| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO SEATTLE |
|
| 169.5 | 71 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL | | | | |
653 | CHICAGO | +170 | 654 | SEATTLE | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (148-72 since 1997.) (67.3%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (117-31 since 1997.) (79.1%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (87-57 since 1997.) (60.4%, +49 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (103-44 since 1997.) (70.1%, +45.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (108-46 since 1997.) (70.1%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (57-13 since 1997.) (81.4%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (72-26 since 1997.) (73.5%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (56-22 since 1997.) (71.8%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (32-10 since 1997.) (76.2%, +26 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (36-13 since 1997.) (73.5%, +24.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (27-2 since 1997.) (93.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (92-53 since 1997.) (63.4%, +47.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (86-59 since 1997.) (59.3%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (51-26 since 1997.) (66.2%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (38-22 since 1997.) (63.3%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (41-23 since 1997.) (64.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +31.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 85 | | 34-70 | 48.1% | 7-19 | 38.5% | 11-14 | 77.9% | 44 | 10 | 16 | SEATTLE | 81 | | 29-67 | 43.8% | 10-25 | 40.3% | 13-16 | 80.2% | 39 | 8 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 598 times, while SEATTLE won 376 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 71-47 against the money line (+26.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 80.1 | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.8, OPPONENT 86.0 | CHICAGO is 12-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.4, OPPONENT 90.2 | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 79.1 | CHICAGO is 17-7 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.0, OPPONENT 83.7 | CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 82.6 | CHICAGO is 79-63 against the money line (+34.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 77.8 | CHICAGO is 24-11 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.0, OPPONENT 84.9 | CHICAGO is 19-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 91.6, OPPONENT 87.1 | SEATTLE is 47-92 against the money line (-78.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | SEATTLE is 66-79 against the money line (-36.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | SEATTLE is 4-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 85.9 | SEATTLE is 1-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 90.1 | SEATTLE is 58-106 against the money line (-71.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 75.3 |
|
CHICAGO is 143-193 against the money line (-62.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 82.0 | CHICAGO is 47-87 against the money line (-37.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 79.1 | CHICAGO is 41-66 against the money line (-29.5 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 89.4 | CHICAGO is 83-196 against the money line (-132.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 87.7 | CHICAGO is 94-145 against the money line (-57.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 80.3 | SEATTLE is 14-2 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 86.4, OPPONENT 76.6 | SEATTLE is 10-5 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 75.3 | SEATTLE is 9-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 81.8 | SEATTLE is 37-15 against the money line (+16.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 86.8, OPPONENT 81.9 | SEATTLE is 80-34 against the money line (+60.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 74.2 | SEATTLE is 18-4 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 75.7 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 18-22 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-24 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-10 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-15 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 70.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 96-160 against the money line (-59.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 94-130 against the money line (-48.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 109-164 against the money line (-56.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 108-164 against the money line (-55.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 31-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 38-18 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 181-138 against the money line (+35.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 33-19 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 24-8 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 33-35 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-7 against the money line (+23.0 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 20-14 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 40-16 against the money line (+22.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 71-58 against the money line (+36.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 79.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 39-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-3 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 6*) | SEATTLE is 20-14 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-11 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-14 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 39-37 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-29 against the money line (+17.9 Units) as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-7 against the money line (+8.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-10 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-27 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-24 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-23 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-24 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-18 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 91.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.7, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-8 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 69.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 12-29 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in road games off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 60-118 against the money line (-44.5 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 30-48 against the money line (-28.2 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-25 against the money line (-20.3 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-11 against the money line (-11.4 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 93.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 7-14 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 51-66 against the money line (-35.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-81 against the money line (-36.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 35-58 against the money line (-31.6 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 55-28 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 55-47 against the money line (+17.3 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 36-23 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-8 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 38-14 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 32-10 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 27-8 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 22-8 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 21-8 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 13-3 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 16-4 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 86.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 7-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-2 | +2.9 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 88.7 | 42.7 | 49.0% | 40.3 | 85.9 | 43.1 | 46.4% | 38.9 | Road Games | 5-2 | +2.9 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 88.7 | 42.7 | 49.0% | 40.3 | 85.9 | 43.1 | 46.4% | 38.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 87.4 | 42.6 | 48.5% | 40.4 | 87.4 | 43.6 | 47.0% | 37.0 | Division Games | 5-2 | +2.9 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 88.7 | 42.7 | 49.0% | 40.3 | 85.9 | 43.1 | 46.4% | 38.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 88.7 | 42.7 | 33-68 | 49.0% | 9-23 | 38.7% | 13-16 | 80.4% | 40 | 8 | 22 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.3 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 88.7 | 42.7 | 33-68 | 49.0% | 9-23 | 38.7% | 13-16 | 80.4% | 40 | 8 | 22 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.9 | 43.1 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 7-18 | 38.4% | 15-20 | 78.1% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 83.9 | 41.4 | 31-68 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 16-21 | 78.0% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.9 | 43.1 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 7-18 | 38.4% | 15-20 | 78.1% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-1 | +2.3 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 83.3 | 42.0 | 44.9% | 42.1 | 76.4 | 35.9 | 39.6% | 42.7 | Road Games | 6-1 | +2.3 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 83.3 | 42.0 | 44.9% | 42.1 | 76.4 | 35.9 | 39.6% | 42.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 81.2 | 42.2 | 43.5% | 44.0 | 79.6 | 36.2 | 41.5% | 40.8 | Division Games | 6-1 | +2.3 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 83.3 | 42.0 | 44.9% | 42.1 | 76.4 | 35.9 | 39.6% | 42.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.3 | 42.0 | 30-68 | 44.9% | 9-23 | 37.0% | 14-18 | 78.9% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.7 | 41.1 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 7-21 | 35.2% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.3 | 42.0 | 30-68 | 44.9% | 9-23 | 37.0% | 14-18 | 78.9% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.4 | 35.9 | 27-69 | 39.6% | 8-25 | 31.0% | 14-16 | 86.1% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 40.9 | 30-67 | 43.9% | 7-21 | 33.4% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.4 | 35.9 | 27-69 | 39.6% | 8-25 | 31.0% | 14-16 | 86.1% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 73.6, SEATTLE 74.6 |
| | |
|
|
7/26/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 88-86 | W | -155 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 38 | 16 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 51 | 17 | 7/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 96-78 | W | +170 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 42 | 15 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 36 | 16 | 7/30/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 81-83 | L | -200 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 14 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 38 | 15 | 8/1/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 88-86 | W | +175 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 17 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 44 | 14 | 8/4/2020 | *DALLAS | 82-79 | W | -270 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 13 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 40 | 10 | 8/6/2020 | *PHOENIX | 86-96 | L | -155 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 38 | 19 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 36 | 21 | 8/8/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 100-93 | W | -155 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 35 | 21 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 27 | 19 | 8/10/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/25/2020 | *NEW YORK | 87-71 | W | | 34-77 | 44.2% | 44 | 13 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 19 | 7/28/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 90-66 | W | -360 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 31 | 11 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 47 | 19 | 7/30/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 71-89 | L | -270 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 46 | 18 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 39 | 8 | 8/1/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 81-75 | W | -165 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 44 | 16 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 44 | 14 | 8/4/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 87-74 | W | -600 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 35 | 9 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 14 | 8/6/2020 | *ATLANTA | 93-92 | W | -650 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 11 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 38 | 17 | 8/8/2020 | *PHOENIX | 74-68 | W | -210 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 52 | 19 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 36 | 18 | 8/10/2020 | *CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2020 | *DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
SEATTLE is 19-12 (+6.9 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 4-2 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
6/28/2019 | CHICAGO | 76 | 152.5 | | 43 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 46 | 9 | 15 | | SEATTLE | 79 | -3 | SU Over | 51 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 44 | 15 | 8 | 6/9/2019 | SEATTLE | 71 | -2 | Under | 34 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 34 | 6 | 11 | | CHICAGO | 78 | 165.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 56 | 11 | 20 | 6/1/2019 | SEATTLE | 79 | 162.5 | Under | 46 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 6-28 | 21.4% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 43 | 12 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 83 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 4-5 | 80.0% | 42 | 5 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 16-7 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 15-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 12-7 against the money line (+8.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 15-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 18-9 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 21-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 16-8 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 89.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 12-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 91.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 15-10 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 94-137 against the money line (-63.8 Units) in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 88-100 against the money line (-49.6 Units) off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Hughes is 55-28 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 30-15 against the money line (+12.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 17-7 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 29-16 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 13-8 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 18-8 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 13-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 78.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 9-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 38-14 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 32-10 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 27-8 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 22-8 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 21-8 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 16-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 13-3 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 16-4 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 9-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 8-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 13-4 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 31-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 38-18 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 42-22 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 33-19 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 24-8 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 20-14 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 40-16 against the money line (+22.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 22-11 against the money line (+9.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 39-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 40-21 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 15-3 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 6*) | Hughes is 20-14 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 18-11 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 19-14 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
[C] 08/08/2020 - Stefanie Dolson is "?" Monday vs Seattle Storm ( Ankle ) | [F/C] 08/05/2020 - Jantel Lavender is out for season ( Foot ) | |
[G] 08/08/2020 - Epiphanny Prince is "?" Monday vs Chicago Sky ( Personal ) | [G] 08/08/2020 - Sue Bird is "?" Monday vs Chicago Sky ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 2:29:07 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|