 | 83.5 | 43.0 | 44.6% | 43.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.4 | 39.6 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 7-21 | 35.3% | 13-17 | 77.4% | 44 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.6 | 39.5 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 8-23 | 36.2% | 13-17 | 75.0% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.3 | 41.7 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 8-24 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 77.6% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.5 | 42.1 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 10-25 | 37.8% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 15-20 | +5 | 18-16 | 17-18 | 79.4 | 38.2 | 43.1% | 41.3 | 82.0 | 42.1 | 41.9% | 43.2 | | Home Games | 8-9 | -2.4 | 9-8 | 8-9 | 81.4 | 37.9 | 43.6% | 41.9 | 82.1 | 42.3 | 41.8% | 43.3 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 38.2 | 41.1% | 41.2 | 73.2 | 41.4 | 39.5% | 43.8 | | Division Games | 9-8 | +7.7 | 10-6 | 7-10 | 78.2 | 39.4 | 43.2% | 40.5 | 80.6 | 40.3 | 41.0% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.4 | 38.2 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 10-28 | 34.7% | 12-15 | 82.3% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.4 | 37.9 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 9-27 | 34.6% | 13-17 | 79.7% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.0 | 42.1 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 7-21 | 33.7% | 17-21 | 82.1% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 7-22 | 34.3% | 15-18 | 79.1% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.1 | 42.3 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-22 | 31.7% | 17-21 | 83.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 71.4, NEW YORK 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/6/2022 | WASHINGTON | 66-85 | L | +180 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 12 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 36 | 9 | | 7/12/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 75-90 | L | +325 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 39 | 17 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 41 | 13 | | 7/15/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 68-93 | L | +280 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 37 | 18 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 48 | 12 | | 7/17/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 85-75 | W | +200 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 51 | 14 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 35 | 13 | | 7/19/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 92-76 | W | +650 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 45 | 16 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 41 | 12 | | 7/21/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 78-85 | L | +105 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 21 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 31 | 12 | | 7/24/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 72-82 | L | +250 | 29-84 | 34.5% | 52 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 44 | 12 | | 7/28/2022 | MINNESOTA | 85-92 | L | -115 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 35 | 10 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 46 | 16 | | 7/30/2022 | DALLAS | 68-81 | L | -120 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 45 | 19 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 42 | 11 | | 8/3/2022 | INDIANA | 91-81 | W | -550 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 47 | 18 | | 8/5/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 88-86 | W | -220 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 37 | 15 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | | 8/7/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-81 | L | +175 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 40 | 10 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 13 | | 8/9/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-97 | L | +600 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 34 | 10 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 37 | 10 | | 8/12/2022 | NEW YORK | 70-80 | L | +100 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 44 | 12 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 11 | | 8/14/2022 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/6/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 116-107 | W | +500 | 42-73 | 57.5% | 38 | 8 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 34 | 7 | | 7/7/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 81-84 | L | +170 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 48 | 15 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 37 | 9 | | 7/12/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 101-107 | L | +210 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 34 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 44 | 14 | | 7/14/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 74-108 | L | +200 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 33 | 12 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 49 | 10 | | 7/19/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 63-82 | L | +175 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 18 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 12 | | 7/21/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 69-78 | L | +280 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 35 | 15 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 42 | 11 | | 7/23/2022 | CHICAGO | 83-80 | W | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 49 | 19 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 45 | 8 | | 7/29/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 81-89 | L | +280 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 18 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 13 | | 7/31/2022 | PHOENIX | 89-69 | W | +100 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 47 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 32 | 12 | | 8/2/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 102-73 | W | -220 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 46 | 19 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 30 | 11 | | 8/3/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 64-61 | W | -300 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 51 | 10 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 16 | | 8/6/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 62-76 | L | -125 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 12 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 55 | 13 | | 8/8/2022 | @ DALLAS | 77-86 | L | +170 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 14 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 10 | | 8/10/2022 | @ DALLAS | 91-73 | W | +120 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 38 | 12 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 40 | 9 | | 8/12/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 80-70 | W | -120 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 11 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 44 | 12 | | 8/14/2022 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 32-23 (+13.7 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 5-3 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 15-10 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 2-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/12/2022 | NEW YORK | 80 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 42 | 6 | 11 | | | ATLANTA | 70 | 159.5 | Under | 42 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 44 | 9 | 12 | 6/30/2022 | ATLANTA | 92 | 159 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 57 | 12 | 15 | | | NEW YORK | 81 | -5.5 | Over | 36 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 10-31 | 32.3% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 43 | 6 | 17 | 6/24/2022 | NEW YORK | 89 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 16-35 | 45.7% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 52 | 9 | 16 | | | ATLANTA | 77 | -1 | Over | 43 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 37 | 9 | 10 | 6/29/2021 | NEW YORK | 69 | 170.5 | Under | 34 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 48 | 7 | 15 | | | ATLANTA | 73 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 44 | 12 | 8 | 6/26/2021 | NEW YORK | 101 | 170 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-59 | 54.2% | 13-32 | 40.6% | 24-28 | 85.7% | 42 | 6 | 18 | | | ATLANTA | 78 | -5 | Over | 40 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 34 | 7 | 14 | 5/29/2021 | ATLANTA | 90 | 169 | SU ATS | 49 | 40-87 | 46.0% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 52 | 10 | 17 | | | NEW YORK | 87 | -2.5 | Over | 45 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 14-34 | 41.2% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 43 | 4 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Brondello is 58-69 against the money line (-32.1 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 80.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 59-52 against the money line (-33.8 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 41-40 against the money line (-32.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 48-39 against the money line (-30.4 Units) in home games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Brondello is 51-29 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 43-19 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in home games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 49-30 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 68-32 against the money line (+27.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 71-37 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 25-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 118-73 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 92-54 against the money line (+32.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 78-48 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 7-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 73-50 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 72-28 against the money line (+22.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 48-21 against the money line (+17.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 12-9 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 45-21 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 96-67 against the money line (+24.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 119-94 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 85-55 against the money line (+28.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 115-74 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 122-95 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 104-67 against the money line (+34.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times, while the road underdog won straight up 12 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 3 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/14/2022 - Monique Billings is probable Sunday vs NY Liberty ( Ankle ) | | [G] 08/13/2022 - Tiffany Hayes is out indefinitely ( Left Team ) | | [G] 08/13/2022 - Kristy Wallace is downgraded to OUT Sunday vs NY Liberty ( Quarantine ) | | [F] 08/13/2022 - Nia Coffey is downgraded to OUT Sunday vs NY Liberty ( Knee ) | | [G] 07/30/2022 - Asia Durr is out for season ( Hip ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/7/2023 7:11:13 PM EST |
|
|
| |
|